{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"openrouter-qwen-qwen3-235b-a22b-thinking-2507","slug":"qwen-qwen3-235b-a22b-thinking-2507","name":"Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507","type":"model","url":"https://openrouter.ai/models/qwen~qwen3-235b-a22b-thinking-2507","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/qwen-qwen3-235b-a22b-thinking-2507","categories":["llm-apis"],"tags":["qwen","api-access","text"],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":"$1.50e-7 per prompt token"},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"openrouter-qwen-qwen3-235b-a22b-thinking-2507__cap_0","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.sparse.mixture.of.experts.reasoning.with.selective.parameter.activation","name":"sparse-mixture-of-experts reasoning with selective parameter activation","description":"Implements a Mixture-of-Experts architecture that activates only 22B of 235B parameters per forward pass using learned gating mechanisms to route tokens to specialized expert subnetworks. This sparse activation pattern reduces computational cost while maintaining model capacity through expert specialization, enabling complex multi-step reasoning without full model inference overhead. The routing mechanism learns to distribute different reasoning types (mathematical, logical, creative) across domain-specific experts during training.","intents":["I need to run a 235B-parameter model efficiently without paying for full dense inference costs","I want complex reasoning capabilities but need sub-second latency for production systems","I need to understand which reasoning pathways the model uses for different problem types"],"best_for":["teams building cost-sensitive reasoning agents that need 235B-class capability","developers optimizing inference pipelines where latency and throughput matter","researchers studying expert specialization in large language models"],"limitations":["Sparse activation introduces load-balancing overhead — some experts may be underutilized on certain token distributions, reducing effective parameter efficiency below theoretical 22B/235B ratio","Expert routing decisions are non-deterministic during sampling, making exact reproducibility difficult across inference runs","Requires inference infrastructure optimized for MoE (vLLM, TensorRT-LLM, or similar) — standard transformers libraries may not efficiently handle expert routing"],"requires":["API access via OpenRouter or compatible inference provider supporting MoE models","Understanding of MoE trade-offs (latency vs cost vs quality)","Inference framework with MoE kernel support for local deployment"],"input_types":["text (natural language prompts)","code (for reasoning about programming tasks)","structured reasoning chains (chain-of-thought prompts)"],"output_types":["text (reasoning steps and final answers)","structured reasoning traces (if prompted for step-by-step output)"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","model-architecture"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-qwen-qwen3-235b-a22b-thinking-2507__cap_1","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.extended.context.reasoning.with.262k.token.window","name":"extended-context reasoning with 262k token window","description":"Supports a 262,144-token context window enabling processing of entire codebases, research papers, or multi-document reasoning tasks in a single forward pass. Uses position interpolation or ALiBi (Attention with Linear Biases) to extend context beyond training length without catastrophic performance degradation. This allows the model to maintain coherence across long reasoning chains and reference distant context without losing information to context truncation.","intents":["I need to analyze a 50K-line codebase and reason about architectural patterns across the entire project","I want to process multiple research papers together and synthesize findings without losing earlier context","I need to maintain conversation history with full context for multi-turn reasoning tasks"],"best_for":["developers working with large codebases requiring whole-project reasoning","researchers synthesizing information across multiple long documents","teams building multi-turn reasoning agents where context accumulation is critical"],"limitations":["262K context window increases memory requirements quadratically with attention computation — a single inference may require 32GB+ VRAM on consumer hardware","Latency scales with context length; processing full 262K tokens adds 5-15 seconds vs 1-2 seconds for 4K context on typical inference hardware","Position interpolation may degrade reasoning quality on tasks requiring precise positional information beyond training context length"],"requires":["Inference infrastructure with sufficient VRAM (48GB+ GPU or multi-GPU setup for optimal throughput)","API provider supporting full 262K context (OpenRouter, Together AI, or self-hosted vLLM)","Awareness that longer context = higher token costs and latency"],"input_types":["text (up to 262,144 tokens)","code (entire files or projects)","concatenated documents (research papers, specifications, logs)"],"output_types":["text (reasoning output)","structured analysis (if prompted for JSON or markdown formatting)"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-qwen-qwen3-235b-a22b-thinking-2507__cap_2","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.multi.step.chain.of.thought.reasoning.with.explicit.thinking.tokens","name":"multi-step chain-of-thought reasoning with explicit thinking tokens","description":"Implements a thinking-token architecture where the model generates explicit intermediate reasoning steps before producing final answers, similar to OpenAI's o1 approach. The model allocates a portion of its output budget to internal reasoning (marked with special thinking tokens) that are hidden from users but influence the final answer generation. This enables the model to decompose complex problems into sub-steps, backtrack on reasoning paths, and verify intermediate conclusions before committing to a final response.","intents":["I need the model to show its reasoning work for complex math or logic problems so I can verify correctness","I want better accuracy on multi-step problems by allowing the model to think before answering","I need to debug why the model arrived at a particular conclusion by inspecting its reasoning chain"],"best_for":["teams building reasoning-critical applications (math tutoring, code review, scientific analysis)","developers who need interpretability into model decision-making","applications where answer correctness is more important than latency"],"limitations":["Thinking tokens consume part of the output token budget — a 4K output limit might allocate 2K to thinking and 2K to final answer, reducing usable output length","Latency increases 2-4x compared to direct-answer generation because the model must generate and process thinking tokens before final output","Thinking tokens are opaque to the user by default — extracting and displaying reasoning requires API support for exposing thinking content (not all providers support this)"],"requires":["API provider that exposes thinking tokens (OpenRouter may require special configuration)","Understanding that thinking-based reasoning trades latency for accuracy","Application design that can handle variable output lengths (thinking + answer)"],"input_types":["text (natural language questions)","code (for reasoning about programming problems)","math problems (equations, proofs)"],"output_types":["text (final answer)","structured reasoning (if provider exposes thinking tokens as separate output field)"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-qwen-qwen3-235b-a22b-thinking-2507__cap_3","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.multilingual.reasoning.across.100.languages.with.unified.tokenization","name":"multilingual reasoning across 100+ languages with unified tokenization","description":"Supports reasoning and generation across 100+ languages using a unified tokenizer and shared expert pool, enabling code-switching and cross-lingual reasoning without language-specific model variants. The model was trained on multilingual data with shared MoE experts that specialize in linguistic patterns rather than language-specific experts, allowing knowledge transfer across languages and enabling reasoning tasks that mix multiple languages in a single prompt.","intents":["I need to reason about code with comments in multiple languages without switching models","I want to translate and reason about content simultaneously without separate translation steps","I need to build a global application that supports reasoning in user's native language without language-specific model selection"],"best_for":["teams building global applications serving non-English users","developers working with multilingual codebases or documentation","researchers studying cross-lingual transfer in large language models"],"limitations":["Unified tokenization may be less efficient for some languages — languages with complex morphology (Turkish, Finnish) may require more tokens per semantic unit than English","Reasoning quality varies by language — model was likely trained with English-dominant data, so non-English reasoning may be 5-15% less accurate than English equivalents","No language-specific fine-tuning means specialized terminology in non-English domains may not be recognized as well as in English"],"requires":["UTF-8 text encoding support","Awareness that token counts vary by language (Chinese ~3x more tokens than English for same semantic content)","No special configuration needed — language detection is automatic"],"input_types":["text in any of 100+ supported languages","code-switched text (mixing multiple languages)","multilingual documents"],"output_types":["text in requested language or same language as input"],"categories":["text-generation-language","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-qwen-qwen3-235b-a22b-thinking-2507__cap_4","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.code.generation.and.reasoning.with.programming.language.awareness","name":"code generation and reasoning with programming language awareness","description":"Generates and reasons about code across 40+ programming languages using syntax-aware token prediction and language-specific expert routing. The model recognizes language-specific patterns (indentation, syntax rules, common idioms) and routes tokens to experts specialized in particular languages or programming paradigms. This enables generation of syntactically correct code, reasoning about code structure, and cross-language refactoring suggestions without requiring explicit language specification in prompts.","intents":["I need to generate correct Python code that follows PEP 8 conventions and common idioms","I want to refactor code across multiple languages while maintaining language-specific best practices","I need to reason about code quality, security issues, and architectural patterns in unfamiliar languages"],"best_for":["developers using the model as a coding assistant for multiple languages","teams building code review or refactoring tools","educators teaching programming across multiple languages"],"limitations":["Code generation quality varies by language — popular languages (Python, JavaScript, Go) have higher quality than niche languages due to training data distribution","Generated code may not follow all language-specific best practices or conventions without explicit prompting","No built-in code execution or validation — generated code must be tested before use"],"requires":["Understanding that code generation requires careful prompt engineering for complex tasks","Code review process to validate generated code before deployment","Awareness of language-specific limitations in the model's training data"],"input_types":["natural language descriptions of code tasks","existing code (for refactoring, completion, or analysis)","code snippets in any supported language"],"output_types":["code in requested language","code explanations","refactoring suggestions"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-qwen-qwen3-235b-a22b-thinking-2507__cap_5","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.structured.output.generation.with.schema.guided.reasoning","name":"structured output generation with schema-guided reasoning","description":"Generates structured outputs (JSON, XML, YAML) that conform to user-provided schemas through constrained decoding and schema-aware expert routing. The model reasons about schema constraints during generation and routes tokens through experts that specialize in structured data formatting, ensuring output validity without post-processing. This enables reliable extraction of structured data from unstructured inputs and generation of API-ready responses without validation overhead.","intents":["I need to extract structured data from documents and guarantee the output is valid JSON","I want to generate API responses that conform to my OpenAPI schema without validation errors","I need to parse natural language into structured database records with guaranteed schema compliance"],"best_for":["teams building data extraction pipelines requiring guaranteed output validity","developers building API integrations where schema compliance is critical","applications requiring reliable structured data generation without post-processing"],"limitations":["Schema-guided generation adds latency — constrained decoding requires checking validity at each token, adding 10-20% overhead vs unconstrained generation","Complex nested schemas may reduce generation quality — the model must balance schema compliance with semantic accuracy","Requires explicit schema provision — the model cannot infer complex schemas from examples alone"],"requires":["Schema definition in JSON Schema, OpenAPI, or similar format","API provider supporting constrained decoding (OpenRouter may require specific configuration)","Understanding that schema constraints may limit output expressiveness"],"input_types":["natural language descriptions","unstructured text (for extraction)","schema definitions (JSON Schema, OpenAPI)"],"output_types":["JSON","XML","YAML","other structured formats matching provided schema"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-qwen-qwen3-235b-a22b-thinking-2507__cap_6","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.function.calling.with.multi.provider.tool.integration","name":"function calling with multi-provider tool integration","description":"Supports function calling through a unified interface that routes function invocations to specialized experts and integrates with multiple tool providers (OpenAI-compatible APIs, custom webhooks, MCP servers). The model generates function calls in a standardized format, and the inference platform routes these calls to appropriate handlers based on function registry configuration. This enables building agentic systems where the model can invoke external tools, APIs, and services without requiring separate tool-calling models.","intents":["I need to build an agent that can call APIs, databases, and custom functions to solve tasks","I want to integrate the model with my existing tool ecosystem without building custom adapters","I need reliable function calling that handles errors and retries transparently"],"best_for":["teams building AI agents with external tool integration","developers creating autonomous systems that need API access","applications requiring reliable function calling with error handling"],"limitations":["Function calling adds latency — each function invocation requires a separate API call and context update, adding 100-500ms per function call","Tool registry must be pre-configured — the model cannot discover or invoke arbitrary functions without explicit registration","Error handling is application-specific — the model generates function calls but doesn't automatically retry or handle failures"],"requires":["Function registry definition (JSON Schema format)","API provider supporting function calling (OpenRouter with tool integration)","Tool endpoints or MCP server for function execution","Application logic to handle function results and context updates"],"input_types":["natural language requests","function registry (JSON Schema)"],"output_types":["function calls (JSON format)","final text response after tool execution"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-qwen-qwen3-235b-a22b-thinking-2507__cap_7","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.few.shot.learning.and.in.context.adaptation.without.fine.tuning","name":"few-shot learning and in-context adaptation without fine-tuning","description":"Learns new tasks and adapts behavior from examples provided in the prompt context without requiring model fine-tuning or retraining. The model uses in-context learning mechanisms where examples are processed through the same reasoning pipeline as the main task, enabling rapid task adaptation. This allows the model to handle domain-specific terminology, custom output formats, and specialized reasoning patterns by simply providing examples in the prompt.","intents":["I need to adapt the model to my domain-specific terminology without fine-tuning","I want to teach the model a custom output format by providing examples","I need to handle specialized reasoning tasks (legal analysis, medical diagnosis) by providing domain examples"],"best_for":["teams that cannot fine-tune models due to cost or infrastructure constraints","applications requiring rapid task adaptation without retraining","domains with specialized terminology that needs quick adaptation"],"limitations":["In-context learning quality degrades with more examples — beyond 10-20 examples, the model may lose focus on the main task due to context length and attention distribution","Few-shot learning is less effective than fine-tuning for complex tasks — domain-specific reasoning may require fine-tuning for optimal performance","Examples consume tokens from the context window — providing many examples reduces space for actual task input"],"requires":["Well-designed examples that clearly demonstrate the desired behavior","Understanding that example quality matters more than quantity","Awareness that in-context learning adds latency proportional to example count"],"input_types":["natural language examples (demonstrations)","task input"],"output_types":["text output following demonstrated patterns"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-qwen-qwen3-235b-a22b-thinking-2507__cap_8","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.semantic.understanding.and.reasoning.about.complex.documents","name":"semantic understanding and reasoning about complex documents","description":"Performs deep semantic analysis of documents including understanding implicit relationships, identifying logical inconsistencies, and reasoning about document structure and intent. The model uses its extended context window and reasoning capabilities to maintain coherence across long documents and identify patterns that require understanding beyond surface-level text matching. This enables document analysis tasks like summarization, question-answering, and logical verification without requiring external semantic analysis tools.","intents":["I need to understand the logical structure and implicit assumptions in a research paper","I want to identify inconsistencies or contradictions in a long document","I need to answer questions about a document that require reasoning across multiple sections"],"best_for":["researchers analyzing academic papers and technical documentation","legal teams reviewing contracts and identifying inconsistencies","teams building document understanding systems"],"limitations":["Semantic understanding quality depends on document clarity — ambiguous or poorly-written documents may lead to incorrect interpretations","The model may hallucinate implicit relationships that don't actually exist in the document","Reasoning about very long documents (100K+ tokens) may lose coherence due to attention distribution"],"requires":["Well-structured documents for optimal understanding","Verification of model outputs for critical applications","Understanding that semantic reasoning is probabilistic, not deterministic"],"input_types":["text documents (up to 262K tokens)","natural language questions about documents"],"output_types":["text analysis","structured summaries","answers to document-based questions"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-qwen-qwen3-235b-a22b-thinking-2507__cap_9","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.real.time.streaming.output.with.token.by.token.generation","name":"real-time streaming output with token-by-token generation","description":"Generates responses as a continuous stream of tokens rather than waiting for complete response generation, enabling real-time output display and early termination of generation. The model outputs tokens incrementally through a streaming API, allowing applications to display partial responses to users immediately and reduce perceived latency. This is particularly valuable for long responses where users benefit from seeing early output rather than waiting for complete generation.","intents":["I need to display model output to users in real-time as it's generated","I want to reduce perceived latency by showing partial responses immediately","I need to implement early stopping where users can interrupt generation mid-response"],"best_for":["teams building interactive chat interfaces","applications where user experience depends on real-time feedback","systems where early stopping can save computation costs"],"limitations":["Streaming adds complexity to error handling — errors may occur mid-stream after partial output has been sent to the user","Token-by-token generation prevents the model from revising earlier tokens, potentially leading to less coherent responses than batch generation","Streaming latency depends on network conditions — slow connections may make streaming less beneficial than batch responses"],"requires":["Client-side streaming support (WebSocket, Server-Sent Events, or similar)","Application logic to handle partial responses and errors","API provider supporting streaming (OpenRouter supports streaming)"],"input_types":["natural language prompts"],"output_types":["text tokens (streamed incrementally)"],"categories":["text-generation-language","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":24,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"low","permissions":["API access via OpenRouter or compatible inference provider supporting MoE models","Understanding of MoE trade-offs (latency vs cost vs quality)","Inference framework with MoE kernel support for local deployment","Inference infrastructure with sufficient VRAM (48GB+ GPU or multi-GPU setup for optimal throughput)","API provider supporting full 262K context (OpenRouter, Together AI, or self-hosted vLLM)","Awareness that longer context = higher token costs and latency","API provider that exposes thinking tokens (OpenRouter may require special configuration)","Understanding that thinking-based reasoning trades latency for accuracy","Application design that can handle variable output lengths (thinking + answer)","UTF-8 text encoding support"],"failure_modes":["Sparse activation introduces load-balancing overhead — some experts may be underutilized on certain token distributions, reducing effective parameter efficiency below theoretical 22B/235B ratio","Expert routing decisions are non-deterministic during sampling, making exact reproducibility difficult across inference runs","Requires inference infrastructure optimized for MoE (vLLM, TensorRT-LLM, or similar) — standard transformers libraries may not efficiently handle expert routing","262K context window increases memory requirements quadratically with attention computation — a single inference may require 32GB+ VRAM on consumer hardware","Latency scales with context length; processing full 262K tokens adds 5-15 seconds vs 1-2 seconds for 4K context on typical inference hardware","Position interpolation may degrade reasoning quality on tasks requiring precise positional information beyond training context length","Thinking tokens consume part of the output token budget — a 4K output limit might allocate 2K to thinking and 2K to final answer, reducing usable output length","Latency increases 2-4x compared to direct-answer generation because the model must generate and process thinking tokens before final output","Thinking tokens are opaque to the user by default — extracting and displaying reasoning requires API support for exposing thinking content (not all providers support this)","Unified tokenization may be less efficient for some languages — languages with complex morphology (Turkish, Finnish) may require more tokens per semantic unit than English","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.45,"ecosystem":0.24,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.35,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.3,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:24.485Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:20:45.776Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=qwen-qwen3-235b-a22b-thinking-2507","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=qwen-qwen3-235b-a22b-thinking-2507"}},"signature":"EvNg5yizBNQQbrWbM6vf2iUzoJWKEYm7YwwvXzbcCCmAGB75QYhjbSKgT4fnMLIINohFSuwdBR8Gz177HH6oAA==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T06:21:48.945Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/qwen-qwen3-235b-a22b-thinking-2507","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/qwen-qwen3-235b-a22b-thinking-2507","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=qwen-qwen3-235b-a22b-thinking-2507","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}