{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_query-vary","slug":"query-vary","name":"Query Vary","type":"product","url":"https://www.queryvary.com","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/query-vary","categories":["testing-quality"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"freemium","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_query-vary__cap_0","uri":"capability://testing.batch.prompt.variation.testing","name":"batch-prompt-variation-testing","description":"Execute multiple prompt variations against the same input simultaneously across one or more LLM models. Collects outputs and performance metrics in a single test run rather than requiring manual iteration.","intents":["I want to test 10 different prompt phrasings at once to see which performs best","I need to quickly compare how rewording instructions affects model output quality","I want to run A/B tests on prompt templates without manually calling the API multiple times"],"best_for":["LLM product teams","AI engineers optimizing prompts","teams with systematic testing workflows"],"limitations":["requires clear success metrics to be defined beforehand","doesn't automatically determine what 'better' means for your use case"],"requires":["API credentials for at least one LLM provider","test inputs/prompts","defined evaluation criteria"],"input_types":["text prompts","prompt templates","test datasets"],"output_types":["structured test results","model responses","comparison metrics"],"categories":["testing","productivity","ai-development"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_query-vary__cap_1","uri":"capability://testing.multi.model.provider.testing","name":"multi-model-provider-testing","description":"Run the same test suite across multiple LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) within a single interface without switching contexts or managing separate API integrations.","intents":["I want to compare how GPT-4 vs Claude vs other models respond to the same prompt","I need to test my prompts across multiple providers to find the best fit","I want to evaluate provider differences without managing multiple separate tools"],"best_for":["teams evaluating multiple LLM providers","developers building provider-agnostic applications","enterprises with multi-vendor strategies"],"limitations":["cost multiplies with each additional provider tested","requires API keys for each provider"],"requires":["API credentials for multiple LLM providers","unified test inputs"],"input_types":["prompts","test cases","provider configurations"],"output_types":["comparative results","provider-specific responses","cross-model metrics"],"categories":["testing","productivity","ai-development"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_query-vary__cap_10","uri":"capability://analytics.performance.metric.aggregation","name":"performance-metric-aggregation","description":"Automatically aggregate and summarize performance metrics across multiple test runs, providing statistical insights into prompt performance and consistency.","intents":["I want to see average performance across all my test variations","I need to understand the variance in model outputs across different prompts","I want statistical summaries to make confident optimization decisions"],"best_for":["data-driven teams","developers making optimization decisions","teams requiring statistical validation"],"limitations":["statistical significance depends on sample size","doesn't provide causal analysis"],"requires":["multiple test runs","quantifiable metrics"],"input_types":["test results","performance scores"],"output_types":["aggregated metrics","statistical summaries","trend analysis"],"categories":["analytics","testing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_query-vary__cap_11","uri":"capability://productivity.cost.tracking.and.optimization","name":"cost-tracking-and-optimization","description":"Monitor and track API costs across test runs, helping teams understand the financial impact of testing and optimize for cost-efficiency without sacrificing quality.","intents":["I want to know how much my testing is costing","I need to optimize my tests to reduce API spending","I want to balance test coverage with budget constraints"],"best_for":["cost-conscious teams","developers managing budgets","enterprises with strict spending controls"],"limitations":["cost tracking depends on accurate API pricing data","doesn't automatically optimize for cost"],"requires":["API usage data","pricing information"],"input_types":["test configurations","API calls"],"output_types":["cost reports","usage analytics","budget alerts"],"categories":["productivity","analytics"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_query-vary__cap_12","uri":"capability://collaboration.collaborative.test.sharing","name":"collaborative-test-sharing","description":"Share test configurations, results, and insights with team members, enabling collaborative prompt optimization and reducing duplicate testing efforts.","intents":["I want to share my test results with my team for feedback","I need my team to see which prompts we've already tested","I want to collaborate on prompt optimization without duplicating work"],"best_for":["teams collaborating on LLM development","distributed teams","organizations with shared prompt libraries"],"limitations":["requires team coordination","doesn't enforce testing standards"],"requires":["team accounts","sharing permissions"],"input_types":["test results","prompt configurations"],"output_types":["shared test reports","collaborative insights","team dashboards"],"categories":["collaboration","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_query-vary__cap_2","uri":"capability://testing.parameter.variation.testing","name":"parameter-variation-testing","description":"Systematically test different model parameters (temperature, top-p, max-tokens, etc.) against the same prompt to understand how parameter changes affect output quality and behavior.","intents":["I want to find the optimal temperature setting for my use case","I need to test how different parameter combinations affect output consistency","I want to measure the impact of parameter tuning on response quality"],"best_for":["LLM engineers fine-tuning model behavior","teams optimizing for specific output characteristics","developers balancing quality vs cost"],"limitations":["parameter sensitivity varies by model and use case","doesn't provide guidance on which parameters matter most"],"requires":["test prompts","defined success metrics","understanding of parameter effects"],"input_types":["prompts","parameter ranges","test datasets"],"output_types":["parameter performance metrics","response variations","optimization recommendations"],"categories":["testing","ai-development"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_query-vary__cap_3","uri":"capability://testing.test.result.comparison.and.visualization","name":"test-result-comparison-and-visualization","description":"Automatically compare test results across prompt variations and parameters with built-in metrics and visual representations to identify which modifications actually improve output quality.","intents":["I want to see side-by-side comparison of which prompt version performed best","I need to visualize how different variations impact key metrics","I want to distinguish real improvements from random variance in model outputs"],"best_for":["teams making data-driven prompt decisions","developers validating optimization claims","product managers evaluating prompt changes"],"limitations":["visualization quality depends on metric selection","requires meaningful metrics to be defined upfront"],"requires":["completed test runs","defined evaluation metrics","test results data"],"input_types":["test results","model outputs","evaluation scores"],"output_types":["comparison charts","metric dashboards","ranking visualizations"],"categories":["testing","analytics","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_query-vary__cap_4","uri":"capability://testing.baseline.establishment.and.tracking","name":"baseline-establishment-and-tracking","description":"Create and maintain measurable performance baselines for prompts before production deployment, enabling teams to track improvements over time and validate that changes are genuine optimizations.","intents":["I want to establish a baseline for my current prompt before making changes","I need to track whether my prompt improvements are real or just noise","I want to prevent regressions when updating prompts in production"],"best_for":["teams with continuous deployment workflows","LLM product teams","developers managing production prompts"],"limitations":["baseline quality depends on test dataset representativeness","doesn't automatically detect when baselines become stale"],"requires":["representative test dataset","defined success metrics","historical test data"],"input_types":["baseline prompts","test cases","evaluation criteria"],"output_types":["baseline metrics","performance reports","regression alerts"],"categories":["testing","productivity","quality-assurance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_query-vary__cap_5","uri":"capability://productivity.batch.api.call.management","name":"batch-api-call-management","description":"Efficiently manage and execute large numbers of LLM API calls in organized batches, reducing manual API management overhead and providing centralized logging of all requests and responses.","intents":["I want to run 100 test variations without manually making individual API calls","I need to organize and track all my LLM API calls in one place","I want to reduce the complexity of managing multiple API requests"],"best_for":["developers running high-volume tests","teams with systematic testing needs","engineers avoiding manual API call management"],"limitations":["costs scale with test volume","requires sufficient API quota from providers"],"requires":["API credentials","test configurations","sufficient API rate limits"],"input_types":["test specifications","prompt variations","model parameters"],"output_types":["organized API responses","request logs","usage reports"],"categories":["productivity","ai-development"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_query-vary__cap_6","uri":"capability://productivity.test.result.export.and.reporting","name":"test-result-export-and-reporting","description":"Export test results and generate reports in multiple formats for sharing with stakeholders, documentation, or integration with other tools and workflows.","intents":["I want to export my test results to share with my team","I need to generate a report showing which prompt version we should use","I want to integrate test results into my CI/CD pipeline"],"best_for":["teams collaborating on prompt optimization","developers integrating with existing workflows","product managers documenting decisions"],"limitations":["export formats may be limited","doesn't provide automated decision-making"],"requires":["completed test runs","export configuration"],"input_types":["test results","metrics data"],"output_types":["CSV","JSON","PDF reports","formatted documents"],"categories":["productivity","collaboration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_query-vary__cap_7","uri":"capability://productivity.prompt.template.management","name":"prompt-template-management","description":"Store, organize, and version control prompt templates within the platform, enabling teams to maintain a library of tested prompts and track changes over time.","intents":["I want to save and reuse my best-performing prompts","I need to keep track of different versions of my prompts","I want my team to share and collaborate on prompt templates"],"best_for":["teams with multiple prompts in production","developers managing prompt libraries","organizations standardizing prompt practices"],"limitations":["doesn't provide semantic versioning or diff tools","requires discipline to maintain clean prompt library"],"requires":["prompt content","version control discipline"],"input_types":["text prompts","template variables"],"output_types":["organized prompt library","version history","prompt metadata"],"categories":["productivity","collaboration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_query-vary__cap_8","uri":"capability://testing.evaluation.metric.definition","name":"evaluation-metric-definition","description":"Define and configure custom evaluation metrics to assess prompt quality based on specific use case requirements, enabling teams to measure what matters for their application.","intents":["I want to define what 'good' means for my specific use case","I need to measure whether my prompt produces outputs that meet my criteria","I want to create custom scoring rules for my domain"],"best_for":["teams with specific quality requirements","developers with domain-specific evaluation needs","product teams defining success criteria"],"limitations":["requires clear thinking about success criteria upfront","doesn't automate the definition of what 'better' means"],"requires":["understanding of use case requirements","clear success criteria","domain expertise"],"input_types":["evaluation criteria","scoring rules","test outputs"],"output_types":["metric definitions","scoring configurations","evaluation results"],"categories":["testing","ai-development"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_query-vary__cap_9","uri":"capability://testing.test.dataset.management","name":"test-dataset-management","description":"Upload, organize, and manage test datasets used for evaluating prompts, supporting multiple input formats and enabling reuse across different test runs.","intents":["I want to upload my test cases once and reuse them across multiple prompt tests","I need to organize different test datasets for different use cases","I want to ensure consistent test data across my team's experiments"],"best_for":["teams running repeated tests","developers with large test datasets","organizations standardizing test data"],"limitations":["dataset quality directly impacts test validity","requires representative test data"],"requires":["test data files","data organization strategy"],"input_types":["CSV","JSON","text files","structured datasets"],"output_types":["organized test datasets","dataset metadata","test case collections"],"categories":["testing","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":44,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["API credentials for at least one LLM provider","test inputs/prompts","defined evaluation criteria","API credentials for multiple LLM providers","unified test inputs","multiple test runs","quantifiable metrics","API usage data","pricing information","team accounts"],"failure_modes":["requires clear success metrics to be defined beforehand","doesn't automatically determine what 'better' means for your use case","cost multiplies with each additional provider tested","requires API keys for each provider","statistical significance depends on sample size","doesn't provide causal analysis","cost tracking depends on accurate API pricing data","doesn't automatically optimize for cost","requires team coordination","doesn't enforce testing standards","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.39999999999999997,"quality":0.82,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:32.438Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.544Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=query-vary","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=query-vary"}},"signature":"LQJ8epwDzLBdLHjRzZabqSaRoEwf1xaoWdg+hPGPaHrVc5UYopHDlTmiTi1iNiE+r3s86I30Om03T853TqlcBQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T13:05:51.258Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/query-vary","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/query-vary","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=query-vary","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}