{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"openrouter-openrouter-auto","slug":"openrouter-auto","name":"Auto Router","type":"mcp","url":"https://openrouter.ai/models/openrouter~auto","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/openrouter-auto","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":["openrouter","api-access","text","image","audio","video"],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":"$-1.00e+0 per prompt token"},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"openrouter-openrouter-auto__cap_0","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.dynamic.model.routing.via.meta.model","name":"dynamic-model-routing-via-meta-model","description":"A meta-model analyzes incoming prompts and routes requests to the optimal model from a pool of dozens of language models, vision models, and multimodal models. The routing decision is made server-side based on prompt characteristics, task type, and model capability profiles, abstracting model selection from the user. This enables cost-optimization and quality-optimization without requiring explicit model selection in the API call.","intents":["I want to send a prompt without knowing which model is best for it","I need the best quality output but don't want to manually compare models","I want to optimize for cost while maintaining quality across different task types","I need a single endpoint that handles text, image, audio, and video tasks intelligently"],"best_for":["developers building multi-task AI applications who want to avoid model selection complexity","teams wanting to leverage multiple model providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, etc.) through a single API","cost-conscious builders who want automatic cost-to-quality optimization"],"limitations":["routing decisions are opaque — no visibility into which model was selected or why without explicit logging","latency overhead from meta-model inference adds ~100-300ms per request before actual task execution","no guarantee of consistent model selection for identical prompts across time (models in pool may change)","cannot force specific model selection if the router chooses suboptimally for your use case"],"requires":["OpenRouter API key","HTTP/REST client capable of making API calls","understanding that response headers or metadata may indicate which model was used"],"input_types":["text prompts","images (base64 or URL)","audio files","video files"],"output_types":["text responses","generated images","structured JSON","audio/video (depending on routed model)"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","model-orchestration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-openrouter-auto__cap_1","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.multi.modal.task.detection.and.routing","name":"multi-modal-task-detection-and-routing","description":"The meta-model analyzes prompt content and structure to detect the primary task type (text generation, image generation, code generation, summarization, translation, image analysis, audio processing, etc.) and routes to a model optimized for that specific task. This involves parsing prompt semantics, detecting embedded images or media, and matching against a capability matrix of available models.","intents":["I have a mixed prompt with text and images — route me to a model that handles both well","I want image generation but don't want to call a separate image API","Route my request to the fastest model for this specific task type","I need the most capable model for code generation, not a general-purpose model"],"best_for":["developers building multi-task agents that handle diverse input types","applications that need to handle user prompts without knowing task type in advance","teams consolidating multiple specialized APIs into a single endpoint"],"limitations":["task detection may misclassify ambiguous prompts (e.g., 'write me a poem about code' could route to code or creative writing models)","no explicit task-type parameter — routing is implicit and not user-controllable","latency varies significantly based on task complexity and routing decision time"],"requires":["OpenRouter API key","properly formatted prompts with clear intent signals","support for multimodal input if mixing text and images"],"input_types":["text prompts","text + images","text + audio","text + video"],"output_types":["text","images","code","structured data"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-openrouter-auto__cap_2","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.cost.optimized.model.selection","name":"cost-optimized-model-selection","description":"The meta-model considers pricing tiers and model costs when routing, selecting the cheapest model capable of handling the task while maintaining quality thresholds. This enables automatic cost optimization without sacrificing output quality, by leveraging cheaper models for simpler tasks and premium models only when necessary.","intents":["I want to minimize API costs while keeping quality high","Route me to the cheapest model that can handle this task","I need cost-aware routing that doesn't degrade output quality","Optimize my bill by using cheaper models for simple tasks"],"best_for":["cost-sensitive startups and indie developers with limited budgets","high-volume applications where per-request costs compound","teams wanting to maximize model diversity without proportional cost increases"],"limitations":["cost optimization may route to lower-capability models that produce suboptimal results for complex tasks","no explicit cost budget or threshold control — routing decisions are opaque","pricing changes in the model pool may shift routing behavior without notification","cannot guarantee cost consistency across identical requests if model pricing changes"],"requires":["OpenRouter API key with billing enabled","understanding that cost optimization may trade quality for savings","monitoring of actual costs via OpenRouter dashboard"],"input_types":["text","images","audio","video"],"output_types":["text","images","structured data"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-openrouter-auto__cap_3","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.quality.optimized.model.selection","name":"quality-optimized-model-selection","description":"The meta-model prioritizes output quality and capability when routing, selecting the most capable model for a given task regardless of cost. This involves evaluating model performance benchmarks, capability matrices, and task-specific quality metrics to route to the best-performing model available.","intents":["I need the highest quality output regardless of cost","Route me to the most capable model for this task","I want the best possible result, not the cheapest option","Use premium models for complex reasoning or creative tasks"],"best_for":["quality-critical applications (legal analysis, medical content, high-stakes decision support)","creative and research-focused use cases where output quality is paramount","teams with sufficient budget to prioritize capability over cost"],"limitations":["higher per-request costs due to routing to premium models","no explicit quality threshold or SLA — routing decisions are implicit","quality optimization may route to slower models, increasing latency","no user control over quality vs. cost tradeoff"],"requires":["OpenRouter API key with sufficient credits","acceptance of higher per-request costs","understanding that quality optimization may increase latency"],"input_types":["text","images","code","complex prompts"],"output_types":["text","code","analysis","structured data"],"categories":["planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-openrouter-auto__cap_4","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.latency.optimized.model.selection","name":"latency-optimized-model-selection","description":"The meta-model routes requests to the fastest-responding models available, minimizing end-to-end latency by considering model inference speed, server response times, and network proximity. This enables low-latency applications without sacrificing too much quality, by selecting models that balance speed and capability.","intents":["I need fast responses for real-time user interactions","Route me to the fastest model that can handle this task","Minimize latency for interactive applications","I need sub-second response times for user-facing features"],"best_for":["real-time chat and conversational AI applications","interactive user-facing features requiring fast feedback","high-frequency API consumers where latency compounds"],"limitations":["speed optimization may route to smaller, less capable models","latency varies based on server load and network conditions","no explicit latency SLA or guarantee","cannot control latency-quality tradeoff explicitly"],"requires":["OpenRouter API key","acceptance that speed may come at the cost of capability","monitoring of actual response times"],"input_types":["text","short prompts"],"output_types":["text","structured data"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-openrouter-auto__cap_5","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.unified.api.abstraction.across.model.providers","name":"unified-api-abstraction-across-model-providers","description":"Auto Router provides a single, unified API endpoint that abstracts away the complexity of multiple underlying model providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, Cohere, etc.). Developers call a single endpoint with a standard request format, and the meta-model handles provider-specific API translation, authentication, and response normalization internally.","intents":["I want to use multiple model providers without managing separate API keys and integrations","Provide a single endpoint for my application that works with any model","I don't want to rewrite code when switching between model providers","Consolidate multiple API integrations into one"],"best_for":["developers building provider-agnostic AI applications","teams wanting to avoid vendor lock-in by supporting multiple providers","applications that need to switch providers dynamically based on availability or cost"],"limitations":["abstraction adds latency overhead for request translation and response normalization","provider-specific features or parameters may not be fully exposed through the unified API","error handling and edge cases may differ across providers, requiring normalization logic","no direct access to provider-specific features or advanced parameters"],"requires":["OpenRouter API key","standard HTTP/REST client","understanding that some provider-specific features may not be available"],"input_types":["text","images","audio","video"],"output_types":["text","images","structured data"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","api-abstraction"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-openrouter-auto__cap_6","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.transparent.model.usage.tracking.and.logging","name":"transparent-model-usage-tracking-and-logging","description":"Auto Router provides metadata in API responses indicating which specific model was selected for each request, enabling developers to track model usage patterns, audit routing decisions, and understand which models are being used for which tasks. This transparency is critical for cost analysis, performance monitoring, and debugging routing behavior.","intents":["I need to know which model was used for each request","Track which models are being routed to for cost analysis","Audit routing decisions to understand if they're optimal","Debug why a particular request produced unexpected results"],"best_for":["teams needing cost visibility and billing analysis","developers debugging routing behavior or model performance","applications requiring audit trails for compliance or transparency"],"limitations":["model selection metadata may not be available in all response formats","no built-in analytics dashboard — requires custom logging and analysis","historical routing data may not be retained long-term without custom storage","no ability to override or influence routing decisions based on logged data"],"requires":["OpenRouter API key","custom logging infrastructure to capture and analyze routing metadata","understanding of response header formats and metadata structure"],"input_types":["API responses with metadata"],"output_types":["model selection logs","usage analytics","cost reports"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":31,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["OpenRouter API key","HTTP/REST client capable of making API calls","understanding that response headers or metadata may indicate which model was used","properly formatted prompts with clear intent signals","support for multimodal input if mixing text and images","OpenRouter API key with billing enabled","understanding that cost optimization may trade quality for savings","monitoring of actual costs via OpenRouter dashboard","OpenRouter API key with sufficient credits","acceptance of higher per-request costs"],"failure_modes":["routing decisions are opaque — no visibility into which model was selected or why without explicit logging","latency overhead from meta-model inference adds ~100-300ms per request before actual task execution","no guarantee of consistent model selection for identical prompts across time (models in pool may change)","cannot force specific model selection if the router chooses suboptimally for your use case","task detection may misclassify ambiguous prompts (e.g., 'write me a poem about code' could route to code or creative writing models)","no explicit task-type parameter — routing is implicit and not user-controllable","latency varies significantly based on task complexity and routing decision time","cost optimization may route to lower-capability models that produce suboptimal results for complex tasks","no explicit cost budget or threshold control — routing decisions are opaque","pricing changes in the model pool may shift routing behavior without notification","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.39,"ecosystem":0.33,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:24.485Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:20:45.777Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=openrouter-auto","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=openrouter-auto"}},"signature":"RodYzcNdU0kVru4wH+ABaeyPStlh4uVTMF+yXwyj1uMMKOOTu+tMBy2riqj0lKxBySz8sgehCn/te6hUk8HTBw==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T01:23:26.115Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/openrouter-auto","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/openrouter-auto","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=openrouter-auto","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}