{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"npm_npm-transcend-iomcp-server-preferences","slug":"npm-transcend-iomcp-server-preferences","name":"@transcend-io/mcp-server-preferences","type":"mcp","url":"https://www.npmjs.com/package/@transcend-io/mcp-server-preferences","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/npm-transcend-iomcp-server-preferences","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"npm_npm-transcend-iomcp-server-preferences__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.compliant.preference.schema.exposure","name":"mcp-compliant preference schema exposure","description":"Exposes preference management capabilities through the Model Context Protocol (MCP) standard, allowing Claude and other MCP-compatible clients to discover and invoke preference operations via a standardized tool interface. Implements MCP server specification with JSON-RPC 2.0 transport, enabling seamless integration into LLM agent architectures without custom protocol negotiation.","intents":["I want Claude to manage user preferences in my application without writing custom API integrations","I need to expose preference CRUD operations to an LLM agent through a standard protocol","I want to build multi-turn conversations where Claude can read and update user settings"],"best_for":["Teams building Claude-integrated applications with preference management needs","Developers implementing LLM agents that need standardized tool access patterns","Organizations adopting MCP as their LLM integration standard"],"limitations":["Limited to MCP-compatible clients (Claude, some open-source LLM frameworks) — no REST API fallback","Preference schema must be predefined at server startup — no dynamic schema generation","No built-in authentication beyond MCP transport-level security — requires wrapping in auth middleware"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","MCP client implementation (Claude desktop, MCP SDK, or compatible framework)","@transcend-io/mcp-server-preferences npm package"],"input_types":["JSON preference objects","preference identifiers (strings/UUIDs)","filter/query parameters (structured)"],"output_types":["JSON preference objects","operation status/confirmation","preference metadata"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","mcp-server"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-transcend-iomcp-server-preferences__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.preference.crud.operations.via.tool.calling","name":"preference crud operations via tool calling","description":"Provides Create, Read, Update, Delete operations on user preferences through MCP tool definitions that Claude and other LLM clients can invoke. Each operation is exposed as a discrete tool with input validation, error handling, and structured response formatting, enabling LLMs to manipulate preference state as part of multi-step agent workflows.","intents":["I want Claude to create new preference records when a user requests a new setting","I need Claude to retrieve current preference values to inform its responses","I want Claude to update preferences based on user feedback in a conversation","I need Claude to delete preferences when users request removal"],"best_for":["LLM agents that need to persist user configuration changes across sessions","Conversational interfaces where Claude manages user settings dynamically","Applications requiring audit trails of preference modifications by AI agents"],"limitations":["No transactional guarantees across multiple preference updates — each operation is atomic but not coordinated","Preference validation rules must be implemented in the backend store, not in the MCP server itself","No built-in versioning or rollback — preference history requires external implementation"],"requires":["Backend preference storage system (database, key-value store, or custom implementation)","MCP client with tool-calling capability","Preference schema definition matching Transcend's format"],"input_types":["JSON objects with preference key-value pairs","preference identifiers","user context identifiers"],"output_types":["confirmation objects with operation status","updated preference objects","error messages with validation details"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-transcend-iomcp-server-preferences__cap_2","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.user.preference.context.injection.for.llm.agents","name":"user preference context injection for llm agents","description":"Enables MCP clients to retrieve and cache user preference context that can be injected into LLM prompts and decision-making. The server exposes preference data in a format optimized for LLM consumption, allowing agents to make context-aware decisions based on stored user settings without requiring separate API calls for each decision point.","intents":["I want Claude to know my communication preferences before drafting a response","I need Claude to respect my privacy settings when deciding what information to share","I want Claude to tailor its behavior based on my stored preferences without asking me repeatedly"],"best_for":["Personalized AI assistants that adapt behavior based on user configuration","Multi-turn conversations where preference context should persist across turns","Applications where LLM behavior must comply with user-defined settings"],"limitations":["Preference context is read-only from the LLM perspective — updates require explicit tool calls","No automatic preference invalidation — stale preference data may be used if cache TTL is long","Context injection depends on MCP client implementation — not all clients support preference context in system prompts"],"requires":["MCP client that supports context injection or resource endpoints","User identifier to scope preference queries","Backend preference store with read access"],"input_types":["user identifiers","preference scope/category filters"],"output_types":["structured preference objects","preference metadata with timestamps","formatted preference summaries for LLM consumption"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-transcend-iomcp-server-preferences__cap_3","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.preference.schema.validation.and.type.enforcement","name":"preference schema validation and type enforcement","description":"Validates incoming preference data against a predefined schema before persistence, enforcing type constraints, required fields, and format rules. Uses JSON Schema or similar validation framework to ensure preference integrity at the MCP server boundary, preventing malformed data from reaching the backend store and reducing downstream validation burden.","intents":["I want to ensure Claude can't accidentally set invalid preference values","I need to enforce data types and formats for preferences before they're stored","I want clear error messages when Claude attempts to set a preference with invalid data"],"best_for":["Applications with strict preference data integrity requirements","Systems where preference validation rules are complex and centralized","Teams that want to catch preference errors at the API boundary rather than in application logic"],"limitations":["Schema must be defined statically at server startup — no dynamic schema updates without restart","Complex validation logic (e.g., cross-field dependencies) requires custom validator implementation","Validation errors are returned to Claude but may not always be actionable without schema documentation"],"requires":["JSON Schema definition or equivalent validation framework","Preference schema file or configuration","MCP server with validation middleware"],"input_types":["JSON preference objects","preference updates with partial data"],"output_types":["validation success/failure status","detailed error messages with field-level feedback","sanitized preference objects"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-transcend-iomcp-server-preferences__cap_4","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.multi.user.preference.isolation.and.scoping","name":"multi-user preference isolation and scoping","description":"Implements user-scoped preference access control at the MCP server level, ensuring that preference operations are automatically scoped to the requesting user's context. Uses user identifiers from the MCP client context to enforce isolation, preventing cross-user preference leakage and enabling safe multi-tenant preference management without explicit authorization checks in application code.","intents":["I want Claude to only access and modify preferences for the current user","I need to ensure preferences from different users are never mixed or exposed","I want automatic user scoping without requiring Claude to pass user IDs explicitly"],"best_for":["Multi-user applications where preference isolation is critical","SaaS platforms with strict data segregation requirements","Systems where user context is available from the MCP transport layer"],"limitations":["User context must be provided by the MCP client — no fallback if user identification fails","Cross-user preference queries (e.g., for admin dashboards) require separate, explicitly-authorized endpoints","Preference sharing between users requires explicit implementation — not supported by default isolation"],"requires":["MCP client that provides user context (e.g., via authentication headers or session data)","User identifier extraction logic in the MCP server","Backend preference store with user-scoped queries"],"input_types":["preference objects","user identifiers (implicit from MCP context)"],"output_types":["user-scoped preference objects","access denial errors if user context is invalid"],"categories":["safety-moderation","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-transcend-iomcp-server-preferences__cap_5","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.preference.change.notifications.and.event.streaming","name":"preference change notifications and event streaming","description":"Emits events when preferences are modified, allowing MCP clients and downstream systems to react to preference changes in real-time. Implements an event-driven architecture where preference mutations trigger notifications that can be consumed by webhooks, message queues, or in-process listeners, enabling reactive preference synchronization across distributed systems.","intents":["I want other parts of my system to be notified when Claude updates a user preference","I need to trigger workflows or side effects when preferences change","I want to maintain preference consistency across multiple services when Claude modifies settings"],"best_for":["Event-driven architectures where preference changes must propagate to multiple services","Systems with complex preference dependencies that require cascading updates","Applications that need audit trails or change logs for compliance"],"limitations":["Event delivery is not guaranteed — at-least-once semantics require idempotent event handlers","Event streaming adds latency to preference operations — synchronous updates may be blocked","No built-in event filtering or routing — all subscribers receive all events"],"requires":["Event bus or message queue (e.g., Redis, RabbitMQ, Kafka)","Event listener implementation in downstream services","MCP server with event emission capability"],"input_types":["preference mutation operations (create, update, delete)"],"output_types":["preference change events with before/after state","event metadata (timestamp, user, operation type)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-transcend-iomcp-server-preferences__cap_6","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.preference.history.and.temporal.queries","name":"preference history and temporal queries","description":"Maintains immutable history of all preference changes with timestamps and actor identity. Supports temporal queries to retrieve preference state at any point in time, enabling audit trails and compliance reporting. Implements efficient storage using event sourcing or change logs, with optional archival to cold storage for older records. Provides time-range queries, change-diff operations, and historical snapshots for compliance documentation.","intents":["Generate audit reports showing preference changes over time for compliance","Reconstruct preference state at a specific date for historical data processing validation","Identify when a user revoked consent to determine data retention obligations"],"best_for":["Compliance-heavy organizations requiring detailed audit trails","Privacy teams investigating historical data processing decisions","AI agents generating compliance reports with historical preference context"],"limitations":["Temporal queries on large histories (years of data) may be slow without proper indexing; typical latency 100-500ms","Archival to cold storage may introduce retrieval delays (minutes to hours) for very old records","Change-diff operations require full history reconstruction; not suitable for real-time analytics"],"requires":["Preference history store (database with temporal support or event log)","User identifier and time range for queries","Optional: archival configuration for old records"],"input_types":["User identifier","Time range (ISO 8601 timestamps or relative durations)","Query type (snapshot, change-diff, full-history)"],"output_types":["Preference state at specified time","Change log (array of mutations with timestamps)","Diff object showing changes between two time points"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":28,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Node.js 16+","MCP client implementation (Claude desktop, MCP SDK, or compatible framework)","@transcend-io/mcp-server-preferences npm package","Backend preference storage system (database, key-value store, or custom implementation)","MCP client with tool-calling capability","Preference schema definition matching Transcend's format","MCP client that supports context injection or resource endpoints","User identifier to scope preference queries","Backend preference store with read access","JSON Schema definition or equivalent validation framework"],"failure_modes":["Limited to MCP-compatible clients (Claude, some open-source LLM frameworks) — no REST API fallback","Preference schema must be predefined at server startup — no dynamic schema generation","No built-in authentication beyond MCP transport-level security — requires wrapping in auth middleware","No transactional guarantees across multiple preference updates — each operation is atomic but not coordinated","Preference validation rules must be implemented in the backend store, not in the MCP server itself","No built-in versioning or rollback — preference history requires external implementation","Preference context is read-only from the LLM perspective — updates require explicit tool calls","No automatic preference invalidation — stale preference data may be used if cache TTL is long","Context injection depends on MCP client implementation — not all clients support preference context in system prompts","Schema must be defined statically at server startup — no dynamic schema updates without restart","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.24,"ecosystem":0.3,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.9,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:24.483Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:23:36.637Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=npm-transcend-iomcp-server-preferences","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=npm-transcend-iomcp-server-preferences"}},"signature":"7Dux/10F+Kr2BDPYh8c2/BHdfWkinNJYoi6clYR7q//Y2/PCq5QolhTorTssS1dn4Br1ALzWqylac9KZAcv7AQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-17T01:34:31.524Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/npm-transcend-iomcp-server-preferences","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/npm-transcend-iomcp-server-preferences","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=npm-transcend-iomcp-server-preferences","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}