{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"openrouter-openrouter-pareto-code","slug":"openrouter-pareto-code","name":"Pareto Code Router","type":"mcp","url":"https://openrouter.ai/models/openrouter~pareto-code","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/openrouter-pareto-code","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":["openrouter","api-access","text"],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":"$-1.00e+0 per prompt token"},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"openrouter-openrouter-pareto-code__cap_0","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.dynamic.coding.model.selection.via.quality.threshold.routing","name":"dynamic coding model selection via quality threshold routing","description":"Implements a preference-based model router that automatically selects from a curated pool of coding-specialized models based on a user-specified `min_coding_score` parameter. The router evaluates available models against this threshold and picks the strongest performer meeting the criteria, eliminating the need for users to manually select between Claude, GPT-4, Llama, or other coding models. This abstraction layer sits atop OpenRouter's multi-model infrastructure, using internal benchmarking scores to make real-time routing decisions.","intents":["I want the best coding model for my task without manually switching between Claude, GPT-4, and other options","I need to set a minimum quality bar for code generation but remain flexible on which specific model delivers it","I want to optimize cost-to-quality ratio by letting the router pick the most efficient model meeting my coding requirements","I need consistent code quality across API calls without hardcoding a single model that might become outdated"],"best_for":["Development teams building coding assistants who want model agility without vendor lock-in","LLM application builders who need deterministic code quality thresholds across multiple models","Cost-conscious teams wanting to balance model capability with API spend dynamically"],"limitations":["Routing decisions are opaque — users cannot inspect which model was selected or why without logging the response headers","Quality scores are OpenRouter-proprietary and not independently auditable; no access to benchmark methodology","No guarantee of model consistency across calls — same input may route to different models if scores shift","Limited control over routing logic — cannot specify secondary preferences (e.g., prefer open-source models, prefer faster inference)","Coding score thresholds are fixed at OpenRouter's discretion; users cannot define custom scoring criteria"],"requires":["OpenRouter API key with access to the Pareto Code Router endpoint","HTTP/REST client capable of making POST requests with custom headers","Understanding of `min_coding_score` parameter range (specific numeric bounds not documented in artifact)"],"input_types":["text (code snippets, natural language prompts describing coding tasks)","structured JSON (OpenRouter API request format with system/user messages)"],"output_types":["text (generated code, explanations, refactored code)","structured JSON (OpenRouter API response with model identifier in headers)"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-openrouter-pareto-code__cap_1","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.cost.quality.optimization.through.quality.threshold.based.model.pooling","name":"cost-quality optimization through quality-threshold-based model pooling","description":"Enables users to express a single quality preference (`min_coding_score`) that OpenRouter maps to an internal pool of models ranked by coding capability and cost efficiency. The router selects the lowest-cost model meeting the threshold, optimizing API spend while maintaining a quality floor. This works by maintaining a ranked model registry where each model has both a coding score and cost metric, allowing the router to pick the Pareto-optimal choice for the given constraint.","intents":["I want to minimize API costs while ensuring my code generation meets a minimum quality standard","I need to automatically use cheaper models when they're sufficient, but upgrade to premium models for complex tasks","I want to avoid overpaying for Claude when a cheaper model can handle my coding task equally well"],"best_for":["Startups and indie developers with limited API budgets who need cost-aware model selection","Teams building high-volume coding applications where per-request costs compound","Researchers comparing cost-quality trade-offs across different coding models"],"limitations":["No visibility into cost calculations — users cannot see the per-token pricing or cost-quality ratio used by the router","Quality scores are relative to OpenRouter's benchmark suite, not absolute measures of code correctness or performance","Cannot specify cost caps or budget constraints — only quality thresholds; no way to say 'spend max $0.01 per request'","Routing may select models with higher latency if they're cheaper; no way to optimize for speed vs. cost","No historical tracking of which models were selected or their actual performance on your specific use cases"],"requires":["OpenRouter API key with billing enabled","Understanding of your application's acceptable quality floor for code generation","Monitoring of actual API costs to validate that routing is delivering expected savings"],"input_types":["text (code prompts, refactoring requests, debugging tasks)","structured JSON (OpenRouter API request with min_coding_score parameter)"],"output_types":["text (generated or refactored code)","structured JSON (API response with implicit model selection)"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-openrouter-pareto-code__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.abstracted.multi.model.api.with.unified.interface","name":"abstracted multi-model api with unified interface","description":"Provides a single API endpoint that abstracts away differences between Claude, GPT-4, Llama, and other coding models, allowing users to make requests without knowing which underlying model will handle them. The router normalizes request/response formats across models with different tokenization, context windows, and API signatures, translating user inputs into the appropriate format for the selected model and normalizing outputs back to a standard format.","intents":["I want to write code that works with multiple coding models without handling model-specific API differences","I need to switch between models without rewriting my application logic","I want to insulate my application from changes in individual model APIs or deprecations"],"best_for":["Application developers building model-agnostic coding assistants","Teams wanting to reduce coupling to specific model providers","Prototypers who want to experiment with different models without refactoring"],"limitations":["Abstraction hides model-specific capabilities — cannot access advanced features unique to Claude or GPT-4 without breaking the abstraction","Normalization adds latency and potential information loss when translating between model formats","Error handling is abstracted — model-specific errors (e.g., 'context window exceeded') are normalized, losing diagnostic detail","No access to model-specific metadata (e.g., exact token counts, model version, reasoning traces) through the unified interface"],"requires":["OpenRouter API key","HTTP client library","Familiarity with OpenRouter's unified request/response format"],"input_types":["text (code prompts, natural language instructions)","structured JSON (OpenRouter-formatted API requests)"],"output_types":["text (code, explanations)","structured JSON (normalized API responses)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-openrouter-pareto-code__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.preference.based.model.selection.without.manual.routing.logic","name":"preference-based model selection without manual routing logic","description":"Allows users to express coding preferences declaratively (via `min_coding_score`) rather than imperatively selecting a specific model. The router interprets this preference, evaluates the current model pool against it, and makes the selection automatically. This eliminates the need for users to write conditional logic, A/B testing frameworks, or model selection algorithms in their application code.","intents":["I want to specify 'give me a strong coding model' without manually choosing between Claude, GPT-4, and others","I need my application to adapt to new models as OpenRouter adds them without code changes","I want to avoid hardcoding model names that might become deprecated or unavailable"],"best_for":["Developers building coding assistants who want to focus on application logic, not model selection","Teams wanting to future-proof their applications against model availability changes","Non-ML engineers who want simple, declarative model preferences without understanding routing algorithms"],"limitations":["Limited expressiveness — can only specify a single quality threshold, not complex preferences (e.g., 'prefer open-source models' or 'minimize latency')","No feedback loop — cannot tell the router 'this model performed poorly on my use case' to adjust future selections","Preference semantics are opaque — unclear what `min_coding_score=8` means in absolute terms or how it maps to real-world code quality","No way to override the router's decision for specific requests or to specify fallback models"],"requires":["OpenRouter API key","Understanding of the `min_coding_score` parameter and its valid range","HTTP client for making API requests"],"input_types":["text (code prompts)","structured JSON (API request with min_coding_score parameter)"],"output_types":["text (generated code)","structured JSON (API response)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":28,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["OpenRouter API key with access to the Pareto Code Router endpoint","HTTP/REST client capable of making POST requests with custom headers","Understanding of `min_coding_score` parameter range (specific numeric bounds not documented in artifact)","OpenRouter API key with billing enabled","Understanding of your application's acceptable quality floor for code generation","Monitoring of actual API costs to validate that routing is delivering expected savings","OpenRouter API key","HTTP client library","Familiarity with OpenRouter's unified request/response format","Understanding of the `min_coding_score` parameter and its valid range"],"failure_modes":["Routing decisions are opaque — users cannot inspect which model was selected or why without logging the response headers","Quality scores are OpenRouter-proprietary and not independently auditable; no access to benchmark methodology","No guarantee of model consistency across calls — same input may route to different models if scores shift","Limited control over routing logic — cannot specify secondary preferences (e.g., prefer open-source models, prefer faster inference)","Coding score thresholds are fixed at OpenRouter's discretion; users cannot define custom scoring criteria","No visibility into cost calculations — users cannot see the per-token pricing or cost-quality ratio used by the router","Quality scores are relative to OpenRouter's benchmark suite, not absolute measures of code correctness or performance","Cannot specify cost caps or budget constraints — only quality thresholds; no way to say 'spend max $0.01 per request'","Routing may select models with higher latency if they're cheaper; no way to optimize for speed vs. cost","No historical tracking of which models were selected or their actual performance on your specific use cases","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.33,"ecosystem":0.24,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:24.485Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:20:45.775Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=openrouter-pareto-code","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=openrouter-pareto-code"}},"signature":"ZsYCS9E9A64feGsPrLT7HcoyktpOlYlr1wu3dcruykQ+WEwAu44tphTa5bwK62Fn4pGtWO+3h6Jkd5ngewdjCA==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T15:19:32.866Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/openrouter-pareto-code","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/openrouter-pareto-code","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=openrouter-pareto-code","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}