{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"percy","slug":"percy","name":"Percy","type":"product","url":"https://percy.io","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/percy","categories":["testing-quality"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"free","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"percy__cap_0","uri":"capability://image.visual.cross.browser.screenshot.capture.with.viewport.normalization","name":"cross-browser screenshot capture with viewport normalization","description":"Automatically captures pixel-perfect screenshots of web applications across multiple browser engines (Chromium, Firefox, Safari) and device viewports (mobile, tablet, desktop) by orchestrating headless browser instances and normalizing rendering differences across rendering engines. Percy manages browser automation infrastructure to ensure consistent capture timing, scroll handling, and font rendering across platforms.","intents":["I need to capture how my website looks on Chrome, Firefox, and Safari simultaneously without manual testing","I want to test my responsive design across iPhone, iPad, and desktop viewports in a single CI/CD run","I need baseline screenshots of my application state before making design changes"],"best_for":["frontend teams building responsive web applications","design systems teams maintaining component libraries","QA engineers automating visual regression detection"],"limitations":["Capture latency increases with number of browsers/viewports — typical 2-5 second per page per browser combination","Cannot capture dynamic content that requires user interaction (hover states, animations) without custom snapshot triggers","Browser support limited to Chromium, Firefox, Safari — no IE11 or legacy browser support","Screenshot resolution and rendering may differ slightly from real user browsers due to headless rendering differences"],"requires":["Web application with publicly accessible URL or local development server","Percy SDK integration (Node.js, Python, Ruby, or language-agnostic CLI)","CI/CD environment with network access to application under test"],"input_types":["URL to web application","viewport dimensions (width, height)","browser identifiers (chrome, firefox, safari)"],"output_types":["PNG screenshots","screenshot metadata (browser, viewport, timestamp)"],"categories":["image-visual","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"percy__cap_1","uri":"capability://image.visual.ai.powered.visual.diff.detection.with.intelligent.pixel.comparison","name":"ai-powered visual diff detection with intelligent pixel comparison","description":"Compares current screenshots against baseline snapshots using machine learning-based diffing that distinguishes intentional design changes from noise (anti-aliasing artifacts, font rendering variations, subpixel shifts). The algorithm learns from user-approved diffs to improve accuracy over time, reducing false positives from environment-specific rendering differences while catching genuine visual regressions.","intents":["I need to automatically detect when CSS changes break the visual appearance of my components","I want to ignore minor rendering differences (font smoothing, subpixel shifts) but catch real layout regressions","I need to review only meaningful visual changes without being overwhelmed by noise from different rendering environments"],"best_for":["design-conscious engineering teams with strict visual standards","component library maintainers managing hundreds of component variants","teams with complex CSS/styling where manual visual QA is error-prone"],"limitations":["AI diffing accuracy depends on baseline quality — poor baselines lead to false positives/negatives","Cannot distinguish between intentional and unintentional changes without human review — requires approval workflow","Diffing algorithm details are proprietary — no transparency into what constitutes a 'meaningful' change threshold","Performance degrades with very large screenshots (>4K resolution) — typical diff time 500ms-2s per comparison","No support for animated GIF or video diffs — only static PNG comparison"],"requires":["Baseline screenshots previously approved in Percy","Current screenshots from same application state","Percy account with sufficient snapshot quota"],"input_types":["PNG screenshot (current state)","PNG screenshot (baseline state)","optional: diff sensitivity threshold (low/medium/high)"],"output_types":["visual diff visualization (highlighted regions of change)","diff metadata (pixel count changed, percentage of page affected)","approval/rejection status"],"categories":["image-visual","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"percy__cap_10","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.performance.metrics.and.visual.regression.analytics","name":"performance metrics and visual regression analytics","description":"Tracks visual testing metrics over time (snapshot count, approval rate, regression detection rate, average review time) and provides analytics dashboards showing trends in visual quality. Percy analyzes approval patterns to identify frequently-changed components and high-risk areas, helping teams prioritize visual testing efforts. Supports custom metrics and integration with analytics platforms.","intents":["I want to see trends in visual regressions over time to understand code quality","I need to identify which components change most frequently and require more testing","I want to measure the effectiveness of my visual testing process"],"best_for":["engineering leaders measuring visual quality metrics","teams using data-driven approaches to prioritize testing efforts","organizations tracking visual testing ROI"],"limitations":["Analytics are Percy-specific — no integration with external analytics platforms","Metrics are limited to Percy-captured data — cannot include manual visual testing","Custom metrics require API integration — not available in web UI","Historical data retention depends on pricing tier — free tier may have limited history","No predictive analytics — only historical trend analysis"],"requires":["Percy account with analytics enabled","Sufficient snapshot history (at least 2-4 weeks) for meaningful trends","Optional: API integration for custom metrics"],"input_types":["snapshot data (count, approval status, timestamp)","component metadata (name, category)"],"output_types":["analytics dashboard (HTML/JavaScript)","trend charts (approval rate, regression rate over time)","component-level metrics (change frequency, regression rate)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"percy__cap_11","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.organization.and.team.management.with.role.based.access.control","name":"organization and team management with role-based access control","description":"Provides team management features including user invitations, role-based access control (admin, reviewer, viewer), project organization, and audit logging. Percy allows organizations to structure teams by project, assign different permissions to different roles, and track who made what changes. Supports SSO integration for enterprise organizations.","intents":["I need to invite designers and QA engineers to review visual changes without giving them full admin access","I want to organize visual tests by project and control who can access each project","I need audit logs showing who approved which changes for compliance purposes"],"best_for":["enterprise organizations with multiple teams and projects","regulated industries requiring audit trails and access control","large organizations with formal role-based permission structures"],"limitations":["Role-based access control is limited to basic tiers (admin/reviewer/viewer) — no fine-grained permissions","SSO integration may require enterprise plan — not available on free tier","Audit logging is Percy-specific — no integration with external audit systems","Team management is project-level — no cross-project team hierarchies","No support for custom roles or permission combinations"],"requires":["Percy account with team management enabled","User email addresses for team members to invite","Optional: SSO provider (Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace) for enterprise"],"input_types":["user email address","role (admin/reviewer/viewer)","project assignment"],"output_types":["team member list","audit log (user actions, timestamps)","permission matrix (user × project × role)"],"categories":["safety-moderation","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"percy__cap_2","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.approval.workflow.with.team.collaboration.and.change.history","name":"approval workflow with team collaboration and change history","description":"Provides a web-based interface for teams to review visual diffs, approve or reject changes, add comments, and track approval history. The workflow integrates with CI/CD to block merges until visual changes are explicitly approved, creating an audit trail of who approved what changes and when. Supports batch approvals, bulk rejection, and role-based access control for design review gates.","intents":["I need designers to review and approve visual changes before code merges to production","I want to track who approved which visual changes and when for compliance/audit purposes","I need to prevent accidental visual regressions from being deployed by requiring explicit approval"],"best_for":["cross-functional teams (engineers + designers) with formal change approval processes","regulated industries requiring audit trails for visual changes","design-driven organizations with strict brand/visual standards"],"limitations":["Approval workflow blocks CI/CD until human review — adds 5-60 minute latency depending on team availability","No automated approval rules — all changes require manual review (cannot auto-approve minor changes)","Comment threads are Percy-specific — no integration with GitHub/GitLab PR comments for unified discussion","Role-based access control limited to basic tiers (viewer/reviewer/admin) — no fine-grained permission control","Approval state is Percy-specific — no webhook to notify external systems when changes are approved"],"requires":["Percy account with team members invited","CI/CD integration configured to wait for Percy approval status","GitHub/GitLab/Bitbucket repository connected to Percy"],"input_types":["visual diff comparison (current vs baseline)","reviewer comments (text)","approval decision (approve/reject)"],"output_types":["approval status (approved/rejected/pending)","approval metadata (reviewer name, timestamp, comment)","CI/CD webhook notification (pass/fail)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"percy__cap_3","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.ci.cd.pipeline.integration.with.status.checks.and.merge.blocking","name":"ci/cd pipeline integration with status checks and merge blocking","description":"Integrates Percy into CI/CD workflows via native plugins (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins) and webhook APIs that report visual test status back to the VCS. Percy blocks pull requests/merge requests until visual changes are approved, preventing unreviewed visual changes from reaching production. Supports conditional checks (only block on certain branches) and custom status messages.","intents":["I want my CI/CD pipeline to wait for visual approval before allowing merges to main branch","I need Percy test results to show up as a status check on my GitHub/GitLab pull requests","I want to automatically run visual tests on every commit without manual intervention"],"best_for":["teams using GitHub, GitLab, or Jenkins with existing CI/CD automation","organizations enforcing code review gates and requiring visual approval","teams wanting to shift visual testing left into the development workflow"],"limitations":["Integration latency adds 2-10 minutes to CI/CD pipeline (screenshot capture + diff + approval time)","Webhook-based status checks may have eventual consistency delays (typically <30 seconds)","No native integration with Azure DevOps, CircleCI, or other CI/CD platforms — requires custom webhook implementation","Cannot conditionally approve based on change type (e.g., auto-approve documentation-only changes) — all changes require review","Merge blocking is at VCS level (GitHub/GitLab) — Percy cannot directly prevent merges, relies on status check enforcement"],"requires":["GitHub, GitLab, or Jenkins with appropriate permissions","Percy SDK installed in CI/CD environment","API token for Percy authentication","Network access from CI/CD runner to Percy API and application under test"],"input_types":["CI/CD environment variables (branch name, commit SHA, PR number)","Percy API token","application URL to test"],"output_types":["CI/CD status check (pass/fail/pending)","VCS status notification (GitHub check, GitLab pipeline status)","approval URL for reviewers"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"percy__cap_4","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.snapshot.versioning.and.baseline.management.with.rollback.capability","name":"snapshot versioning and baseline management with rollback capability","description":"Maintains version history of approved baselines, allowing teams to compare against previous versions, rollback to earlier baselines if needed, and track when visual changes were introduced. Each approved snapshot is timestamped and linked to the commit/PR that introduced it, creating a complete visual change history. Supports branching baselines for feature branches and automatic baseline synchronization across branches.","intents":["I need to see what visual changes were introduced in each commit/PR","I want to rollback to a previous visual baseline if a change was approved by mistake","I need separate baselines for feature branches without affecting the main branch baseline"],"best_for":["teams with long-lived feature branches requiring separate visual baselines","organizations needing visual change audit trails for compliance","teams that occasionally approve visual changes by mistake and need rollback capability"],"limitations":["Baseline rollback is manual — no automatic rollback on failed deployments","Branching baselines require explicit configuration — no automatic branch detection","Baseline storage is Percy-specific — no export of baseline history for external analysis","Version history retention depends on pricing tier — free tier may have limited history","No diff between non-consecutive baselines — can only compare current against immediate previous version"],"requires":["Percy account with baseline history enabled","Git repository with branch information passed to Percy"],"input_types":["baseline version identifier (commit SHA, timestamp)","branch name (for branching baselines)"],"output_types":["baseline version history (list of approved baselines with metadata)","visual diff between versions","rollback confirmation"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"percy__cap_5","uri":"capability://image.visual.responsive.design.testing.across.device.breakpoints","name":"responsive design testing across device breakpoints","description":"Automatically captures and tests web applications across predefined device breakpoints (mobile, tablet, desktop) and custom viewport dimensions, detecting responsive design regressions where layouts break at specific screen sizes. Percy manages viewport-specific baselines and diffs, allowing teams to verify that responsive CSS changes work correctly across all target devices without manual testing.","intents":["I need to test my responsive design across iPhone, iPad, and desktop in every CI/CD run","I want to catch responsive layout regressions where my CSS breaks on mobile but not desktop","I need to verify that my media queries work correctly across all target breakpoints"],"best_for":["frontend teams building responsive web applications","mobile-first development teams needing automated responsive testing","design systems teams maintaining responsive component libraries"],"limitations":["Viewport testing is static — cannot test dynamic responsive behavior (orientation changes, window resizing)","Predefined device breakpoints may not match actual user devices — custom viewports required for exact testing","Screenshot count multiplies with each viewport — testing 3 browsers × 5 viewports = 15 screenshots per page","Responsive testing increases CI/CD time proportionally — 5 viewports = ~5x longer capture time","No support for testing touch interactions or mobile-specific features (swipe, pinch)"],"requires":["Responsive web application with CSS media queries","Percy SDK configured with viewport list","CI/CD environment with sufficient time/resources for multi-viewport testing"],"input_types":["viewport dimensions (width, height)","device name (optional, for labeling)","application URL"],"output_types":["responsive design screenshots (one per viewport)","responsive design diffs (changes per viewport)","viewport-specific approval status"],"categories":["image-visual","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"percy__cap_6","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.sdk.based.snapshot.triggering.with.custom.comparison.logic","name":"sdk-based snapshot triggering with custom comparison logic","description":"Provides language-specific SDKs (Node.js, Python, Ruby, JavaScript) that allow developers to programmatically trigger snapshots at specific points in test code, with support for custom comparison logic (ignore regions, custom thresholds, conditional snapshots). SDKs integrate with popular testing frameworks (Cypress, Playwright, Selenium, Puppeteer) to capture snapshots within test execution, enabling fine-grained control over what gets captured and compared.","intents":["I want to capture snapshots at specific points in my Cypress/Playwright tests without manual screenshots","I need to ignore certain regions (ads, timestamps, dynamic content) when comparing visual diffs","I want to conditionally capture snapshots only on certain branches or test conditions"],"best_for":["developers using Cypress, Playwright, or Selenium for end-to-end testing","teams with complex test scenarios requiring fine-grained snapshot control","organizations with dynamic content (ads, timestamps) that need to be ignored in visual diffs"],"limitations":["SDK integration requires code changes to test files — not zero-config","Language support limited to Node.js, Python, Ruby — no Java, Go, or other languages","Custom comparison logic (ignore regions) requires manual configuration per snapshot","SDK latency adds 500ms-2s per snapshot due to API calls and image processing","No built-in support for visual regression detection within tests — requires Percy API calls"],"requires":["Testing framework (Cypress, Playwright, Selenium, Puppeteer, or compatible)","Percy SDK for your language (Node.js, Python, Ruby)","Percy API token","Test code modifications to add snapshot calls"],"input_types":["snapshot name (string identifier)","optional: ignore regions (CSS selectors or coordinates)","optional: custom diff threshold","optional: conditional snapshot logic"],"output_types":["snapshot capture confirmation","diff status (approved/rejected/pending)","diff visualization URL"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"percy__cap_7","uri":"capability://image.visual.ignore.regions.and.dynamic.content.masking.for.noise.reduction","name":"ignore regions and dynamic content masking for noise reduction","description":"Allows developers to define regions of screenshots to ignore during visual diffing (using CSS selectors, coordinates, or element references), masking dynamic content (timestamps, ads, user-specific data) that changes between snapshots but is not relevant to visual testing. Percy's masking engine removes these regions from diff calculations, reducing false positives from non-visual changes while maintaining coverage of intentional visual changes.","intents":["I need to ignore timestamps and dynamic content that changes on every snapshot","I want to exclude third-party ads or tracking pixels from visual diffs","I need to mask user-specific data (names, emails) that appears in screenshots"],"best_for":["applications with dynamic content (timestamps, user data, ads) that change between snapshots","teams with third-party integrations (ads, analytics) that shouldn't affect visual tests","organizations with privacy concerns about capturing user data in screenshots"],"limitations":["Ignore regions must be manually configured per snapshot — no automatic detection of dynamic content","CSS selector-based masking may be fragile if HTML structure changes","Coordinate-based masking is viewport-specific — requires separate configuration per viewport","No support for masking based on content patterns (e.g., 'any timestamp-like string') — only static regions","Masked regions are completely ignored in diffs — cannot detect changes within masked areas"],"requires":["CSS selectors or coordinates for regions to ignore","Percy SDK or web interface to configure ignore regions","Understanding of application layout to identify dynamic regions"],"input_types":["CSS selector (string)","coordinates (x, y, width, height)","element reference (from test code)"],"output_types":["masked screenshot (with regions removed)","diff visualization (excluding masked regions)"],"categories":["image-visual","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"percy__cap_8","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.parallel.snapshot.capture.with.batch.processing","name":"parallel snapshot capture with batch processing","description":"Captures multiple snapshots in parallel across browsers and viewports, batching requests to Percy's infrastructure to reduce total test time. Percy's backend orchestrates parallel browser instances and image processing, allowing teams to test dozens of snapshots across multiple browsers/viewports in the time it would take to test serially. Supports configurable parallelism and batch size optimization.","intents":["I want to test 50 pages across 3 browsers and 5 viewports without multiplying my CI/CD time by 15x","I need to optimize my visual test suite to run in under 5 minutes despite testing many snapshots","I want to maximize resource utilization by running snapshots in parallel"],"best_for":["large applications with many pages/components requiring visual testing","teams with strict CI/CD time budgets (under 10 minutes)","design systems teams testing hundreds of component variants"],"limitations":["Parallel capture increases Percy API load — may hit rate limits on free tier","Parallelism is limited by Percy's infrastructure — cannot arbitrarily increase concurrency","Batch processing adds complexity to debugging (harder to identify which snapshot failed)","Parallel capture may have non-deterministic timing issues (race conditions in application state)","Cost increases with parallelism — higher snapshot volume = higher billing"],"requires":["Percy SDK configured for parallel snapshot capture","CI/CD environment with sufficient network bandwidth","Application that can handle concurrent requests"],"input_types":["list of snapshots to capture","parallelism level (number of concurrent captures)","batch size (snapshots per batch)"],"output_types":["batch processing status (in progress, completed)","snapshot results (per snapshot)","total processing time"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"percy__cap_9","uri":"capability://image.visual.visual.diff.visualization.with.region.highlighting.and.zoom","name":"visual diff visualization with region highlighting and zoom","description":"Provides an interactive web interface for reviewing visual diffs with side-by-side baseline/current comparison, region highlighting showing exactly what changed, and zoom/pan controls for detailed inspection. The interface uses color-coded overlays (red for removed, green for added, yellow for modified) to highlight changed regions, with pixel-level accuracy for identifying small changes. Supports full-page diffs and region-specific diffs.","intents":["I need to see exactly what visual changes were made in a diff without guessing","I want to zoom in on small changes to verify they're intentional","I need to understand the scope of visual changes before approving them"],"best_for":["designers and QA engineers reviewing visual changes","teams with strict visual standards requiring detailed change inspection","organizations needing to document visual changes for compliance"],"limitations":["Diff visualization is Percy-specific — no integration with GitHub/GitLab diff viewers","Large diffs (full-page changes) may be slow to render in browser","Color-coded overlays may be hard to distinguish for colorblind users","Zoom/pan controls are basic — no advanced annotation or markup tools","No support for animated diffs or video comparison — only static PNG diffs"],"requires":["Percy account with diff visualization enabled","Web browser with JavaScript support","Baseline and current screenshots"],"input_types":["baseline screenshot (PNG)","current screenshot (PNG)"],"output_types":["interactive diff visualization (HTML/JavaScript)","region highlighting (color-coded overlays)","zoom/pan coordinates"],"categories":["image-visual"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"percy__headline","uri":"capability://testing.quality.visual.testing.and.review.platform","name":"visual testing and review platform","description":"Percy is a visual testing and review platform that captures screenshots across browsers, detects visual regressions with AI, and integrates into CI/CD for automated workflows, making it essential for modern web development teams.","intents":["best visual testing platform","visual testing for CI/CD","automated visual regression testing tools","top visual review tools for developers","AI-powered visual testing solutions"],"best_for":["web application developers","QA engineers"],"limitations":["does not provide functional testing","limited handling of dynamic content"],"requires":["integration with CI/CD tools"],"input_types":["web application URLs"],"output_types":["visual regression reports","screenshots"],"categories":["testing-quality"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":54,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Web application with publicly accessible URL or local development server","Percy SDK integration (Node.js, Python, Ruby, or language-agnostic CLI)","CI/CD environment with network access to application under test","Baseline screenshots previously approved in Percy","Current screenshots from same application state","Percy account with sufficient snapshot quota","Percy account with analytics enabled","Sufficient snapshot history (at least 2-4 weeks) for meaningful trends","Optional: API integration for custom metrics","Percy account with team management enabled"],"failure_modes":["Capture latency increases with number of browsers/viewports — typical 2-5 second per page per browser combination","Cannot capture dynamic content that requires user interaction (hover states, animations) without custom snapshot triggers","Browser support limited to Chromium, Firefox, Safari — no IE11 or legacy browser support","Screenshot resolution and rendering may differ slightly from real user browsers due to headless rendering differences","AI diffing accuracy depends on baseline quality — poor baselines lead to false positives/negatives","Cannot distinguish between intentional and unintentional changes without human review — requires approval workflow","Diffing algorithm details are proprietary — no transparency into what constitutes a 'meaningful' change threshold","Performance degrades with very large screenshots (>4K resolution) — typical diff time 500ms-2s per comparison","No support for animated GIF or video diffs — only static PNG comparison","Analytics are Percy-specific — no integration with external analytics platforms","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.7,"quality":0.9,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:25.060Z","last_scraped_at":null,"last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=percy","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=percy"}},"signature":"iK/oLDDYAUxFQlFUEyhJxtBy0qX3lfOFUuyQ+v+TBFBlA7D8MxVp+sDSHRSJvPl7V0wlzEQoLuFS0ENoeyXdBA==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T15:23:42.642Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/percy","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/percy","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=percy","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}