{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"awesome-privategpt","slug":"privategpt","name":"privateGPT","type":"repo","url":"https://github.com/zylon-ai/private-gpt","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/privategpt","categories":["automation"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"awesome-privategpt__cap_0","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.local.document.embedding.and.indexing","name":"local-document-embedding-and-indexing","description":"Converts documents into vector embeddings using local embedding models (no cloud calls) and stores them in a local vector database for semantic search. Uses a pluggable embedding provider architecture that supports multiple embedding models (e.g., sentence-transformers, Ollama embeddings) and vector stores (Chroma, Weaviate, Milvus), enabling fully offline document indexing without external API dependencies.","intents":["I want to index my proprietary documents locally without sending them to cloud services","I need to embed documents using open-source models that run on my hardware","I want to switch between different embedding models and vector databases without code changes"],"best_for":["enterprises with data privacy requirements","teams working with sensitive/proprietary documents","developers building offline-first RAG systems"],"limitations":["embedding quality depends on chosen model; smaller models (e.g., MiniLM) trade accuracy for speed","vector database performance degrades with very large document collections (>1M embeddings) without proper indexing tuning","no built-in incremental re-indexing; full re-index required for document updates"],"requires":["Python 3.9+","sufficient disk space for vector database and embedding models (varies by model, typically 500MB-2GB)","GPU optional but recommended for faster embedding generation"],"input_types":["PDF","DOCX","TXT","Markdown","CSV"],"output_types":["vector embeddings (float arrays)","indexed document chunks with metadata"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-privategpt__cap_1","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.offline.llm.inference.with.provider.abstraction","name":"offline-llm-inference-with-provider-abstraction","description":"Executes LLM inference locally using pluggable LLM providers (Ollama, LlamaCPP, local Hugging Face models) or connects to local/self-hosted endpoints without internet connectivity. Implements a provider abstraction layer that normalizes different LLM APIs (streaming, token counting, model parameters) into a unified interface, allowing seamless switching between models and inference engines.","intents":["I want to run LLM inference on my local machine without cloud API calls","I need to switch between different open-source models (Llama, Mistral, etc.) without rewriting code","I want to use a self-hosted LLM endpoint while maintaining the same application code"],"best_for":["organizations with strict data residency requirements","developers building privacy-first AI applications","teams experimenting with multiple open-source LLM models"],"limitations":["inference latency significantly higher than cloud APIs (2-10x slower depending on hardware and model size)","limited to models that fit in available VRAM; quantization required for consumer GPUs","no built-in load balancing or failover between multiple local endpoints"],"requires":["Python 3.9+","Ollama installed (for Ollama provider) OR LlamaCPP compiled (for LlamaCPP provider)","GPU with 4GB+ VRAM for reasonable inference speed, or CPU-only (very slow)","model weights downloaded locally (2GB-70GB+ depending on model)"],"input_types":["text prompts","conversation history"],"output_types":["text completions","streaming token responses"],"categories":["text-generation-language","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-privategpt__cap_10","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.batch.document.ingestion.and.indexing","name":"batch-document-ingestion-and-indexing","description":"Processes multiple documents in batch mode, parsing, chunking, embedding, and indexing them into the vector database with progress tracking and error handling. Implements parallel processing where possible (embedding generation, parsing) to reduce total ingestion time, with resumable indexing for interrupted batches.","intents":["I want to index a large collection of documents efficiently","I need progress feedback while documents are being processed","I want to handle errors gracefully without losing already-indexed documents"],"best_for":["teams with large document collections (100+ documents)","applications requiring periodic document updates","developers optimizing ingestion performance"],"limitations":["parallel processing increases memory usage; may require tuning for resource-constrained environments","no built-in deduplication; duplicate documents will be indexed separately","resumable indexing requires state persistence; not available without external storage"],"requires":["Python 3.9+","sufficient disk space for vector database","sufficient RAM for parallel processing (varies by batch size and model)"],"input_types":["document files (multiple formats)","directory paths"],"output_types":["indexing progress reports","error logs","indexed document count"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-privategpt__cap_2","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.document.chunking.and.context.windowing","name":"document-chunking-and-context-windowing","description":"Splits documents into semantically-aware chunks using configurable strategies (fixed-size, recursive, semantic boundaries) and manages context windows for LLM consumption. Implements chunk overlap and metadata preservation to maintain document structure and enable accurate source attribution, with support for different chunking strategies per document type.","intents":["I need to split large documents into chunks that fit within LLM context windows","I want chunks to respect semantic boundaries (paragraphs, sections) rather than arbitrary token counts","I need to track which original document and page each chunk came from for citation"],"best_for":["developers building document QA systems","teams needing precise source attribution in LLM responses","applications processing mixed document types (PDFs, web pages, code)"],"limitations":["semantic chunking requires additional NLP processing, adding 10-50ms per document","no automatic optimization of chunk size based on LLM context window; requires manual tuning","metadata preservation depends on input document format; PDFs may lose structural information"],"requires":["Python 3.9+","document parser library (PyPDF2, python-docx, etc.)","tokenizer for accurate token counting (tiktoken or model-specific)"],"input_types":["raw document text","parsed document content with metadata"],"output_types":["document chunks with metadata","chunk-to-source mappings"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-privategpt__cap_3","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.multi.document.question.answering.with.retrieval","name":"multi-document-question-answering-with-retrieval","description":"Orchestrates a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipeline that retrieves relevant document chunks via semantic search, constructs a context-aware prompt, and generates answers using local LLMs. Implements ranking and filtering of retrieved chunks to manage context window constraints, with support for follow-up questions that maintain conversation history.","intents":["I want to ask questions about my documents and get answers grounded in their content","I need the system to cite which documents were used to answer my question","I want to have multi-turn conversations where follow-up questions understand previous context"],"best_for":["teams building internal knowledge bases","enterprises with document-heavy workflows (legal, medical, technical)","developers creating chatbots for proprietary data"],"limitations":["answer quality depends on retrieval quality; irrelevant chunks in context can degrade LLM output","no built-in handling of contradictory information across documents","conversation history grows unbounded; requires manual pruning for long conversations"],"requires":["Python 3.9+","indexed document embeddings (from local-document-embedding-and-indexing capability)","local LLM provider configured (from offline-llm-inference-with-provider-abstraction capability)","vector database with semantic search support"],"input_types":["natural language questions","conversation history"],"output_types":["text answers","source document references","confidence scores (optional)"],"categories":["text-generation-language","memory-knowledge","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-privategpt__cap_4","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.document.format.parsing.and.extraction","name":"document-format-parsing-and-extraction","description":"Extracts text and metadata from multiple document formats (PDF, DOCX, TXT, Markdown, CSV) using format-specific parsers and preserves structural information (headings, tables, page numbers). Implements a pluggable parser architecture that allows adding custom parsers for additional formats without modifying core logic.","intents":["I want to ingest documents in various formats without manual conversion","I need to preserve document structure (sections, tables) during parsing","I want to extract metadata like page numbers and document titles for citation"],"best_for":["teams processing heterogeneous document collections","applications requiring precise source attribution","developers building document ingestion pipelines"],"limitations":["PDF parsing quality varies; scanned PDFs require OCR (not built-in)","table extraction from PDFs is lossy; complex layouts may not preserve structure","no automatic language detection; assumes UTF-8 encoding"],"requires":["Python 3.9+","format-specific libraries (PyPDF2, python-docx, etc.)","optional: Tesseract for OCR on scanned PDFs"],"input_types":["PDF files","DOCX files","TXT files","Markdown files","CSV files"],"output_types":["extracted text","document metadata (title, author, page count)","structural information (headings, sections)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-privategpt__cap_5","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.conversation.history.management.with.context.pruning","name":"conversation-history-management-with-context-pruning","description":"Maintains multi-turn conversation state by storing and retrieving message history, with automatic context pruning strategies to prevent exceeding LLM context windows. Implements sliding window, summarization, and selective retention approaches to manage conversation length while preserving semantic continuity.","intents":["I want to have multi-turn conversations where the LLM remembers previous questions","I need to prevent context window overflow in long conversations","I want to control how much conversation history is retained for cost/performance reasons"],"best_for":["applications with interactive chat interfaces","teams building conversational document QA systems","developers optimizing for LLM token usage"],"limitations":["context pruning strategies may lose important information from early conversation turns","no built-in persistence; conversation history lost on application restart without external storage","summarization-based pruning requires additional LLM calls, increasing latency"],"requires":["Python 3.9+","local LLM provider for summarization (if using summarization pruning strategy)"],"input_types":["user messages","assistant responses"],"output_types":["conversation history","pruned context for LLM prompt"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-privategpt__cap_6","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.web.ui.for.document.interaction","name":"web-ui-for-document-interaction","description":"Provides a web-based interface (built with modern frontend framework) for uploading documents, asking questions, and viewing answers with source citations. Implements real-time streaming responses, document management UI, and conversation history display without requiring backend API knowledge.","intents":["I want a user-friendly interface to interact with my documents without command-line usage","I need to upload documents through a web UI and see them indexed","I want to see streaming responses and source citations in real-time"],"best_for":["non-technical users interacting with document QA systems","teams deploying privateGPT as an internal tool","developers prototyping RAG applications quickly"],"limitations":["web UI performance depends on backend inference speed; slow LLMs create poor UX","no built-in user authentication; requires reverse proxy for multi-user deployments","file upload size limits depend on server configuration (typically 100MB-1GB)"],"requires":["Python 3.9+ (backend)","modern web browser (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge)","local privateGPT instance running"],"input_types":["document files (via file upload)","text questions (via text input)"],"output_types":["rendered HTML responses","streaming text responses","source document references"],"categories":["text-generation-language","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-privategpt__cap_7","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.configurable.llm.and.embedding.provider.selection","name":"configurable-llm-and-embedding-provider-selection","description":"Exposes configuration options (via YAML, environment variables, or code) to select and customize LLM providers, embedding models, vector databases, and other components at runtime. Implements a dependency injection pattern that allows swapping implementations without code changes, supporting multiple configuration sources with precedence rules.","intents":["I want to switch between different LLM models without modifying code","I need to configure embedding models and vector databases for my specific hardware","I want to use environment variables for deployment-specific configuration"],"best_for":["teams deploying privateGPT across different environments","developers experimenting with multiple model combinations","organizations with strict configuration management requirements"],"limitations":["configuration validation is minimal; invalid configurations may fail at runtime","no built-in configuration versioning or rollback","documentation of all configuration options may be incomplete"],"requires":["Python 3.9+","understanding of YAML syntax (if using YAML config)","knowledge of available LLM providers and embedding models"],"input_types":["YAML configuration files","environment variables","Python code configuration"],"output_types":["configured component instances","validation errors"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-privategpt__cap_8","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.streaming.response.generation","name":"streaming-response-generation","description":"Streams LLM responses token-by-token to the client in real-time rather than waiting for complete generation, reducing perceived latency and enabling progressive display of answers. Implements streaming protocol support for both local LLM providers (Ollama, LlamaCPP) and API-based providers, with proper handling of stream interruption and error states.","intents":["I want to see LLM responses appear in real-time rather than waiting for full completion","I need to display streaming responses in a web UI with progressive rendering","I want to cancel long-running LLM generations mid-stream"],"best_for":["interactive chat applications","web-based document QA interfaces","developers optimizing perceived performance"],"limitations":["streaming adds complexity to error handling; partial responses may be displayed before errors occur","token-by-token streaming prevents certain post-processing (e.g., reranking entire response)","web UI must implement proper streaming protocol support (Server-Sent Events or WebSocket)"],"requires":["Python 3.9+","LLM provider with streaming support (Ollama, LlamaCPP, OpenAI API)","web framework with streaming response support (FastAPI, Flask)"],"input_types":["LLM prompts"],"output_types":["streamed text tokens","completion metadata"],"categories":["text-generation-language","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-privategpt__cap_9","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.source.attribution.and.citation.tracking","name":"source-attribution-and-citation-tracking","description":"Tracks which document chunks contributed to each LLM answer and provides source citations with document names, page numbers, and chunk references. Implements metadata propagation through the RAG pipeline to maintain source information from retrieval through generation, enabling users to verify answer provenance.","intents":["I want to know which documents were used to answer my question","I need to cite sources when presenting answers to stakeholders","I want to verify that answers are grounded in actual document content"],"best_for":["applications requiring answer transparency","teams in regulated industries (legal, medical, finance)","developers building trustworthy AI systems"],"limitations":["citation accuracy depends on LLM not hallucinating sources; no automatic verification","metadata loss during document parsing reduces citation precision","no built-in deduplication of similar sources in citation lists"],"requires":["Python 3.9+","document metadata preserved during parsing (from document-format-parsing-and-extraction capability)","chunk metadata stored in vector database"],"input_types":["retrieved document chunks with metadata"],"output_types":["source citations","document references with page numbers"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":24,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Python 3.9+","sufficient disk space for vector database and embedding models (varies by model, typically 500MB-2GB)","GPU optional but recommended for faster embedding generation","Ollama installed (for Ollama provider) OR LlamaCPP compiled (for LlamaCPP provider)","GPU with 4GB+ VRAM for reasonable inference speed, or CPU-only (very slow)","model weights downloaded locally (2GB-70GB+ depending on model)","sufficient disk space for vector database","sufficient RAM for parallel processing (varies by batch size and model)","document parser library (PyPDF2, python-docx, etc.)","tokenizer for accurate token counting (tiktoken or model-specific)"],"failure_modes":["embedding quality depends on chosen model; smaller models (e.g., MiniLM) trade accuracy for speed","vector database performance degrades with very large document collections (>1M embeddings) without proper indexing tuning","no built-in incremental re-indexing; full re-index required for document updates","inference latency significantly higher than cloud APIs (2-10x slower depending on hardware and model size)","limited to models that fit in available VRAM; quantization required for consumer GPUs","no built-in load balancing or failover between multiple local endpoints","parallel processing increases memory usage; may require tuning for resource-constrained environments","no built-in deduplication; duplicate documents will be indexed separately","resumable indexing requires state persistence; not available without external storage","semantic chunking requires additional NLP processing, adding 10-50ms per document","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.32,"ecosystem":0.39999999999999997,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.52,"weights":{"adoption":0.3,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.3,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:04.047Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:00:20.516Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=privategpt","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=privategpt"}},"signature":"wT5JwVYI65qDP8vRZLv/Tdf4U/NBpoCFf5WJ2lGOrSefMcSiZs2VNkJvKEokGkrSTGlFTJIAfARQS3QUW/bGCw==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T14:26:46.810Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/privategpt","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/privategpt","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=privategpt","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}