{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"hn-46470115","slug":"open-source-ai-workflows-with-read-only-auth-scope","name":"Open-source AI workflows with read-only auth scopes","type":"repo","url":"https://github.com/seer-engg/seer","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/open-source-ai-workflows-with-read-only-auth-scope","categories":["automation"],"tags":["hackernews","show-hn"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"hn-46470115__cap_0","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.read.only.permission.scoped.workflow.execution","name":"read-only permission-scoped workflow execution","description":"Executes AI agent workflows with granular read-only authentication scopes that prevent destructive operations. Implements a capability-based security model where workflows declare required permissions upfront, and the runtime enforces scope boundaries at the API integration layer. This prevents agents from accidentally or maliciously modifying external systems while maintaining full read access to necessary data sources.","intents":["I want to run AI agents against production systems without risking data mutations or deletions","I need to audit exactly what permissions an AI workflow requires before deploying it","I want to give AI agents read access to customer data without write capabilities"],"best_for":["teams deploying AI agents in regulated industries (finance, healthcare, legal)","enterprises requiring strict access control and audit trails","developers building multi-tenant SaaS with AI features"],"limitations":["read-only scope prevents workflows from creating tickets, updating records, or triggering side effects — requires separate write-enabled workflows for mutations","scope enforcement depends on underlying API provider support — some legacy APIs may not support fine-grained permission boundaries","no built-in scope revocation during runtime — permissions are static per workflow execution"],"requires":["API credentials with read-only permission support (GitHub, Jira, Slack, etc.)","workflow definition that explicitly declares required scopes","runtime environment with capability-based access control enforcement"],"input_types":["workflow configuration (YAML/JSON)","API credentials with scope metadata","external system endpoints (REST APIs, webhooks)"],"output_types":["workflow execution logs with permission checks","read-only data responses from external systems","audit trail of accessed resources"],"categories":["safety-moderation","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hn-46470115__cap_1","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.declarative.workflow.composition.with.schema.based.task.definition","name":"declarative workflow composition with schema-based task definition","description":"Allows users to define multi-step AI workflows using declarative configuration (YAML/JSON) that specifies task sequences, data transformations, and integration points without writing imperative code. The runtime parses workflow schemas, validates task dependencies, and orchestrates execution through a directed acyclic graph (DAG) execution engine that handles branching, error recovery, and state management between steps.","intents":["I want to define complex multi-step AI processes without writing custom code","I need to version control and review AI workflow logic like infrastructure-as-code","I want to reuse workflow templates across different projects and teams"],"best_for":["non-technical users building AI automation workflows","teams practicing GitOps and infrastructure-as-code patterns","organizations needing workflow auditability and change tracking"],"limitations":["declarative approach limits dynamic branching logic — complex conditional flows require custom task implementations","schema validation happens at parse time, not runtime — some errors only surface during execution","no built-in visual workflow editor — users must manually write YAML/JSON configuration"],"requires":["workflow schema definition (YAML or JSON format)","runtime environment supporting DAG execution","task implementations for each workflow step (can be built-in or custom)"],"input_types":["workflow definition files (YAML/JSON)","task input parameters (structured data)","external system responses (JSON/XML)"],"output_types":["workflow execution results (structured data)","execution logs with step-by-step traces","state snapshots between workflow steps"],"categories":["automation-workflow","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hn-46470115__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.multi.provider.api.integration.with.unified.interface","name":"multi-provider api integration with unified interface","description":"Abstracts multiple external API providers (GitHub, Jira, Slack, etc.) behind a unified task interface, allowing workflows to interact with different systems using consistent syntax. The integration layer handles provider-specific authentication, request/response transformation, rate limiting, and error handling, so workflows don't need to know implementation details of each provider.","intents":["I want to build workflows that work across GitHub, Jira, and Slack without learning each API","I need to switch between different API providers without rewriting workflow logic","I want consistent error handling and retry logic across all external integrations"],"best_for":["teams using multiple SaaS tools and needing cross-platform automation","developers building platform-agnostic AI workflows","organizations standardizing on a single workflow language across tools"],"limitations":["supported providers are limited to pre-built integrations — custom APIs require custom task implementations","provider-specific features may not be fully exposed through the unified interface — advanced use cases may require provider-specific tasks","rate limiting is handled per-provider but not globally — workflows may hit provider limits if not carefully designed"],"requires":["API credentials for target providers (GitHub token, Jira API key, Slack bot token, etc.)","workflow definition that references provider tasks","network connectivity to external provider endpoints"],"input_types":["provider-specific parameters (repo name, issue ID, channel name, etc.)","authentication credentials (API keys, OAuth tokens)","query/filter parameters (search terms, date ranges, etc.)"],"output_types":["provider-specific response data (issues, pull requests, messages, etc.)","normalized error responses","rate limit status and retry information"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hn-46470115__cap_3","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.workflow.execution.with.error.recovery.and.retry.logic","name":"workflow execution with error recovery and retry logic","description":"Provides built-in error handling and automatic retry mechanisms for workflow steps that fail due to transient errors (network timeouts, rate limits, temporary service unavailability). The runtime implements exponential backoff, configurable retry policies, and fallback task definitions, allowing workflows to gracefully handle failures without manual intervention or workflow restarts.","intents":["I want my AI workflows to automatically retry failed steps instead of failing completely","I need to handle rate limiting from external APIs without manual intervention","I want to define fallback behavior when a task fails after retries"],"best_for":["production workflows that need high reliability and fault tolerance","teams integrating with rate-limited APIs (GitHub, Jira, etc.)","systems requiring minimal manual intervention and monitoring"],"limitations":["retry logic only handles transient errors — permanent failures (authentication errors, invalid input) still fail immediately","exponential backoff may cause long delays for workflows with many retries — not suitable for real-time use cases","no built-in circuit breaker pattern — workflows may continue retrying against a failing service"],"requires":["workflow definition with retry policies specified per task","timeout configuration for individual steps","fallback task definitions (optional but recommended)"],"input_types":["task configuration with retry parameters (max retries, backoff multiplier, etc.)","error responses from external APIs","timeout thresholds"],"output_types":["successful task result after retries","fallback result if retries exhausted","execution log with retry attempts and backoff timing"],"categories":["automation-workflow","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hn-46470115__cap_4","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.workflow.execution.logging.and.audit.trail.generation","name":"workflow execution logging and audit trail generation","description":"Captures detailed execution logs for every workflow step, including task inputs, outputs, timestamps, permission checks, and error details. Logs are structured and queryable, enabling post-execution analysis, debugging, and compliance auditing. The system maintains an immutable audit trail that records what data was accessed, which permissions were used, and what actions were taken.","intents":["I need to debug why a workflow step failed by reviewing detailed execution logs","I want to audit which data sources were accessed by an AI workflow for compliance","I need to understand the full execution path of a workflow for troubleshooting"],"best_for":["regulated industries requiring audit trails (finance, healthcare, legal)","teams debugging complex multi-step workflows","organizations needing compliance documentation for AI system usage"],"limitations":["detailed logging adds overhead to workflow execution — may increase latency by 5-10% per step","logs can grow very large for long-running workflows — requires log retention and cleanup policies","sensitive data in logs (API responses, user data) must be carefully handled — requires log sanitization or encryption"],"requires":["logging infrastructure (file system, cloud storage, or log aggregation service)","log retention policy and cleanup mechanisms","structured logging format (JSON recommended)"],"input_types":["workflow execution events (step start, step complete, error, etc.)","task inputs and outputs","permission check results","error stack traces"],"output_types":["structured execution logs (JSON format)","audit trail with timestamps and actor information","queryable log index for searching and filtering"],"categories":["safety-moderation","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hn-46470115__cap_5","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.workflow.templating.and.reuse.across.projects","name":"workflow templating and reuse across projects","description":"Provides a library of pre-built workflow templates for common AI automation tasks (code review, issue triage, documentation generation, etc.) that can be instantiated with project-specific parameters. Templates are versioned, documented, and shareable across teams, reducing the need to write workflows from scratch and promoting best practices.","intents":["I want to quickly set up a code review workflow without writing it from scratch","I need to share workflow templates across multiple teams in my organization","I want to version and update workflow templates while maintaining backward compatibility"],"best_for":["organizations standardizing on AI workflows across teams","teams building similar workflows repeatedly","enterprises needing centralized workflow governance"],"limitations":["templates are static — customization requires forking or creating new templates","no built-in template marketplace or discovery mechanism — teams must manually share templates","template versioning can create compatibility issues if workflows depend on specific template versions"],"requires":["template repository or registry (Git, package manager, or custom registry)","template documentation and parameter schema","version control for templates"],"input_types":["template definitions (YAML/JSON with parameter placeholders)","parameter values for template instantiation","template metadata (version, author, description)"],"output_types":["instantiated workflow definition","parameter validation results","template documentation"],"categories":["automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hn-46470115__cap_6","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.permission.scope.declaration.and.validation","name":"permission scope declaration and validation","description":"Allows workflows to explicitly declare which external systems they need to access and what operations they require (read-only vs. read-write). The runtime validates these declarations against the configured authentication credentials and enforces scope boundaries at execution time. This creates a contract between the workflow author and the runtime about what permissions are needed.","intents":["I want to declare upfront what permissions a workflow needs before deploying it","I need to validate that a workflow only uses the permissions it declared","I want to prevent workflows from accessing systems they didn't declare"],"best_for":["security-conscious teams deploying AI workflows in production","organizations with strict access control policies","teams practicing principle of least privilege"],"limitations":["scope validation is static — dynamic permission requirements (determined at runtime) cannot be declared upfront","no built-in scope negotiation — if a workflow declares a scope that isn't available, it fails immediately","scope declarations are workflow-level — no fine-grained per-task scope control"],"requires":["workflow definition with explicit scope declarations","authentication credentials with scope metadata","runtime enforcement of scope boundaries"],"input_types":["workflow definition with scope declarations","authentication credentials","external system endpoints"],"output_types":["scope validation results","permission check logs","access denied errors if scope is exceeded"],"categories":["safety-moderation","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hn-46470115__cap_7","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.local.first.workflow.execution.with.optional.cloud.deployment","name":"local-first workflow execution with optional cloud deployment","description":"Supports running workflows locally on developer machines or self-hosted infrastructure, with optional integration to cloud deployment platforms. The runtime can execute workflows entirely offline (for read-only operations against local data) or connect to cloud services for scaling and monitoring. This architecture gives users control over data residency and execution location.","intents":["I want to run AI workflows on my local machine without sending data to the cloud","I need to test workflows locally before deploying to production","I want to keep sensitive data on-premises while using cloud services for scaling"],"best_for":["organizations with data residency requirements or privacy concerns","developers building and testing workflows locally","enterprises with hybrid cloud/on-premises infrastructure"],"limitations":["local execution limits scalability — workflows are constrained by local machine resources","offline execution only works for read-only operations — write operations require cloud connectivity","no built-in data synchronization between local and cloud deployments — manual state management required"],"requires":["local runtime environment (Python, Node.js, or Docker)","local API credentials for external systems","optional cloud credentials for cloud deployment"],"input_types":["workflow definitions","local configuration files","local data sources"],"output_types":["local execution logs","workflow results (stored locally or synced to cloud)","deployment manifests for cloud deployment"],"categories":["automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":33,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["API credentials with read-only permission support (GitHub, Jira, Slack, etc.)","workflow definition that explicitly declares required scopes","runtime environment with capability-based access control enforcement","workflow schema definition (YAML or JSON format)","runtime environment supporting DAG execution","task implementations for each workflow step (can be built-in or custom)","API credentials for target providers (GitHub token, Jira API key, Slack bot token, etc.)","workflow definition that references provider tasks","network connectivity to external provider endpoints","workflow definition with retry policies specified per task"],"failure_modes":["read-only scope prevents workflows from creating tickets, updating records, or triggering side effects — requires separate write-enabled workflows for mutations","scope enforcement depends on underlying API provider support — some legacy APIs may not support fine-grained permission boundaries","no built-in scope revocation during runtime — permissions are static per workflow execution","declarative approach limits dynamic branching logic — complex conditional flows require custom task implementations","schema validation happens at parse time, not runtime — some errors only surface during execution","no built-in visual workflow editor — users must manually write YAML/JSON configuration","supported providers are limited to pre-built integrations — custom APIs require custom task implementations","provider-specific features may not be fully exposed through the unified interface — advanced use cases may require provider-specific tasks","rate limiting is handled per-provider but not globally — workflows may hit provider limits if not carefully designed","retry logic only handles transient errors — permanent failures (authentication errors, invalid input) still fail immediately","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.36,"quality":0.26,"ecosystem":0.46,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.6,"weights":{"adoption":0.3,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.3,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:04.691Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-04T08:10:10.018Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=open-source-ai-workflows-with-read-only-auth-scope","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=open-source-ai-workflows-with-read-only-auth-scope"}},"signature":"qut+cnNrH5Ng0yOFlWihCOuPR8Wwe/2LksnWjk30GLB2QLZabfHp9euYXYqoMiCAF8eJvb7b16PZknF3w42KBQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T15:41:01.897Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/open-source-ai-workflows-with-read-only-auth-scope","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/open-source-ai-workflows-with-read-only-auth-scope","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=open-source-ai-workflows-with-read-only-auth-scope","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}