{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"awesome-opentools","slug":"opentools","name":"OpenTools","type":"mcp","url":"https://opentools.com","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/opentools","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"unknown","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"awesome-opentools__cap_0","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.mcp.server.discovery.and.registry.search","name":"mcp server discovery and registry search","description":"Provides a searchable, centralized registry of Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers with metadata indexing and filtering capabilities. Users can query the registry by server name, capability tags, author, or functionality to discover available MCP implementations. The registry maintains structured metadata about each server including version, compatibility, dependencies, and integration requirements, enabling developers to find servers matching their specific use case without manual GitHub searching.","intents":["Find an MCP server that provides filesystem access capabilities for my LLM application","Discover all available MCP servers compatible with Claude or other specific LLM providers","Search for MCP servers by category (e.g., database, web scraping, file operations)","Compare different implementations of the same MCP capability to choose the best fit"],"best_for":["LLM application developers building with Claude, GPT, or other models","Teams evaluating MCP ecosystem maturity and available integrations","Developers new to MCP looking for reference implementations"],"limitations":["Registry completeness depends on community contributions — not all MCP servers may be indexed","Search functionality limited to metadata; no semantic search across server capabilities","No built-in server health monitoring or activity metrics to assess maintenance status"],"requires":["Web browser access to opentools.com","Basic understanding of MCP protocol and use cases"],"input_types":["text search queries","filter parameters (category, compatibility, author)"],"output_types":["structured server metadata (JSON)","installation instructions","compatibility matrices"],"categories":["search-retrieval","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-opentools__cap_1","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.one.command.mcp.server.installation","name":"one-command mcp server installation","description":"Provides automated installation workflows for MCP servers with dependency resolution and environment configuration. The system handles downloading server packages, resolving transitive dependencies, configuring authentication credentials, and setting up environment variables required for server operation. Installation can be triggered via CLI commands or web UI, with support for multiple installation targets (local development, Docker containers, cloud deployments) and version pinning to ensure reproducible setups.","intents":["Install an MCP server locally with all dependencies resolved automatically","Set up an MCP server in a Docker container for production deployment","Install multiple MCP servers together with conflict resolution","Pin specific server versions to ensure reproducible development environments"],"best_for":["Developers wanting to quickly prototype with MCP servers without manual configuration","DevOps teams deploying MCP servers at scale across multiple environments","Non-technical users or teams without deep MCP ecosystem knowledge"],"limitations":["Installation abstraction may hide underlying configuration details needed for advanced customization","Dependency resolution limited to declared dependencies; undeclared transitive dependencies may cause runtime failures","No built-in rollback mechanism if installation fails partway through multi-server setups"],"requires":["CLI tool installed (language/runtime depends on implementation)","Network access to package repositories","Appropriate system permissions for installation target"],"input_types":["server name or registry ID","version specifier (optional)","configuration parameters (API keys, endpoints)"],"output_types":["installed server binaries","configuration files","environment setup scripts"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-opentools__cap_2","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.mcp.server.compatibility.matrix.and.version.management","name":"mcp server compatibility matrix and version management","description":"Maintains and exposes compatibility information between MCP servers and LLM providers, client libraries, and protocol versions. The system tracks which servers work with which Claude versions, GPT models, or other LLM clients, and manages version constraints to prevent incompatible combinations. Compatibility data is updated as new server and client versions are released, with clear documentation of breaking changes and migration paths between versions.","intents":["Check if a specific MCP server is compatible with my Claude version before installing","Find all MCP servers compatible with GPT-4 and my current client library version","Understand what changed in a new MCP server version and whether I need to update my configuration","Plan upgrades by identifying which servers need updates when I upgrade my LLM client"],"best_for":["Teams managing multiple MCP servers across different LLM provider integrations","Developers maintaining production systems requiring compatibility guarantees","Organizations with strict version pinning policies and change management processes"],"limitations":["Compatibility matrix only as current as the last update — may lag behind rapid release cycles","No automated testing of compatibility claims; relies on server maintainers to declare compatibility","Breaking changes in minor versions may not be captured if maintainers don't follow semantic versioning"],"requires":["Access to opentools.com registry","Knowledge of your current LLM client and version"],"input_types":["server name","LLM provider name","client library version"],"output_types":["compatibility status (compatible/incompatible/untested)","version constraints","migration guides"],"categories":["search-retrieval","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-opentools__cap_3","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.mcp.server.template.generation.and.scaffolding","name":"mcp server template generation and scaffolding","description":"Provides starter templates and code scaffolding for building new MCP servers in multiple languages (Python, TypeScript, Go, etc.). Templates include boilerplate for protocol implementation, capability declaration, error handling, and testing. The scaffolding system generates project structure, dependency files, and example implementations that developers can customize, reducing time-to-first-working-server from hours to minutes and ensuring new servers follow MCP best practices.","intents":["Create a new MCP server for my custom business logic without implementing the protocol from scratch","Generate a TypeScript MCP server template with testing and CI/CD configuration","Build an MCP server that wraps an existing REST API or database","Ensure my new MCP server follows protocol best practices and is compatible with major clients"],"best_for":["Developers building custom MCP servers for internal tools or proprietary integrations","Teams standardizing on MCP server development patterns across multiple projects","Organizations onboarding new developers to MCP server development"],"limitations":["Templates may become outdated if MCP protocol evolves faster than template updates","Generated code includes boilerplate that may not be optimal for all use cases (e.g., high-throughput servers)","Limited customization options in templates — complex requirements may need manual refactoring"],"requires":["Development environment for target language (Python 3.9+, Node.js 18+, Go 1.18+, etc.)","Git for version control","Basic understanding of MCP protocol concepts"],"input_types":["language selection (Python, TypeScript, Go, etc.)","server name and description","capability declarations (tools, resources, prompts)","optional: existing API/database schema"],"output_types":["project directory structure","source code files with boilerplate","dependency manifests (requirements.txt, package.json, go.mod)","test files and CI/CD configuration"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-opentools__cap_4","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.mcp.server.publishing.and.distribution.workflow","name":"mcp server publishing and distribution workflow","description":"Provides a submission and review workflow for publishing new MCP servers to the registry, including validation, testing, and metadata verification. The system checks that servers meet quality standards (protocol compliance, documentation completeness, security checks), manages versioning and release notes, and handles distribution through multiple channels (registry, package managers, container registries). Publishers can manage server updates, deprecations, and maintenance status through a dashboard.","intents":["Publish my custom MCP server to the registry so others can discover and use it","Submit a new version of my MCP server with updated capabilities and bug fixes","Mark my MCP server as deprecated or archived when I stop maintaining it","Manage access controls and permissions for who can publish updates to my server"],"best_for":["Open-source developers sharing MCP servers with the community","Companies publishing MCP servers as part of their product ecosystem","Maintainers managing long-lived MCP server projects with regular updates"],"limitations":["Review process may introduce delays before new servers are available in registry","Quality validation rules may be opinionated and not suitable for all use cases","No built-in monetization or licensing enforcement for commercial MCP servers"],"requires":["Account on opentools.com","MCP server code meeting quality standards","Documentation (README, capability descriptions, usage examples)","Version control repository (GitHub, GitLab, etc.)"],"input_types":["server metadata (name, description, author, license)","server code and binaries","documentation files","capability declarations"],"output_types":["registry listing with metadata","installation instructions","version history and release notes","compatibility information"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-opentools__cap_5","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.mcp.server.configuration.and.credential.management","name":"mcp server configuration and credential management","description":"Provides secure configuration management for MCP servers including API key storage, environment variable injection, and credential rotation. The system supports multiple credential types (API keys, OAuth tokens, database credentials, service accounts) and integrates with common secret management systems (AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault, environment variables). Configuration can be templated and version-controlled separately from secrets, enabling safe sharing of configurations across teams.","intents":["Securely store and inject API keys for MCP servers without hardcoding them in configuration files","Configure multiple MCP servers with different credentials for different environments (dev, staging, prod)","Rotate API credentials for MCP servers without redeploying or restarting","Share MCP server configurations across team members without exposing secrets"],"best_for":["Teams deploying MCP servers in production with security requirements","Organizations managing multiple environments with different credentials","Developers wanting to avoid secrets in version control"],"limitations":["Credential management complexity adds operational overhead compared to simple environment variables","Integration with external secret managers requires additional infrastructure setup","No built-in audit logging for credential access — requires external monitoring"],"requires":["Secret management system (AWS Secrets Manager, Vault, or environment variable support)","Appropriate IAM permissions to access secrets","Configuration file format support (YAML, JSON, TOML, etc.)"],"input_types":["credential type (API key, OAuth token, database URL, etc.)","secret values","environment names (dev, staging, prod)"],"output_types":["configuration files with credential placeholders","environment variable exports","secret references for external systems"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-opentools__cap_6","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.mcp.server.monitoring.and.health.checking","name":"mcp server monitoring and health checking","description":"Provides health monitoring and observability for deployed MCP servers including uptime tracking, capability availability verification, and performance metrics. The system periodically tests that servers are responding to requests, that declared capabilities are functional, and that response times meet SLAs. Monitoring data is exposed through dashboards and alerts, enabling operators to detect and respond to server failures or degradation.","intents":["Monitor uptime and availability of MCP servers in production","Get alerted when an MCP server becomes unavailable or unresponsive","Track performance metrics (latency, error rates) for MCP servers over time","Verify that all declared capabilities of an MCP server are actually functional"],"best_for":["Teams running MCP servers in production with SLA requirements","Organizations managing multiple MCP servers and needing centralized observability","DevOps teams wanting to detect and respond to server failures automatically"],"limitations":["Health checks add network overhead and may impact server performance if too frequent","Synthetic health checks may not catch all failure modes (e.g., data corruption, slow degradation)","No built-in correlation with client-side errors — requires external tracing integration"],"requires":["Deployed MCP servers with network accessibility","Monitoring infrastructure (Prometheus, Datadog, CloudWatch, etc.) for metrics storage","Alert routing system (PagerDuty, Slack, email, etc.)"],"input_types":["server endpoint URLs","health check configuration (frequency, timeout, expected responses)","SLA thresholds (uptime %, max latency)"],"output_types":["health status (up/down/degraded)","performance metrics (latency, error rates, throughput)","alert notifications","historical dashboards"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-opentools__cap_7","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.mcp.server.documentation.generation.and.hosting","name":"mcp server documentation generation and hosting","description":"Automatically generates and hosts documentation for MCP servers including capability descriptions, usage examples, API references, and integration guides. The system extracts documentation from server metadata and code comments, generates formatted documentation in multiple formats (HTML, Markdown, PDF), and hosts it on a centralized documentation site. Documentation is versioned alongside server releases and includes interactive examples for testing capabilities.","intents":["Generate API documentation for my MCP server automatically from capability declarations","Create usage examples and integration guides for developers using my MCP server","Host documentation for my MCP server without setting up separate documentation infrastructure","Keep documentation in sync with server versions and capability changes"],"best_for":["MCP server maintainers wanting to provide professional documentation without extra effort","Teams building internal MCP servers and needing to document them for other teams","Open-source projects wanting to lower barriers to adoption through good documentation"],"limitations":["Auto-generated documentation may lack narrative flow and context that hand-written docs provide","Complex usage patterns and edge cases may not be captured by automated extraction","Documentation generation depends on quality of server metadata and code comments"],"requires":["MCP server with complete capability declarations and metadata","Code comments or docstrings describing capabilities and parameters","Version control repository with release tags"],"input_types":["server code and metadata","capability declarations","example code snippets","custom documentation sections (optional)"],"output_types":["HTML documentation site","Markdown documentation files","API reference pages","interactive capability examples"],"categories":["text-generation-language","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":30,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Web browser access to opentools.com","Basic understanding of MCP protocol and use cases","CLI tool installed (language/runtime depends on implementation)","Network access to package repositories","Appropriate system permissions for installation target","Access to opentools.com registry","Knowledge of your current LLM client and version","Development environment for target language (Python 3.9+, Node.js 18+, Go 1.18+, etc.)","Git for version control","Basic understanding of MCP protocol concepts"],"failure_modes":["Registry completeness depends on community contributions — not all MCP servers may be indexed","Search functionality limited to metadata; no semantic search across server capabilities","No built-in server health monitoring or activity metrics to assess maintenance status","Installation abstraction may hide underlying configuration details needed for advanced customization","Dependency resolution limited to declared dependencies; undeclared transitive dependencies may cause runtime failures","No built-in rollback mechanism if installation fails partway through multi-server setups","Compatibility matrix only as current as the last update — may lag behind rapid release cycles","No automated testing of compatibility claims; relies on server maintainers to declare compatibility","Breaking changes in minor versions may not be captured if maintainers don't follow semantic versioning","Templates may become outdated if MCP protocol evolves faster than template updates","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.41,"ecosystem":0.25,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:03.579Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:00:18.053Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=opentools","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=opentools"}},"signature":"vQQc3yk75XarE0J2sNp9RvgA+6tqgLOu1xswsU2J/hhU+8gn7RipnnK35W6D05s5UC1wwrUCUyNJaCmsHz1aDw==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T06:16:22.579Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/opentools","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/opentools","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=opentools","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}