{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"pypi_pypi-browser-use","slug":"pypi-browser-use","name":"browser-use","type":"mcp","url":"https://pypi.org/project/browser-use/","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/pypi-browser-use","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"pypi_pypi-browser-use__cap_0","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.dom.to.llm.serialization.with.interactive.element.indexing","name":"dom-to-llm serialization with interactive element indexing","description":"Converts raw HTML/CSS/JavaScript into LLM-readable structured text by building a DOM tree, detecting interactive elements (buttons, inputs, links), calculating visibility and viewport coordinates, and assigning numeric indices for element reference. Uses a watchdog pattern with event listeners to track DOM mutations and re-serialize only changed subtrees, enabling efficient context windows for multi-step interactions.","intents":["I need my LLM agent to understand which elements on a webpage are clickable and where they are located","I want to reduce token usage by only serializing visible DOM elements and their coordinates","I need to track DOM changes in real-time so my agent sees updated page state after each action"],"best_for":["AI agent builders automating web tasks with LLMs","Teams building autonomous browser automation without Selenium/Playwright overhead","Developers needing sub-100ms DOM state updates for real-time agent decision-making"],"limitations":["Shadow DOM elements are not fully traversed — only light DOM is serialized","Visibility calculation uses bounding box intersection, not pixel-perfect rendering detection","Dynamic content loaded via JavaScript after initial page load may require explicit wait conditions","Coordinate transformation assumes single-frame context — nested iframes require separate session management"],"requires":["Chrome/Chromium browser with DevTools Protocol (CDP) support","Python 3.9+","Playwright or similar CDP client library for browser control"],"input_types":["HTML document (raw or rendered)","CSS computed styles","JavaScript-mutated DOM state"],"output_types":["Markdown-formatted page content with indexed interactive elements","JSON structure with element IDs, coordinates, and action schemas","Screenshot with highlighted clickable regions"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","browser-automation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"pypi_pypi-browser-use__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.multi.provider.llm.integration.with.structured.output.schema.optimization","name":"multi-provider llm integration with structured output schema optimization","description":"Abstracts LLM provider differences (OpenAI, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, local Ollama, AWS Bedrock) behind a unified interface that auto-detects provider capabilities and optimizes structured output schemas. Implements provider-specific schema transformation (e.g., converting JSON Schema to Anthropic's tool_use format) and handles streaming vs non-streaming responses with automatic fallback and retry logic including exponential backoff and token limit handling.","intents":["I want to swap LLM providers without rewriting my agent code","I need structured action outputs from my LLM (click, type, navigate) with schema validation","I want to use local LLMs (Ollama) for privacy but fall back to cloud providers if needed","I need automatic retry and error recovery when LLM calls fail or hit rate limits"],"best_for":["Teams building multi-model agent systems with provider flexibility","Enterprises requiring on-premise LLM execution with cloud fallback","Developers optimizing for cost by mixing cheap local models with premium cloud models","AI product teams needing provider-agnostic agent code for future model swaps"],"limitations":["Schema optimization adds 50-150ms latency per LLM call due to transformation overhead","Streaming responses not supported for all providers (e.g., structured output streaming limited to OpenAI)","Local LLM support requires manual model quantization and VRAM tuning — no automatic optimization","Token counting is approximate for non-OpenAI models, leading to potential context window overflows","Provider-specific features (e.g., vision for Claude) require explicit capability detection code"],"requires":["API keys for at least one provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, AWS)","Python 3.9+","For local models: Ollama 0.1+ or compatible OpenAI-compatible server","For structured output: LLM model version supporting function calling or tool_use (GPT-4, Claude 3+, Gemini 1.5+)"],"input_types":["System prompt (string)","Message history (list of role/content pairs)","Action schema (JSON Schema or Pydantic model)","Optional: image data (base64 or URL) for vision-capable models"],"output_types":["Structured action object (parsed from LLM response)","Raw text response (fallback if structured output fails)","Token usage metadata (input/output token counts)","Provider-specific metadata (finish_reason, stop_reason, etc.)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"pypi_pypi-browser-use__cap_10","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.cloud.deployment.with.actor.api.for.low.level.browser.control","name":"cloud deployment with actor api for low-level browser control","description":"Provides cloud-native deployment option via browser-use Cloud, with Actor API for low-level CDP command execution and session management. Abstracts away local browser process management, enabling serverless execution of agents. Includes automatic scaling, session pooling, and observability (telemetry, logging) for production deployments. Actor API allows direct CDP command execution for advanced use cases.","intents":["I want to run browser-use agents in the cloud without managing browser processes","I need to scale from 1 to 1000 concurrent agent sessions automatically","I want observability (logs, metrics, traces) for production agent deployments","I need low-level CDP access for advanced browser control beyond built-in actions"],"best_for":["Teams deploying agents to production at scale","Enterprises requiring managed infrastructure and SLAs","Workflows with variable load (batch jobs, event-driven triggers)","Developers needing observability and debugging for cloud agents"],"limitations":["Cloud deployment adds latency (100-500ms per request) vs local execution","Pricing is per-session-minute, making long-running agents expensive","Limited customization of browser launch arguments and profiles","Data residency and compliance may require on-premise deployment","Vendor lock-in to browser-use Cloud — difficult to migrate to self-hosted","Actor API requires understanding of CDP protocol — not beginner-friendly"],"requires":["browser-use Cloud account with API key","Python 3.9+ (for client SDK)","Network connectivity to browser-use Cloud endpoints"],"input_types":["Agent task description","Optional: custom browser launch arguments","Optional: storage state (cookies, local storage)","Optional: CDP commands (for Actor API)"],"output_types":["Session ID (for tracking)","Final browser state (screenshot, DOM, extracted data)","Execution logs and metrics (duration, token usage, cost)","CDP command responses (for Actor API)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"pypi_pypi-browser-use__cap_11","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.telemetry.and.usage.tracking.with.custom.pricing.models","name":"telemetry and usage tracking with custom pricing models","description":"Collects telemetry data (task duration, token usage, action counts, success/failure rates) and sends to browser-use Cloud for analytics and billing. Implements custom pricing models per provider and per-action, enabling cost tracking and optimization. Includes local logging with configurable verbosity and optional cloud sync for centralized observability.","intents":["I want to track how much my agents cost to run (token usage, session time)","I need to understand which tasks are expensive and optimize them","I want to monitor agent success rates and failure modes in production","I need to implement chargeback or cost allocation across teams"],"best_for":["Teams running agents at scale and needing cost visibility","Enterprises implementing chargeback or cost allocation","Developers optimizing agent performance and cost","Teams using multiple LLM providers and needing cost comparison"],"limitations":["Telemetry collection adds 10-50ms overhead per step","Cloud sync may leak sensitive data (URLs, extracted content) — requires careful configuration","Custom pricing models require manual configuration per provider and action","No built-in cost optimization recommendations — requires manual analysis","Telemetry data retention is limited (default 30 days) — requires export for long-term analysis"],"requires":["Python 3.9+","Optional: browser-use Cloud account for cloud sync","Optional: custom pricing configuration (JSON or Python)"],"input_types":["Telemetry event (task start/end, action execution, token usage)","Optional: custom metadata (user ID, project ID, cost center)","Optional: pricing configuration (per-provider, per-action rates)"],"output_types":["Telemetry metrics (duration, token count, action count, cost)","Aggregated analytics (success rate, average duration, cost per task)","Billing data (for chargeback)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"pypi_pypi-browser-use__cap_12","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.popup.and.dialog.handling.with.automatic.detection.and.dismissal","name":"popup and dialog handling with automatic detection and dismissal","description":"Detects browser popups, alerts, and modal dialogs using CDP's Page.javascriptDialogOpening event and DOM inspection for modal elements. Automatically dismisses or accepts dialogs based on configurable rules (e.g., dismiss all alerts, accept confirmations). Handles file download dialogs, print dialogs, and permission prompts. Prevents popups from blocking agent execution.","intents":["I want my agent to automatically dismiss popup ads and alerts without manual intervention","I need to handle permission prompts (camera, microphone, location) automatically","I want to prevent popups from blocking agent execution","I need to handle file download dialogs gracefully"],"best_for":["Agents operating on public websites with ads and popups","Workflows requiring permission grants (e.g., location-based services)","Batch automation tasks where manual popup handling is infeasible","Teams needing robust automation that doesn't break on unexpected dialogs"],"limitations":["Automatic dismissal may skip important dialogs (e.g., confirmation before deleting data)","Custom modal dialogs (not standard browser dialogs) may not be detected","Permission prompts are browser-specific — behavior varies across Chrome versions","File download dialogs require manual configuration of download directory","Some popups are rendered as iframes — cannot be dismissed via CDP"],"requires":["Active BrowserSession with CDP connection","Chrome/Chromium 90+ with Page.javascriptDialogOpening event support","Optional: dialog handling rules configuration"],"input_types":["Dialog handling rules (dismiss, accept, ignore)","Optional: file download directory","Optional: permission grant rules (allow, deny, prompt)"],"output_types":["Dialog detection event (type, message, buttons)","Action taken (dismissed, accepted, ignored)","Downloaded file path (if applicable)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"pypi_pypi-browser-use__cap_13","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.file.system.integration.for.downloads.and.file.uploads","name":"file system integration for downloads and file uploads","description":"Manages file downloads via CDP's Page.downloadWillBegin event and configurable download directory. Detects file uploads and provides helper methods to inject files into file input elements via CDP's Input.setFiles command. Handles file path validation, MIME type detection, and cleanup of temporary files.","intents":["I want my agent to download files from websites and save them locally","I need to upload files to web forms without manual file picker interaction","I want to track downloaded files and verify their contents","I need to handle file uploads with multiple files or specific MIME types"],"best_for":["Agents performing file-based workflows (document download, form submission with attachments)","Automation of file transfer between websites and local storage","Batch processing workflows requiring file I/O"],"limitations":["File uploads via Input.setFiles only work for file input elements — not drag-and-drop","Download detection requires CDP event listening — may miss downloads initiated via JavaScript","File path validation is basic — no deep inspection of file contents","Temporary file cleanup may fail on Windows if files are locked","Large file uploads (>100MB) may timeout or exceed memory limits"],"requires":["Active BrowserSession with CDP connection","Write permissions to download directory","For uploads: valid file paths accessible to agent process"],"input_types":["For downloads: download directory path","For uploads: file path(s) and target file input element","Optional: MIME type filter"],"output_types":["Downloaded file path and metadata (size, MIME type, timestamp)","Upload status (success/failure)","File validation results"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"pypi_pypi-browser-use__cap_2","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.agent.execution.loop.with.loop.detection.and.behavioral.nudges","name":"agent execution loop with loop detection and behavioral nudges","description":"Implements a stateful agent loop that executes: (1) serialize current browser state to LLM context, (2) call LLM to generate next action, (3) execute action via CDP, (4) detect if agent is stuck in a loop (same action repeated N times or same DOM state for M steps), and (5) inject behavioral nudges (e.g., 'try a different approach') or force action diversification. Maintains full message history with optional compaction to prevent context explosion on long-running tasks.","intents":["I want my agent to autonomously complete multi-step web tasks without human intervention","I need to detect when my agent is stuck and automatically recover or escalate","I want to understand what my agent did and why via full execution traces","I need to limit execution time and token spend while ensuring task completion"],"best_for":["Autonomous web automation for data extraction, form filling, and transactional tasks","Teams building long-running agents that need self-recovery from dead-ends","Developers debugging agent behavior via detailed execution traces and state snapshots","Cost-conscious teams needing token budgeting and message compaction"],"limitations":["Loop detection is heuristic-based (action repetition count, DOM hash comparison) — can miss semantic loops (e.g., agent clicking different buttons that all fail)","Message compaction via summarization may lose fine-grained context needed for complex tasks, reducing success rate by 5-15%","Behavioral nudges are rule-based and may not work for novel failure modes","No built-in task decomposition — agent must handle multi-step reasoning within single execution loop","Max execution steps (default 100) may be insufficient for complex workflows requiring 200+ steps"],"requires":["Python 3.9+","Active BrowserSession with CDP connection","LLM provider configured with structured output support","Task description (string) defining goal for agent"],"input_types":["Task description (natural language string)","Optional: initial URL to navigate to","Optional: custom action schema (if extending built-in actions)","Optional: max steps, max tokens, timeout duration"],"output_types":["Final browser state (screenshot, DOM, extracted data)","Execution trace (list of actions, LLM responses, state snapshots)","Success/failure status with reason","Token usage and execution time metrics"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"pypi_pypi-browser-use__cap_3","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.chrome.devtools.protocol.cdp.session.management.with.connection.pooling","name":"chrome devtools protocol (cdp) session management with connection pooling","description":"Manages lifecycle of CDP connections to Chrome/Chromium instances, including browser launch with custom arguments, profile persistence, tab/frame management, and connection pooling for concurrent agent sessions. Implements SessionManager that maintains a pool of reusable CDP connections, handles target switching between tabs/frames, and provides graceful shutdown with cleanup of browser processes and temporary profiles.","intents":["I want to launch and manage multiple browser sessions concurrently without spawning excessive Chrome processes","I need to persist browser state (cookies, local storage, cache) across agent runs","I want to handle multiple tabs and iframes within a single agent session","I need to gracefully shut down browsers and clean up resources on agent completion or error"],"best_for":["Teams running multiple concurrent agents (e.g., batch web scraping, parallel form filling)","Developers needing persistent browser profiles for stateful workflows (e.g., login once, then automate)","Production deployments requiring resource pooling and graceful shutdown","Multi-tab workflows where agent must coordinate actions across multiple browser tabs"],"limitations":["Connection pooling adds 50-200ms overhead per session acquisition due to target switching","Profile persistence requires disk space and may cause conflicts if multiple sessions use same profile simultaneously","Frame/iframe handling is limited — cross-origin iframes cannot be directly manipulated via CDP","Browser launch arguments are Chrome-specific — no support for Firefox or Safari","Temporary profile cleanup may fail on Windows if browser process hasn't fully exited, leaving orphaned directories"],"requires":["Chrome or Chromium binary (version 90+) installed locally or accessible via PATH","Python 3.9+","For connection pooling: asyncio event loop (built-in to browser-use)","Optional: existing Chrome user profile path for state persistence"],"input_types":["Browser launch arguments (list of strings, e.g., ['--disable-blink-features=AutomationControlled'])","Optional: profile directory path","Optional: storage state JSON (cookies, local storage, session storage)","Optional: proxy configuration (host:port)"],"output_types":["CDP WebSocket connection URL","Target ID (for tab/frame switching)","Browser process handle (for cleanup)","Session metadata (profile path, launch time, connection status)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"pypi_pypi-browser-use__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.built.in.action.execution.with.coordinate.based.clicking.and.input.handling","name":"built-in action execution with coordinate-based clicking and input handling","description":"Provides a registry of pre-built actions (click, type, navigate, extract, scroll, wait) that translate high-level LLM decisions into CDP commands. Click action uses coordinate-based targeting with optional element index fallback, type action includes autocomplete detection and keyboard event simulation, and extract action uses DOM selectors or text matching to retrieve page data. Each action includes input validation, error handling, and post-execution state verification.","intents":["I want my LLM agent to click buttons, fill forms, and navigate pages without writing CDP code","I need reliable clicking that works even when element selectors change or elements are dynamically positioned","I want to detect and handle autocomplete suggestions when typing into search/input fields","I need to extract structured data from pages (tables, lists, text) and return it to the agent"],"best_for":["Developers building web automation agents without deep CDP knowledge","Teams automating form-heavy workflows (e.g., data entry, account creation)","Agents performing data extraction from unstructured web pages","Workflows requiring reliable interaction with dynamically-rendered content"],"limitations":["Coordinate-based clicking may fail if page layout shifts between DOM serialization and action execution (race condition)","Autocomplete detection is heuristic-based (looks for dropdown elements with specific classes) — may miss custom autocomplete implementations","Extract action requires valid CSS selectors or text patterns — no fuzzy matching for typos or partial text","Type action simulates keyboard events but doesn't handle IME (Input Method Editor) for non-Latin scripts","No built-in action for file uploads — requires custom action or direct file system integration","Scroll action is viewport-relative — may not work correctly in nested scrollable containers"],"requires":["Active BrowserSession with CDP connection","For click: valid element index or (x, y) coordinates","For type: target input element index or selector","For navigate: valid URL","For extract: valid CSS selector or text pattern"],"input_types":["Action name (string: 'click', 'type', 'navigate', 'extract', 'scroll', 'wait')","Action parameters (element index, text, URL, selector, coordinates, duration)","Optional: retry count and timeout"],"output_types":["Success/failure status","Updated browser state (screenshot, DOM)","Extracted data (for extract action)","Error message (if action failed)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"pypi_pypi-browser-use__cap_5","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.custom.action.extension.system.with.pydantic.schema.validation","name":"custom action extension system with pydantic schema validation","description":"Allows developers to define custom actions beyond built-ins by creating Pydantic models that inherit from BaseAction, implementing execute() method with CDP access, and registering in the action registry. Automatically generates LLM-compatible JSON schemas from Pydantic models and validates LLM-generated action parameters before execution, with support for optional parameters, enums, and nested objects.","intents":["I want to add domain-specific actions (e.g., 'login_with_oauth', 'download_file') without modifying browser-use core","I need my LLM agent to understand the parameters and constraints of custom actions via schema","I want to reuse custom actions across multiple agent tasks without code duplication","I need to validate action parameters before execution to catch LLM mistakes early"],"best_for":["Teams building specialized agents for specific domains (e.g., e-commerce, banking, SaaS)","Developers extending browser-use with proprietary automation logic","Workflows requiring complex multi-step actions that are awkward to express as sequences of built-ins"],"limitations":["Custom actions must be synchronous — no built-in async/await support within action execute()","Schema generation from Pydantic models may produce overly verbose schemas for complex nested types","No built-in testing framework for custom actions — developers must write their own tests","Custom actions don't automatically get loop detection or retry logic — must be implemented per-action","Documentation generation is manual — no auto-doc from schema"],"requires":["Python 3.9+","Pydantic v2.0+","Understanding of CDP API for actions requiring direct browser control","Access to browser-use Agent instance to register custom action"],"input_types":["Pydantic model class definition","execute() method implementation with browser and agent parameters","Optional: description and example fields for LLM context"],"output_types":["JSON Schema representation of action (for LLM)","Action result object (success status, output data, error message)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"pypi_pypi-browser-use__cap_6","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.message.history.management.with.context.window.optimization","name":"message history management with context window optimization","description":"Maintains a rolling message history of agent steps (LLM prompts, responses, action results) and implements automatic message compaction when approaching LLM context limits. Compaction uses LLM-based summarization to condense old steps into brief summaries while preserving recent N steps in full detail. Includes token counting per-provider and configurable retention policies (e.g., keep last 20 steps, summarize older steps).","intents":["I want my agent to handle long-running tasks (100+ steps) without hitting context window limits","I need to understand the agent's reasoning by reviewing full message history for recent steps","I want to optimize token usage by summarizing old steps while keeping recent context detailed","I need to track token spend per task and per provider for cost analysis"],"best_for":["Long-running agents performing complex workflows (data entry, multi-page navigation)","Cost-conscious teams needing token budgeting and spend tracking","Developers debugging agent behavior via detailed execution traces","Teams using smaller context window models (e.g., GPT-3.5, local LLMs) that need aggressive compaction"],"limitations":["Message compaction via summarization may lose fine-grained details needed for recovery from errors","Token counting is approximate for non-OpenAI models, leading to potential context window overflows","Summarization adds 1-3 seconds per compaction cycle, slowing agent execution","No built-in deduplication of repeated steps — may waste tokens on redundant history","Compaction is lossy — cannot recover original details after summarization"],"requires":["Python 3.9+","LLM provider configured for summarization (uses same provider as agent)","Token counting mappings for target LLM model"],"input_types":["Message objects (role, content, optional metadata)","Context window size (tokens)","Retention policy (e.g., keep_recent_steps=20, summarize_older=True)"],"output_types":["Compacted message history (original recent steps + summarized older steps)","Token usage metrics (before/after compaction, savings percentage)","Compaction metadata (which steps were summarized, summary text)"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"pypi_pypi-browser-use__cap_7","uri":"capability://image.visual.screenshot.capture.with.interactive.element.highlighting","name":"screenshot capture with interactive element highlighting","description":"Captures current browser viewport as screenshot via CDP and overlays visual highlights (bounding boxes, numbers, labels) on interactive elements (buttons, inputs, links) to help LLM understand clickable regions. Highlights are rendered server-side using CDP's DOM.getBoxModel and Overlay.highlightFrame commands, avoiding client-side JavaScript injection. Supports multiple highlight styles (boxes, numbers, labels) and filters highlights by visibility and element type.","intents":["I want my LLM agent to see which elements are clickable and where they are located on the page","I need to reduce ambiguity when multiple similar elements exist (e.g., multiple buttons with same text)","I want to verify that my agent is looking at the right element before clicking","I need to debug agent failures by seeing what the agent saw when it made a wrong decision"],"best_for":["Developers debugging agent behavior via visual inspection","Agents operating on pages with many similar elements (e.g., search results, product listings)","Teams needing to explain agent decisions to non-technical stakeholders via screenshots","Workflows where visual context significantly improves LLM decision-making"],"limitations":["Screenshot highlighting adds 200-500ms per step due to CDP overlay rendering","Highlights may obscure page content, making it harder for LLM to read text","Overlay rendering is not pixel-perfect — may misalign with actual element positions in some cases","Large pages with 100+ interactive elements produce cluttered screenshots with overlapping highlights","Screenshots are JPEG/PNG — no vector format for lossless scaling"],"requires":["Active BrowserSession with CDP connection","Chrome/Chromium 90+ with Overlay API support"],"input_types":["Optional: highlight style (boxes, numbers, labels)","Optional: filter criteria (element types, visibility threshold)","Optional: output format (JPEG quality, PNG compression)"],"output_types":["Screenshot as base64-encoded JPEG or PNG","Metadata: viewport dimensions, highlight count, timestamp"],"categories":["image-visual","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"pypi_pypi-browser-use__cap_8","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.event.driven.dom.mutation.tracking.with.watchdog.pattern","name":"event-driven dom mutation tracking with watchdog pattern","description":"Monitors DOM changes in real-time using CDP's DOM.setDOMBreakpoint and Page.domContentEventFired events, triggering re-serialization of affected subtrees when mutations occur. Implements watchdog pattern with base classes (Watchdog, PageWatchdog, FrameWatchdog) that listen for specific event types (navigation, frame load, DOM mutation) and coordinate state updates. Enables efficient incremental updates instead of full-page re-parsing on each agent step.","intents":["I want my agent to see page updates immediately after actions (e.g., form validation errors, dynamic content load)","I need to detect when a page has fully loaded before proceeding with next action","I want to track which parts of the page changed so I can update context efficiently","I need to handle dynamic content (infinite scroll, lazy loading) without explicit wait conditions"],"best_for":["Agents operating on highly dynamic pages (SPAs, real-time dashboards, chat interfaces)","Workflows requiring sub-second response to page changes","Teams optimizing token usage by tracking only changed DOM regions","Developers debugging timing issues (e.g., agent clicking before element is ready)"],"limitations":["Event-driven tracking adds complexity and potential race conditions if mutations occur during serialization","Watchdog pattern requires careful cleanup to avoid memory leaks from dangling event listeners","DOM breakpoints (CDP.DOM.setDOMBreakpoint) only track direct mutations, not CSS-only visual changes","Cross-origin iframe mutations cannot be tracked — requires separate session per iframe","Event batching may cause delays if many mutations occur in rapid succession"],"requires":["Active BrowserSession with CDP connection","Chrome/Chromium 90+ with DOM breakpoint support","Async/await support for event handling"],"input_types":["Event type to monitor (navigation, frame load, DOM mutation, etc.)","Optional: target node ID or selector for scoped monitoring","Optional: debounce duration (ms) to batch rapid mutations"],"output_types":["Event notification with mutation details (node ID, change type, affected subtree)","Updated DOM serialization for changed regions","Timestamp and event metadata"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"pypi_pypi-browser-use__cap_9","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.model.context.protocol.server.integration.for.external.tool.access","name":"mcp (model context protocol) server integration for external tool access","description":"Exposes browser-use agent capabilities as an MCP server, allowing external LLM clients (Claude, other agents) to control the browser via standardized MCP protocol. Implements MCP resource types (browser state, screenshots, DOM) and tool definitions (click, type, navigate, extract) that conform to MCP spec. Handles MCP request/response serialization and manages session lifecycle via MCP lifecycle hooks.","intents":["I want to use Claude or another LLM client to control a browser-use agent via MCP","I need to integrate browser automation into a larger MCP-based agent ecosystem","I want to expose browser capabilities as reusable tools for multiple LLM clients","I need standardized protocol for browser control instead of custom APIs"],"best_for":["Teams building MCP-compatible agent systems","Developers integrating browser-use with Claude or other MCP-aware LLMs","Enterprises standardizing on MCP for tool interoperability","Workflows requiring multiple LLM clients to share browser sessions"],"limitations":["MCP server adds network latency (100-500ms per request) vs direct Python API","Resource streaming (large screenshots, DOM trees) may hit MCP message size limits","Session management across multiple MCP clients requires careful state synchronization","No built-in authentication — requires external auth layer for production use","MCP spec is still evolving — may require updates as spec changes"],"requires":["Python 3.9+","MCP client library (e.g., Claude SDK with MCP support)","Network connectivity between MCP client and server","Optional: TLS certificate for secure MCP communication"],"input_types":["MCP request (tool call, resource read, etc.)","Session ID (for multi-session management)","Optional: authentication token"],"output_types":["MCP response (tool result, resource content, error)","Session metadata (active targets, connection status)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":28,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Chrome/Chromium browser with DevTools Protocol (CDP) support","Python 3.9+","Playwright or similar CDP client library for browser control","API keys for at least one provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, AWS)","For local models: Ollama 0.1+ or compatible OpenAI-compatible server","For structured output: LLM model version supporting function calling or tool_use (GPT-4, Claude 3+, Gemini 1.5+)","browser-use Cloud account with API key","Python 3.9+ (for client SDK)","Network connectivity to browser-use Cloud endpoints","Optional: browser-use Cloud account for cloud sync"],"failure_modes":["Shadow DOM elements are not fully traversed — only light DOM is serialized","Visibility calculation uses bounding box intersection, not pixel-perfect rendering detection","Dynamic content loaded via JavaScript after initial page load may require explicit wait conditions","Coordinate transformation assumes single-frame context — nested iframes require separate session management","Schema optimization adds 50-150ms latency per LLM call due to transformation overhead","Streaming responses not supported for all providers (e.g., structured output streaming limited to OpenAI)","Local LLM support requires manual model quantization and VRAM tuning — no automatic optimization","Token counting is approximate for non-OpenAI models, leading to potential context window overflows","Provider-specific features (e.g., vision for Claude) require explicit capability detection code","Cloud deployment adds latency (100-500ms per request) vs local execution","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.35,"ecosystem":0.39999999999999997,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.52,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:25.060Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:20:21.281Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=pypi-browser-use","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=pypi-browser-use"}},"signature":"FQAdNmvYLqxhbJ+ZJHWhYbjvrQsf3ismk0bX8RVIqtg8BqwzjbVU2f5P8AO6KyMD4CU05o8Bl5b8JqnyFvtKDQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T09:20:59.147Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/pypi-browser-use","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/pypi-browser-use","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=pypi-browser-use","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}