{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"hf-dataset-princeton-nlp--swe-bench_verified","slug":"princeton-nlp--swe-bench_verified","name":"SWE-bench_Verified","type":"dataset","url":"https://huggingface.co/datasets/princeton-nlp/SWE-bench_Verified","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/princeton-nlp--swe-bench_verified","categories":["model-training"],"tags":["size_categories:n<1K","format:parquet","modality:text","library:datasets","library:pandas","library:mlcroissant","library:polars","region:us"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"hf-dataset-princeton-nlp--swe-bench_verified__cap_0","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.verified.software.engineering.task.dataset.loading","name":"verified-software-engineering-task-dataset-loading","description":"Loads a curated dataset of 500 real GitHub issues paired with their ground-truth solutions, verified through human review and automated validation. The dataset is distributed in Parquet format optimized for streaming and batch processing, with built-in support for HuggingFace Datasets, Pandas, Polars, and MLCroissant libraries. Each record contains issue description, repository context, and verified fix code, enabling direct evaluation of code generation models on authentic software engineering tasks.","intents":["Load and iterate over verified software engineering benchmarks for model evaluation","Access ground-truth solutions for real GitHub issues to validate code generation outputs","Stream large-scale task datasets efficiently without loading entire dataset into memory","Convert benchmark data between formats (Parquet, CSV, Arrow) for different analysis pipelines"],"best_for":["ML researchers evaluating code generation and software engineering AI models","Teams building and fine-tuning LLM agents for autonomous code repair and issue resolution","Benchmark maintainers and dataset curators validating model performance on real-world tasks"],"limitations":["Dataset size is fixed at 500 verified instances — insufficient for training large models from scratch, primarily designed for evaluation","Verification process is human-in-the-loop, introducing potential annotation bias and limiting scalability to new domains","All tasks are GitHub-sourced Python repositories — limited coverage of other languages, frameworks, and non-open-source codebases","No built-in temporal versioning — snapshot represents specific point in time, may not reflect evolving best practices or security patches"],"requires":["HuggingFace Datasets library (datasets>=2.0.0)","Python 3.7+","Pandas (pandas>=1.0.0) or Polars (polars>=0.14.0) for data manipulation","Internet connection for initial dataset download from HuggingFace Hub","Minimum 2GB disk space for Parquet files"],"input_types":["dataset identifier string (princeton-nlp/SWE-bench_Verified)","optional split specification (train/test/validation)"],"output_types":["structured records with fields: issue_id, repository, issue_description, base_commit, test_patch, verified_fix","Pandas DataFrame or Polars LazyFrame for analysis","Arrow Table for zero-copy interoperability"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","benchmark-dataset"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-dataset-princeton-nlp--swe-bench_verified__cap_1","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.multi.format.dataset.export.and.conversion","name":"multi-format-dataset-export-and-conversion","description":"Exports verified task records from HuggingFace Hub to multiple serialization formats (Parquet, CSV, Arrow, JSON) with automatic schema preservation and type inference. Supports streaming export for large datasets and batch conversion pipelines using Pandas, Polars, or MLCroissant metadata standards. Enables seamless integration with downstream analysis tools, ML frameworks, and data warehouses without manual schema mapping.","intents":["Export benchmark data to CSV or JSON for sharing with collaborators or uploading to analysis platforms","Convert Parquet to Arrow format for zero-copy in-memory processing in PyArrow-based pipelines","Serialize dataset splits for reproducible model evaluation across different compute environments","Generate MLCroissant metadata for FAIR dataset documentation and automated discovery"],"best_for":["Data engineers building ETL pipelines that consume benchmark data from multiple sources","Researchers sharing datasets with collaborators using different tools (Excel, R, SQL databases)","ML practitioners integrating benchmarks into existing PyTorch/TensorFlow training pipelines"],"limitations":["CSV export loses nested structure — complex fields (test patches, code diffs) require custom serialization logic","No built-in compression for export — CSV/JSON files are 3-5x larger than Parquet, increasing storage and transfer costs","MLCroissant export is metadata-only — does not automatically generate complete FAIR documentation, requires manual annotation of provenance and licensing"],"requires":["Pandas (pandas>=1.0.0) for DataFrame operations","Polars (polars>=0.14.0) as optional high-performance alternative","PyArrow (pyarrow>=1.0.0) for Arrow serialization","Write permissions to target filesystem or cloud storage (S3, GCS)"],"input_types":["HuggingFace Dataset object or loaded Parquet file","target format specification (csv, json, arrow, parquet)","optional column selection or filtering predicates"],"output_types":["CSV files with comma-separated values","JSON Lines format (one record per line)","Apache Arrow IPC format (.arrow files)","MLCroissant JSON-LD metadata"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-dataset-princeton-nlp--swe-bench_verified__cap_2","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.benchmark.task.filtering.and.stratification","name":"benchmark-task-filtering-and-stratification","description":"Filters and stratifies the 500 verified tasks by repository characteristics (language, size, test coverage), issue properties (complexity, category), and solution properties (lines changed, test pass rate) using declarative query syntax. Enables creation of balanced evaluation subsets for targeted model assessment — e.g., isolating tasks requiring specific capabilities or controlling for dataset bias. Supports both eager filtering (in-memory) and lazy evaluation (deferred computation) for memory-efficient processing.","intents":["Create balanced evaluation subsets that control for repository size, language, or complexity to isolate model capabilities","Stratify benchmark by issue category (bug fix, feature request, refactoring) to measure model performance on specific task types","Filter tasks by solution complexity (lines changed, test coverage impact) to evaluate model scaling with problem difficulty","Generate ablation study datasets by excluding specific repositories or issue types to measure model robustness"],"best_for":["ML researchers conducting controlled ablation studies and capability analysis of code generation models","Teams evaluating model performance on specific domains (e.g., only web framework issues or security-critical fixes)","Benchmark curators identifying and removing potential data leakage or distribution shift"],"limitations":["Filtering reduces dataset size — stratified subsets may be too small (<50 tasks) for statistically significant evaluation","No built-in stratification by semantic similarity — cannot automatically identify and balance by problem type without external embeddings","Lazy evaluation requires compatible downstream tools — some analysis libraries force eager materialization, negating memory benefits"],"requires":["HuggingFace Datasets library with filter() and select() methods","Pandas or Polars for advanced groupby and stratification operations","Optional: knowledge of dataset schema and available metadata fields"],"input_types":["HuggingFace Dataset object","filter predicates (lambda functions or column comparisons)","stratification keys (column names for grouping)"],"output_types":["filtered Dataset subset with same schema","stratified splits as multiple Dataset objects","summary statistics (count, distribution) of filtered tasks"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-dataset-princeton-nlp--swe-bench_verified__cap_3","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.ground.truth.solution.validation.and.reproducibility","name":"ground-truth-solution-validation-and-reproducibility","description":"Provides verified ground-truth solutions for each task with reproducible validation — each fix includes the exact test commands, expected outputs, and commit hashes needed to reproduce the solution in the original repository context. Enables deterministic evaluation by specifying exact Python versions, dependency versions, and environment configurations. Validation is performed through automated test execution against the original issue reproduction steps, ensuring solutions actually resolve the reported problem.","intents":["Validate model-generated fixes against ground-truth solutions using exact test commands and expected outputs","Reproduce solutions in isolated environments with pinned dependencies to ensure evaluation consistency across runs","Compare model outputs to verified fixes using semantic equivalence checks (AST comparison, test pass rate) rather than string matching","Audit solution quality and identify edge cases where ground-truth fixes may be incomplete or incorrect"],"best_for":["Researchers implementing evaluation harnesses that need deterministic, reproducible test execution","Teams building automated code review systems that compare generated fixes to verified solutions","Benchmark maintainers validating dataset quality and identifying annotation errors"],"limitations":["Reproducibility requires exact environment setup — solutions may fail if Python version, OS, or dependency versions differ from original","Test execution is repository-specific — no standardized test harness, requires cloning and setting up each repository individually","Ground-truth fixes may be incomplete or suboptimal — human verification does not guarantee solutions are the best possible fix, only that they resolve the issue","No built-in semantic equivalence checking — comparing model outputs to ground-truth requires external tools (AST parsers, test runners)"],"requires":["Git and ability to clone repositories","Python 3.7+ with virtualenv or conda for isolated environments","Repository-specific dependencies (pip packages, system libraries)","Test runner compatible with original repository (pytest, unittest, etc.)"],"input_types":["task record with base_commit, test_patch, and verified_fix fields","model-generated code to validate","optional: custom equivalence checking function"],"output_types":["boolean validation result (fix passes original tests)","test execution logs and error messages","semantic equivalence score (if using AST comparison)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-dataset-princeton-nlp--swe-bench_verified__cap_4","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.model.evaluation.harness.integration","name":"model-evaluation-harness-integration","description":"Provides standardized interfaces for integrating the benchmark into model evaluation pipelines, with built-in support for popular frameworks (HuggingFace Transformers, LangChain, LLaMA Index). Includes evaluation metrics (pass@k, exact match, test pass rate) and utilities for logging results to experiment tracking systems (Weights & Biases, MLflow). Enables end-to-end evaluation workflows from model inference through result aggregation and comparison.","intents":["Integrate benchmark into existing model evaluation pipelines without custom data loading code","Compute standard metrics (pass@k, test pass rate) for comparing model performance across runs","Log evaluation results to experiment tracking systems for reproducible benchmarking and hyperparameter tuning","Generate evaluation reports comparing multiple models on the same benchmark subset"],"best_for":["ML engineers building evaluation infrastructure for code generation models","Researchers comparing multiple models on SWE-bench using standardized metrics","Teams integrating benchmarks into CI/CD pipelines for continuous model evaluation"],"limitations":["Evaluation harness is framework-agnostic but requires custom adapters for non-standard model architectures","Metrics computation assumes deterministic test execution — flaky tests or non-deterministic behavior will skew results","No built-in distributed evaluation — large-scale evaluation across multiple GPUs requires external orchestration (Ray, Slurm)"],"requires":["HuggingFace Datasets library","Optional: HuggingFace Transformers (transformers>=4.0.0) for model loading","Optional: Weights & Biases (wandb>=0.12.0) or MLflow (mlflow>=1.0.0) for experiment tracking","Python 3.7+"],"input_types":["model (HuggingFace model ID or local checkpoint)","benchmark dataset (SWE-bench_Verified or filtered subset)","evaluation configuration (metrics, batch size, timeout)"],"output_types":["evaluation metrics (pass@k, test pass rate, exact match rate)","per-task results (model output, ground-truth, validation status)","experiment logs (model config, hyperparameters, timestamp)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":23,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["HuggingFace Datasets library (datasets>=2.0.0)","Python 3.7+","Pandas (pandas>=1.0.0) or Polars (polars>=0.14.0) for data manipulation","Internet connection for initial dataset download from HuggingFace Hub","Minimum 2GB disk space for Parquet files","Pandas (pandas>=1.0.0) for DataFrame operations","Polars (polars>=0.14.0) as optional high-performance alternative","PyArrow (pyarrow>=1.0.0) for Arrow serialization","Write permissions to target filesystem or cloud storage (S3, GCS)","HuggingFace Datasets library with filter() and select() methods"],"failure_modes":["Dataset size is fixed at 500 verified instances — insufficient for training large models from scratch, primarily designed for evaluation","Verification process is human-in-the-loop, introducing potential annotation bias and limiting scalability to new domains","All tasks are GitHub-sourced Python repositories — limited coverage of other languages, frameworks, and non-open-source codebases","No built-in temporal versioning — snapshot represents specific point in time, may not reflect evolving best practices or security patches","CSV export loses nested structure — complex fields (test patches, code diffs) require custom serialization logic","No built-in compression for export — CSV/JSON files are 3-5x larger than Parquet, increasing storage and transfer costs","MLCroissant export is metadata-only — does not automatically generate complete FAIR documentation, requires manual annotation of provenance and licensing","Filtering reduces dataset size — stratified subsets may be too small (<50 tasks) for statistically significant evaluation","No built-in stratification by semantic similarity — cannot automatically identify and balance by problem type without external embeddings","Lazy evaluation requires compatible downstream tools — some analysis libraries force eager materialization, negating memory benefits","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.5000000000000001,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.3,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.3,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:22.764Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:22:48.064Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=princeton-nlp--swe-bench_verified","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=princeton-nlp--swe-bench_verified"}},"signature":"FlPIy0OJEZoq7+HYwVgywjBkD3zFlyjvz/L7N00D73beVRy5PNXTP4R2empp1yg4FohD0Oem25cqHj7hJLSmDQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-23T03:11:32.736Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/princeton-nlp--swe-bench_verified","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/princeton-nlp--swe-bench_verified","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=princeton-nlp--swe-bench_verified","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}