{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"awesome-perplexity","slug":"perplexity","name":"Perplexity","type":"mcp","url":"https://github.com/tanigami/mcp-server-perplexity","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/perplexity","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"awesome-perplexity__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.real.time.web.search.with.ai.synthesis.via.mcp.protocol","name":"real-time web search with ai synthesis via mcp protocol","description":"Implements a Model Context Protocol server that bridges Perplexity's real-time search API with LLM applications, enabling structured queries that return synthesized answers with source citations. The MCP server translates tool-call requests into Perplexity API calls, handles response parsing, and returns results in a format compatible with Claude, LLaMA, and other MCP-aware LLMs. Uses JSON-RPC 2.0 message framing over stdio/HTTP transports to maintain stateless request-response semantics.","intents":["Query current events and real-time information without training data cutoff limitations","Retrieve web search results with AI-synthesized summaries instead of raw link lists","Integrate live web search into multi-step LLM reasoning chains and agent workflows","Ground LLM responses in cited sources to reduce hallucinations on factual queries"],"best_for":["LLM application developers building agents that need current information","Teams integrating Perplexity search into Claude-based workflows via MCP","Builders creating research assistants that require source attribution"],"limitations":["Perplexity API rate limits apply per account tier — no built-in queuing or backoff strategy","Synthesis quality depends on Perplexity's backend model; no control over answer generation parameters","MCP protocol adds ~100-300ms latency per request due to JSON-RPC serialization and transport overhead","No caching layer — identical queries to Perplexity incur full API costs each time"],"requires":["Perplexity API key with active subscription","MCP-compatible LLM client (Claude Desktop, custom LLM app with MCP support)","Node.js 16+ or Python 3.8+ depending on server implementation","Network access to Perplexity API endpoints"],"input_types":["natural language search queries","structured search parameters (topic, search_type, etc.)"],"output_types":["synthesized text answer","structured citation metadata with URLs","confidence/relevance scores"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-perplexity__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.tool.registration.and.schema.based.function.calling","name":"mcp tool registration and schema-based function calling","description":"Registers Perplexity search as a callable tool within the MCP ecosystem by defining a JSON schema that describes input parameters, output format, and tool metadata. The server implements the MCP tools/list and tools/call RPC methods, allowing LLM clients to discover available tools, validate inputs against the schema, and invoke search with type-safe parameters. Uses JSON Schema Draft 7 for parameter validation and supports optional tool hints for LLM routing.","intents":["Enable LLM clients to discover Perplexity search as an available tool without hardcoding","Validate search query parameters before sending to Perplexity API to catch malformed requests early","Allow LLMs to route queries to Perplexity vs other tools based on tool descriptions and capabilities","Maintain compatibility with future MCP tool extensions without breaking existing integrations"],"best_for":["LLM framework developers implementing MCP tool discovery","Agent builders who need type-safe tool invocation with schema validation","Teams standardizing on MCP for multi-tool orchestration"],"limitations":["Schema validation is synchronous — complex nested schemas may add 10-50ms per validation","No built-in tool versioning — breaking schema changes require client-side updates","LLM routing decisions based on tool descriptions are heuristic and may not always select the optimal tool","MCP spec does not support conditional tool availability — all registered tools are always advertised"],"requires":["MCP client implementation that supports tools/list and tools/call RPC methods","JSON Schema understanding in the LLM client for parameter validation","MCP protocol version 1.0 or later"],"input_types":["JSON schema definitions","tool invocation requests with typed parameters"],"output_types":["tool metadata and schema","validation results","tool execution results"],"categories":["tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-perplexity__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.stateless.request.response.mcp.server.over.stdio.http.transports","name":"stateless request-response mcp server over stdio/http transports","description":"Implements a stateless MCP server that communicates via JSON-RPC 2.0 messages over stdio (for local integration) or HTTP (for remote access). Each request is independently routed to the appropriate handler (search, tool listing, etc.) without maintaining session state or connection context. The server uses a simple message dispatcher pattern to map RPC method names to handler functions, enabling lightweight deployment as a subprocess or containerized service.","intents":["Run Perplexity search as a subprocess within Claude Desktop or other MCP clients","Deploy Perplexity search as a remote MCP server accessible over HTTP from multiple LLM clients","Integrate Perplexity into existing MCP server infrastructure without state management complexity","Scale Perplexity search horizontally by running stateless server instances behind a load balancer"],"best_for":["Developers deploying MCP servers as lightweight subprocesses","Teams running containerized MCP services in Kubernetes or Docker","Builders who want minimal operational overhead (no database, no session store)"],"limitations":["Statelessness means no built-in request deduplication — identical concurrent queries both hit Perplexity API","No connection pooling — each HTTP request creates a new Perplexity API call","Stdio transport is single-threaded and blocks on I/O — high concurrency requires multiple server processes","HTTP transport requires explicit authentication (API key in headers) — no session-based auth"],"requires":["JSON-RPC 2.0 compatible client","stdio or HTTP connectivity to the server","Perplexity API key passed at server startup or via environment variable"],"input_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 request objects"],"output_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 response objects","error responses with standardized error codes"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-perplexity__cap_3","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.perplexity.api.credential.management.and.request.signing","name":"perplexity api credential management and request signing","description":"Manages Perplexity API authentication by accepting an API key at server initialization and injecting it into all outbound Perplexity API requests via HTTP headers. The server handles credential validation (checking for missing or malformed keys) and propagates authentication errors back to the MCP client. Uses environment variables or configuration files to avoid hardcoding secrets in code.","intents":["Securely pass Perplexity API credentials to the MCP server without exposing them in client code","Validate API keys before making expensive Perplexity API calls","Support multiple Perplexity accounts by allowing credential rotation or per-request key specification","Fail gracefully when credentials are missing or invalid"],"best_for":["Developers deploying MCP servers in shared or containerized environments","Teams managing multiple Perplexity API accounts across different projects","Security-conscious builders who want to keep API keys out of client code"],"limitations":["API key is stored in memory — no encryption at rest; compromise of the server process exposes the key","No built-in key rotation — requires server restart to update credentials","No audit logging of API key usage — cannot track which requests used which credentials","Environment variable approach is vulnerable to process inspection tools"],"requires":["Valid Perplexity API key with active subscription","Ability to set environment variables or pass config at server startup"],"input_types":["API key string (from environment or config)"],"output_types":["authentication status (success/failure)","error messages for invalid credentials"],"categories":["safety-moderation","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-perplexity__cap_4","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.search.result.parsing.and.source.citation.extraction","name":"search result parsing and source citation extraction","description":"Parses Perplexity API responses to extract synthesized answer text, source URLs, and citation metadata. The parser maps Perplexity's response schema (which may include nested citations, confidence scores, and related queries) into a normalized output format suitable for MCP clients. Handles edge cases like missing citations, malformed URLs, and partial responses from Perplexity.","intents":["Extract structured citation data from Perplexity responses for attribution in LLM outputs","Normalize Perplexity's response format into a consistent schema for downstream processing","Handle Perplexity API schema changes without breaking MCP client integrations","Provide fallback behavior when Perplexity returns incomplete or malformed responses"],"best_for":["Builders who need source attribution in search results for transparency","Teams integrating Perplexity with multiple LLM clients that expect different response formats","Developers who want to decouple their code from Perplexity's API schema"],"limitations":["Parser is tightly coupled to Perplexity's current response schema — API changes require code updates","Citation extraction assumes Perplexity includes source metadata — may fail silently if Perplexity changes response format","No validation of extracted URLs — malformed or unreachable URLs are passed through unchanged","Parsing adds ~50-100ms latency per response"],"requires":["Perplexity API response in expected JSON format","JSON parsing library (built-in to most languages)"],"input_types":["Perplexity API JSON response"],"output_types":["normalized answer text","structured citation list with URLs","metadata (confidence, search type, etc.)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-perplexity__cap_5","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.error.handling.and.graceful.degradation.for.api.failures","name":"error handling and graceful degradation for api failures","description":"Implements error handling for Perplexity API failures (rate limits, timeouts, invalid responses) by catching exceptions, mapping them to MCP error codes, and returning structured error responses to the client. The server implements retry logic with exponential backoff for transient failures and provides fallback responses when Perplexity is unavailable. Error messages include diagnostic information (HTTP status, error code, retry-after headers) to help clients decide whether to retry.","intents":["Handle Perplexity API rate limits gracefully without crashing the MCP server","Retry transient failures (network timeouts, temporary unavailability) automatically","Provide meaningful error messages to LLM clients so they can decide whether to retry or use alternative tools","Maintain server stability under adverse conditions (API outages, network issues)"],"best_for":["Production deployments where API reliability is critical","Teams running Perplexity search in high-concurrency environments","Builders who want resilient agent workflows that degrade gracefully"],"limitations":["Retry logic is exponential backoff with fixed max retries — no adaptive strategy based on error type","No circuit breaker pattern — server will continue retrying even if Perplexity is down for extended periods","Timeout values are hardcoded — no per-request timeout customization","Error responses may leak internal details (Perplexity API error messages) that could be sensitive"],"requires":["HTTP client library with timeout support","Retry logic implementation (custom or via library like tenacity/retry)"],"input_types":["Perplexity API errors (HTTP status codes, error responses)"],"output_types":["MCP error responses with standardized error codes","retry-after headers and backoff recommendations"],"categories":["safety-moderation","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":45,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Perplexity API key with active subscription","MCP-compatible LLM client (Claude Desktop, custom LLM app with MCP support)","Node.js 16+ or Python 3.8+ depending on server implementation","Network access to Perplexity API endpoints","MCP client implementation that supports tools/list and tools/call RPC methods","JSON Schema understanding in the LLM client for parameter validation","MCP protocol version 1.0 or later","JSON-RPC 2.0 compatible client","stdio or HTTP connectivity to the server","Perplexity API key passed at server startup or via environment variable"],"failure_modes":["Perplexity API rate limits apply per account tier — no built-in queuing or backoff strategy","Synthesis quality depends on Perplexity's backend model; no control over answer generation parameters","MCP protocol adds ~100-300ms latency per request due to JSON-RPC serialization and transport overhead","No caching layer — identical queries to Perplexity incur full API costs each time","Schema validation is synchronous — complex nested schemas may add 10-50ms per validation","No built-in tool versioning — breaking schema changes require client-side updates","LLM routing decisions based on tool descriptions are heuristic and may not always select the optimal tool","MCP spec does not support conditional tool availability — all registered tools are always advertised","Statelessness means no built-in request deduplication — identical concurrent queries both hit Perplexity API","No connection pooling — each HTTP request creates a new Perplexity API call","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.22,"ecosystem":0.39999999999999997,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.52,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:03.579Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:00:15.503Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=perplexity","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=perplexity"}},"signature":"clLB5VjzN6RVKeH49Tv1wOHiKsrfIY77X8DLi3bq8YJsX8gZOhx+Xfe/bfoEP0KnaD2vf55ccEE0sDe6s61zBQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-23T16:05:38.474Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/perplexity","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/perplexity","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=perplexity","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}