{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"github-pathonaiorg--litemultiagent","slug":"pathonaiorg--litemultiagent","name":"LiteMultiAgent","type":"repo","url":"https://github.com/PathOnAIOrg/LiteMultiAgent","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/pathonaiorg--litemultiagent","categories":["ai-agents"],"tags":["agent","agent-based-framework","agentic-agi","agentic-framework","agentic-workflow","ai-agent","ai-agents","autonomous-agent","autonomous-agents","gpt","llm","llm-agent","llm-agents","llm-framework","multi-agent","multi-agent-systems","web-agent"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"github-pathonaiorg--litemultiagent__cap_0","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.multi.agent.orchestration.with.role.based.task.delegation","name":"multi-agent orchestration with role-based task delegation","description":"Coordinates multiple LLM-based agents with distinct roles and responsibilities, routing tasks to appropriate agents based on their specialization. Implements agent registry pattern where each agent maintains its own system prompt, tools, and state, enabling parallel execution and hierarchical task decomposition across a team of specialized agents rather than a single monolithic LLM.","intents":["I need multiple AI agents with different expertise to collaborate on complex tasks","I want to decompose a problem across specialized agents and aggregate their outputs","I need to route user requests to the most appropriate agent based on task type"],"best_for":["teams building autonomous multi-agent systems for complex workflows","developers creating specialized agent teams (research, coding, analysis agents)","builders prototyping agentic AI applications with role-based task distribution"],"limitations":["No built-in load balancing across agents — synchronous execution may bottleneck on slowest agent","Agent communication is implicit through shared context rather than explicit message passing","Limited cross-agent state synchronization — each agent maintains isolated context","No native support for agent failure recovery or fallback routing"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","API key for at least one LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, or compatible)","Understanding of agent role definition and task decomposition patterns"],"input_types":["natural language task descriptions","structured task specifications","user queries"],"output_types":["agent responses","aggregated multi-agent outputs","task execution logs"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-pathonaiorg--litemultiagent__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.tool.use.integration.with.schema.based.function.calling","name":"tool-use integration with schema-based function calling","description":"Enables agents to invoke external tools and APIs through a schema-based function registry that maps tool definitions to callable functions. Agents receive tool schemas in their context, generate function calls based on task requirements, and the framework handles parameter binding, execution, and result injection back into the agent's context for downstream reasoning.","intents":["I want my agents to call external APIs and tools as part of their reasoning","I need to define a set of available tools and let agents decide when to use them","I want to integrate web APIs, databases, or custom functions into agent workflows"],"best_for":["developers building agents that need real-time data access or external integrations","teams creating web agents that interact with APIs and services","builders prototyping autonomous workflows that require tool invocation"],"limitations":["Tool schema definition is manual — no automatic schema generation from function signatures","No built-in retry logic for failed tool calls — requires explicit error handling in agent prompts","Limited tool result validation — assumes tool outputs are well-formed","No native support for async tool execution — all calls are synchronous"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Tool definitions with explicit schemas (name, description, parameters)","LLM provider that supports function calling (OpenAI, Anthropic, or compatible)"],"input_types":["tool schema definitions","function references","parameter specifications"],"output_types":["function call results","structured tool outputs","error messages"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-pathonaiorg--litemultiagent__cap_10","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.task.decomposition.and.hierarchical.agent.workflows","name":"task decomposition and hierarchical agent workflows","description":"Supports decomposition of complex tasks into subtasks that can be distributed across multiple agents in hierarchical workflows. The framework provides task specification patterns, enables parent agents to delegate subtasks to child agents, manages task dependencies, and aggregates results from subtasks into final outputs.","intents":["I want to break down complex tasks into subtasks for specialized agents","I need to create hierarchical agent workflows with task dependencies","I want to parallelize task execution across multiple agents"],"best_for":["developers building hierarchical agent systems for complex problems","teams creating agent workflows with task dependencies","builders prototyping task-oriented multi-agent systems"],"limitations":["Task dependency management is basic — no sophisticated DAG scheduling","No built-in task parallelization — subtasks execute sequentially","Result aggregation requires manual implementation","No automatic task rebalancing if agents fail"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Clear task decomposition strategy and dependency definitions"],"input_types":["complex tasks","task specifications","dependency definitions"],"output_types":["subtask assignments","aggregated results","task execution logs"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-pathonaiorg--litemultiagent__cap_2","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.context.aware.agent.memory.with.conversation.history.management","name":"context-aware agent memory with conversation history management","description":"Maintains conversation history and agent state across multiple interactions, allowing agents to reference previous exchanges and build context over time. The framework manages message buffers per agent, implements sliding window or summarization strategies to keep context within token limits, and enables agents to access historical context when making decisions.","intents":["I want agents to remember previous interactions and build on past context","I need to manage conversation history without exceeding token limits","I want agents to have persistent memory across multiple task executions"],"best_for":["developers building conversational agents that need continuity across sessions","teams creating long-running agent workflows with multi-turn interactions","builders prototyping chatbot-style agents with memory requirements"],"limitations":["No built-in persistence layer — conversation history is in-memory only, lost on restart","Context window management is basic — no intelligent summarization, only truncation","No support for selective memory retrieval — all history is treated equally","Memory overhead grows linearly with conversation length, no automatic cleanup"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","LLM provider with sufficient context window for conversation history","Manual implementation of persistence if durability is required"],"input_types":["user messages","agent responses","conversation metadata"],"output_types":["conversation history","context summaries","memory state"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-pathonaiorg--litemultiagent__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.llm.provider.abstraction.with.multi.provider.support","name":"llm provider abstraction with multi-provider support","description":"Abstracts LLM interactions behind a unified interface that supports multiple providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, local models via Ollama, etc.). Agents interact with a provider-agnostic API, and the framework handles provider-specific request formatting, response parsing, and error handling, enabling agents to switch providers without code changes.","intents":["I want to support multiple LLM providers without rewriting agent code","I need to switch between OpenAI, Anthropic, and local models dynamically","I want to abstract away provider-specific API differences in my agents"],"best_for":["developers building provider-agnostic agent systems","teams evaluating multiple LLM providers for cost or performance","builders creating agents that need to work with on-premise or local models"],"limitations":["Provider feature parity is not guaranteed — some providers lack function calling or streaming","Response format differences between providers may require agent-level handling","No automatic fallback between providers on failure","Provider-specific parameters (temperature, top_p) may not map consistently across providers"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","API keys for desired providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) or local Ollama instance","Provider-specific client libraries installed"],"input_types":["provider configuration","model names","API credentials"],"output_types":["LLM responses","token usage metrics","provider metadata"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-pathonaiorg--litemultiagent__cap_4","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.agent.task.execution.with.streaming.response.handling","name":"agent task execution with streaming response handling","description":"Executes agent tasks with support for streaming LLM responses, allowing real-time output delivery to users as agents generate responses token-by-token. The framework manages streaming state, buffers partial responses, and provides hooks for processing streamed content before final output, enabling responsive user experiences without waiting for complete agent responses.","intents":["I want to show users agent responses in real-time as they're generated","I need to process streaming LLM output and display it incrementally","I want to build responsive agent interfaces that don't block on full response generation"],"best_for":["developers building interactive agent applications with real-time feedback","teams creating web-based agent interfaces that need responsive UX","builders prototyping streaming agent responses for chat applications"],"limitations":["Streaming state management is basic — no built-in buffering or backpressure handling","Tool calls during streaming may interrupt the stream, requiring special handling","No support for streaming structured outputs — only text streaming is fully supported","Error recovery during streaming is limited — partial responses may be lost on failure"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","LLM provider that supports streaming (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)","Async-capable application framework if using streaming in async contexts"],"input_types":["agent tasks","streaming configuration"],"output_types":["streamed text tokens","complete responses","streaming metadata"],"categories":["automation-workflow","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-pathonaiorg--litemultiagent__cap_5","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.agent.state.management.with.execution.context.isolation","name":"agent state management with execution context isolation","description":"Manages agent execution state including current task, tool results, and reasoning chain within isolated execution contexts. Each agent maintains its own state namespace, preventing cross-agent interference while enabling state inspection and debugging. The framework tracks execution flow, maintains execution logs, and provides state snapshots for monitoring and troubleshooting.","intents":["I want to isolate agent state to prevent interference between concurrent agents","I need to inspect and debug agent execution state during development","I want to track agent reasoning and decision-making for auditing"],"best_for":["developers debugging multi-agent systems and agent behavior","teams requiring audit trails and execution transparency","builders creating production agent systems with state monitoring"],"limitations":["State isolation is logical only — no true process isolation between agents","No built-in state persistence — execution context is lost after task completion","Debugging tools are minimal — no interactive debugger or state inspector","State snapshots are not versioned — only current state is available"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Understanding of agent execution flow and state lifecycle"],"input_types":["agent tasks","execution parameters"],"output_types":["execution logs","state snapshots","execution traces"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-pathonaiorg--litemultiagent__cap_6","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.agent.response.formatting.and.output.structuring","name":"agent response formatting and output structuring","description":"Formats agent responses into structured outputs with consistent formatting, enabling downstream processing and integration. The framework supports multiple output formats (JSON, plain text, markdown), validates response structure against expected schemas, and provides formatting hooks for customizing agent output before delivery to users or downstream systems.","intents":["I want agent responses in a consistent, structured format","I need to validate agent outputs against expected schemas","I want to format agent responses for specific downstream systems or UIs"],"best_for":["developers building agent systems that feed into structured pipelines","teams requiring consistent output formats across multiple agents","builders creating agent APIs that need predictable response structures"],"limitations":["Output validation is basic — no comprehensive schema enforcement","Format conversion is limited to common formats (JSON, text, markdown)","No automatic format negotiation between agents and consumers","Malformed agent outputs may not be recoverable without manual intervention"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Output format specifications or schemas"],"input_types":["agent responses","format specifications"],"output_types":["formatted responses","structured data","validation results"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-pathonaiorg--litemultiagent__cap_7","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.agent.error.handling.and.recovery.with.graceful.degradation","name":"agent error handling and recovery with graceful degradation","description":"Implements error handling mechanisms for agent failures including LLM errors, tool call failures, and timeout scenarios. The framework provides retry logic with exponential backoff, fallback strategies, and error recovery hooks that allow agents to gracefully degrade functionality or attempt alternative approaches when primary operations fail.","intents":["I want agents to recover from transient failures automatically","I need to handle tool call failures without crashing the entire workflow","I want agents to fall back to alternative strategies when primary approaches fail"],"best_for":["developers building production agent systems requiring reliability","teams creating long-running autonomous agents","builders prototyping resilient multi-agent workflows"],"limitations":["Retry logic is basic — no intelligent backoff strategies based on error type","Fallback strategies must be manually defined in agent prompts","No built-in circuit breaker pattern for cascading failures","Error context is limited — detailed error information may not be available to agents"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Error handling configuration and fallback strategy definitions"],"input_types":["error conditions","retry parameters"],"output_types":["recovery results","error logs","fallback responses"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-pathonaiorg--litemultiagent__cap_8","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.agent.prompt.engineering.with.system.prompt.customization","name":"agent prompt engineering with system prompt customization","description":"Enables fine-grained control over agent behavior through customizable system prompts that define agent personality, expertise, constraints, and reasoning style. Each agent can have a distinct system prompt that shapes its responses, tool usage patterns, and decision-making approach, allowing developers to specialize agents for specific roles without code changes.","intents":["I want to customize agent behavior and expertise through system prompts","I need agents with different personalities or reasoning styles","I want to constrain agent behavior or enforce specific guidelines"],"best_for":["developers fine-tuning agent behavior for specific use cases","teams creating specialized agent teams with distinct roles","builders prototyping different agent personalities and expertise levels"],"limitations":["System prompt effectiveness depends on LLM model capabilities","No automated prompt optimization — requires manual iteration","Prompt injection vulnerabilities are not mitigated","No built-in prompt versioning or A/B testing framework"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Understanding of prompt engineering best practices","LLM provider that respects system prompts (most modern providers)"],"input_types":["system prompt text","agent role definitions"],"output_types":["customized agent behavior","specialized responses"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github-pathonaiorg--litemultiagent__cap_9","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.agent.communication.and.inter.agent.message.passing","name":"agent communication and inter-agent message passing","description":"Enables communication between agents through message passing mechanisms, allowing agents to share information, request assistance from other agents, and coordinate on complex tasks. The framework manages message routing between agents, maintains message queues, and provides message formatting standards for inter-agent communication.","intents":["I want agents to communicate and collaborate with each other","I need agents to request help from specialized agents","I want to coordinate tasks across multiple agents through messaging"],"best_for":["developers building collaborative multi-agent systems","teams creating agent hierarchies with delegation patterns","builders prototyping agent swarms with coordination requirements"],"limitations":["Message passing is synchronous — no asynchronous message queuing","No message persistence — messages are lost if not immediately processed","Limited message routing intelligence — no automatic agent selection","No built-in message ordering guarantees or delivery confirmation"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Multi-agent system design with clear communication patterns"],"input_types":["agent messages","routing specifications"],"output_types":["message delivery results","inter-agent responses"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":32,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"low","permissions":["Python 3.8+","API key for at least one LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, or compatible)","Understanding of agent role definition and task decomposition patterns","Tool definitions with explicit schemas (name, description, parameters)","LLM provider that supports function calling (OpenAI, Anthropic, or compatible)","Clear task decomposition strategy and dependency definitions","LLM provider with sufficient context window for conversation history","Manual implementation of persistence if durability is required","API keys for desired providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) or local Ollama instance","Provider-specific client libraries installed"],"failure_modes":["No built-in load balancing across agents — synchronous execution may bottleneck on slowest agent","Agent communication is implicit through shared context rather than explicit message passing","Limited cross-agent state synchronization — each agent maintains isolated context","No native support for agent failure recovery or fallback routing","Tool schema definition is manual — no automatic schema generation from function signatures","No built-in retry logic for failed tool calls — requires explicit error handling in agent prompts","Limited tool result validation — assumes tool outputs are well-formed","No native support for async tool execution — all calls are synchronous","Task dependency management is basic — no sophisticated DAG scheduling","No built-in task parallelization — subtasks execute sequentially","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.20930590516288045,"quality":0.32,"ecosystem":0.6000000000000001,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.6,"weights":{"adoption":0.3,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.3,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:22.063Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T13:57:09.058Z","last_commit":"2025-07-18T06:19:35Z"},"community":{"stars":102,"forks":20,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=pathonaiorg--litemultiagent","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=pathonaiorg--litemultiagent"}},"signature":"BaBCcO9UgTqj1RVuyUl6uqeHf7eqO2PSNJ13AIZcWZnx3W1exATo/r29cIXusjN8XUjZ8ZyrmmxksbNN7v5SDw==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T01:32:32.890Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/pathonaiorg--litemultiagent","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/pathonaiorg--litemultiagent","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=pathonaiorg--litemultiagent","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}