{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_protectai","slug":"protectai","name":"ProtectAI","type":"product","url":"https://protectai.com","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/protectai","categories":["code-review-security"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_protectai__cap_0","uri":"capability://security.prompt.injection.vulnerability.detection","name":"prompt-injection-vulnerability-detection","description":"Scans language model applications for prompt injection vulnerabilities by testing inputs against known attack patterns and injection techniques. Identifies weaknesses in prompt design and input validation that could allow adversarial manipulation of model behavior.","intents":["Find prompt injection vulnerabilities before deploying my LLM application","Test if my chatbot can be tricked into ignoring system instructions","Validate that my prompt engineering is secure against adversarial inputs"],"best_for":["LLM application developers","AI security teams","enterprises deploying chatbots or generative AI"],"limitations":["Only detects known injection patterns; may miss novel attack vectors","Requires clear definition of expected model behavior to validate against"],"requires":["Access to model API or deployment endpoint","Understanding of application's intended behavior and constraints"],"input_types":["text prompts","model API endpoints","application configuration"],"output_types":["vulnerability report","risk severity scores","remediation recommendations"],"categories":["security","testing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_protectai__cap_1","uri":"capability://security.data.poisoning.detection","name":"data-poisoning-detection","description":"Analyzes training datasets and model behavior to identify signs of data poisoning attacks where malicious data has been injected to corrupt model outputs or introduce backdoors. Detects anomalous patterns in training data and model responses.","intents":["Verify that my training dataset hasn't been compromised before model training","Detect if my model has learned malicious patterns from poisoned data","Ensure third-party training data sources are trustworthy"],"best_for":["ML engineers managing training pipelines","data security teams","enterprises using external training data"],"limitations":["Sophisticated poisoning attacks may evade detection","Requires baseline of expected clean data behavior for comparison"],"requires":["Access to training dataset","Model artifacts and inference capabilities","Knowledge of expected model behavior"],"input_types":["training datasets","model weights","inference outputs"],"output_types":["poisoning risk assessment","anomaly reports","contaminated data samples"],"categories":["security","testing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_protectai__cap_2","uri":"capability://security.model.adversarial.robustness.testing","name":"model-adversarial-robustness-testing","description":"Evaluates how well machine learning models resist adversarial examples and perturbations designed to fool the model. Tests model stability against small input modifications that shouldn't change predictions.","intents":["Measure how robust my computer vision model is against adversarial images","Test if my model makes consistent predictions when inputs are slightly modified","Identify which model inputs are most vulnerable to adversarial attacks"],"best_for":["ML researchers","computer vision teams","safety-critical AI applications"],"limitations":["Testing is computationally expensive for large models","Adversarial robustness is an evolving field with no perfect solutions"],"requires":["Model artifacts","Representative test datasets","Computational resources for adversarial example generation"],"input_types":["model weights","test datasets","image/audio/text inputs"],"output_types":["robustness scores","adversarial example visualizations","vulnerability heatmaps"],"categories":["security","testing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_protectai__cap_3","uri":"capability://security.ml.vulnerability.scanning","name":"ml-vulnerability-scanning","description":"Automated scanning of ML systems and codebases to identify common security misconfigurations, insecure dependencies, and unsafe model deployment patterns. Detects issues like unvalidated model inputs, exposed model artifacts, and insecure API configurations.","intents":["Scan my ML codebase for security vulnerabilities before deployment","Find insecure model serving configurations in my infrastructure","Identify unsafe dependencies in my ML pipeline"],"best_for":["DevOps/MLOps engineers","security teams","AI infrastructure teams"],"limitations":["Only detects known vulnerability signatures","May produce false positives requiring manual verification"],"requires":["Access to codebase","Model serving configuration files","Dependency manifests"],"input_types":["source code","configuration files","dependency lists","model serving setup"],"output_types":["vulnerability inventory","severity ratings","remediation guidance"],"categories":["security","testing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_protectai__cap_4","uri":"capability://compliance.compliance.documentation.generation","name":"compliance-documentation-generation","description":"Generates automated compliance reports and safety assessment documentation for AI models to meet regulatory requirements like the EU AI Act and SEC guidance. Creates audit trails and evidence of security testing performed.","intents":["Create compliance documentation for my AI system to meet EU AI Act requirements","Generate evidence of safety testing for regulatory audits","Document risk assessments for my AI deployment"],"best_for":["compliance officers","legal teams","enterprise AI governance","regulated industries"],"limitations":["Reports are only as good as underlying testing; doesn't guarantee compliance","Regulatory requirements evolve faster than documentation templates"],"requires":["Completed security assessments","Model metadata and training information","Deployment configuration details"],"input_types":["assessment results","model documentation","testing reports"],"output_types":["compliance reports","audit documentation","risk assessment forms"],"categories":["compliance","documentation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_protectai__cap_5","uri":"capability://testing.model.behavior.validation","name":"model-behavior-validation","description":"Tests deployed models against expected behavior specifications to ensure outputs remain safe, accurate, and aligned with intended use. Validates that model behavior hasn't drifted or been compromised post-deployment.","intents":["Verify my model produces expected outputs for known test cases","Detect if my model's behavior has changed unexpectedly after deployment","Validate that my model respects safety constraints and content policies"],"best_for":["ML operations teams","model monitoring engineers","production AI teams"],"limitations":["Requires predefined expected behaviors; can't validate against unknown requirements","Doesn't catch subtle behavioral drift that doesn't violate explicit constraints"],"requires":["Test case specifications","Expected output definitions","Model inference access"],"input_types":["test datasets","behavior specifications","model endpoints"],"output_types":["validation reports","behavior deviation alerts","compliance status"],"categories":["testing","monitoring"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_protectai__cap_6","uri":"capability://security.supply.chain.security.assessment","name":"supply-chain-security-assessment","description":"Evaluates the security of ML supply chains including model sources, training data provenance, and third-party dependencies. Identifies risks from using untrusted models or data sources.","intents":["Verify that pre-trained models I'm using come from trustworthy sources","Assess security risks of third-party training datasets","Audit the entire supply chain of my ML system for vulnerabilities"],"best_for":["procurement teams","security architects","enterprises using open-source models"],"limitations":["Difficult to verify provenance of models from unknown sources","Supply chain risks evolve as new attack methods emerge"],"requires":["Model source information","Data source documentation","Dependency tracking"],"input_types":["model metadata","data source information","dependency manifests"],"output_types":["supply chain risk report","source verification results","trust scores"],"categories":["security","governance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_protectai__cap_7","uri":"capability://testing.bias.and.fairness.assessment","name":"bias-and-fairness-assessment","description":"Analyzes models for demographic bias, fairness issues, and discriminatory outputs across different population groups. Identifies disparities in model performance and behavior across protected attributes.","intents":["Check if my model treats different demographic groups fairly","Identify bias in my model's predictions across protected attributes","Measure fairness metrics for regulatory and ethical compliance"],"best_for":["ethics teams","compliance officers","responsible AI practitioners"],"limitations":["Fairness is context-dependent; no universal fairness definition","Requires labeled demographic data which may not be available"],"requires":["Model artifacts","Test datasets with demographic labels","Definition of fairness metrics"],"input_types":["models","test datasets with demographic attributes","fairness criteria"],"output_types":["bias reports","fairness metrics","demographic performance disparities"],"categories":["testing","governance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_protectai__cap_8","uri":"capability://security.model.extraction.attack.detection","name":"model-extraction-attack-detection","description":"Detects and prevents model extraction attacks where adversaries attempt to steal or reverse-engineer proprietary models through repeated queries. Identifies suspicious query patterns indicative of extraction attempts.","intents":["Protect my proprietary model from being stolen through API queries","Detect if someone is trying to extract my model through repeated testing","Monitor for suspicious access patterns that indicate model theft attempts"],"best_for":["model owners with proprietary systems","API security teams","enterprises protecting IP"],"limitations":["Difficult to distinguish legitimate testing from extraction attempts","Sophisticated attackers may evade detection"],"requires":["Model API access logs","Query pattern analysis capability","Baseline of normal usage"],"input_types":["API query logs","access patterns","model inference data"],"output_types":["extraction risk alerts","suspicious query reports","access pattern analysis"],"categories":["security","monitoring"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_protectai__cap_9","uri":"capability://testing.interpretability.and.explainability.validation","name":"interpretability-and-explainability-validation","description":"Validates that model explanations and interpretability outputs are accurate and trustworthy. Ensures that explanation methods don't themselves introduce vulnerabilities or mislead users about model behavior.","intents":["Verify that my model's explanations are actually faithful to its decision-making","Ensure my interpretability methods aren't being gamed by adversaries","Validate that stakeholders understand how my model makes decisions"],"best_for":["ML researchers","explainable AI teams","regulated industries requiring model transparency"],"limitations":["Explanation validation is computationally expensive","No universal standard for explanation quality"],"requires":["Model artifacts","Explanation method implementations","Test datasets"],"input_types":["models","explanation outputs","test cases"],"output_types":["explanation fidelity reports","validation scores","trustworthiness assessments"],"categories":["testing","governance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":46,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"low","permissions":["Access to model API or deployment endpoint","Understanding of application's intended behavior and constraints","Access to training dataset","Model artifacts and inference capabilities","Knowledge of expected model behavior","Model artifacts","Representative test datasets","Computational resources for adversarial example generation","Access to codebase","Model serving configuration files"],"failure_modes":["Only detects known injection patterns; may miss novel attack vectors","Requires clear definition of expected model behavior to validate against","Sophisticated poisoning attacks may evade detection","Requires baseline of expected clean data behavior for comparison","Testing is computationally expensive for large models","Adversarial robustness is an evolving field with no perfect solutions","Only detects known vulnerability signatures","May produce false positives requiring manual verification","Reports are only as good as underlying testing; doesn't guarantee compliance","Regulatory requirements evolve faster than documentation templates","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.43333333333333335,"quality":0.86,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:32.438Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.536Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=protectai","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=protectai"}},"signature":"dbwuFXV66PUufAtL7GkwfYm2Ep/gp6b7R1uBiNMkEi/31Nuq5l3Q6+Bq7lIjpkfnkgfcZ7K5dwXgohKOyGTsAQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T15:52:54.962Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/protectai","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/protectai","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=protectai","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}