{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_profluent-bio","slug":"profluent-bio","name":"Profluent Bio","type":"product","url":"https://www.profluent.bio","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/profluent-bio","categories":["research-search"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_profluent-bio__cap_0","uri":"capability://research.ai.optimized.crispr.guide.rna.design","name":"ai-optimized crispr guide rna design","description":"Uses transformer-based language models trained on genomic data to computationally design optimal CRISPR guide RNA sequences for specific target genes. The system predicts on-target efficiency and ranks candidate guide RNAs by predicted editing effectiveness.","intents":["I need to find the best guide RNA sequences for my target gene","I want to reduce the number of guide RNAs I have to experimentally validate","I need higher on-target editing efficiency for my CRISPR experiment"],"best_for":["Academic research teams","Biotech companies","Gene therapy developers","Large-scale CRISPR screening campaigns"],"limitations":["Requires institutional access and budget","Limited independent validation compared to established tools","Accuracy depends on quality of training data","May not generalize well to non-human organisms without retraining"],"requires":["Target gene sequence information","Access to Profluent Bio platform","Basic understanding of CRISPR methodology"],"input_types":["DNA sequence (FASTA format)","Gene identifiers","Target genomic coordinates"],"output_types":["Ranked list of guide RNA sequences","Predicted on-target efficiency scores","Sequence design recommendations"],"categories":["research","computational biology","genetic engineering"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_profluent-bio__cap_1","uri":"capability://research.off.target.effect.prediction","name":"off-target effect prediction","description":"Predicts potential off-target binding sites and editing events for CRISPR guide RNAs across the genome using AI models. Identifies unintended genomic locations where the guide RNA might cause unwanted edits, enabling researchers to avoid problematic sequences.","intents":["I need to assess the specificity of my guide RNA candidates","I want to identify potential off-target effects before running experiments","I need to select guide RNAs with minimal off-target risk for therapeutic applications"],"best_for":["Gene therapy developers","Clinical research teams","Researchers working with therapeutic CRISPR applications","Teams with strict safety requirements"],"limitations":["Predictions are computational estimates, not experimental validation","Accuracy varies depending on guide RNA sequence complexity","May miss novel off-target sites not represented in training data","Requires complete reference genome for analysis"],"requires":["Guide RNA sequences","Reference genome data","Understanding of acceptable off-target thresholds"],"input_types":["Guide RNA sequences","Target organism genome","Mismatch tolerance parameters"],"output_types":["Off-target site predictions","Off-target risk scores","Specificity rankings"],"categories":["research","computational biology","safety assessment"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_profluent-bio__cap_2","uri":"capability://research.computational.guide.rna.pre.filtering","name":"computational guide rna pre-filtering","description":"Automatically filters and ranks large pools of candidate guide RNAs based on predicted performance metrics, reducing the number of sequences researchers need to experimentally validate. Prioritizes candidates most likely to succeed in wet-lab experiments.","intents":["I want to reduce the cost and time of experimental guide RNA validation","I need to prioritize which guide RNAs to test first in the lab","I want to minimize wasted resources on low-performing guide RNA candidates"],"best_for":["Research teams with large screening campaigns","Resource-constrained academic labs","Biotech companies optimizing development timelines","High-throughput CRISPR screening projects"],"limitations":["Computational predictions may not perfectly correlate with experimental results","Cell-type specific effects not captured in general models","Requires sufficient candidate pool to be effective","Does not account for delivery efficiency or cellular context"],"requires":["Multiple candidate guide RNA sequences","Target gene information","Computational resources for analysis"],"input_types":["Batch of guide RNA sequences","Target specifications","Performance criteria thresholds"],"output_types":["Ranked guide RNA list","Performance score distribution","Recommended subset for validation"],"categories":["research","optimization","computational biology"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_profluent-bio__cap_3","uri":"capability://research.genomic.sequence.analysis.with.ai.models","name":"genomic sequence analysis with ai models","description":"Analyzes genomic sequences using transformer-based language models to extract features relevant to CRISPR editing outcomes. Identifies sequence characteristics that correlate with editing efficiency and specificity.","intents":["I want to understand what sequence features make a good CRISPR target","I need to analyze genomic context around my target sites","I want to predict how sequence composition affects editing outcomes"],"best_for":["Computational biologists","Genomics researchers","CRISPR method developers","Teams studying CRISPR mechanism"],"limitations":["Model interpretability may be limited due to deep learning complexity","Requires large amounts of training data for accurate predictions","May not capture all biological factors affecting editing","Sequence context effects are organism and cell-type dependent"],"requires":["Genomic sequences in standard formats","Reference genome data","Understanding of CRISPR biology"],"input_types":["DNA sequences (FASTA)","Genomic coordinates","Sequence windows around targets"],"output_types":["Feature importance scores","Sequence characteristic analysis","Predictive performance metrics"],"categories":["research","computational biology","genomics"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_profluent-bio__cap_4","uri":"capability://research.gene.therapy.target.optimization","name":"gene therapy target optimization","description":"Optimizes CRISPR guide RNA selection specifically for therapeutic gene editing applications by balancing on-target efficiency, off-target risk, and other clinical safety considerations. Recommends guide RNAs most suitable for therapeutic use.","intents":["I need to select guide RNAs for a gene therapy clinical application","I want to ensure my CRISPR design meets therapeutic safety standards","I need to optimize for both efficacy and safety in therapeutic contexts"],"best_for":["Gene therapy companies","Clinical research teams","Therapeutic CRISPR developers","Regulatory-focused research groups"],"limitations":["Computational predictions cannot fully replace clinical validation","Therapeutic requirements vary by disease and target tissue","Does not account for delivery method or in vivo performance","Regulatory standards may evolve faster than model updates"],"requires":["Therapeutic target specification","Safety requirement thresholds","Target tissue information","Regulatory framework understanding"],"input_types":["Target gene sequences","Therapeutic safety parameters","Clinical context information"],"output_types":["Optimized guide RNA recommendations","Safety assessment reports","Clinical suitability scores"],"categories":["research","therapeutic development","safety assessment"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_profluent-bio__cap_5","uri":"capability://research.crispr.experiment.design.acceleration","name":"crispr experiment design acceleration","description":"Streamlines the entire CRISPR experimental design workflow by computationally pre-validating guide RNA candidates before wet-lab work begins. Reduces iteration cycles and failed experiments by prioritizing high-confidence candidates.","intents":["I want to accelerate my CRISPR project timeline","I need to reduce the number of failed experimental iterations","I want to make better decisions about which experiments to run first"],"best_for":["Research teams with time-sensitive projects","Budget-constrained academic labs","Biotech companies optimizing development speed","Large-scale screening projects"],"limitations":["Computational predictions have inherent error rates","Wet-lab validation still required for final confirmation","Cell-type and delivery method effects not fully captured","Requires upfront computational investment before experiments"],"requires":["Clear experimental objectives","Target gene information","Access to Profluent Bio platform","Experimental validation capability"],"input_types":["Target specifications","Experimental parameters","Candidate guide RNA sequences"],"output_types":["Prioritized experimental plan","Guide RNA recommendations","Expected success probability estimates"],"categories":["research","workflow optimization","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":43,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"low","permissions":["Target gene sequence information","Access to Profluent Bio platform","Basic understanding of CRISPR methodology","Guide RNA sequences","Reference genome data","Understanding of acceptable off-target thresholds","Multiple candidate guide RNA sequences","Target gene information","Computational resources for analysis","Genomic sequences in standard formats"],"failure_modes":["Requires institutional access and budget","Limited independent validation compared to established tools","Accuracy depends on quality of training data","May not generalize well to non-human organisms without retraining","Predictions are computational estimates, not experimental validation","Accuracy varies depending on guide RNA sequence complexity","May miss novel off-target sites not represented in training data","Requires complete reference genome for analysis","Computational predictions may not perfectly correlate with experimental results","Cell-type specific effects not captured in general models","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.39999999999999997,"quality":0.77,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:32.438Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.544Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=profluent-bio","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=profluent-bio"}},"signature":"rbc0Js+FYTOsTk54Xy4xp3Atmar1vaa4wLGWbBkkdd3R/Cm7Hlh0+RLjqHHQXEAmXq5dQkgBV3KhCHMgEaaTBw==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T23:37:10.826Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/profluent-bio","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/profluent-bio","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=profluent-bio","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}