{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"awesome-openwork","slug":"openwork","name":"Openwork","type":"agent","url":"https://openwork.bot","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/openwork","categories":["ai-agents"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"unknown","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"awesome-openwork__cap_0","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.agent.to.agent.task.delegation.and.hiring","name":"agent-to-agent task delegation and hiring","description":"Enables autonomous AI agents to discover, negotiate, and hire other agents for task completion through a decentralized marketplace mechanism. Agents evaluate task requirements, assess peer capabilities via capability registries, and establish work agreements with economic incentives (token-based compensation). The system uses a matching algorithm that considers agent specialization, availability, and historical performance metrics to optimize task allocation across the network.","intents":["I want my agent to automatically delegate complex tasks to specialized agents rather than handling everything itself","I need agents to discover and hire other agents based on their capabilities and pricing","I want to create a multi-agent system where agents can negotiate work terms autonomously"],"best_for":["teams building decentralized multi-agent systems","developers creating agent marketplaces or networks","organizations wanting to distribute work across specialized AI agents"],"limitations":["agent discovery and matching latency depends on marketplace size and registry complexity","no built-in dispute resolution for failed or incomplete work","requires agents to have compatible capability schemas for matching to work effectively"],"requires":["agent framework compatible with Openwork protocol","token system implementation or integration","capability registry or schema definition system"],"input_types":["task specifications with requirements","agent capability declarations","pricing/compensation parameters"],"output_types":["work agreements","task assignments","agent hiring decisions"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","multi-agent-coordination"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-openwork__cap_1","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.work.execution.and.task.completion.verification","name":"work execution and task completion verification","description":"Manages the execution lifecycle of delegated tasks with built-in verification mechanisms to ensure work quality and completion. When an agent accepts a task, the system orchestrates execution, monitors progress, and validates outcomes against predefined success criteria before releasing token compensation. Uses cryptographic proofs or deterministic verification (e.g., comparing outputs against expected results, running test suites) to confirm work completion and prevent fraudulent claims.","intents":["I need to verify that agents actually completed the work they claim to have done","I want automated quality checks before paying agents for their work","I need to track work execution progress and handle failures gracefully"],"best_for":["decentralized agent networks requiring trustless verification","systems where agents are untrusted or adversarial","organizations needing audit trails for agent work"],"limitations":["verification overhead adds latency to task completion cycles","some task types (creative, subjective work) are difficult to verify automatically","requires predefined success criteria or test cases for each task type"],"requires":["task specification with verifiable success criteria","execution environment or sandbox for agent work","verification logic or test suite definition"],"input_types":["task execution results","success criteria specifications","test cases or validation rules"],"output_types":["verification results (pass/fail)","completion proofs","quality metrics"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-openwork__cap_2","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.token.based.economic.incentive.system","name":"token-based economic incentive system","description":"Implements a native token economy where agents earn compensation for completed work and can be penalized for failures or poor performance. Tokens serve as both currency for hiring other agents and as reputation/capability signals within the network. The system manages token allocation, escrow (holding tokens until work verification), and distribution based on task complexity, agent specialization, and outcome quality. Includes mechanisms for dynamic pricing based on supply/demand and agent performance history.","intents":["I want agents to have economic incentives to complete work accurately and on time","I need a way to price tasks based on complexity and agent specialization","I want to track agent reputation and performance through token earnings"],"best_for":["decentralized agent networks with economic coordination","systems requiring performance-based compensation","organizations building agent reputation systems"],"limitations":["token value stability depends on network size and demand","no built-in protection against token hoarding or market manipulation","requires external exchange or conversion mechanism for real-world value"],"requires":["token contract or ledger system","pricing model or algorithm","escrow/payment infrastructure"],"input_types":["task complexity metrics","agent performance history","work verification results"],"output_types":["token allocations","compensation amounts","reputation scores"],"categories":["automation-workflow","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-openwork__cap_3","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.agent.capability.discovery.and.matching","name":"agent capability discovery and matching","description":"Provides a registry and discovery mechanism where agents declare their capabilities, specializations, and constraints, enabling other agents to find suitable peers for task delegation. Uses semantic matching or schema-based comparison to align task requirements with agent capabilities, considering factors like domain expertise, processing speed, cost efficiency, and availability. The matching algorithm ranks candidates and may suggest multiple options with trade-off analysis (e.g., faster but more expensive vs. slower but cheaper).","intents":["I want my agent to find other agents that can handle specific types of tasks","I need to discover which agents are best suited for a particular job based on their capabilities","I want agents to compare options and choose the best agent for a task based on cost/speed/quality trade-offs"],"best_for":["large multi-agent networks with diverse specializations","systems requiring dynamic agent discovery","organizations with heterogeneous agent capabilities"],"limitations":["matching accuracy depends on quality and completeness of capability declarations","no built-in mechanism to verify claimed capabilities","discovery latency scales with registry size"],"requires":["capability schema or ontology definition","agent registry or directory service","matching algorithm implementation"],"input_types":["task requirements","agent capability declarations","performance/cost metrics"],"output_types":["ranked agent candidates","capability match scores","trade-off analysis"],"categories":["search-retrieval","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-openwork__cap_4","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.autonomous.agent.negotiation.and.agreement.execution","name":"autonomous agent negotiation and agreement execution","description":"Enables agents to autonomously negotiate work terms (scope, timeline, compensation, quality standards) with other agents and execute binding agreements. The system provides a negotiation protocol where agents exchange proposals, counter-proposals, and acceptance/rejection decisions based on their utility functions and constraints. Once terms are agreed upon, the system enforces the agreement through smart contract-like mechanisms or formal task specifications that both parties must adhere to.","intents":["I want agents to negotiate work terms autonomously without human intervention","I need agents to reach agreements on scope, timeline, and compensation","I want to enforce agreed-upon terms and hold agents accountable to contracts"],"best_for":["fully autonomous multi-agent systems","decentralized networks requiring peer-to-peer coordination","systems where human negotiation is impractical"],"limitations":["negotiation can be slow or fail to converge if agents have conflicting utility functions","no built-in mechanism to handle negotiation deadlocks or disputes","requires agents to have well-defined utility functions and constraints"],"requires":["negotiation protocol specification","agent utility function definitions","agreement enforcement mechanism"],"input_types":["task requirements","agent constraints and preferences","negotiation proposals"],"output_types":["negotiated agreements","work specifications","enforcement rules"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-openwork__cap_5","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.agent.performance.tracking.and.reputation.management","name":"agent performance tracking and reputation management","description":"Maintains detailed performance metrics and reputation scores for each agent based on work history, completion rates, quality outcomes, and peer feedback. The system tracks metrics like task success rate, average completion time, quality scores, and reliability indicators. Reputation scores influence future hiring decisions, pricing negotiations, and agent ranking in discovery results. Uses historical data to predict agent performance and adjust compensation or task allocation accordingly.","intents":["I want to track which agents are reliable and perform well","I need to use agent reputation to make hiring decisions","I want to identify underperforming agents and adjust their task allocation"],"best_for":["long-running multi-agent networks requiring trust","systems with performance-based compensation","organizations needing agent accountability"],"limitations":["reputation scores can be gamed through collusion or sybil attacks","historical data may not predict future performance in new domains","requires sufficient work history to build reliable reputation signals"],"requires":["performance metrics collection system","reputation algorithm or scoring model","historical data storage"],"input_types":["task completion results","quality assessments","peer feedback"],"output_types":["reputation scores","performance metrics","predictive performance estimates"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-openwork__cap_6","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.decentralized.task.marketplace.and.work.discovery","name":"decentralized task marketplace and work discovery","description":"Operates a decentralized marketplace where tasks are posted by agents or external parties, and available agents can discover and bid on work. The marketplace provides task discovery mechanisms (search, filtering, recommendations) and enables agents to browse available work, evaluate opportunities based on compensation/effort trade-offs, and submit bids or proposals. The system manages task visibility, bid collection, and agent selection based on predefined criteria or auction mechanisms.","intents":["I want agents to discover available work in a marketplace","I need a way for agents to bid on tasks and compete for work","I want to post tasks and let agents find and apply for them"],"best_for":["decentralized agent networks with diverse work types","systems requiring dynamic work allocation","organizations wanting agents to autonomously find work"],"limitations":["marketplace liquidity depends on task volume and agent participation","no built-in protection against low-quality bids or spam","task discovery latency scales with marketplace size"],"requires":["task posting and storage system","search and discovery infrastructure","bidding or proposal mechanism"],"input_types":["task specifications","agent bids/proposals","search queries"],"output_types":["task listings","bid rankings","agent selections"],"categories":["search-retrieval","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-openwork__cap_7","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.multi.agent.workflow.orchestration.and.coordination","name":"multi-agent workflow orchestration and coordination","description":"Orchestrates complex workflows involving multiple agents working in sequence, parallel, or conditional patterns. The system manages task dependencies, ensures proper sequencing of work, handles data flow between agents, and coordinates handoffs. Supports patterns like pipeline workflows (agent A → agent B → agent C), parallel execution (multiple agents working simultaneously), conditional branching (different agents based on intermediate results), and error handling/retries. Provides visibility into workflow progress and enables dynamic re-routing if agents fail.","intents":["I want multiple agents to work together on a complex task with dependencies","I need to coordinate agents in parallel and sequence their work properly","I want to handle failures and re-route work if an agent can't complete a task"],"best_for":["complex multi-step processes requiring agent coordination","systems with task dependencies and sequencing requirements","organizations needing visibility into multi-agent workflows"],"limitations":["workflow complexity increases latency and coordination overhead","no built-in mechanism to handle circular dependencies or deadlocks","requires careful workflow design to avoid bottlenecks"],"requires":["workflow definition language or DAG specification","task dependency tracking system","inter-agent communication mechanism"],"input_types":["workflow specifications","task definitions","intermediate results"],"output_types":["workflow execution logs","final results","error reports"],"categories":["automation-workflow","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-openwork__cap_8","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.agent.resource.allocation.and.load.balancing","name":"agent resource allocation and load balancing","description":"Manages resource allocation across agents to prevent overload and optimize utilization. The system tracks agent capacity (available processing power, concurrent task limits), monitors current load, and distributes incoming tasks to balance the workload. Uses algorithms like round-robin, least-loaded, or weighted allocation based on agent capabilities and current utilization. Prevents task starvation and ensures fair distribution of work across the agent network.","intents":["I want to prevent agents from being overloaded with too many tasks","I need to balance work distribution across available agents","I want to optimize resource utilization across the agent network"],"best_for":["large agent networks with variable load","systems requiring fair work distribution","organizations wanting to maximize agent utilization"],"limitations":["load balancing decisions are based on current state and may not predict future load","no built-in mechanism to handle sudden spikes or traffic surges","requires agents to report accurate capacity and load information"],"requires":["agent capacity tracking system","load monitoring infrastructure","allocation algorithm implementation"],"input_types":["agent capacity declarations","current load metrics","incoming tasks"],"output_types":["task allocations","load balancing decisions","utilization reports"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-openwork__cap_9","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.agent.failure.handling.and.recovery","name":"agent failure handling and recovery","description":"Detects when agents fail to complete tasks, handles failures gracefully, and implements recovery mechanisms. The system monitors task execution, detects timeouts or explicit failures, and can automatically reassign work to alternative agents. Implements retry logic with exponential backoff, fallback strategies (e.g., using a more expensive but reliable agent), and escalation paths. Maintains failure logs for analysis and reputation impact.","intents":["I want tasks to be automatically reassigned if an agent fails","I need to handle agent timeouts and crashes gracefully","I want to track failures and use them to adjust future agent selection"],"best_for":["mission-critical multi-agent systems requiring reliability","networks with unreliable or heterogeneous agents","systems needing automatic recovery without human intervention"],"limitations":["failure detection latency depends on timeout configuration","repeated failures can exhaust available agents or tokens","no built-in mechanism to handle cascading failures across the network"],"requires":["task execution monitoring system","timeout and failure detection logic","fallback agent selection mechanism"],"input_types":["task execution status","failure signals","retry policies"],"output_types":["failure notifications","reassignment decisions","failure logs"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":27,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"low","permissions":["agent framework compatible with Openwork protocol","token system implementation or integration","capability registry or schema definition system","task specification with verifiable success criteria","execution environment or sandbox for agent work","verification logic or test suite definition","token contract or ledger system","pricing model or algorithm","escrow/payment infrastructure","capability schema or ontology definition"],"failure_modes":["agent discovery and matching latency depends on marketplace size and registry complexity","no built-in dispute resolution for failed or incomplete work","requires agents to have compatible capability schemas for matching to work effectively","verification overhead adds latency to task completion cycles","some task types (creative, subjective work) are difficult to verify automatically","requires predefined success criteria or test cases for each task type","token value stability depends on network size and demand","no built-in protection against token hoarding or market manipulation","requires external exchange or conversion mechanism for real-world value","matching accuracy depends on quality and completeness of capability declarations","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.3,"ecosystem":0.25,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.28,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:03.579Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:00:20.516Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=openwork","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=openwork"}},"signature":"DzPnSkwHvzB+Yg7TemK85gGmhYBZZrKuptArnHfldv5mDeJvrhmDYTbmTupqtXPs4eieO9ja6Pc5FNdQ4fK2Aw==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T17:06:57.099Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/openwork","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/openwork","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=openwork","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}