{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"hf-space-open-llm-leaderboard--open_llm_leaderboard","slug":"open-llm-leaderboard--open_llm_leaderboard","name":"open_llm_leaderboard","type":"webapp","url":"https://huggingface.co/spaces/open-llm-leaderboard/open_llm_leaderboard","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/open-llm-leaderboard--open_llm_leaderboard","categories":["testing-quality"],"tags":["docker","leaderboard","modality:text","submission:automatic","test:public","language:english","eval:code","eval:math","region:us"],"pricing":{"model":"free","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"hf-space-open-llm-leaderboard--open_llm_leaderboard__cap_0","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.automated.llm.benchmark.evaluation.pipeline","name":"automated-llm-benchmark-evaluation-pipeline","description":"Executes standardized evaluation benchmarks (code generation, mathematical reasoning, general language understanding) against submitted LLM models through a containerized Docker-based pipeline. The system orchestrates multi-benchmark test execution, collects structured results, and persists scores to a centralized leaderboard database. Evaluation runs are triggered automatically upon model submission without manual intervention, using HuggingFace Spaces infrastructure for compute isolation and reproducibility.","intents":["I want to automatically evaluate my open-source LLM against standard benchmarks without setting up evaluation infrastructure","I need to compare my model's performance against other open models on code, math, and language tasks","I want my model evaluation to run in a reproducible, containerized environment with public transparency"],"best_for":["open-source LLM researchers publishing models to HuggingFace Hub","teams benchmarking multiple model variants across standardized tasks","developers building LLM comparison tools and need reliable evaluation data"],"limitations":["evaluation latency depends on HuggingFace Spaces queue — can take hours for popular models","limited to predefined benchmark suites (code, math, language) — cannot add custom evaluation tasks","no fine-grained control over evaluation hyperparameters (temperature, max tokens, sampling strategy)","Docker container resource constraints may timeout on very large models (>70B parameters)","evaluation results are point-in-time snapshots — no tracking of model performance degradation over time"],"requires":["HuggingFace account with model upload permissions","model in HuggingFace Hub format (safetensors or PyTorch)","model must be compatible with transformers library inference","public model repository (private models not supported)"],"input_types":["HuggingFace model identifier (org/model-name)","model weights in safetensors or PyTorch format","model config.json with architecture metadata"],"output_types":["structured benchmark scores (JSON)","leaderboard ranking position","per-benchmark performance metrics (accuracy, pass@1, etc.)","evaluation metadata (timestamp, hardware used, benchmark version)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-space-open-llm-leaderboard--open_llm_leaderboard__cap_1","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.multi.benchmark.aggregation.and.ranking","name":"multi-benchmark-aggregation-and-ranking","description":"Aggregates results from multiple independent benchmark evaluations (code generation, mathematical reasoning, language understanding) into a unified leaderboard ranking using weighted scoring or averaging strategies. The system normalizes scores across heterogeneous benchmarks with different scales and metrics, applies ranking algorithms to determine model positions, and maintains historical snapshots of leaderboard state. Rankings are computed deterministically and exposed via web UI and API endpoints for programmatic access.","intents":["I want to see how my model ranks against competitors across multiple evaluation dimensions","I need a single composite score that reflects overall model quality across code, math, and language tasks","I want to understand which benchmark categories my model excels or underperforms in"],"best_for":["model developers comparing their work against the open-source landscape","researchers analyzing which capabilities correlate with overall model quality","downstream users selecting models based on multi-dimensional performance profiles"],"limitations":["weighting strategy for combining benchmarks is fixed by leaderboard maintainers — no user-customizable weights","benchmark versions may change over time, making historical comparisons difficult","does not account for inference cost, latency, or memory requirements — purely capability-focused","tied scores may have arbitrary ordering depending on submission timestamp","no statistical significance testing — cannot determine if score differences are meaningful"],"requires":["model must have completed evaluation on all required benchmarks","benchmark evaluation infrastructure must be operational","leaderboard database must be accessible and up-to-date"],"input_types":["individual benchmark scores (numeric)","benchmark metadata (name, version, max score)","model metadata (submission date, model size, architecture)"],"output_types":["ranked leaderboard (model name, composite score, rank position)","per-benchmark breakdown (individual scores by category)","ranking history (snapshots of leaderboard state over time)","JSON API responses with full ranking data"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-space-open-llm-leaderboard--open_llm_leaderboard__cap_2","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.public.leaderboard.web.interface.and.visualization","name":"public-leaderboard-web-interface-and-visualization","description":"Renders an interactive web UI (built on HuggingFace Spaces Gradio framework) that displays ranked model listings, benchmark scores, and filtering/sorting controls. The interface fetches leaderboard data from backend storage, applies client-side filtering by model size/type/benchmark, sorts by selected columns, and renders tables and charts. The UI is stateless and read-only, pulling fresh data on page load or refresh, with no user authentication required for viewing.","intents":["I want to browse the leaderboard and find the best model for my use case","I need to filter models by size, architecture, or benchmark performance","I want to export leaderboard data for analysis or comparison"],"best_for":["model consumers researching which open model to use","researchers analyzing trends in open model capabilities","developers building downstream tools that need leaderboard data"],"limitations":["UI is read-only — cannot submit models directly from leaderboard interface (requires HuggingFace Hub submission)","filtering is client-side only — large leaderboards may have slow filtering performance in browser","no user accounts or saved preferences — filtering state is not persisted","visualization is limited to tables and basic charts — no advanced analytics dashboards","data freshness depends on evaluation pipeline — may be hours behind latest submissions"],"requires":["modern web browser with JavaScript enabled","internet connection to HuggingFace Spaces","no authentication required"],"input_types":["leaderboard data (JSON from backend)","user filter/sort selections (UI interactions)"],"output_types":["rendered HTML table with ranked models","filtered/sorted leaderboard views","benchmark score visualizations","model detail pages with full metadata"],"categories":["search-retrieval","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-space-open-llm-leaderboard--open_llm_leaderboard__cap_3","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.code.and.math.benchmark.evaluation","name":"code-and-math-benchmark-evaluation","description":"Executes specialized evaluation suites for code generation (e.g., HumanEval, MBPP) and mathematical reasoning (e.g., GSM8K, MATH) tasks. The system generates model outputs for benchmark prompts, compares outputs against ground-truth solutions using execution-based or string-matching validators, and computes pass rates and accuracy metrics. Evaluation is performed in isolated execution environments (sandboxed code execution for code benchmarks) to safely run generated code without security risks.","intents":["I want to measure my model's code generation capability on standard benchmarks","I need to evaluate mathematical reasoning performance across diverse problem types","I want to understand where my model fails on code and math tasks"],"best_for":["LLM developers optimizing models for code and reasoning tasks","researchers studying how model scale/architecture affects code/math capabilities","teams selecting models for code generation or math-heavy applications"],"limitations":["code execution is sandboxed but still carries security risks — only safe for trusted benchmark code","benchmarks are fixed and may not reflect real-world code generation patterns","no partial credit — code is either correct or incorrect, no credit for near-correct solutions","evaluation timeout may be too strict or too lenient for different code complexity levels","does not measure code quality attributes (readability, efficiency, maintainability)"],"requires":["model must support text generation with sufficient context length","Python runtime for code execution (for code benchmarks)","benchmark datasets (HumanEval, MBPP, GSM8K, MATH) must be available"],"input_types":["benchmark prompts (code problem descriptions, math word problems)","model outputs (generated code or reasoning steps)","ground-truth solutions (reference implementations or answers)"],"output_types":["pass@1 rate (percentage of problems solved correctly)","accuracy metrics (for math benchmarks)","per-problem results (pass/fail for each benchmark item)","execution logs (for debugging failed evaluations)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-space-open-llm-leaderboard--open_llm_leaderboard__cap_4","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.model.submission.and.ingestion.workflow","name":"model-submission-and-ingestion-workflow","description":"Accepts model submissions from HuggingFace Hub via automated triggers (webhook or polling) when new model versions are uploaded. The system validates model format (safetensors/PyTorch compatibility), extracts metadata (model size, architecture, parameters), queues the model for evaluation, and tracks submission status. Submissions are processed asynchronously through a job queue, with status updates visible in the leaderboard UI (pending, evaluating, completed, failed).","intents":["I want to submit my model to the leaderboard for automatic evaluation","I need to track the evaluation status of my submitted model","I want to resubmit a model after fixing issues or retraining"],"best_for":["open-source model developers publishing to HuggingFace Hub","teams running multiple model training experiments and need automated evaluation","researchers benchmarking model variants without manual evaluation setup"],"limitations":["submission requires public HuggingFace model repository — private models not supported","model must be in transformers-compatible format — custom architectures may fail","no way to prioritize submissions — all models evaluated in FIFO order","failed evaluations may not have detailed error messages — debugging requires manual investigation","duplicate submissions (same model version) are not deduplicated — may waste evaluation resources"],"requires":["HuggingFace account with model upload permissions","model repository on HuggingFace Hub","model in safetensors or PyTorch format","model config.json with required metadata"],"input_types":["HuggingFace model identifier (org/model-name)","model weights and configuration files","optional: model card with description"],"output_types":["submission confirmation (submission ID, timestamp)","evaluation status updates (pending → evaluating → completed/failed)","leaderboard entry with benchmark scores (on completion)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-space-open-llm-leaderboard--open_llm_leaderboard__cap_5","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.benchmark.version.management.and.reproducibility","name":"benchmark-version-management-and-reproducibility","description":"Maintains versioned benchmark datasets and evaluation code to ensure reproducibility across leaderboard updates. The system pins specific versions of benchmark suites (HumanEval v1.0, GSM8K snapshot from date X), stores evaluation code in version control, and documents any changes to evaluation methodology. When benchmark versions change, the system may re-evaluate models or maintain separate leaderboard tracks for different benchmark versions.","intents":["I want to understand which benchmark version was used to evaluate my model","I need to reproduce evaluation results locally using the exact same benchmark version","I want to compare my model against historical leaderboard snapshots with the same benchmarks"],"best_for":["researchers requiring reproducible evaluation for papers and publications","teams comparing models across different leaderboard versions","developers building tools that depend on stable leaderboard data"],"limitations":["benchmark version pinning may lag behind latest benchmark improvements","re-evaluation of all models after benchmark updates is computationally expensive","no automatic detection of benchmark changes — requires manual version bumping","historical leaderboard snapshots may not be preserved indefinitely","documentation of evaluation methodology changes may be incomplete"],"requires":["version control system (Git) for evaluation code","benchmark dataset snapshots or fixed URLs","documentation of evaluation methodology"],"input_types":["benchmark version identifiers","evaluation code snapshots","benchmark dataset versions"],"output_types":["benchmark version metadata (version number, date, changelog)","evaluation code (reproducible scripts)","leaderboard snapshots for specific benchmark versions","documentation of evaluation methodology"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-space-open-llm-leaderboard--open_llm_leaderboard__cap_6","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.leaderboard.data.export.and.api.access","name":"leaderboard-data-export-and-api-access","description":"Exposes leaderboard data through programmatic APIs (REST endpoints or JSON downloads) that return ranked models, benchmark scores, and metadata in structured formats. The system provides endpoints for querying specific models, filtering by criteria, and downloading full leaderboard snapshots. Data is served without authentication, enabling downstream tools and analyses to consume leaderboard data programmatically.","intents":["I want to programmatically fetch leaderboard data for my analysis or tool","I need to download the full leaderboard as CSV or JSON for offline analysis","I want to query specific models and their benchmark scores via API"],"best_for":["researchers building analysis tools on top of leaderboard data","developers integrating leaderboard data into model selection tools","data analysts studying trends in open model capabilities"],"limitations":["no authentication — API endpoints are public and rate-limited only by IP","no versioning of API responses — breaking changes may occur without deprecation period","limited query capabilities — cannot perform complex filtering or aggregations server-side","data freshness depends on evaluation pipeline — may be hours behind latest submissions","no webhooks or subscriptions — must poll for updates"],"requires":["HTTP client (curl, Python requests, etc.)","knowledge of API endpoint structure and response format","no authentication credentials required"],"input_types":["API query parameters (model name, benchmark filter, sort order)","optional: format specifier (JSON, CSV)"],"output_types":["JSON responses with ranked models and scores","CSV exports of leaderboard data","individual model detail objects with full metadata","benchmark metadata and descriptions"],"categories":["search-retrieval","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":25,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["HuggingFace account with model upload permissions","model in HuggingFace Hub format (safetensors or PyTorch)","model must be compatible with transformers library inference","public model repository (private models not supported)","model must have completed evaluation on all required benchmarks","benchmark evaluation infrastructure must be operational","leaderboard database must be accessible and up-to-date","modern web browser with JavaScript enabled","internet connection to HuggingFace Spaces","no authentication required"],"failure_modes":["evaluation latency depends on HuggingFace Spaces queue — can take hours for popular models","limited to predefined benchmark suites (code, math, language) — cannot add custom evaluation tasks","no fine-grained control over evaluation hyperparameters (temperature, max tokens, sampling strategy)","Docker container resource constraints may timeout on very large models (>70B parameters)","evaluation results are point-in-time snapshots — no tracking of model performance degradation over time","weighting strategy for combining benchmarks is fixed by leaderboard maintainers — no user-customizable weights","benchmark versions may change over time, making historical comparisons difficult","does not account for inference cost, latency, or memory requirements — purely capability-focused","tied scores may have arbitrary ordering depending on submission timestamp","no statistical significance testing — cannot determine if score differences are meaningful","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.24,"ecosystem":0.5000000000000001,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:23.325Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:22:48.012Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=open-llm-leaderboard--open_llm_leaderboard","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=open-llm-leaderboard--open_llm_leaderboard"}},"signature":"0gg9aluEPS4JgO4+X3fAC9bdkprnkYVqJln0CETCjpyFSGNfsgjg0Fuaci8oP3Q7xuzR1wQ37ichHrblQ+WICA==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T04:36:43.306Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/open-llm-leaderboard--open_llm_leaderboard","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/open-llm-leaderboard--open_llm_leaderboard","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=open-llm-leaderboard--open_llm_leaderboard","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}