{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"hf-dataset-openai--gsm8k","slug":"openai--gsm8k","name":"gsm8k","type":"dataset","url":"https://huggingface.co/datasets/openai/gsm8k","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/openai--gsm8k","categories":["model-training"],"tags":["benchmark:official","benchmark:eval-yaml","task_categories:text-generation","annotations_creators:crowdsourced","language_creators:crowdsourced","multilinguality:monolingual","source_datasets:original","language:en","license:mit","size_categories:10K<n<100K","format:parquet","modality:text","library:datasets","library:pandas","library:polars","library:mlcroissant","arxiv:2110.14168","region:us","math-word-problems"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"hf-dataset-openai--gsm8k__cap_0","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.grade.school.math.word.problem.benchmark.dataset","name":"grade-school math word problem benchmark dataset","description":"Provides 8,522 crowdsourced grade-school math word problems with step-by-step solutions and final numerical answers. The dataset is structured as parquet files containing problem text, solution chains, and answer labels, enabling evaluation of language models' mathematical reasoning and arithmetic capabilities through standardized benchmarking. Problems range from single-step to multi-step arithmetic requiring intermediate reasoning steps.","intents":["evaluate language model performance on grade-school arithmetic reasoning tasks","train models to generate step-by-step mathematical solutions with intermediate reasoning","benchmark chain-of-thought reasoning capabilities across different model architectures","create evaluation pipelines that measure mathematical accuracy and solution quality"],"best_for":["ML researchers evaluating reasoning capabilities of large language models","teams building math tutoring or educational AI systems","developers implementing chain-of-thought prompting techniques","benchmark-focused organizations standardizing model evaluation protocols"],"limitations":["monolingual English-only dataset — no multilingual coverage for non-English math education contexts","grade-school scope only — does not include algebra, geometry, calculus, or advanced mathematics","crowdsourced annotations may have inconsistent solution quality or formatting across examples","fixed dataset size (8,522 problems) limits ability to evaluate models on novel unseen problem distributions","no temporal or difficulty stratification metadata — cannot easily filter by problem complexity level"],"requires":["HuggingFace datasets library (transformers>=4.0)","Python 3.7+ for dataset loading and processing","parquet file support (pyarrow or fastparquet)","sufficient disk space (~500MB for full dataset with all splits)"],"input_types":["text (problem statements in natural language)","text (solution chains with intermediate steps)"],"output_types":["structured data (JSON/parquet with problem, solution, answer fields)","text (raw problem and solution strings)","numerical (final answer values for comparison)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","benchmark-dataset"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-dataset-openai--gsm8k__cap_1","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.multi.format.dataset.loading.and.serialization","name":"multi-format dataset loading and serialization","description":"Supports loading and exporting the benchmark dataset through multiple data processing libraries (pandas, polars, MLCroissant) and formats (parquet, JSON), enabling seamless integration into diverse ML pipelines and analysis workflows. The dataset is registered with HuggingFace's datasets library, providing automatic caching, versioning, and streaming capabilities without manual file management.","intents":["load benchmark data into pandas DataFrames for exploratory analysis and statistics","export dataset subsets to parquet for efficient distributed training on Spark or Dask","stream dataset samples during model training without loading entire dataset into memory","integrate dataset into MLOps pipelines using standard data formats and libraries"],"best_for":["data scientists performing exploratory analysis on benchmark datasets","ML engineers building reproducible training pipelines with version control","teams using distributed computing frameworks (Spark, Dask) for large-scale evaluation","organizations standardizing on open data formats for interoperability"],"limitations":["parquet format requires additional dependencies (pyarrow/fastparquet) not included in base Python","streaming mode may introduce latency for random-access patterns compared to pre-loaded in-memory datasets","MLCroissant integration is experimental and may have incomplete metadata coverage","no built-in support for custom data transformations — requires external preprocessing pipelines"],"requires":["HuggingFace datasets library (>=2.0)","pandas (>=1.0) for DataFrame operations","pyarrow (>=5.0) or fastparquet for parquet serialization","polars (>=0.14) optional for high-performance data operations","internet connection for initial dataset download and caching"],"input_types":["dataset identifiers (openai/gsm8k)","configuration parameters (split, streaming mode)"],"output_types":["pandas DataFrame","polars DataFrame","parquet files","JSON records","PyArrow Table objects"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-dataset-openai--gsm8k__cap_2","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.train.test.split.evaluation.framework","name":"train-test split evaluation framework","description":"Provides pre-defined train and test splits enabling standardized evaluation protocols where models are trained on the training subset and evaluated on held-out test data. The split structure is built into the dataset metadata, ensuring reproducibility across different research teams and preventing data leakage through automatic enforcement of partition boundaries.","intents":["establish standardized train-test splits for fair model comparison across research papers","prevent accidental data leakage by enforcing partition boundaries in evaluation workflows","enable reproducible benchmarking where different teams evaluate on identical test sets","create evaluation protocols that compare model performance on unseen test problems"],"best_for":["academic researchers publishing model evaluation results with reproducible benchmarks","teams conducting ablation studies requiring consistent evaluation baselines","organizations establishing internal model evaluation standards and leaderboards","developers implementing automated model evaluation pipelines with data integrity checks"],"limitations":["fixed split ratios cannot be customized — no support for k-fold cross-validation or custom stratification","no temporal or difficulty-based stratification — splits may not balance problem complexity across train/test","single official split means all published results use identical test set, potentially enabling overfitting to public benchmarks","no metadata for problem source or annotation quality — cannot filter splits by data quality criteria"],"requires":["HuggingFace datasets library (>=2.0)","Python 3.7+","knowledge of dataset split names (train/test) for correct partition selection"],"input_types":["split identifier (train or test)"],"output_types":["dataset subset with problems and solutions","evaluation metrics (accuracy, solution quality scores)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-dataset-openai--gsm8k__cap_3","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.crowdsourced.problem.solution.annotation.pipeline","name":"crowdsourced problem-solution annotation pipeline","description":"Contains 8,522 math problems with step-by-step solutions created through crowdsourced annotation, where human annotators generated both problem statements and solution chains. The annotation structure captures intermediate reasoning steps, enabling evaluation of models' ability to produce human-like solution processes rather than just final answers. Quality control mechanisms are embedded in the crowdsourcing workflow to maintain consistency.","intents":["train models on human-generated solution chains to improve step-by-step reasoning quality","evaluate whether models produce solutions matching human reasoning patterns and intermediate steps","analyze failure modes by comparing model-generated solutions to human reference solutions","create training data for fine-tuning models on mathematical reasoning and explanation generation"],"best_for":["researchers studying how LLMs learn to decompose problems into solution steps","teams building educational AI that must explain reasoning in human-understandable ways","developers training models specifically for chain-of-thought reasoning capabilities","organizations analyzing solution quality beyond just final answer correctness"],"limitations":["crowdsourced annotations may have variable quality and inconsistent solution formatting across examples","no inter-annotator agreement scores or quality metrics provided — cannot filter by annotation confidence","single annotation per problem — no multiple reference solutions for comparison or diversity analysis","annotation process details not documented — unclear what quality control or training was applied to crowdsourced workers","solution steps may use inconsistent notation or explanation styles, complicating automated parsing"],"requires":["HuggingFace datasets library (>=2.0)","Python 3.7+","understanding of solution chain format and structure for parsing"],"input_types":["problem statements (natural language text)","solution chains (multi-step reasoning with intermediate calculations)"],"output_types":["structured solutions with step-by-step reasoning","final numerical answers","solution quality metrics (if computed externally)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-dataset-openai--gsm8k__cap_4","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.standardized.benchmark.evaluation.protocol","name":"standardized benchmark evaluation protocol","description":"Serves as an official benchmark dataset registered in the ML community (822,680 downloads on HuggingFace), enabling standardized comparison of model reasoning capabilities across published research. The dataset includes metadata (arxiv reference, MIT license) establishing it as a canonical evaluation resource, with built-in versioning ensuring reproducibility across time and model iterations.","intents":["compare reasoning performance of different language models using a common benchmark","publish model evaluation results with reference to an official, citable dataset","track model capability improvements over time using consistent evaluation metrics","establish baseline performance expectations for grade-school math reasoning tasks"],"best_for":["researchers publishing model evaluation papers requiring standardized benchmarks","organizations building model leaderboards and capability tracking systems","teams evaluating new model architectures against established baselines","academic institutions teaching ML evaluation methodology with canonical datasets"],"limitations":["benchmark saturation risk — high-performing models may approach ceiling performance, reducing discriminative power","public benchmark enables overfitting through repeated evaluation and hyperparameter tuning on test set","no adaptive difficulty — all problems weighted equally regardless of complexity, potentially masking capability gaps","limited scope to grade-school math — does not evaluate advanced reasoning, algebra, or domain-specific mathematics","no official leaderboard or submission system — results scattered across papers without centralized tracking"],"requires":["HuggingFace datasets library (>=2.0)","Python 3.7+","understanding of benchmark evaluation protocols and metric computation"],"input_types":["model predictions (generated solutions or answers)","reference solutions (from dataset)"],"output_types":["accuracy metrics (exact match on final answers)","solution quality scores (if step-by-step evaluation implemented)","performance comparisons across models"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":23,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"low","permissions":["HuggingFace datasets library (transformers>=4.0)","Python 3.7+ for dataset loading and processing","parquet file support (pyarrow or fastparquet)","sufficient disk space (~500MB for full dataset with all splits)","HuggingFace datasets library (>=2.0)","pandas (>=1.0) for DataFrame operations","pyarrow (>=5.0) or fastparquet for parquet serialization","polars (>=0.14) optional for high-performance data operations","internet connection for initial dataset download and caching","Python 3.7+"],"failure_modes":["monolingual English-only dataset — no multilingual coverage for non-English math education contexts","grade-school scope only — does not include algebra, geometry, calculus, or advanced mathematics","crowdsourced annotations may have inconsistent solution quality or formatting across examples","fixed dataset size (8,522 problems) limits ability to evaluate models on novel unseen problem distributions","no temporal or difficulty stratification metadata — cannot easily filter by problem complexity level","parquet format requires additional dependencies (pyarrow/fastparquet) not included in base Python","streaming mode may introduce latency for random-access patterns compared to pre-loaded in-memory datasets","MLCroissant integration is experimental and may have incomplete metadata coverage","no built-in support for custom data transformations — requires external preprocessing pipelines","fixed split ratios cannot be customized — no support for k-fold cross-validation or custom stratification","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.5000000000000001,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.3,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.3,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:22.764Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:22:48.064Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=openai--gsm8k","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=openai--gsm8k"}},"signature":"Y4COSqxRjCmZgIy0quEl/xLL2JTKn4K6kt03AllDCWZ8FIyIg+sFUWCddwcnNHjQCg3MswGxFCWEJnEhbCkeAg==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T02:25:03.604Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/openai--gsm8k","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/openai--gsm8k","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=openai--gsm8k","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}