{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_patlytics","slug":"patlytics","name":"Patlytics","type":"product","url":"https://www.patlytics.ai","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/patlytics","categories":["text-writing"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_patlytics__cap_0","uri":"capability://legal.automated.prior.art.discovery","name":"automated-prior-art-discovery","description":"Searches patent databases and scientific literature to identify existing patents and prior art relevant to a new invention. Uses ML models to surface competitive landscape and novelty gaps without manual research.","intents":["I need to understand what patents already exist in my technology space","I want to quickly identify if my invention is truly novel before filing","I need to find prior art references to strengthen my patent claims"],"best_for":["large corporations","law firms","institutional IP departments"],"limitations":["requires clear invention description for accurate results","may miss very recent filings or non-patent literature","effectiveness depends on search query quality"],"requires":["patent database access","invention description or technical documentation","domain expertise to interpret results"],"input_types":["text description","technical specifications","patent documents"],"output_types":["prior art references","patent landscape report","novelty assessment"],"categories":["legal","research"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_patlytics__cap_1","uri":"capability://legal.patent.landscape.analysis","name":"patent-landscape-analysis","description":"Analyzes competitive patent portfolios and technology trends across industries to identify white space opportunities and market gaps. Provides strategic insights on where to focus patent filing efforts.","intents":["I want to see where my competitors are filing patents","I need to identify technology areas with low patent density where we can innovate","I want to understand patent filing trends in my industry"],"best_for":["large corporations","strategic IP teams","innovation departments"],"limitations":["analysis quality depends on patent database completeness","trends may lag actual market developments by 6-12 months"],"requires":["access to patent databases","definition of relevant technology categories","historical patent data"],"input_types":["technology keywords","competitor names","industry classifications"],"output_types":["landscape visualization","trend reports","opportunity analysis","filing recommendations"],"categories":["legal","strategy"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_patlytics__cap_10","uri":"capability://legal.international.filing.recommendation","name":"international-filing-recommendation","description":"Recommends optimal international filing strategies based on market analysis, patent landscape, and cost considerations. Suggests which jurisdictions to file in and optimal timing for PCT and national phase entries.","intents":["I want to know which countries I should file my patent in","I need to optimize my international filing strategy for cost and coverage","I want to understand filing deadlines and priority dates across jurisdictions"],"best_for":["large corporations","IP counsel","international IP teams"],"limitations":["recommendations based on patent landscape, not market demand","requires understanding of international patent law","costs vary significantly by jurisdiction"],"requires":["invention description","market analysis","budget constraints","international filing experience"],"input_types":["patent application","market data","competitor information","budget parameters"],"output_types":["filing recommendations","jurisdiction analysis","cost estimates","timeline recommendations"],"categories":["legal","strategy"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_patlytics__cap_11","uri":"capability://legal.patent.licensing.opportunity.identification","name":"patent-licensing-opportunity-identification","description":"Identifies potential licensing opportunities by analyzing patent portfolios against market trends and competitor technologies. Suggests patents with high licensing potential and target licensees.","intents":["I want to monetize my patent portfolio through licensing","I need to identify which patents have the most licensing potential","I want to find potential licensees for my patents"],"best_for":["large corporations","IP monetization teams","patent licensing professionals"],"limitations":["requires market data and competitor analysis","licensing potential varies by industry and market conditions","requires negotiation expertise to execute"],"requires":["patent portfolio data","market analysis","competitor information","licensing expertise"],"input_types":["patent claims","technology descriptions","market data","competitor products"],"output_types":["licensing opportunity scores","target licensee suggestions","market analysis","revenue projections"],"categories":["legal","business"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_patlytics__cap_12","uri":"capability://legal.patent.invalidity.argument.generation","name":"patent-invalidity-argument-generation","description":"Generates detailed invalidity arguments for use in litigation or post-grant proceedings. Identifies prior art combinations and claim construction issues that could invalidate competitor patents.","intents":["I need to defend against a patent infringement claim","I want to challenge a competitor's patent validity in IPR proceedings","I need to prepare invalidity arguments for litigation"],"best_for":["litigation teams","IP counsel","patent prosecutors"],"limitations":["arguments require legal expertise to finalize","effectiveness depends on prior art quality","must comply with procedural rules for specific proceedings"],"requires":["competitor patent claims","prior art references","technical expertise","legal review"],"input_types":["patent claims","prior art documents","technical specifications","claim construction arguments"],"output_types":["invalidity arguments","prior art analysis","claim construction briefs","evidence summaries"],"categories":["legal","litigation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_patlytics__cap_2","uri":"capability://legal.ai.powered.claim.drafting","name":"ai-powered-claim-drafting","description":"Generates patent claim language using machine learning models trained on successful patents. Suggests claim structures, dependent claims, and language optimizations to improve clarity and enforceability.","intents":["I need to draft patent claims that will survive USPTO examination","I want to create broader independent claims while maintaining novelty","I need help writing dependent claims that add specific embodiments"],"best_for":["patent attorneys","IP counsel","large IP departments"],"limitations":["requires human review and legal expertise to finalize","may not capture all nuances of complex inventions","output quality varies by technology domain"],"requires":["detailed invention specification","patent attorney review","understanding of claim drafting principles"],"input_types":["invention description","technical drawings","prior art references","claim scope parameters"],"output_types":["draft claims","claim language suggestions","dependent claim variations"],"categories":["legal","writing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_patlytics__cap_3","uri":"capability://legal.prosecution.rejection.prediction","name":"prosecution-rejection-prediction","description":"Predicts likely USPTO rejections based on prior art and examiner patterns. Recommends claim amendments and arguments to overcome anticipated rejections before they occur.","intents":["I want to know what rejections the USPTO examiner will likely issue","I need to proactively amend my claims to avoid rejections","I want to prepare arguments that address examiner concerns in advance"],"best_for":["patent prosecutors","IP counsel","large IP departments"],"limitations":["predictions based on historical patterns may not account for new examiner guidelines","accuracy varies by technology field","requires complete application specification"],"requires":["complete patent application","prior art references","examiner art unit data","historical rejection patterns"],"input_types":["patent application","claims","specification","prior art documents"],"output_types":["rejection predictions","amendment recommendations","argument suggestions","confidence scores"],"categories":["legal","predictive-analytics"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_patlytics__cap_4","uri":"capability://legal.claim.quality.assessment","name":"claim-quality-assessment","description":"Evaluates patent claims for clarity, scope, enforceability, and vulnerability to invalidity challenges. Provides scores and recommendations for improving claim quality before filing or during prosecution.","intents":["I want to know if my claims are well-written and enforceable","I need to identify weak claims that could be invalidated in litigation","I want to improve claim quality before filing to reduce prosecution time"],"best_for":["patent attorneys","IP counsel","patent examiners"],"limitations":["assessment is based on technical analysis, not legal precedent","cannot predict all litigation outcomes","requires clear claim language to analyze"],"requires":["patent claims","specification","prior art references"],"input_types":["claim text","specification","prior art documents"],"output_types":["quality scores","vulnerability analysis","improvement recommendations","enforceability assessment"],"categories":["legal","quality-assurance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_patlytics__cap_5","uri":"capability://legal.litigation.infringement.risk.assessment","name":"litigation-infringement-risk-assessment","description":"Analyzes patent claims against competitor products or technologies to predict infringement likelihood and litigation risk. Provides quantified risk scores and detailed claim-to-feature mapping.","intents":["I want to know if a competitor is infringing my patent","I need to assess the strength of my patent before pursuing litigation","I want to understand which claims are most likely to survive a validity challenge"],"best_for":["IP counsel","litigation teams","large corporations"],"limitations":["analysis based on public information only","cannot account for trade secrets or hidden features","requires detailed product information","not a substitute for legal analysis"],"requires":["patent claims","competitor product specifications","technical documentation","legal expertise for interpretation"],"input_types":["patent claims","product descriptions","technical specifications","competitor documentation"],"output_types":["infringement risk scores","claim-to-feature mapping","litigation strength assessment","validity challenge predictions"],"categories":["legal","litigation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_patlytics__cap_6","uri":"capability://legal.patent.validity.challenge.prediction","name":"patent-validity-challenge-prediction","description":"Predicts likelihood that a patent will be invalidated in litigation or post-grant proceedings (IPR, PGR). Identifies vulnerable claim elements and suggests strengthening strategies.","intents":["I want to know if my patent can withstand an IPR challenge","I need to identify which claims are most vulnerable to invalidity attacks","I want to assess the strength of my patent portfolio before litigation"],"best_for":["IP counsel","litigation teams","patent prosecutors"],"limitations":["predictions based on historical data, not guaranteed outcomes","cannot account for new prior art discoveries","requires complete patent specification"],"requires":["complete patent document","prior art references","claim language","historical IPR/PGR data"],"input_types":["patent claims","specification","prior art documents","prosecution history"],"output_types":["validity risk scores","vulnerable claim identification","strengthening recommendations","challenge prediction"],"categories":["legal","predictive-analytics"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_patlytics__cap_7","uri":"capability://legal.patent.portfolio.management","name":"patent-portfolio-management","description":"Organizes and tracks patent portfolios across multiple jurisdictions and technologies. Provides dashboards for monitoring prosecution status, renewal deadlines, and portfolio health metrics.","intents":["I need to track all my patents in one place across multiple countries","I want to know which patents are expiring soon and need renewal decisions","I need visibility into prosecution status and upcoming deadlines"],"best_for":["large corporations","law firms","institutional IP departments"],"limitations":["requires manual data entry or integration with existing systems","accuracy depends on data quality","may not integrate with all patent office systems"],"requires":["patent portfolio data","jurisdiction information","renewal tracking","system integration"],"input_types":["patent documents","prosecution records","renewal dates","portfolio metadata"],"output_types":["portfolio dashboards","status reports","deadline alerts","renewal recommendations"],"categories":["legal","productivity"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_patlytics__cap_8","uri":"capability://legal.prosecution.strategy.recommendation","name":"prosecution-strategy-recommendation","description":"Recommends optimal prosecution strategies based on examiner patterns, prior art, and claim scope goals. Suggests claim amendment sequences and argument approaches to maximize allowance likelihood.","intents":["I want to know the best way to prosecute my application to get it allowed","I need to decide whether to amend claims or argue against rejections","I want to optimize my prosecution strategy based on examiner history"],"best_for":["patent prosecutors","IP counsel","large IP departments"],"limitations":["recommendations based on historical patterns, not guaranteed success","requires understanding of specific examiner preferences","may not account for recent guideline changes"],"requires":["patent application","examiner information","prior art references","prosecution history"],"input_types":["patent application","office actions","examiner data","prior art documents"],"output_types":["strategy recommendations","amendment suggestions","argument templates","success probability estimates"],"categories":["legal","strategy"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_patlytics__cap_9","uri":"capability://legal.patent.document.analysis","name":"patent-document-analysis","description":"Extracts and analyzes key information from patent documents including claims, specifications, drawings, and prosecution history. Provides structured data and insights from unstructured patent documents.","intents":["I need to quickly understand what a patent covers","I want to extract key technical details from patent specifications","I need to analyze prosecution history to understand examiner concerns"],"best_for":["patent attorneys","IP researchers","litigation teams"],"limitations":["accuracy depends on document quality and clarity","may struggle with poorly scanned documents","requires OCR for image-based PDFs"],"requires":["patent documents","OCR capability for scanned documents"],"input_types":["patent PDFs","specification text","prosecution documents","drawings"],"output_types":["structured patent data","claim summaries","technical analysis","prosecution timeline"],"categories":["legal","research"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":47,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["patent database access","invention description or technical documentation","domain expertise to interpret results","access to patent databases","definition of relevant technology categories","historical patent data","invention description","market analysis","budget constraints","international filing experience"],"failure_modes":["requires clear invention description for accurate results","may miss very recent filings or non-patent literature","effectiveness depends on search query quality","analysis quality depends on patent database completeness","trends may lag actual market developments by 6-12 months","recommendations based on patent landscape, not market demand","requires understanding of international patent law","costs vary significantly by jurisdiction","requires market data and competitor analysis","licensing potential varies by industry and market conditions","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.45,"quality":0.88,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:32.437Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.534Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=patlytics","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=patlytics"}},"signature":"tdILvnBpLC7kxHV/heh2NlSAjyQGN0RPL+BulVb2TQ/vwItmWcGIVBDyw0ujCmEeZAIVO2k4ic3zhz0gmCqRCw==","signedAt":"2026-06-19T08:37:10.767Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/patlytics","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/patlytics","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=patlytics","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}