{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"npm_npm-vantasdkvanta-mcp-server","slug":"npm-vantasdkvanta-mcp-server","name":"@vantasdk/vanta-mcp-server","type":"mcp","url":"https://www.npmjs.com/package/@vantasdk/vanta-mcp-server","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/npm-vantasdkvanta-mcp-server","categories":["mcp-servers","code-review-security"],"tags":["mcp","model-context-protocol","vanta","security","compliance"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"npm_npm-vantasdkvanta-mcp-server__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.security.compliance.context.injection.via.mcp","name":"security-compliance-context-injection-via-mcp","description":"Injects Vanta security compliance data and audit findings into Claude/LLM context through the Model Context Protocol, enabling AI agents to access real-time compliance posture, control status, and remediation requirements without direct API calls. Uses MCP's resource and tool abstractions to expose Vanta's compliance framework as structured context that LLMs can reason over and reference in code review, architecture decisions, and security policy enforcement.","intents":["I want Claude to understand our current compliance gaps when reviewing code changes","I need my AI agent to reference our security controls during architecture decisions","I want to automate compliance-aware code review by giving Claude access to our Vanta audit data","I need to ensure generated code meets our organization's compliance requirements"],"best_for":["security-focused development teams using Claude with MCP clients","compliance officers automating policy enforcement in CI/CD pipelines","enterprises integrating Vanta compliance data into AI-assisted code review workflows"],"limitations":["Requires Vanta account with API access — no standalone compliance data generation","MCP protocol overhead adds latency to context injection (typically 100-300ms per request)","Compliance data freshness depends on Vanta sync frequency — near-real-time but not instantaneous","Limited to read-only context injection; cannot trigger Vanta remediation actions directly through MCP"],"requires":["Vanta account with API credentials","MCP-compatible client (Claude Desktop, custom MCP host, or compatible LLM interface)","Node.js 16+ for running the MCP server","@vantasdk/vanta-mcp-server npm package installed"],"input_types":["MCP resource requests (compliance framework queries)","MCP tool invocations (audit data retrieval)","LLM context prompts referencing compliance state"],"output_types":["structured compliance data (JSON)","audit findings and control status","remediation guidance and policy requirements"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","memory-knowledge","compliance-automation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-vantasdkvanta-mcp-server__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.vanta.api.resource.exposure.via.mcp.tools","name":"vanta-api-resource-exposure-via-mcp-tools","description":"Exposes Vanta's REST API endpoints as MCP tools with schema-based function calling, allowing LLM agents to query compliance frameworks, retrieve audit findings, check control status, and access remediation recommendations through standardized MCP tool invocation. Implements request/response marshaling between MCP protocol and Vanta API, handling authentication, error translation, and response formatting to present compliance data as structured tool outputs.","intents":["I want my AI agent to query Vanta's audit findings programmatically during code review","I need to check if a specific security control is passing before deploying infrastructure","I want Claude to retrieve remediation steps for failed compliance controls","I need to list all applicable compliance frameworks for my organization via AI agent"],"best_for":["developers building LLM agents that need live compliance data","security teams automating compliance checks in deployment pipelines","AI-assisted code review systems that must validate against organizational controls"],"limitations":["Tool invocation latency depends on Vanta API response time (typically 200-500ms)","Rate limiting on Vanta API may throttle high-frequency tool calls from agents","No built-in caching — each tool invocation hits Vanta API directly, increasing costs and latency","Tool schema must be manually maintained if Vanta API changes"],"requires":["Vanta API credentials (API key or OAuth token)","MCP client that supports tool calling (Claude Desktop, custom MCP host)","Network access to Vanta API endpoints"],"input_types":["MCP tool call requests with parameters (framework IDs, control names, etc.)","query parameters for filtering audit data"],"output_types":["JSON-structured compliance data","audit findings with severity and status","control remediation guidance"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-vantasdkvanta-mcp-server__cap_2","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.compliance.framework.context.retrieval","name":"compliance-framework-context-retrieval","description":"Retrieves and structures Vanta compliance framework definitions (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, etc.) as queryable context resources through MCP, allowing LLM agents to understand applicable compliance requirements, control mappings, and audit scope without manual documentation lookup. Caches framework metadata to reduce API calls and presents hierarchical control structures that LLMs can traverse to understand compliance dependencies.","intents":["I want Claude to understand which compliance frameworks apply to our codebase","I need to map code changes against specific compliance control requirements","I want to generate compliance documentation that references our applicable frameworks","I need to understand the audit scope and control hierarchy for our organization"],"best_for":["compliance teams documenting control mappings in code","developers building compliance-aware code generation systems","security architects using AI to analyze code against framework requirements"],"limitations":["Framework definitions are read-only — cannot modify control mappings through MCP","Caching adds complexity; stale framework data if Vanta definitions change","Large framework hierarchies may exceed context window limits in some LLM clients","No built-in filtering by framework version — always returns latest definitions"],"requires":["Vanta account with framework data populated","MCP client with resource retrieval support","Sufficient LLM context window to hold framework definitions"],"input_types":["framework identifiers (SOC 2, ISO 27001, etc.)","control query parameters"],"output_types":["framework metadata (name, version, scope)","control hierarchies with descriptions","control-to-requirement mappings"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-vantasdkvanta-mcp-server__cap_3","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.audit.findings.and.remediation.guidance.exposure","name":"audit-findings-and-remediation-guidance-exposure","description":"Exposes Vanta audit findings, failed controls, and remediation recommendations as queryable MCP resources, allowing LLM agents to retrieve specific compliance gaps, understand remediation steps, and prioritize fixes based on severity and impact. Implements filtering and sorting logic to surface the most critical findings and maps remediation guidance to code changes or infrastructure updates that LLMs can reason over.","intents":["I want Claude to identify which compliance controls are failing in our environment","I need to generate remediation code based on Vanta's specific guidance for failed controls","I want to prioritize security fixes by compliance impact and control severity","I need to understand the root cause of compliance failures before deploying fixes"],"best_for":["security teams automating remediation workflows with AI assistance","developers generating compliance-fixing code changes","compliance managers using AI to prioritize remediation efforts"],"limitations":["Remediation guidance is advisory only — LLM-generated fixes must be validated before deployment","Findings freshness depends on Vanta scan frequency (typically daily, not real-time)","No built-in tracking of remediation progress — cannot mark findings as 'in progress' through MCP","Large numbers of findings may exceed context limits; requires pagination or filtering"],"requires":["Vanta account with active scans and findings data","MCP client with pagination support for large result sets"],"input_types":["severity filters (critical, high, medium, low)","control type or framework filters","date range for finding recency"],"output_types":["audit findings with severity and status","remediation steps and guidance","affected resources and control mappings"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-vantasdkvanta-mcp-server__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.protocol.server.lifecycle.management","name":"mcp-protocol-server-lifecycle-management","description":"Implements the full MCP server lifecycle (initialization, resource discovery, tool registration, request handling, error recovery) as a Node.js process that can be spawned by MCP clients like Claude Desktop or custom MCP hosts. Handles MCP protocol handshake, capability negotiation, and graceful shutdown, allowing the server to integrate seamlessly into any MCP-compatible environment without custom client code.","intents":["I want to run the Vanta MCP server as a Claude Desktop plugin","I need to integrate Vanta compliance data into my custom MCP host","I want to deploy the MCP server in a containerized environment","I need to monitor and restart the MCP server if it crashes"],"best_for":["developers integrating Vanta into MCP-compatible LLM clients","DevOps teams deploying MCP servers in production environments","teams building custom MCP hosts that need Vanta compliance context"],"limitations":["Server process must be running continuously — no serverless deployment model","No built-in load balancing or horizontal scaling for high-concurrency scenarios","Process management (restart, monitoring) requires external tooling (systemd, Docker, PM2)","MCP protocol version compatibility must match client expectations"],"requires":["Node.js 16+ runtime","MCP client that supports stdio or HTTP transport","Vanta API credentials available as environment variables or config"],"input_types":["MCP protocol messages (JSON-RPC over stdio or HTTP)"],"output_types":["MCP protocol responses (resource data, tool results, error messages)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-vantasdkvanta-mcp-server__cap_5","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.vanta.api.authentication.and.credential.management","name":"vanta-api-authentication-and-credential-management","description":"Manages Vanta API authentication through environment variables or configuration files, handling credential loading, token refresh (if applicable), and secure credential passing to API requests. Implements error handling for authentication failures and provides clear error messages when credentials are missing or invalid, preventing silent failures in production environments.","intents":["I want to securely pass Vanta API credentials to the MCP server without hardcoding","I need to handle credential rotation without restarting the MCP server","I want clear error messages if Vanta authentication fails","I need to ensure credentials are not logged or exposed in error messages"],"best_for":["DevOps teams deploying MCP servers in production","security-conscious teams managing API credentials","teams using containerized or cloud-hosted MCP servers"],"limitations":["No built-in credential rotation — requires manual restart or external tooling","Credentials must be provided via environment variables or config files — no interactive prompts","No audit logging of credential access or API calls (requires external monitoring)","Token refresh logic depends on Vanta API design — may not support long-lived sessions"],"requires":["Vanta API key or credentials","Environment variable support (VANTA_API_KEY, etc.) or config file","Secure credential storage mechanism (secrets manager, .env file with restricted permissions)"],"input_types":["environment variables","configuration files"],"output_types":["authenticated API requests to Vanta","error messages for auth failures"],"categories":["safety-moderation","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-vantasdkvanta-mcp-server__cap_6","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.error.translation.and.user.facing.messages","name":"error-translation-and-user-facing-messages","description":"Translates Vanta API errors and MCP protocol errors into user-friendly messages that help developers understand what went wrong and how to fix it. Maps HTTP status codes, API error responses, and protocol violations to actionable error messages that reference specific configuration issues, missing data, or API limits, reducing debugging time for integration issues.","intents":["I want clear error messages when Vanta API calls fail","I need to understand why a compliance query returned no results","I want to know if I've hit Vanta API rate limits","I need to debug MCP protocol errors without reading raw protocol logs"],"best_for":["developers integrating Vanta MCP server for the first time","teams troubleshooting production MCP deployments","security teams debugging compliance data access issues"],"limitations":["Error messages are static — cannot provide context-specific guidance for all failure modes","Vanta API error codes must be documented for proper translation — incomplete mappings may result in generic errors","No built-in error recovery — errors are reported but not automatically retried","Error messages may expose internal API details that could be security-sensitive"],"requires":["MCP client that displays error messages to users"],"input_types":["Vanta API error responses","MCP protocol errors"],"output_types":["human-readable error messages","troubleshooting guidance"],"categories":["safety-moderation","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-vantasdkvanta-mcp-server__cap_7","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.resource.discovery.and.capability.advertisement","name":"mcp-resource-discovery-and-capability-advertisement","description":"Implements MCP resource discovery and tool capability advertisement, allowing MCP clients to discover what compliance data and operations are available through the server. Exposes resource types (frameworks, findings, controls), tool schemas (query operations, filters), and supported parameters, enabling clients to build dynamic UIs or auto-complete for compliance queries without hardcoding server capabilities.","intents":["I want Claude to discover what compliance data is available from Vanta","I need to build a dynamic UI that shows available compliance queries","I want auto-complete for compliance framework names and control IDs","I need to understand what parameters each compliance query accepts"],"best_for":["developers building MCP clients that need dynamic capability discovery","teams building custom UIs for compliance data access","LLM clients that use capability advertisement for prompt optimization"],"limitations":["Capability advertisement is static — does not reflect dynamic changes in Vanta account (new frameworks, controls)","Tool schemas must be manually maintained — no automatic schema generation from Vanta API","Large numbers of resources may exceed MCP protocol limits for capability advertisement","Clients must implement capability caching to avoid repeated discovery requests"],"requires":["MCP client that supports resource discovery and tool schema advertisement"],"input_types":["MCP capability discovery requests"],"output_types":["resource type definitions","tool schemas with parameters and return types","supported filters and query options"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":28,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Vanta account with API credentials","MCP-compatible client (Claude Desktop, custom MCP host, or compatible LLM interface)","Node.js 16+ for running the MCP server","@vantasdk/vanta-mcp-server npm package installed","Vanta API credentials (API key or OAuth token)","MCP client that supports tool calling (Claude Desktop, custom MCP host)","Network access to Vanta API endpoints","Vanta account with framework data populated","MCP client with resource retrieval support","Sufficient LLM context window to hold framework definitions"],"failure_modes":["Requires Vanta account with API access — no standalone compliance data generation","MCP protocol overhead adds latency to context injection (typically 100-300ms per request)","Compliance data freshness depends on Vanta sync frequency — near-real-time but not instantaneous","Limited to read-only context injection; cannot trigger Vanta remediation actions directly through MCP","Tool invocation latency depends on Vanta API response time (typically 200-500ms)","Rate limiting on Vanta API may throttle high-frequency tool calls from agents","No built-in caching — each tool invocation hits Vanta API directly, increasing costs and latency","Tool schema must be manually maintained if Vanta API changes","Framework definitions are read-only — cannot modify control mappings through MCP","Caching adds complexity; stale framework data if Vanta definitions change","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.26,"ecosystem":0.55,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.52,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:24.483Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:23:54.161Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=npm-vantasdkvanta-mcp-server","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=npm-vantasdkvanta-mcp-server"}},"signature":"aQzVD0B0jvriGIHHorPlVcW6I8xkGGq5keE1bHsOc/TJLxAaRLx6nAvPeXSUk12ngnJDU1Oo+RpqPlxyOjzMAg==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T00:13:25.421Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/npm-vantasdkvanta-mcp-server","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/npm-vantasdkvanta-mcp-server","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=npm-vantasdkvanta-mcp-server","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}