{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_prompt-security","slug":"prompt-security","name":"Prompt Security","type":"product","url":"https://www.prompt.security","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/prompt-security","categories":["code-review-security"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_prompt-security__cap_0","uri":"capability://security.real.time.prompt.injection.detection","name":"real-time prompt injection detection","description":"Monitors LLM application traffic in real-time to identify and flag prompt injection attempts before they reach the model. Analyzes input payloads against patterns indicative of injection attacks and blocks malicious requests.","intents":["I need to prevent attackers from manipulating my LLM through crafted prompts","I want to catch injection attempts before they compromise my application","I need visibility into what malicious prompts are being sent to my system"],"best_for":["security teams","AI governance leaders","enterprises deploying customer-facing LLM applications"],"limitations":["requires integration with existing LLM infrastructure","effectiveness depends on rule quality and model updates","may require tuning to reduce false positives in specific domains"],"requires":["LLM application deployment","network/API access to monitor","configuration of detection rules"],"input_types":["user prompts","API requests","text input to LLM"],"output_types":["detection alerts","blocked requests","threat logs"],"categories":["security","ai-safety"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_prompt-security__cap_1","uri":"capability://security.jailbreak.attack.prevention","name":"jailbreak attack prevention","description":"Detects and blocks attempts to circumvent LLM safety guidelines through sophisticated jailbreak techniques. Identifies patterns that try to override model instructions or elicit harmful outputs.","intents":["I need to prevent users from tricking my LLM into generating harmful content","I want to block sophisticated jailbreak techniques that bypass model safeguards","I need to maintain control over what my LLM can be made to produce"],"best_for":["security teams","content moderation teams","enterprises with brand reputation concerns"],"limitations":["jailbreak techniques evolve constantly requiring ongoing rule updates","may block legitimate edge-case use cases","effectiveness varies by LLM model type"],"requires":["LLM application deployment","security team to define acceptable behaviors","ongoing threat intelligence updates"],"input_types":["user prompts","multi-turn conversations","structured requests"],"output_types":["blocked requests","jailbreak attempt logs","severity classifications"],"categories":["security","ai-safety"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_prompt-security__cap_2","uri":"capability://security.data.exfiltration.prevention","name":"data exfiltration prevention","description":"Monitors LLM outputs to detect and prevent sensitive data from being extracted or leaked through model responses. Identifies patterns where confidential information is being exposed to unauthorized users.","intents":["I need to ensure my LLM doesn't leak confidential customer data in responses","I want to prevent sensitive information from being extracted through prompt engineering","I need to comply with data protection regulations by preventing unauthorized data access"],"best_for":["security teams","compliance officers","enterprises handling PII or confidential data"],"limitations":["requires definition of what constitutes sensitive data","context-dependent sensitivity may require custom rules","may produce false positives on legitimate data references"],"requires":["data classification policies","LLM output monitoring integration","sensitive data patterns definition"],"input_types":["LLM responses","output text","generated content"],"output_types":["exfiltration alerts","redacted responses","data leak reports"],"categories":["security","compliance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_prompt-security__cap_3","uri":"capability://security.customizable.security.policy.enforcement","name":"customizable security policy enforcement","description":"Allows security teams to define and enforce tailored guardrails and policies specific to their organization's use cases and risk tolerance. Enables fine-grained control over LLM behavior without broad restrictions.","intents":["I need security rules that match my specific business requirements, not generic restrictions","I want to allow certain use cases while blocking others based on my risk profile","I need to balance security with productivity by customizing what my LLM can do"],"best_for":["security teams","AI governance leaders","organizations with specific compliance requirements"],"limitations":["requires security expertise to define effective policies","poorly configured rules can create security gaps","policy maintenance overhead increases with application complexity"],"requires":["security team involvement","understanding of use case requirements","ongoing policy review and updates"],"input_types":["policy definitions","rule configurations","risk parameters"],"output_types":["enforced policies","policy violation logs","configuration status"],"categories":["security","governance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_prompt-security__cap_4","uri":"capability://security.real.time.inference.monitoring.and.logging","name":"real-time inference monitoring and logging","description":"Provides continuous visibility into all requests and responses flowing through LLM applications without requiring architectural changes. Captures detailed logs of inference activity for audit and analysis purposes.","intents":["I need to see what's actually happening in my LLM application in real-time","I want to audit all LLM interactions for compliance and security purposes","I need visibility without having to redesign my application architecture"],"best_for":["security teams","compliance teams","operations teams"],"limitations":["high-volume applications may generate large log volumes","real-time monitoring adds latency if not optimized","requires storage infrastructure for log retention"],"requires":["network/API access to LLM traffic","log storage and retention capability","monitoring dashboard access"],"input_types":["LLM API calls","user inputs","model outputs"],"output_types":["activity logs","monitoring dashboards","audit trails"],"categories":["security","operations"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_prompt-security__cap_5","uri":"capability://security.threat.intelligence.and.attack.pattern.detection","name":"threat intelligence and attack pattern detection","description":"Identifies emerging attack patterns and known threat signatures targeting LLM applications. Continuously updates detection rules based on evolving threat landscape and known attack techniques.","intents":["I need to know about new attack techniques targeting LLM applications","I want my security system to automatically adapt to emerging threats","I need to stay ahead of attackers who are constantly evolving their techniques"],"best_for":["security teams","enterprises with advanced threat intelligence needs"],"limitations":["zero-day attacks may not be detected immediately","threat intelligence quality depends on data sources","requires continuous updates and maintenance"],"requires":["threat intelligence feeds","regular rule updates","security team to interpret findings"],"input_types":["attack patterns","threat signatures","behavioral indicators"],"output_types":["threat alerts","pattern matches","risk assessments"],"categories":["security"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_prompt-security__cap_6","uri":"capability://security.sensitive.data.classification.and.masking","name":"sensitive data classification and masking","description":"Automatically identifies and classifies sensitive data in LLM inputs and outputs, then applies masking or redaction rules to prevent exposure. Supports PII, credentials, and custom data types.","intents":["I need to automatically redact PII before it reaches my LLM","I want to prevent API keys and credentials from being logged or exposed","I need to mask sensitive data in outputs to comply with privacy regulations"],"best_for":["security teams","compliance teams","enterprises handling regulated data"],"limitations":["context-dependent classification may miss some sensitive data","masking can reduce utility of LLM responses","requires configuration of data types and masking rules"],"requires":["data classification definitions","masking rule configuration","integration with data pipeline"],"input_types":["user inputs","LLM outputs","application data"],"output_types":["masked data","classification reports","redacted logs"],"categories":["security","compliance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_prompt-security__cap_7","uri":"capability://security.api.and.endpoint.security.enforcement","name":"api and endpoint security enforcement","description":"Secures LLM API endpoints by enforcing authentication, rate limiting, and access control policies. Prevents unauthorized access and abuse of LLM services.","intents":["I need to control who can access my LLM API endpoints","I want to prevent abuse and rate limit attacks on my LLM service","I need to enforce authentication and authorization for LLM access"],"best_for":["security teams","API platform teams","enterprises exposing LLM APIs"],"limitations":["requires integration with authentication systems","rate limiting policies must be tuned to legitimate usage","may impact legitimate high-volume users"],"requires":["authentication system integration","rate limiting configuration","access control policies"],"input_types":["API requests","authentication credentials","access policies"],"output_types":["access decisions","rate limit enforcement","security logs"],"categories":["security"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_prompt-security__cap_8","uri":"capability://compliance.compliance.and.audit.reporting","name":"compliance and audit reporting","description":"Generates comprehensive audit trails and compliance reports documenting all LLM application activity, security events, and policy enforcement. Supports regulatory requirements and internal audits.","intents":["I need to demonstrate compliance with security and privacy regulations","I want to generate audit reports for internal and external audits","I need to document all security events and policy violations for investigation"],"best_for":["compliance officers","audit teams","enterprises in regulated industries"],"limitations":["report generation may require significant data processing","compliance requirements vary by jurisdiction","requires ongoing maintenance of audit logs"],"requires":["audit log retention","compliance framework definitions","reporting infrastructure"],"input_types":["security events","policy violations","activity logs"],"output_types":["audit reports","compliance documentation","event summaries"],"categories":["compliance","governance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_prompt-security__cap_9","uri":"capability://security.model.specific.threat.adaptation","name":"model-specific threat adaptation","description":"Tailors security rules and detection patterns to specific LLM models and their known vulnerabilities. Adapts protection strategies based on the underlying model architecture and behavior.","intents":["I need security rules optimized for the specific LLM model I'm using","I want to account for known vulnerabilities in my chosen model","I need different security policies for different LLM models in my stack"],"best_for":["security teams","AI platform teams","enterprises using multiple LLM models"],"limitations":["requires knowledge of model-specific vulnerabilities","new models may lack established threat profiles","rules must be updated as models are updated"],"requires":["model identification and versioning","model-specific threat intelligence","rule customization capability"],"input_types":["model type","model version","model specifications"],"output_types":["model-specific rules","vulnerability assessments","adaptation recommendations"],"categories":["security","ai-safety"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_prompt-security__headline","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.specialized.security.for.generative.ai.applications","name":"specialized security for generative ai applications","description":"Prompt Security offers tailored protection specifically for Generative AI applications, addressing prompt injection and data exfiltration threats that traditional security tools often overlook.","intents":["best security for Generative AI","security solutions for AI applications","how to protect LLMs from attacks","top tools for AI security","real-time security for AI models"],"best_for":["security teams in mid-market and enterprise organizations"],"limitations":[],"requires":[],"input_types":[],"output_types":[],"categories":["safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":47,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"low","permissions":["LLM application deployment","network/API access to monitor","configuration of detection rules","security team to define acceptable behaviors","ongoing threat intelligence updates","data classification policies","LLM output monitoring integration","sensitive data patterns definition","security team involvement","understanding of use case requirements"],"failure_modes":["requires integration with existing LLM infrastructure","effectiveness depends on rule quality and model updates","may require tuning to reduce false positives in specific domains","jailbreak techniques evolve constantly requiring ongoing rule updates","may block legitimate edge-case use cases","effectiveness varies by LLM model type","requires definition of what constitutes sensitive data","context-dependent sensitivity may require custom rules","may produce false positives on legitimate data references","requires security expertise to define effective policies","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.43333333333333335,"quality":0.86,"ecosystem":0.25,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:32.438Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.536Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=prompt-security","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=prompt-security"}},"signature":"6H+sr9CuRgWg0cgmXRHf3TkW73upwz5F0toIwKQ8/ihcWrsAWHYEcOkOQeHJ9Dm4PI2YEi4OgaS9ErOw086xBQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T03:54:37.739Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/prompt-security","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/prompt-security","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=prompt-security","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}