{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"openrouter-openai-o1-pro","slug":"openai-o1-pro","name":"OpenAI: o1-pro","type":"model","url":"https://openrouter.ai/models/openai~o1-pro","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/openai-o1-pro","categories":["model-training"],"tags":["openai","api-access","text","image"],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":"$1.50e-4 per prompt token"},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"openrouter-openai-o1-pro__cap_0","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.extended.chain.of.thought.reasoning.with.compute.allocation","name":"extended-chain-of-thought reasoning with compute allocation","description":"o1-pro implements reinforcement learning-trained reasoning that allocates variable compute budgets to internal chain-of-thought processes before generating responses. The model learns to spend more computational tokens on harder problems, using a learned policy to decide when to think longer versus answer directly. This is distinct from prompt-based CoT because the reasoning is learned during training rather than instructed, enabling adaptive complexity handling without explicit prompting.","intents":["solve complex multi-step mathematical proofs that require deep reasoning","debug intricate software architecture problems requiring systems-level thinking","analyze nuanced research questions requiring synthesis across multiple domains","generate solutions to novel problems without step-by-step guidance"],"best_for":["researchers and engineers solving novel technical problems","teams building reasoning-heavy AI applications (theorem proving, formal verification)","developers needing high-confidence answers on complex queries without prompt engineering"],"limitations":["internal reasoning tokens are not exposed to users — no visibility into thinking process","higher latency than standard models due to extended reasoning (typically 10-60 seconds per query)","significantly higher per-token cost due to compute-intensive reasoning phase","reasoning budget is fixed per query — cannot be dynamically adjusted by users","less suitable for real-time applications or high-throughput scenarios"],"requires":["OpenAI API key with o1-pro model access","HTTP/REST client or OpenAI SDK (Python 1.0+, Node.js 4.0+, etc.)","tolerance for 10-60 second response latencies","budget for higher token costs (approximately 10-20x standard model pricing)"],"input_types":["text (natural language queries, problem statements, code snippets)"],"output_types":["text (reasoning-derived answers, explanations, solutions)"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","complex-problem-solving"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-openai-o1-pro__cap_1","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.multi.domain.complex.problem.decomposition.and.synthesis","name":"multi-domain complex problem decomposition and synthesis","description":"o1-pro can decompose intricate problems spanning multiple technical domains (mathematics, physics, software engineering, formal logic) and synthesize solutions by reasoning across domain boundaries. The model internally breaks down problems into sub-components, reasons about each, and integrates results — all within the extended reasoning phase. This differs from retrieval-based approaches because reasoning is generative and learned rather than lookup-based.","intents":["solve interdisciplinary research problems requiring knowledge synthesis across fields","debug complex system failures that span multiple architectural layers","generate formal proofs or mathematical derivations with multi-step logic","architect solutions to novel engineering challenges without domain-specific tools"],"best_for":["academic researchers and PhD students tackling novel problems","senior engineers solving architecture-level system design challenges","teams building formal verification or theorem-proving systems"],"limitations":["reasoning process is opaque — cannot inspect intermediate decomposition steps","performance degrades on problems requiring specialized domain tools (e.g., numerical solvers, symbolic math engines)","may over-reason on simple problems, wasting compute budget","no ability to integrate external tools or APIs during reasoning phase"],"requires":["OpenAI API key with o1-pro access","clear, well-structured problem statement (ambiguous queries reduce reasoning effectiveness)","acceptance of non-deterministic outputs (same query may produce different reasoning paths)"],"input_types":["text (problem statements, code, mathematical notation, system descriptions)"],"output_types":["text (synthesized solutions, proofs, explanations, architectural recommendations)"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-openai-o1-pro__cap_2","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.code.generation.and.debugging.with.reasoning.informed.context","name":"code generation and debugging with reasoning-informed context","description":"o1-pro generates and debugs code by reasoning through implementation details, edge cases, and architectural implications before producing output. The extended reasoning phase allows the model to consider multiple implementation approaches, anticipate failure modes, and select optimal solutions. Unlike standard code generation models that produce code directly, o1-pro's reasoning phase enables deeper understanding of requirements and constraints.","intents":["generate correct implementations of complex algorithms on first attempt","debug subtle bugs in multi-threaded or distributed systems code","refactor large codebases while reasoning about architectural implications","generate code that handles edge cases and error conditions comprehensively"],"best_for":["backend engineers building critical infrastructure","teams implementing complex algorithms or data structures","developers working on systems where correctness is paramount (financial, medical, aerospace)"],"limitations":["reasoning latency makes it unsuitable for real-time code completion workflows","cannot directly execute or test generated code — requires manual validation","reasoning process cannot access external documentation or APIs during thinking phase","generated code may be over-engineered for simple problems due to extended reasoning"],"requires":["OpenAI API key with o1-pro access","code context or problem description (more detailed context improves reasoning quality)","ability to wait 10-60 seconds for response","manual testing and validation infrastructure"],"input_types":["text (code snippets, problem descriptions, requirements, error messages)","code (existing implementations, test cases, architecture diagrams as text)"],"output_types":["code (generated implementations, refactored code, bug fixes)","text (explanations of reasoning, architectural recommendations)"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-openai-o1-pro__cap_3","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.mathematical.proof.generation.and.verification.reasoning","name":"mathematical proof generation and verification reasoning","description":"o1-pro can generate formal and informal mathematical proofs by reasoning through logical steps, verifying intermediate results, and ensuring soundness of derivations. The extended reasoning phase allows the model to explore proof strategies, backtrack when approaches fail, and synthesize valid proofs. This differs from retrieval-based proof systems because proofs are generated through reasoning rather than looked up from databases.","intents":["generate proofs for mathematical theorems in discrete math, calculus, or linear algebra","verify correctness of mathematical derivations and identify logical gaps","explore alternative proof strategies and compare their elegance or efficiency","generate counterexamples to disprove conjectures through systematic reasoning"],"best_for":["mathematics students and educators verifying proof correctness","researchers exploring new mathematical results","teams building automated theorem proving systems"],"limitations":["cannot generate proofs for theorems requiring specialized mathematical tools (e.g., computer algebra systems)","reasoning is not formally verified — proofs may contain subtle logical errors","performance degrades on proofs requiring deep knowledge of specialized domains (e.g., algebraic topology)","cannot access mathematical databases or proof libraries during reasoning"],"requires":["OpenAI API key with o1-pro access","clear mathematical problem statement with definitions and assumptions","knowledge of mathematical notation to interpret outputs"],"input_types":["text (theorem statements, definitions, assumptions, proof sketches)"],"output_types":["text (formal or informal proofs, step-by-step derivations, counterexamples)"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-openai-o1-pro__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.api.based.access.with.streaming.and.batch.processing.support","name":"api-based access with streaming and batch processing support","description":"o1-pro is accessed via OpenAI's REST API with support for both streaming responses and batch processing modes. The API abstracts the underlying reasoning infrastructure, exposing a standard chat completion interface with extended reasoning parameters. Streaming allows progressive output delivery, while batch mode enables asynchronous processing of multiple queries with optimized throughput and cost efficiency.","intents":["integrate o1-pro reasoning into production applications via REST API","process large batches of complex reasoning queries asynchronously","stream reasoning outputs to users for progressive feedback","build multi-turn reasoning conversations with context management"],"best_for":["backend engineers building AI-powered applications","teams processing large volumes of reasoning queries offline","developers building interactive reasoning interfaces with streaming"],"limitations":["streaming adds latency overhead compared to batch processing","batch processing introduces additional latency (typically hours) for processing","API rate limits may restrict throughput for high-volume applications","no local inference option — all reasoning happens on OpenAI infrastructure"],"requires":["OpenAI API key with o1-pro model access","HTTP client library or OpenAI SDK (Python 1.0+, Node.js 4.0+, etc.)","network connectivity to OpenAI API endpoints","budget for API usage (pay-per-token pricing model)"],"input_types":["text (JSON-formatted chat messages with role and content fields)"],"output_types":["text (JSON-formatted chat completion responses with reasoning tokens and output)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-openai-o1-pro__cap_5","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.context.aware.multi.turn.reasoning.conversations","name":"context-aware multi-turn reasoning conversations","description":"o1-pro maintains conversation context across multiple turns, allowing users to build on previous reasoning results and refine solutions iteratively. The model carries forward context from prior exchanges, enabling follow-up questions that reference earlier reasoning without re-explaining the problem. This differs from stateless APIs because the model can reason about relationships between current and previous queries.","intents":["iteratively refine solutions by asking follow-up questions based on previous reasoning","explore alternative approaches to a problem by building on prior reasoning context","debug code by asking clarifying questions and building on previous analysis","conduct multi-turn research discussions where each turn builds on prior insights"],"best_for":["researchers and engineers exploring problems iteratively","teams conducting collaborative reasoning sessions","developers debugging complex systems through dialogue"],"limitations":["context window is limited — very long conversations may lose early context","each turn incurs full reasoning cost — no caching of prior reasoning results","context management is user's responsibility — no automatic summarization","reasoning is not deterministic — same follow-up question may produce different results"],"requires":["OpenAI API key with o1-pro access","client application managing conversation history and message ordering","ability to track and pass conversation context across API calls"],"input_types":["text (chat messages with role and content, conversation history)"],"output_types":["text (reasoning-informed responses that reference prior context)"],"categories":["text-generation-language","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-openai-o1-pro__cap_6","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.structured.reasoning.output.with.confidence.and.uncertainty.quantification","name":"structured reasoning output with confidence and uncertainty quantification","description":"o1-pro can generate structured outputs that include confidence levels and uncertainty estimates alongside reasoning results. The model learns to express confidence in its reasoning through the reinforcement learning process, providing signals about solution reliability. This enables downstream applications to make decisions based on reasoning confidence rather than treating all outputs as equally reliable.","intents":["identify high-confidence solutions versus uncertain reasoning results","prioritize manual review of low-confidence reasoning outputs","make risk-aware decisions based on solution confidence levels","build fallback strategies for low-confidence reasoning results"],"best_for":["teams building safety-critical reasoning applications","systems requiring human-in-the-loop validation of reasoning results","applications where confidence levels inform downstream decision-making"],"limitations":["confidence estimates are learned heuristics, not formal probability bounds","no calibration guarantees — confidence may not correlate with actual correctness","confidence is implicit in reasoning output — requires interpretation","no explicit uncertainty quantification methods (e.g., Bayesian intervals)"],"requires":["OpenAI API key with o1-pro access","application logic to interpret and act on confidence signals","validation data to calibrate confidence estimates for specific domains"],"input_types":["text (problem statements, queries)"],"output_types":["text (reasoning outputs with implicit confidence signals)"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":24,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"low","permissions":["OpenAI API key with o1-pro model access","HTTP/REST client or OpenAI SDK (Python 1.0+, Node.js 4.0+, etc.)","tolerance for 10-60 second response latencies","budget for higher token costs (approximately 10-20x standard model pricing)","OpenAI API key with o1-pro access","clear, well-structured problem statement (ambiguous queries reduce reasoning effectiveness)","acceptance of non-deterministic outputs (same query may produce different reasoning paths)","code context or problem description (more detailed context improves reasoning quality)","ability to wait 10-60 seconds for response","manual testing and validation infrastructure"],"failure_modes":["internal reasoning tokens are not exposed to users — no visibility into thinking process","higher latency than standard models due to extended reasoning (typically 10-60 seconds per query)","significantly higher per-token cost due to compute-intensive reasoning phase","reasoning budget is fixed per query — cannot be dynamically adjusted by users","less suitable for real-time applications or high-throughput scenarios","reasoning process is opaque — cannot inspect intermediate decomposition steps","performance degrades on problems requiring specialized domain tools (e.g., numerical solvers, symbolic math engines)","may over-reason on simple problems, wasting compute budget","no ability to integrate external tools or APIs during reasoning phase","reasoning latency makes it unsuitable for real-time code completion workflows","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.39,"ecosystem":0.27,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.35,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.3,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:24.485Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:20:45.776Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=openai-o1-pro","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=openai-o1-pro"}},"signature":"4W7nvhTw0oW3PWu1TN6S5IZ8jJ29bQSbuJq387PK6bIe6YYpancNDSQinL24BTk1HJXhMpkB+WRrvyxNCE+MDg==","signedAt":"2026-06-23T14:04:03.369Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/openai-o1-pro","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/openai-o1-pro","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=openai-o1-pro","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}