{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"awesome-octocode","slug":"octocode","name":"Octocode","type":"mcp","url":"https://github.com/bgauryy/octocode-mcp","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/octocode","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"awesome-octocode__cap_0","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.github.repository.semantic.code.search.across.ecosystems","name":"github repository semantic code search across ecosystems","description":"Enables semantic search across multiple GitHub repositories by indexing code structure and content, allowing developers to find relevant code patterns, functions, and implementations across large codebases without exact keyword matching. Uses MCP protocol to expose search capabilities to AI clients, leveraging GitHub API for repository access and likely embedding-based retrieval for semantic matching across code files.","intents":["Find similar implementations of a feature across multiple repositories in an ecosystem","Discover how other projects solve a specific technical problem","Locate code examples matching a semantic description rather than exact keywords","Research patterns and best practices across related GitHub projects"],"best_for":["Research teams analyzing code patterns across large GitHub ecosystems","Developers building on top of open-source projects and needing cross-repo insights","AI agents performing code discovery and analysis tasks"],"limitations":["Search performance degrades with very large ecosystems (100k+ repositories) without pagination/filtering","Semantic search accuracy depends on embedding model quality and may miss domain-specific terminology","GitHub API rate limits (60 requests/hour unauthenticated, 5000/hour authenticated) constrain search scope","No built-in caching of embeddings — each search may require recomputation across indexed repositories"],"requires":["GitHub API access (personal access token recommended for higher rate limits)","MCP client implementation supporting the Octocode MCP server","Network connectivity to GitHub API endpoints","Sufficient local storage or remote vector database for code embeddings if indexing large ecosystems"],"input_types":["text query (semantic description or code snippet)","repository URLs or GitHub organization names","file patterns or language filters"],"output_types":["ranked list of matching code files with repository context","code snippets with line numbers and repository metadata","relevance scores for each match"],"categories":["search-retrieval","code-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-octocode__cap_1","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.multi.repository.code.context.aggregation.for.ai.analysis","name":"multi-repository code context aggregation for ai analysis","description":"Aggregates code context from multiple GitHub repositories into a unified format suitable for AI analysis, handling repository structure traversal, file filtering, and context window optimization. Implements MCP resource handlers to expose repository code as structured context that AI clients can request, managing the complexity of pulling relevant code snippets across repository boundaries while respecting token/context limits.","intents":["Provide AI agents with cross-repository code context for informed analysis and recommendations","Build a unified view of how a feature is implemented across multiple related projects","Enable AI-powered code review that understands patterns across an ecosystem","Gather comparative code examples for architectural decision-making"],"best_for":["AI agents performing ecosystem-wide code analysis and recommendations","Teams conducting comparative code reviews across multiple repositories","Researchers analyzing implementation patterns in open-source ecosystems"],"limitations":["Context aggregation may exceed AI model context windows for large ecosystems — requires intelligent filtering/summarization","No built-in deduplication of similar code patterns across repositories — may return redundant context","Requires maintaining fresh repository clones or API access; stale data if repositories update frequently","File size limits and binary file handling not explicitly addressed — may fail on very large codebases"],"requires":["GitHub API access with appropriate permissions for repository access","MCP client capable of handling resource requests","Sufficient memory to hold aggregated context from multiple repositories","Target AI model with adequate context window for aggregated code"],"input_types":["list of GitHub repository URLs or organization names","file path patterns or language filters","context size constraints or relevance thresholds"],"output_types":["structured code context with repository and file metadata","filtered/summarized code snippets optimized for context windows","repository relationship maps showing dependencies or shared patterns"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-octocode__cap_2","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.repository.structure.and.dependency.graph.analysis","name":"repository structure and dependency graph analysis","description":"Analyzes GitHub repository structures to extract and expose dependency graphs, module relationships, and architectural patterns across multiple projects. Parses repository metadata (package.json, requirements.txt, go.mod, etc.), traverses directory structures, and builds relationship maps that AI clients can query to understand how repositories depend on and relate to each other within an ecosystem.","intents":["Understand how repositories in an ecosystem depend on each other","Identify architectural patterns and shared dependencies across projects","Trace how a change in one repository might impact dependent projects","Discover alternative implementations of shared functionality"],"best_for":["Ecosystem maintainers managing multiple interdependent repositories","AI agents performing impact analysis or architectural recommendations","Teams migrating or refactoring shared code across multiple projects"],"limitations":["Dependency parsing limited to standard manifest files — custom or implicit dependencies may be missed","Transitive dependency resolution requires recursive API calls, increasing latency and rate limit consumption","No version conflict detection or semantic versioning analysis built-in","Monorepo structures may be misinterpreted as separate repositories without explicit configuration"],"requires":["GitHub API access to read repository contents and metadata","MCP client to query dependency graph structures","Support for multiple language package managers (npm, pip, go, cargo, etc.)"],"input_types":["GitHub repository URLs or organization names","language/framework filters","depth limits for transitive dependency traversal"],"output_types":["dependency graphs in structured format (JSON/GraphQL)","module relationship maps with version information","architectural pattern classifications"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-octocode__cap_3","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.code.pattern.and.best.practice.discovery.across.ecosystems","name":"code pattern and best practice discovery across ecosystems","description":"Identifies recurring code patterns, architectural practices, and best practices by analyzing implementations across multiple repositories in an ecosystem. Uses code structure analysis and likely statistical pattern matching to surface common approaches, idioms, and design decisions that appear across projects, enabling AI to learn and recommend ecosystem-specific best practices.","intents":["Discover what patterns are considered best practices in a specific ecosystem","Learn how experienced developers in an ecosystem solve common problems","Identify anti-patterns or deprecated approaches still in use","Generate code recommendations aligned with ecosystem conventions"],"best_for":["New contributors learning ecosystem conventions and best practices","AI code generation systems trained on ecosystem-specific patterns","Teams establishing coding standards based on community practices","Researchers studying software engineering practices across open-source ecosystems"],"limitations":["Pattern detection may conflate correlation with causation — popular patterns aren't necessarily best practices","No quality metrics to distinguish high-quality implementations from mediocre ones","Language-specific idioms may be misclassified as anti-patterns without semantic understanding","Requires sufficient sample size (many repositories) for statistical significance — small ecosystems may produce unreliable patterns"],"requires":["Multiple repositories in target ecosystem (minimum 10-20 for meaningful pattern analysis)","GitHub API access to analyze code across repositories","MCP client to query discovered patterns and recommendations","Code parsing/AST analysis capabilities for language-specific pattern detection"],"input_types":["ecosystem name or list of repository URLs","code pattern queries (e.g., 'error handling patterns', 'async patterns')","language or framework filters"],"output_types":["ranked list of common patterns with frequency/adoption metrics","code examples demonstrating each pattern","best practice recommendations with ecosystem context","anti-pattern warnings with prevalence data"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-octocode__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.ai.powered.code.research.and.discovery.agent.interface","name":"ai-powered code research and discovery agent interface","description":"Provides an MCP-based interface enabling AI agents to autonomously research, analyze, and discover code patterns across GitHub ecosystems. Exposes search, context aggregation, and analysis capabilities as callable tools/resources that agents can chain together to answer complex research questions about code, architecture, and practices without human intervention.","intents":["Enable AI agents to autonomously research how a feature is implemented across an ecosystem","Allow agents to answer architectural questions by analyzing multiple repositories","Support agents in generating ecosystem-informed code recommendations","Enable automated code review agents that understand ecosystem context and patterns"],"best_for":["AI agent frameworks (LangChain, AutoGPT, etc.) performing code research tasks","Autonomous code analysis and recommendation systems","Research automation tools analyzing open-source ecosystems","AI-powered code review and quality analysis platforms"],"limitations":["Agent reasoning quality depends on underlying LLM capabilities — may produce incorrect conclusions from code analysis","No built-in safeguards against agents making excessive API calls or consuming rate limits","Agent context windows may be insufficient for complex multi-step research tasks across large ecosystems","Requires careful prompt engineering to guide agents toward useful research directions"],"requires":["MCP-compatible AI agent framework or LLM client","GitHub API access with sufficient rate limits for agent research tasks","LLM with code understanding capabilities (GPT-4, Claude, etc.)","Proper error handling and rate limit management in agent implementation"],"input_types":["natural language research questions about code and architecture","repository or ecosystem specifications","analysis scope and depth constraints"],"output_types":["research findings and analysis results","code examples and pattern demonstrations","recommendations and insights","structured analysis reports"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-octocode__cap_5","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.github.api.integration.and.repository.access.abstraction","name":"github api integration and repository access abstraction","description":"Provides abstraction layer over GitHub API for repository access, authentication, and data retrieval, handling rate limiting, pagination, and error recovery transparently. Implements MCP server that manages GitHub API credentials and exposes repository data through standardized resource handlers, allowing clients to access repository information without directly managing GitHub API complexity.","intents":["Access repository code and metadata without managing GitHub API authentication","Handle GitHub API rate limits and pagination transparently","Retrieve repository information across multiple projects efficiently","Integrate GitHub data into AI analysis workflows seamlessly"],"best_for":["AI agents and applications needing GitHub data without API expertise","Teams building tools on top of GitHub without managing API complexity","Systems requiring reliable GitHub access with automatic error recovery"],"limitations":["GitHub API rate limits (5000 requests/hour authenticated) constrain analysis scope for large ecosystems","No built-in caching — repeated queries to same repositories consume rate limits","Large file handling limited by GitHub API (raw content endpoint has size limits)","Real-time data freshness depends on API polling frequency — may return stale repository state"],"requires":["GitHub personal access token or OAuth credentials","Network connectivity to GitHub API endpoints","MCP client implementation","Proper credential management and security practices"],"input_types":["GitHub repository URLs or organization names","GitHub usernames or team identifiers","file paths and content requests"],"output_types":["repository metadata (stars, forks, language, etc.)","file contents and directory structures","commit history and contributor information","issue and pull request data"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":28,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["GitHub API access (personal access token recommended for higher rate limits)","MCP client implementation supporting the Octocode MCP server","Network connectivity to GitHub API endpoints","Sufficient local storage or remote vector database for code embeddings if indexing large ecosystems","GitHub API access with appropriate permissions for repository access","MCP client capable of handling resource requests","Sufficient memory to hold aggregated context from multiple repositories","Target AI model with adequate context window for aggregated code","GitHub API access to read repository contents and metadata","MCP client to query dependency graph structures"],"failure_modes":["Search performance degrades with very large ecosystems (100k+ repositories) without pagination/filtering","Semantic search accuracy depends on embedding model quality and may miss domain-specific terminology","GitHub API rate limits (60 requests/hour unauthenticated, 5000/hour authenticated) constrain search scope","No built-in caching of embeddings — each search may require recomputation across indexed repositories","Context aggregation may exceed AI model context windows for large ecosystems — requires intelligent filtering/summarization","No built-in deduplication of similar code patterns across repositories — may return redundant context","Requires maintaining fresh repository clones or API access; stale data if repositories update frequently","File size limits and binary file handling not explicitly addressed — may fail on very large codebases","Dependency parsing limited to standard manifest files — custom or implicit dependencies may be missed","Transitive dependency resolution requires recursive API calls, increasing latency and rate limit consumption","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.37,"ecosystem":0.39999999999999997,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.52,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:03.579Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:00:15.503Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=octocode","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=octocode"}},"signature":"uTmSDbHlh0wwf40IsDJddkPpN4Nk3vtW7bf5CAVePbJ5AypbOWeXlwTLL8VJ+E9tJN5xJRJ7delsDp52b30WBw==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T22:40:20.251Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/octocode","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/octocode","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=octocode","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}