{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"awesome-openfort","slug":"openfort","name":"Openfort","type":"mcp","url":"https://github.com/openfort-xyz/mcp","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/openfort","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"awesome-openfort__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.based.wallet.authentication.integration","name":"mcp-based wallet authentication integration","description":"Provides standardized Model Context Protocol (MCP) bindings for integrating blockchain wallet authentication into AI assistants without custom API wrappers. Implements MCP server pattern to expose wallet connection, signing, and session management as callable tools that LLMs can invoke directly, abstracting away provider-specific authentication flows (MetaMask, WalletConnect, etc.) behind a unified interface.","intents":["I want my AI agent to authenticate users via blockchain wallets without building custom integrations","I need to expose wallet operations as callable tools in my LLM application","I want to standardize how my AI handles wallet connections across multiple providers"],"best_for":["AI agents and assistants requiring blockchain user authentication","Teams building Web3 applications with LLM backends","Developers migrating from REST-based wallet APIs to MCP protocol"],"limitations":["Requires MCP-compatible LLM client (Claude, custom implementations) — not compatible with standard OpenAI API","Authentication state is ephemeral per MCP session — requires external persistence for multi-turn wallet sessions","No built-in rate limiting or transaction signing validation — relies on downstream wallet provider security"],"requires":["MCP client implementation (e.g., Claude SDK with MCP support)","Node.js 16+ or Python 3.8+ runtime","Blockchain wallet provider SDK (MetaMask, ethers.js, or similar)"],"input_types":["wallet address (string)","transaction objects (JSON)","signing requests (structured data)"],"output_types":["signed transactions (hex string)","wallet metadata (JSON)","authentication tokens (string)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","blockchain"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-openfort__cap_1","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.smart.contract.scaffolding.and.project.generation","name":"smart contract scaffolding and project generation","description":"Generates boilerplate smart contract projects and Web3 application structures via MCP tools that LLMs can invoke. Implements template-based code generation with configurable parameters (contract type, blockchain target, dependency versions) and outputs ready-to-deploy project directories with compiled artifacts, test suites, and deployment scripts pre-configured for target networks.","intents":["I want my AI assistant to generate starter smart contract projects from natural language descriptions","I need to scaffold Web3 dApps with pre-configured tooling (Hardhat, Foundry, etc.) via AI prompts","I want to generate contract boilerplate that's immediately testable and deployable"],"best_for":["AI-assisted smart contract development workflows","Teams prototyping multiple contract variants quickly","Non-expert developers learning smart contract patterns via AI guidance"],"limitations":["Generated code requires security audit before mainnet deployment — no built-in vulnerability scanning","Template library is fixed at build time — adding custom templates requires forking or extending the MCP server","No support for cross-chain contract patterns (e.g., LayerZero, Axelar) — limited to single-chain scaffolds"],"requires":["Node.js 16+ or Python 3.8+","Solidity compiler (solc) 0.8.0+ or Rust toolchain for Foundry","MCP client with code generation capability"],"input_types":["natural language project description (string)","configuration parameters (JSON: contract type, blockchain, version)","template selection (enum)"],"output_types":["project directory structure (file tree)","smart contract source code (Solidity/Rust)","deployment scripts (JavaScript/Python)","test suite (Hardhat/Foundry format)"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-openfort__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.embedded.wallet.creation.and.management","name":"embedded wallet creation and management","description":"Provides MCP tools for programmatic creation and lifecycle management of embedded (non-custodial) blockchain wallets within AI applications. Implements key derivation, account abstraction support, and transaction building without exposing private keys to the LLM, using secure enclave patterns or hardware-backed key storage. Enables AI agents to manage user wallets on behalf of applications while maintaining cryptographic security boundaries.","intents":["I want my AI agent to create wallets for users without requiring external wallet software","I need to build account abstraction (AA) wallets that support gasless transactions via my AI","I want to manage wallet lifecycle (creation, recovery, rotation) programmatically via AI tools"],"best_for":["AI-powered Web3 applications requiring seamless onboarding","Teams building account abstraction infrastructure with LLM interfaces","Applications needing programmatic wallet management at scale"],"limitations":["Private key material never exposed to LLM, but key storage security depends on host environment — requires secure enclave or HSM for production","Account abstraction support limited to ERC-4337 compatible networks — no Solana or other VM support","Recovery mechanisms (seed phrases, social recovery) require additional infrastructure — not included in base MCP server"],"requires":["Node.js 16+ or Python 3.8+","Blockchain RPC endpoint (Infura, Alchemy, or self-hosted)","Account abstraction bundler endpoint (Pimlico, Stackup, or similar) for AA features","Secure key storage backend (AWS KMS, HashiCorp Vault, or local encrypted store)"],"input_types":["user identifier (string)","wallet configuration (JSON: chain ID, account type)","transaction parameters (JSON: to, value, data)"],"output_types":["wallet address (hex string)","transaction hash (hex string)","wallet metadata (JSON: creation time, balance, nonce)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-openfort__cap_3","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.transaction.building.and.simulation.with.on.chain.state.awareness","name":"transaction building and simulation with on-chain state awareness","description":"Constructs and simulates blockchain transactions by querying live on-chain state (balances, allowances, contract state) and building transaction objects that account for current network conditions (gas prices, nonce management). Implements state-aware transaction building where the MCP server fetches required data from blockchain RPC endpoints and constructs transactions that are validated against current state before signing, preventing failed transactions due to stale assumptions.","intents":["I want my AI agent to build transactions that won't fail due to insufficient balance or stale nonce","I need to simulate transactions before signing to estimate gas and validate logic","I want the AI to automatically handle gas price estimation and nonce management"],"best_for":["AI agents executing complex multi-step transactions (swaps, lending, staking)","Applications requiring high transaction success rates without user intervention","Teams building autonomous trading or portfolio management agents"],"limitations":["Simulation accuracy depends on RPC provider — some providers (Infura, Alchemy) have limited simulation APIs vs full archive nodes","State queries add 200-500ms latency per transaction build — not suitable for sub-second trading","Complex contract interactions (flash loans, MEV-aware routing) require custom simulation logic — not included in base implementation"],"requires":["Blockchain RPC endpoint with eth_call and eth_estimateGas support","ethers.js 5.0+ or web3.py 5.0+ for transaction building","Access to contract ABIs for state queries (optional but recommended)"],"input_types":["transaction intent (JSON: from, to, function, args)","blockchain network (enum: mainnet, testnet, etc.)","simulation parameters (JSON: block number, state overrides)"],"output_types":["transaction object (JSON: to, data, value, gas)","simulation result (JSON: success, gas used, revert reason)","gas estimate (wei, formatted string)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-openfort__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.multi.provider.blockchain.rpc.abstraction","name":"multi-provider blockchain rpc abstraction","description":"Abstracts blockchain RPC calls across multiple providers (Infura, Alchemy, QuickNode, self-hosted) with automatic failover, load balancing, and provider-specific optimization. Implements a provider registry pattern where the MCP server routes calls to the best available provider based on method support, latency, and rate limit status, and transparently handles provider-specific quirks (response format differences, timeout behavior).","intents":["I want my AI agent to work reliably even if one RPC provider is down","I need to optimize RPC calls across multiple providers to minimize latency","I want to avoid hardcoding provider endpoints and handle provider switching transparently"],"best_for":["Production AI agents requiring high availability","Teams managing multiple blockchain networks with different RPC providers","Applications sensitive to RPC latency (trading, real-time monitoring)"],"limitations":["Failover adds 50-200ms latency on provider failures — not suitable for sub-100ms requirements","Load balancing is round-robin or latency-based — no intelligent request routing based on method type","Rate limit handling is reactive (retry on 429) — no proactive quota management across providers"],"requires":["API keys for at least 2 RPC providers (Infura, Alchemy, etc.)","Node.js 16+ or Python 3.8+","Network connectivity to multiple RPC endpoints"],"input_types":["RPC method name (string: eth_call, eth_sendTransaction, etc.)","RPC parameters (JSON)","provider preference (optional: enum or priority list)"],"output_types":["RPC response (JSON, format varies by method)","provider used (string: metadata about which provider handled request)","latency metrics (milliseconds)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-openfort__cap_5","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.natural.language.to.smart.contract.interaction.translation","name":"natural language to smart contract interaction translation","description":"Translates natural language descriptions of contract interactions into properly formatted function calls with correct parameter types and ABI encoding. Parses contract ABIs, matches natural language intent to contract functions using semantic matching or heuristics, and generates typed function call objects that can be directly executed. Enables LLMs to interact with arbitrary smart contracts without explicit ABI knowledge by bridging the semantic gap between natural language and low-level contract interfaces.","intents":["I want my AI agent to understand 'swap 1 ETH for USDC' and translate it to a Uniswap contract call","I need the AI to infer correct function parameters from natural language without explicit type hints","I want to interact with new contracts without manually providing function signatures to the AI"],"best_for":["AI agents interacting with multiple DeFi protocols","Applications requiring flexible contract interaction without hardcoded function mappings","Teams building natural language blockchain interfaces"],"limitations":["Semantic matching is heuristic-based — ambiguous function names may resolve incorrectly (e.g., 'swap' matching wrong DEX function)","Parameter type inference relies on context — complex types (nested structs, arrays) may require explicit specification","No support for contract function overloading — assumes unique function names per contract"],"requires":["Contract ABI (JSON format)","Semantic matching model (built-in heuristics or external embedding model)","ethers.js 5.0+ or web3.py 5.0+ for ABI encoding"],"input_types":["natural language intent (string: 'swap 1 ETH for USDC')","contract ABI (JSON)","optional: parameter hints (JSON with partial values)"],"output_types":["function call object (JSON: functionName, args, encoded data)","confidence score (0-1 float)","alternative matches (array of possible functions)"],"categories":["text-generation-language","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-openfort__cap_6","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.mcp.server.lifecycle.and.context.management","name":"mcp server lifecycle and context management","description":"Manages the lifecycle of the Openfort MCP server including initialization, configuration loading, context preservation across tool calls, and graceful shutdown. Implements context management patterns where wallet state, transaction history, and provider connections are maintained across multiple LLM tool invocations within a single conversation, enabling stateful AI workflows without requiring external session storage.","intents":["I want my AI agent to maintain wallet context across multiple transactions in one conversation","I need the MCP server to initialize with my blockchain configuration without manual setup","I want to ensure wallet state is properly cleaned up when the conversation ends"],"best_for":["Multi-turn AI conversations requiring persistent wallet state","Teams deploying Openfort as a managed service","Applications needing automatic resource cleanup and error recovery"],"limitations":["Context is in-memory — lost on server restart unless persisted to external store","No built-in distributed context sharing — each MCP server instance has isolated state","Cleanup is synchronous — long-running cleanup operations may block new requests"],"requires":["Node.js 16+ or Python 3.8+","Configuration file or environment variables for initialization","Optional: external state store (Redis, database) for persistence"],"input_types":["server configuration (JSON or environment variables)","initialization parameters (JSON)"],"output_types":["server status (JSON: running, ready, error)","context metadata (JSON: active wallets, sessions)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":30,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["MCP client implementation (e.g., Claude SDK with MCP support)","Node.js 16+ or Python 3.8+ runtime","Blockchain wallet provider SDK (MetaMask, ethers.js, or similar)","Node.js 16+ or Python 3.8+","Solidity compiler (solc) 0.8.0+ or Rust toolchain for Foundry","MCP client with code generation capability","Blockchain RPC endpoint (Infura, Alchemy, or self-hosted)","Account abstraction bundler endpoint (Pimlico, Stackup, or similar) for AA features","Secure key storage backend (AWS KMS, HashiCorp Vault, or local encrypted store)","Blockchain RPC endpoint with eth_call and eth_estimateGas support"],"failure_modes":["Requires MCP-compatible LLM client (Claude, custom implementations) — not compatible with standard OpenAI API","Authentication state is ephemeral per MCP session — requires external persistence for multi-turn wallet sessions","No built-in rate limiting or transaction signing validation — relies on downstream wallet provider security","Generated code requires security audit before mainnet deployment — no built-in vulnerability scanning","Template library is fixed at build time — adding custom templates requires forking or extending the MCP server","No support for cross-chain contract patterns (e.g., LayerZero, Axelar) — limited to single-chain scaffolds","Private key material never exposed to LLM, but key storage security depends on host environment — requires secure enclave or HSM for production","Account abstraction support limited to ERC-4337 compatible networks — no Solana or other VM support","Recovery mechanisms (seed phrases, social recovery) require additional infrastructure — not included in base MCP server","Simulation accuracy depends on RPC provider — some providers (Infura, Alchemy) have limited simulation APIs vs full archive nodes","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.39,"ecosystem":0.39999999999999997,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.6,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:03.579Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:00:15.503Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=openfort","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=openfort"}},"signature":"12oKQl4cR0ytjdI1Iwk3RUkAcITBZOWXR7jhTUdmGs/6Jc36CP5+aNhXUzR+u5uCBbuOs0QUv0UGd+mrt8utCw==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T19:59:38.350Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/openfort","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/openfort","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=openfort","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}