{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"pypi_pypi-llama-cpp-python","slug":"pypi-llama-cpp-python","name":"llama-cpp-python","type":"repo","url":"https://pypi.org/project/llama-cpp-python/","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/pypi-llama-cpp-python","categories":["frameworks-sdks"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"pypi_pypi-llama-cpp-python__cap_0","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.cpu.optimized.llm.inference.with.quantized.model.loading","name":"cpu-optimized llm inference with quantized model loading","description":"Loads and executes quantized language models (GGUF format) directly on CPU using llama.cpp's optimized C++ backend, with Python bindings that expose low-level inference parameters. Supports multiple quantization formats (Q4, Q5, Q8) and CPU-specific optimizations like BLAS acceleration, enabling inference on consumer hardware without GPU requirements. The binding layer marshals tensor operations between Python and the native C++ runtime, handling memory management and model state across the FFI boundary.","intents":["Run open-source LLMs locally on CPU-only machines without cloud dependencies","Deploy quantized models in resource-constrained environments like edge devices or serverless functions","Experiment with different quantization levels to balance model quality vs inference speed on fixed hardware"],"best_for":["Solo developers building privacy-first LLM applications","Teams deploying models to edge infrastructure without GPU access","Researchers benchmarking quantization trade-offs on consumer hardware"],"limitations":["Inference speed significantly slower than GPU-accelerated alternatives (10-100x depending on model size and quantization)","No distributed inference across multiple machines — single-process bottleneck","Memory usage scales linearly with model size; 7B+ models require 8GB+ RAM even with aggressive quantization","No built-in batching support for concurrent requests — processes one inference at a time"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","GGUF-format model file (compatible with llama.cpp)","4GB+ RAM minimum (8GB+ recommended for 7B models)","C++ compiler for building native extensions (gcc/clang on Linux/macOS, MSVC on Windows)"],"input_types":["GGUF quantized model files","Text prompts (strings)","Token sequences (integer arrays)"],"output_types":["Generated text (strings)","Token logits (float arrays)","Embedding vectors (float arrays)"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","local-inference","quantization"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"pypi_pypi-llama-cpp-python__cap_1","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.streaming.token.generation.with.callback.based.output","name":"streaming token generation with callback-based output","description":"Generates text tokens incrementally with callback functions invoked per-token, enabling real-time streaming output to clients without buffering the entire response. The implementation uses a generator pattern where the C++ backend yields tokens one at a time, and Python callbacks (user-provided functions) process each token immediately for display, logging, or downstream processing. This pattern decouples token generation from output handling, allowing flexible integration with web frameworks, CLI tools, or message queues.","intents":["Stream LLM responses to web clients in real-time without waiting for full completion","Log or monitor token generation in real-time for debugging or cost tracking","Implement custom output formatting or filtering on a per-token basis"],"best_for":["Web application developers building chat interfaces with streaming responses","CLI tool builders providing interactive LLM experiences","Teams implementing token-level monitoring or custom output pipelines"],"limitations":["Callback overhead adds ~1-5ms per token depending on callback complexity","No built-in backpressure handling — callbacks must complete before next token is generated","Streaming state is not serializable — cannot pause/resume generation across process boundaries"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Loaded llama.cpp model instance","Callable Python function for token callback"],"input_types":["Text prompt (string)","Callback function (callable)"],"output_types":["Token strings (via callback)","Complete generated text (string)"],"categories":["text-generation-language","streaming"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"pypi_pypi-llama-cpp-python__cap_10","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.low.level.ffi.bindings.with.memory.safety","name":"low-level ffi bindings with memory safety","description":"Provides direct Python bindings to llama.cpp's C++ API through ctypes/CFFI, exposing low-level inference functions while maintaining memory safety through reference counting and automatic cleanup. The binding layer handles marshaling between Python objects and C++ data structures, managing tensor allocation/deallocation, and ensuring proper cleanup of model state. This approach provides zero-overhead access to the C++ backend while preventing memory leaks or dangling pointers.","intents":["Access low-level llama.cpp functions for advanced use cases","Integrate llama.cpp into existing Python applications without subprocess overhead","Extend llama.cpp functionality with custom Python code"],"best_for":["Advanced developers implementing custom inference loops","Teams integrating llama.cpp into larger Python systems","Researchers extending llama.cpp with custom functionality"],"limitations":["Low-level API requires understanding of C++ memory management concepts","No automatic type checking — incorrect FFI calls can crash the process","Documentation limited to llama.cpp C API — Python-specific docs may be sparse","Breaking changes in llama.cpp C API require binding updates"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","C++ compiler for building native extensions","Understanding of ctypes/CFFI and C++ memory management"],"input_types":["C++ function signatures (via ctypes)"],"output_types":["C++ data structures (via ctypes)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","bindings"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"pypi_pypi-llama-cpp-python__cap_2","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.sampling.strategy.configuration.with.multiple.algorithms","name":"sampling strategy configuration with multiple algorithms","description":"Exposes fine-grained control over text generation sampling via parameters like temperature, top-k, top-p (nucleus sampling), and repetition penalty, allowing users to tune the randomness and diversity of generated text. The implementation maps Python parameters directly to llama.cpp's sampling pipeline, which applies these filters sequentially to the logit distribution before token selection. Supports multiple sampling strategies (greedy, temperature-based, top-k, top-p) and their combinations, enabling experimentation with different generation behaviors without modifying model weights.","intents":["Adjust generation randomness for different use cases (deterministic code generation vs creative writing)","Prevent repetitive outputs by configuring repetition penalty","Implement nucleus sampling for more natural language generation"],"best_for":["Researchers tuning generation quality for specific domains","Application developers balancing coherence vs diversity in outputs","Teams A/B testing different sampling strategies"],"limitations":["No adaptive sampling based on model confidence or entropy","Limited documentation on parameter interactions — requires empirical tuning","No built-in validation of parameter combinations (e.g., conflicting top-k and top-p settings)"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Loaded llama.cpp model instance"],"input_types":["Sampling parameters (floats: temperature, top_k, top_p, repeat_penalty)"],"output_types":["Generated text (string)"],"categories":["text-generation-language","sampling"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"pypi_pypi-llama-cpp-python__cap_3","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.multi.gpu.and.cpu.acceleration.with.backend.selection","name":"multi-gpu and cpu acceleration with backend selection","description":"Supports hardware acceleration through multiple backends (CUDA, Metal, OpenCL, BLAS) selected at load time, allowing the same Python code to run on different hardware without modification. The binding layer detects available accelerators and routes tensor operations to the appropriate backend (e.g., CUDA kernels on NVIDIA GPUs, Metal on Apple Silicon, OpenBLAS on CPU). Backend selection is configured via environment variables or constructor parameters, enabling deployment flexibility across heterogeneous infrastructure.","intents":["Accelerate inference on NVIDIA GPUs without rewriting code","Deploy models on Apple Silicon Macs with native Metal acceleration","Fall back to CPU inference gracefully when GPU is unavailable"],"best_for":["Teams deploying models across mixed hardware (some GPU, some CPU nodes)","Developers targeting Apple Silicon without CUDA dependencies","Organizations with existing NVIDIA GPU infrastructure"],"limitations":["CUDA backend requires NVIDIA GPU with compute capability 3.0+ and CUDA 11.0+","Metal backend limited to Apple Silicon (M1/M2/M3) — no Intel Mac support","Backend switching requires model reload — no hot-swapping between accelerators","Multi-GPU inference not supported — single GPU per process"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","NVIDIA CUDA 11.0+ (for CUDA backend) OR Apple Silicon (for Metal) OR OpenBLAS library (for CPU acceleration)","Appropriate GPU drivers installed"],"input_types":["Backend selection parameter (string: 'cuda', 'metal', 'cpu')"],"output_types":["Accelerated inference results (same as CPU path)"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","acceleration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"pypi_pypi-llama-cpp-python__cap_4","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.context.window.management.with.sliding.window.attention","name":"context window management with sliding window attention","description":"Manages the model's context window (maximum sequence length) with support for sliding window attention, which limits the attention computation to recent tokens rather than the full history. This reduces memory usage and computation time for long sequences by only attending to the last N tokens. The implementation exposes context size configuration at model load time and supports KV cache management, allowing users to trade off context length against memory consumption and inference speed.","intents":["Process long documents by limiting context to recent tokens while maintaining coherence","Reduce memory footprint for models with large context windows","Implement efficient conversation history management in chat applications"],"best_for":["Developers building document processing pipelines with long inputs","Teams optimizing memory usage on resource-constrained hardware","Chat application builders managing conversation history efficiently"],"limitations":["Sliding window attention may lose important context from earlier in the sequence","Context size must be set at model load time — cannot be changed per-inference","No automatic context truncation — user must manage prompt length to fit window","KV cache is not serializable — cannot persist state across process restarts"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Model architecture supporting sliding window attention (not all GGUF models support this)"],"input_types":["Context window size (integer)","Text prompt (string)"],"output_types":["Generated text (string)"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","context-management"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"pypi_pypi-llama-cpp-python__cap_5","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.embedding.generation.for.semantic.search.and.similarity","name":"embedding generation for semantic search and similarity","description":"Generates fixed-size embedding vectors from text using the model's internal representations, enabling semantic search and similarity comparisons without generating text. The implementation extracts the model's final hidden state or pooled representation and returns it as a float vector, which can be indexed in vector databases or used for similarity calculations. This capability reuses the same quantized model for both generation and embedding tasks, avoiding the need for separate embedding models.","intents":["Generate embeddings for semantic search over document collections","Compute similarity scores between text pairs for clustering or deduplication","Build vector indices for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems"],"best_for":["Developers building semantic search systems with local models","Teams implementing RAG pipelines without external embedding APIs","Researchers comparing embedding quality across different quantization levels"],"limitations":["Embedding quality depends on model architecture — not all models produce useful embeddings","No built-in vector normalization — user must normalize embeddings for cosine similarity","Embedding dimension fixed by model architecture — cannot be changed","No batch embedding API — must call embedding function once per text"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Model architecture supporting embedding extraction (most modern LLMs)"],"input_types":["Text (string)"],"output_types":["Embedding vector (float array, dimension depends on model)"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","embeddings"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"pypi_pypi-llama-cpp-python__cap_6","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.batch.prompt.processing.with.token.level.control","name":"batch prompt processing with token-level control","description":"Processes multiple prompts sequentially with fine-grained control over token generation per prompt, including the ability to set different sampling parameters, context windows, or stopping conditions for each batch item. The implementation maintains separate inference state for each prompt and allows users to configure per-prompt generation parameters, enabling heterogeneous batch processing without code duplication. Batch processing is sequential (not parallel) but allows efficient reuse of model state across prompts.","intents":["Process multiple prompts with different generation parameters in a single script","Generate multiple variations of the same prompt with different sampling settings","Implement batch inference pipelines with per-item configuration"],"best_for":["Developers building batch processing pipelines for LLM inference","Teams generating multiple model outputs for evaluation or comparison","Researchers benchmarking different generation strategies"],"limitations":["Sequential processing — no parallelization across batch items","No built-in batching optimization — each prompt loads full model state","Batch size limited by available memory (one model instance)","No distributed batch processing — single machine only"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Loaded llama.cpp model instance"],"input_types":["List of prompts (strings)","Per-prompt generation parameters (optional)"],"output_types":["List of generated texts (strings)"],"categories":["text-generation-language","batch-processing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"pypi_pypi-llama-cpp-python__cap_7","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.token.probability.and.logit.inspection.for.interpretability","name":"token probability and logit inspection for interpretability","description":"Exposes token-level probabilities and raw logits from the model's output distribution, enabling inspection of model confidence and alternative token predictions. The implementation returns the full probability distribution over the vocabulary for each generated token, allowing users to analyze model uncertainty, debug generation behavior, or implement custom decoding strategies. This capability is useful for understanding model behavior and implementing advanced sampling techniques.","intents":["Inspect model confidence for each generated token to detect hallucinations","Analyze alternative token predictions for debugging generation quality","Implement custom decoding strategies based on token probabilities"],"best_for":["Researchers analyzing model behavior and uncertainty","Developers implementing custom decoding or filtering logic","Teams debugging generation quality issues"],"limitations":["Logit inspection adds memory overhead — full vocabulary distribution must be stored","No built-in confidence thresholding — user must implement filtering logic","Vocabulary size varies by model — logit arrays can be very large (50K+ tokens)","No aggregation of probabilities across multiple generations"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Loaded llama.cpp model instance"],"input_types":["Text prompt (string)"],"output_types":["Token probabilities (float arrays)","Raw logits (float arrays)"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","interpretability"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"pypi_pypi-llama-cpp-python__cap_8","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.grammar.constrained.generation.with.ebnf.rules","name":"grammar-constrained generation with ebnf rules","description":"Constrains text generation to follow user-defined EBNF grammar rules, ensuring outputs conform to specific formats (JSON, SQL, code, etc.) without post-processing. The implementation integrates llama.cpp's grammar engine which filters the token selection at each step to only allow tokens that could lead to valid grammar completions. This approach guarantees syntactic correctness while maintaining semantic quality from the model, enabling reliable structured output generation.","intents":["Generate valid JSON or XML without post-processing or validation","Produce syntactically correct code in specific languages","Ensure structured outputs conform to predefined schemas"],"best_for":["Developers building systems requiring structured outputs (APIs, data pipelines)","Teams implementing code generation with syntax guarantees","Researchers exploring constrained decoding techniques"],"limitations":["Grammar complexity impacts generation speed — complex grammars add 10-50% latency","EBNF grammar must be manually written and tested — no automatic schema-to-grammar conversion","Grammar validation errors are not user-friendly — debugging requires understanding EBNF","No support for semantic constraints (e.g., valid JSON but invalid schema)"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","EBNF grammar definition (string)","Loaded llama.cpp model instance"],"input_types":["Text prompt (string)","EBNF grammar (string)"],"output_types":["Grammar-constrained generated text (string)"],"categories":["text-generation-language","structured-output"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"pypi_pypi-llama-cpp-python__cap_9","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.model.quantization.format.support.with.automatic.detection","name":"model quantization format support with automatic detection","description":"Supports multiple GGUF quantization formats (Q2_K, Q3_K, Q4_K, Q5_K, Q6_K, Q8_0, etc.) with automatic format detection from model files, enabling users to load different quantization levels without code changes. The implementation reads GGUF metadata to determine quantization parameters and configures the inference engine accordingly. This flexibility allows users to experiment with different quality/speed trade-offs by simply swapping model files.","intents":["Load different quantization levels of the same model to compare quality vs speed","Deploy models with appropriate quantization for target hardware constraints","Automatically detect and handle quantization format from model files"],"best_for":["Developers optimizing model deployment for specific hardware","Teams benchmarking quantization trade-offs","Researchers comparing model quality across quantization levels"],"limitations":["Quantization quality varies significantly by format — no universal best choice","GGUF format is specific to llama.cpp — incompatible with other frameworks","No built-in quantization tool — users must convert models externally","Quantization parameters are immutable after model load — cannot change mid-inference"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","GGUF-format model file"],"input_types":["GGUF model file (binary)"],"output_types":["Loaded model instance"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","quantization"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":22,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"low","permissions":["Python 3.8+","GGUF-format model file (compatible with llama.cpp)","4GB+ RAM minimum (8GB+ recommended for 7B models)","C++ compiler for building native extensions (gcc/clang on Linux/macOS, MSVC on Windows)","Loaded llama.cpp model instance","Callable Python function for token callback","C++ compiler for building native extensions","Understanding of ctypes/CFFI and C++ memory management","NVIDIA CUDA 11.0+ (for CUDA backend) OR Apple Silicon (for Metal) OR OpenBLAS library (for CPU acceleration)","Appropriate GPU drivers installed"],"failure_modes":["Inference speed significantly slower than GPU-accelerated alternatives (10-100x depending on model size and quantization)","No distributed inference across multiple machines — single-process bottleneck","Memory usage scales linearly with model size; 7B+ models require 8GB+ RAM even with aggressive quantization","No built-in batching support for concurrent requests — processes one inference at a time","Callback overhead adds ~1-5ms per token depending on callback complexity","No built-in backpressure handling — callbacks must complete before next token is generated","Streaming state is not serializable — cannot pause/resume generation across process boundaries","Low-level API requires understanding of C++ memory management concepts","No automatic type checking — incorrect FFI calls can crash the process","Documentation limited to llama.cpp C API — Python-specific docs may be sparse","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.32,"ecosystem":0.3,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.5,"weights":{"adoption":0.3,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.3,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:25.060Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:20:19.404Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=pypi-llama-cpp-python","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=pypi-llama-cpp-python"}},"signature":"D4Kai2fM8PXoVIdqpUrHV3cVnmDqGuiuXrr8mkSlwX8LqKESfRVmcNA8V/KZUTNHjtzteXYQWLzEcTwUKT5JBw==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T08:43:50.539Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/pypi-llama-cpp-python","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/pypi-llama-cpp-python","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=pypi-llama-cpp-python","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}