{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"awesome-openhands","slug":"openhands","name":"OpenHands","type":"agent","url":"https://github.com/OpenHands/OpenHands","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/openhands","categories":["ai-agents"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"awesome-openhands__cap_0","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.autonomous.task.decomposition.and.execution","name":"autonomous-task-decomposition-and-execution","description":"OpenHands decomposes high-level software engineering tasks into executable subtasks using an agentic loop that iteratively plans, executes, observes, and refines. The agent maintains internal state across multiple reasoning steps, using LLM-based planning to decide which tools to invoke next based on task progress and environmental feedback. This enables multi-step workflows like 'implement a feature' or 'fix a bug' to be executed without human intervention between steps.","intents":["I want an agent to autonomously implement a feature from a GitHub issue without me manually running commands","I need to automatically fix bugs by having the agent read error logs, modify code, run tests, and iterate until tests pass","I want to delegate code review and refactoring tasks to an agent that can understand context and make structural changes"],"best_for":["teams building autonomous software engineering workflows","developers integrating agentic capabilities into CI/CD pipelines","organizations automating repetitive coding tasks at scale"],"limitations":["task decomposition quality depends on LLM reasoning capability — complex multi-domain tasks may require human guidance","no built-in rollback mechanism if agent makes breaking changes; requires external version control integration","execution time scales with task complexity; no hard timeout guarantees for long-running workflows"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","LLM API access (OpenAI, Anthropic, or local Ollama instance)","Git repository with write access","Unix-like environment or Windows with WSL for shell command execution"],"input_types":["natural language task description","GitHub issue text","error messages and stack traces","code snippets and file paths"],"output_types":["code changes (diffs)","git commits","test results","execution logs","structured task completion status"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-openhands__cap_1","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.codebase.aware.context.management","name":"codebase-aware-context-management","description":"OpenHands maintains a dynamic context window that includes relevant code files, function signatures, and dependency graphs, automatically selecting which files to include in LLM prompts based on the current task. The agent uses static analysis (AST parsing, import tracing) to identify related code and avoid context explosion while ensuring the LLM has sufficient information to make correct decisions. This context is updated after each action based on what files were modified or accessed.","intents":["I want the agent to understand my codebase structure without me manually specifying which files are relevant","I need the agent to make changes that respect existing code patterns and dependencies","I want to avoid sending my entire codebase to the LLM for every request due to cost and latency"],"best_for":["developers working with large codebases (>10K files)","teams concerned about token efficiency and LLM API costs","projects with complex dependency graphs requiring structural understanding"],"limitations":["static analysis may miss dynamic imports or reflection-based code patterns","context selection heuristics are language-specific; support varies across Python, JavaScript, Java, Go, etc.","circular dependencies or highly coupled code may result in context bloat despite filtering"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","language-specific parsers (tree-sitter for most languages)","Git repository with .gitignore properly configured","sufficient disk space for AST caching"],"input_types":["file paths","code snippets","function/class names","import statements"],"output_types":["filtered code context","dependency graphs","relevant file lists","AST representations"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-openhands__cap_10","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.interactive.debugging.with.human.feedback.loops","name":"interactive-debugging-with-human-feedback-loops","description":"OpenHands can pause execution and request human feedback when it encounters ambiguity or needs clarification. The agent can ask questions about task requirements, show proposed changes for approval, or request guidance on complex decisions. This enables a collaborative mode where the agent handles routine tasks but escalates decisions to humans.","intents":["I want the agent to ask me for clarification when the task is ambiguous","I need to review and approve agent changes before they're committed","I want to guide the agent when it's stuck or making incorrect assumptions"],"best_for":["teams requiring human oversight of agent actions","projects with complex or ambiguous requirements","developers building human-in-the-loop automation systems"],"limitations":["interactive mode requires human availability; cannot be fully autonomous","feedback loops add latency; not suitable for time-critical tasks","human feedback quality affects agent performance; poor guidance can lead to worse outcomes"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","communication channel for feedback (CLI, API, webhook)","human availability during agent execution","timeout mechanism to prevent indefinite waiting"],"input_types":["agent questions","proposed changes","clarification requests","human responses"],"output_types":["human feedback","approval decisions","clarifications","guidance"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-openhands__cap_11","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.multi.language.code.understanding.and.generation","name":"multi-language-code-understanding-and-generation","description":"OpenHands supports multiple programming languages (Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, Java, Go, Rust, etc.) with language-specific parsers, syntax validators, and code generation patterns. The agent can understand code structure in any supported language and generate syntactically correct code. Language detection is automatic based on file extensions and content analysis.","intents":["I want the agent to work with my polyglot codebase without language-specific configuration","I need the agent to generate code in multiple languages with correct syntax","I want the agent to refactor code while respecting language-specific idioms"],"best_for":["teams with polyglot codebases","organizations migrating between languages","developers building language-agnostic automation tools"],"limitations":["language support varies; some languages (Python, JavaScript) have better support than others (Kotlin, Scala)","language-specific idioms and best practices may not be followed; agent may generate code that works but isn't idiomatic","cross-language refactoring (e.g., moving code between Python and JavaScript) is not supported"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","tree-sitter or language-specific parsers for each language","language compilers/interpreters in PATH for validation","language-specific linters and formatters (optional but recommended)"],"input_types":["code in any supported language","file paths with language extensions","language identifiers"],"output_types":["generated code in target language","syntax validation results","language-specific formatting"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-openhands__cap_12","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.performance.profiling.and.optimization.suggestions","name":"performance-profiling-and-optimization-suggestions","description":"OpenHands can analyze code for performance issues by running profilers (cProfile for Python, Chrome DevTools for JavaScript, etc.) and interpreting results. The agent identifies bottlenecks and suggests optimizations (caching, algorithm improvements, parallelization). This enables the agent to autonomously improve code performance.","intents":["I want the agent to identify performance bottlenecks in my code","I need the agent to suggest and implement optimizations","I want to automatically refactor slow code to improve performance"],"best_for":["teams with performance-critical applications","developers automating performance optimization","projects with continuous performance monitoring"],"limitations":["profiling results depend on representative workloads; may not catch edge cases","optimization suggestions are heuristic-based; may not be optimal for all scenarios","some optimizations (parallelization, caching) require domain knowledge and may introduce bugs"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","profilers installed (cProfile, py-spy, etc.)","representative test data or workloads","performance baselines for comparison"],"input_types":["code to profile","test workloads","performance targets","profiling configuration"],"output_types":["profiling results","bottleneck identification","optimization suggestions","performance improvements"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-openhands__cap_13","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.documentation.generation.and.maintenance","name":"documentation-generation-and-maintenance","description":"OpenHands can generate or update code documentation (docstrings, comments, README sections) based on code analysis. The agent understands function signatures, parameters, and return types, then generates documentation in standard formats (Google-style, NumPy-style, JSDoc). Documentation is kept in sync with code changes automatically.","intents":["I want the agent to generate docstrings for all functions in my codebase","I need to keep documentation in sync with code changes","I want the agent to generate API documentation from code"],"best_for":["teams with documentation standards","projects requiring comprehensive API documentation","developers automating documentation maintenance"],"limitations":["generated documentation may be generic or miss important details","documentation quality depends on code clarity and naming conventions","maintaining documentation sync requires continuous monitoring"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","AST parsers for function signature extraction","documentation templates or style guides"],"input_types":["code files","function signatures","documentation style specifications"],"output_types":["generated docstrings","documentation files","API documentation","README sections"],"categories":["text-generation-language","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-openhands__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.tool.use.orchestration.with.bash.execution","name":"tool-use-orchestration-with-bash-execution","description":"OpenHands provides a unified interface for the agent to invoke external tools via a tool registry that includes bash command execution, file system operations, and language-specific interpreters. The agent receives structured feedback from each tool invocation (stdout, stderr, exit code, execution time) which informs subsequent decisions. Tool calls are validated against a safety policy before execution to prevent dangerous operations like `rm -rf /`.","intents":["I want the agent to run tests, linters, and build commands to validate its changes","I need the agent to execute arbitrary shell commands as part of a workflow (e.g., install dependencies, run migrations)","I want to extend the agent with custom tools specific to my tech stack"],"best_for":["teams with heterogeneous tech stacks requiring flexible tool integration","developers building custom agentic workflows with domain-specific tools","organizations needing full audit trails of agent-executed commands"],"limitations":["bash execution is synchronous; long-running processes (>5 minutes) may timeout without explicit configuration","no built-in sandboxing — agent runs with same permissions as the process owner; requires OS-level isolation for untrusted agents","tool output parsing is regex-based for some tools; structured output (JSON) is more reliable than free-form text"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Unix-like shell (bash, zsh) or Windows with WSL2","tools installed in PATH (git, python, node, etc. depending on codebase)","write permissions to repository and temporary directories"],"input_types":["bash commands","file paths","environment variables","structured tool schemas"],"output_types":["command output (stdout/stderr)","exit codes","execution time","structured results (JSON if tool supports it)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-openhands__cap_3","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.code.generation.with.language.specific.syntax.validation","name":"code-generation-with-language-specific-syntax-validation","description":"OpenHands generates code by prompting an LLM and then validates the generated code using language-specific parsers (tree-sitter, Python AST, TypeScript compiler) before committing changes. If syntax is invalid, the agent receives detailed error messages and can iteratively refine the code. This prevents broken code from being written to disk and ensures generated code is at least syntactically correct.","intents":["I want the agent to generate code that compiles/parses without syntax errors","I need the agent to refactor code while maintaining syntactic correctness","I want to catch code generation mistakes early before they propagate to tests"],"best_for":["teams requiring high code quality standards","projects where syntax errors are expensive (compiled languages, strict type systems)","developers building code generation pipelines with automated validation"],"limitations":["syntax validation only catches parse errors, not semantic errors (e.g., undefined variables, type mismatches)","language support varies; some languages (Rust, Go) have better parser support than others (Kotlin, Scala)","validation adds ~50-200ms per code generation step depending on file size and language"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","tree-sitter or language-specific parser libraries","language compiler/interpreter in PATH for semantic validation (optional but recommended)"],"input_types":["code snippets","file paths","language identifiers","modification instructions"],"output_types":["validated code","syntax error reports","diff representations","validation status (pass/fail)"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-openhands__cap_4","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.test.driven.development.loop.with.feedback","name":"test-driven-development-loop-with-feedback","description":"OpenHands can execute test suites (pytest, Jest, unittest, etc.) and parse test output to identify failures, then use that feedback to guide code modifications. The agent understands test failure messages and can correlate them to specific code locations, enabling it to iteratively fix code until tests pass. This creates a feedback loop where the agent's changes are validated against the test suite.","intents":["I want the agent to fix failing tests by understanding error messages and modifying relevant code","I need the agent to implement features test-first, writing code that passes existing test suites","I want to ensure agent-generated code is validated against my test suite before committing"],"best_for":["teams with comprehensive test coverage","projects using TDD or BDD practices","developers automating bug fixes and feature implementation"],"limitations":["test parsing is language-specific; custom test frameworks may not be recognized","flaky tests can cause the agent to enter infinite retry loops; requires stable test suites","test execution time scales with suite size; large test suites (>1000 tests) may be slow"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","test framework installed (pytest, Jest, unittest, etc.)","tests executable in the current environment","test output in standard format (JUnit XML, TAP, or parseable text)"],"input_types":["test file paths","test failure messages","code to be tested","test configuration"],"output_types":["test results (pass/fail)","failure messages with line numbers","code coverage reports","execution time metrics"],"categories":["automation-workflow","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-openhands__cap_5","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.git.aware.change.tracking.and.commit.generation","name":"git-aware-change-tracking-and-commit-generation","description":"OpenHands integrates with Git to track file changes, generate meaningful commit messages, and manage branches. The agent can create commits with appropriate messages based on the changes made, revert changes if needed, and maintain a clean git history. This enables the agent to work within standard version control workflows and produce auditable change records.","intents":["I want the agent to create well-formatted commits with descriptive messages for each logical change","I need to track what the agent changed and be able to revert specific changes if needed","I want the agent to work on feature branches and create pull requests with proper commit history"],"best_for":["teams using Git-based workflows","projects requiring audit trails and change tracking","developers integrating agents into CI/CD pipelines with PR automation"],"limitations":["commit message generation relies on LLM quality; may produce generic or inaccurate messages","no built-in conflict resolution; agent cannot automatically merge conflicting branches","large binary files or LFS-tracked files may cause performance issues"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Git 2.20+","repository with write access","Git configured with user.name and user.email"],"input_types":["file paths","change descriptions","branch names","commit message templates"],"output_types":["git diffs","commit hashes","branch names","commit messages","change summaries"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-openhands__cap_6","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.multi.file.refactoring.with.structural.awareness","name":"multi-file-refactoring-with-structural-awareness","description":"OpenHands can refactor code across multiple files by understanding code structure (classes, functions, imports) and updating all references consistently. The agent uses AST analysis to identify all usages of a renamed function or moved class, then updates them atomically. This prevents broken references and ensures refactoring is complete across the codebase.","intents":["I want to rename a function and have all call sites updated automatically","I need to move a class to a different module and update all imports","I want to extract a function from one file and use it in multiple files with proper imports"],"best_for":["teams with large codebases requiring frequent refactoring","developers automating code modernization tasks","projects with strict code organization standards"],"limitations":["refactoring is language-specific; complex metaprogramming or dynamic code may not be handled correctly","circular dependencies can complicate refactoring; may require manual intervention","refactoring large files (>5000 lines) may be slow due to AST analysis overhead"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","tree-sitter or language-specific AST parser","full codebase access for import analysis","test suite to validate refactoring correctness"],"input_types":["function/class names","old and new names/locations","file paths","refactoring type (rename, move, extract)"],"output_types":["modified files","updated imports","refactoring summary","validation results"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-openhands__cap_7","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.error.diagnosis.and.debugging.assistance","name":"error-diagnosis-and-debugging-assistance","description":"OpenHands analyzes error messages, stack traces, and logs to diagnose root causes and suggest fixes. The agent can parse error output from compilers, interpreters, and test frameworks, correlate errors to code locations, and use that information to guide code modifications. This enables the agent to autonomously debug issues without human intervention.","intents":["I want the agent to read a stack trace and identify which code change caused the error","I need the agent to fix compilation errors by understanding compiler error messages","I want the agent to diagnose test failures and suggest code fixes"],"best_for":["teams automating bug fixes","developers building self-healing systems","projects with comprehensive error logging"],"limitations":["error diagnosis quality depends on error message clarity; cryptic errors may confuse the agent","some errors (race conditions, memory leaks) are difficult to diagnose from logs alone","agent may fix symptoms rather than root causes without domain knowledge"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","error logs or stack traces in standard format","source code with line numbers matching error messages","language-specific error parsers"],"input_types":["error messages","stack traces","log files","compiler/interpreter output"],"output_types":["root cause analysis","suggested fixes","code modifications","diagnostic reports"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-openhands__cap_8","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.natural.language.task.interpretation.and.planning","name":"natural-language-task-interpretation-and-planning","description":"OpenHands accepts high-level natural language task descriptions (e.g., 'add pagination to the user list endpoint') and decomposes them into concrete steps using LLM reasoning. The agent creates a plan that includes identifying affected files, understanding current implementation, making changes, and validating results. This plan is executed step-by-step with feedback loops.","intents":["I want to describe a feature in plain English and have the agent implement it","I need the agent to understand ambiguous requirements and ask clarifying questions","I want the agent to break down complex tasks into manageable steps"],"best_for":["non-technical stakeholders describing features","teams with clear documentation and code comments","projects where task clarity is high"],"limitations":["ambiguous or incomplete task descriptions may result in incorrect implementations","agent cannot ask clarifying questions in autonomous mode; requires human feedback","task interpretation quality depends on codebase documentation and code clarity"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","LLM API access","well-documented codebase with clear naming conventions","existing code examples for the agent to learn from"],"input_types":["natural language task descriptions","GitHub issues","feature specifications","user stories"],"output_types":["task decomposition","execution plan","implementation steps","completion status"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-openhands__cap_9","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.dependency.and.import.management.automation","name":"dependency-and-import-management-automation","description":"OpenHands automatically manages imports and dependencies when generating or modifying code. When the agent uses a new function or class, it can add the necessary import statements, install missing packages via package managers (pip, npm, etc.), and update dependency files (requirements.txt, package.json). This ensures generated code is immediately runnable without manual dependency resolution.","intents":["I want the agent to add import statements automatically when using new libraries","I need the agent to install missing dependencies and update dependency files","I want to avoid broken imports when the agent refactors code"],"best_for":["teams with multiple package managers and dependency formats","projects with strict dependency management policies","developers automating code generation with external library usage"],"limitations":["package installation may fail due to version conflicts; agent cannot resolve complex dependency graphs","some package managers (Gradle, Maven) have complex configuration; support is limited","adding dependencies without testing may introduce security vulnerabilities or incompatibilities"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","package managers installed (pip, npm, cargo, etc.)","write access to dependency files","network access for package downloads"],"input_types":["library names","import statements","version specifications","dependency files"],"output_types":["updated import statements","modified dependency files","installation logs","dependency resolution status"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":27,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Python 3.8+","LLM API access (OpenAI, Anthropic, or local Ollama instance)","Git repository with write access","Unix-like environment or Windows with WSL for shell command execution","language-specific parsers (tree-sitter for most languages)","Git repository with .gitignore properly configured","sufficient disk space for AST caching","communication channel for feedback (CLI, API, webhook)","human availability during agent execution","timeout mechanism to prevent indefinite waiting"],"failure_modes":["task decomposition quality depends on LLM reasoning capability — complex multi-domain tasks may require human guidance","no built-in rollback mechanism if agent makes breaking changes; requires external version control integration","execution time scales with task complexity; no hard timeout guarantees for long-running workflows","static analysis may miss dynamic imports or reflection-based code patterns","context selection heuristics are language-specific; support varies across Python, JavaScript, Java, Go, etc.","circular dependencies or highly coupled code may result in context bloat despite filtering","interactive mode requires human availability; cannot be fully autonomous","feedback loops add latency; not suitable for time-critical tasks","human feedback quality affects agent performance; poor guidance can lead to worse outcomes","language support varies; some languages (Python, JavaScript) have better support than others (Kotlin, Scala)","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.35,"ecosystem":0.39999999999999997,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.52,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.28,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:03.579Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:00:20.516Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=openhands","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=openhands"}},"signature":"nPtk+vK5al+JdVO4erBo4WgLRyTnMjzKAsdS29VlJMWU/9qutE6F8o9LZoA8od2ULj6RLk+AhEiC9yZUsimIAA==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T17:18:01.589Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/openhands","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/openhands","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=openhands","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}