{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"npm_npm-transcend-iomcp-server-discovery","slug":"npm-transcend-iomcp-server-discovery","name":"@transcend-io/mcp-server-discovery","type":"mcp","url":"https://www.npmjs.com/package/@transcend-io/mcp-server-discovery","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/npm-transcend-iomcp-server-discovery","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"npm_npm-transcend-iomcp-server-discovery__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.server.discovery.and.enumeration","name":"mcp server discovery and enumeration","description":"Discovers and enumerates available MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers in a runtime environment by scanning for server implementations that conform to the MCP specification. Works by introspecting the MCP server registry or filesystem to identify installed servers, their endpoints, and capabilities, exposing them through a standardized discovery interface that clients can query to dynamically load available tools and resources.","intents":["I need to programmatically find all MCP servers available in my environment without hardcoding server addresses","I want to build a client that can auto-discover and connect to any MCP server that's installed locally or remotely","I need to list all available MCP servers and their capabilities to present options to users"],"best_for":["MCP client developers building dynamic server discovery systems","Teams deploying multiple MCP servers and needing runtime visibility","LLM application builders integrating with heterogeneous tool ecosystems"],"limitations":["Discovery scope limited to servers registered in the MCP registry or filesystem — cannot discover servers on arbitrary networks without explicit configuration","No built-in caching of discovered servers — each discovery call may incur latency from registry lookups","Requires MCP servers to be properly registered/installed; orphaned or misconfigured servers may not be discoverable"],"requires":["Node.js 16+ (typical for npm packages)","MCP specification compliance in target servers","Network access to MCP server registry or local filesystem access for discovery"],"input_types":["configuration object (optional filters, registry URLs)","environment variables (MCP_SERVER_PATH, etc.)"],"output_types":["structured server metadata (name, version, endpoint, capabilities)","JSON array of discovered server definitions"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-transcend-iomcp-server-discovery__cap_1","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.data.source.capability.introspection","name":"data source capability introspection","description":"Introspects connected data sources (databases, APIs, file systems) to expose their available tools, resources, and schemas through the MCP protocol. Implements reflection/introspection patterns to query what operations, queries, and data access methods each source supports, then wraps these as MCP tools and resources that LLM clients can discover and invoke without prior knowledge of the source's structure.","intents":["I want to expose my database schema and available queries as MCP tools so an LLM can query it without me writing custom integrations","I need to let clients discover what data sources are available and what operations they support","I want to build a data discovery layer that shows LLMs what tables, APIs, and resources exist in my data stack"],"best_for":["Data engineers building LLM-accessible data catalogs","Teams with heterogeneous data sources wanting unified MCP access","Developers creating data discovery agents that need runtime visibility into available datasets"],"limitations":["Introspection depth depends on source capabilities — some APIs/databases expose minimal schema information","Performance overhead for introspecting large schemas (thousands of tables/fields) on each discovery call","Requires appropriate permissions/credentials to introspect each data source; cannot discover sources the MCP server lacks access to"],"requires":["Connection credentials or API keys for target data sources","Data source drivers/SDKs (database drivers, API clients, etc.)","MCP server running with appropriate network/filesystem access"],"input_types":["data source connection strings or configuration","optional schema filters (e.g., 'only expose tables matching pattern')"],"output_types":["structured schema metadata (tables, columns, types, constraints)","MCP tool definitions representing available queries/operations","JSON schema representations of data source capabilities"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-transcend-iomcp-server-discovery__cap_2","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.data.lineage.and.dependency.tracking","name":"data lineage and dependency tracking","description":"Tracks data lineage and dependencies across connected data sources by analyzing query execution, data transformations, and relationships between datasets. Builds a directed acyclic graph (DAG) of data flows showing how data moves through the system, which sources feed into which transformations, and what downstream dependencies exist. Exposes this lineage information through MCP tools so clients can query data provenance and impact analysis.","intents":["I need to understand where a particular data field comes from and how it's transformed through my data pipeline","I want to know what downstream systems or reports depend on a specific data source before I modify it","I need to trace data lineage for compliance/audit purposes and expose that information to LLM-based analysis tools"],"best_for":["Data governance teams implementing lineage tracking for compliance","Data engineers managing complex ETL pipelines needing impact analysis","Organizations building data observability platforms with LLM-powered insights"],"limitations":["Lineage tracking requires instrumentation of data transformations — cannot infer lineage from passive observation alone","Complex transformations (stored procedures, custom code) may not be fully traceable without explicit lineage annotations","DAG construction adds computational overhead; large pipelines with thousands of nodes may have performance implications","Requires write access to lineage storage system; read-only data sources cannot contribute lineage information"],"requires":["Instrumentation/logging in data transformation code or query engines","Lineage storage backend (graph database, metadata store, or similar)","Access to query execution logs or transformation metadata"],"input_types":["query execution traces or logs","transformation definitions (SQL, code, DAG specifications)","data source connection metadata"],"output_types":["lineage graph (nodes=datasets, edges=transformations)","dependency lists (upstream/downstream sources)","impact analysis results (affected datasets for a given change)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-transcend-iomcp-server-discovery__cap_3","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.sensitive.data.classification.and.detection","name":"sensitive data classification and detection","description":"Scans data sources to identify and classify sensitive information (PII, PHI, financial data, etc.) using pattern matching, regex rules, and machine learning-based classifiers. Maintains a classification registry mapping data fields to sensitivity levels and data types, then exposes this classification through MCP tools so clients can query what sensitive data exists, where it's located, and apply appropriate access controls or masking policies.","intents":["I need to discover all personally identifiable information in my data sources for GDPR/privacy compliance","I want to prevent LLMs from accessing or exposing sensitive data by knowing which fields contain PII before granting access","I need to classify data sensitivity levels across my organization and expose that classification to access control systems"],"best_for":["Privacy/compliance teams implementing data governance and PII detection","Security engineers building data access controls with sensitivity awareness","Organizations deploying LLMs that need to avoid exposing sensitive data"],"limitations":["Pattern-based detection has false positive/negative rates — context-dependent sensitivity (e.g., 'John' as name vs. username) may be misclassified","ML-based classifiers require training data and may not generalize to domain-specific sensitive data types","Scanning large datasets for sensitive data can be computationally expensive; may require sampling or incremental scanning","Classification is point-in-time; new sensitive data added after scanning is not automatically detected"],"requires":["Classification rules/patterns (regex, ML models, or rule engine)","Access to data source contents for scanning","Sensitivity classification schema/taxonomy"],"input_types":["data source schemas and sample data","classification rules or ML models","sensitivity taxonomy definitions"],"output_types":["classification results (field -> sensitivity level mapping)","PII/sensitive data inventory","masking/redaction policies"],"categories":["safety-moderation","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-transcend-iomcp-server-discovery__cap_4","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.data.access.policy.enforcement.and.auditing","name":"data access policy enforcement and auditing","description":"Enforces data access policies at the MCP server level by intercepting data access requests, checking them against configured policies (role-based, attribute-based, or sensitivity-based), and logging all access attempts for audit trails. Implements policy evaluation logic that determines whether a client can access a specific dataset or field based on credentials, requested operation, and data sensitivity classification.","intents":["I need to enforce fine-grained access control over which LLM clients can access which data sources and fields","I want to audit all data access through the MCP server for compliance and security monitoring","I need to apply different access policies based on data sensitivity — blocking LLM access to PII while allowing access to aggregated data"],"best_for":["Security teams implementing data access controls for LLM systems","Compliance officers needing audit trails for data access","Organizations with multi-tenant or role-based data access requirements"],"limitations":["Policy evaluation adds latency to each data access request (typically 10-100ms depending on policy complexity)","Requires integration with identity/authentication systems; cannot enforce policies without knowing client identity","Policy language/engine must be maintained and updated as access requirements change","Audit logging at scale can generate large volumes of log data requiring storage and retention management"],"requires":["Authentication/identity system (OIDC, API keys, mTLS, etc.)","Policy definition language or engine (ABAC, RBAC, or custom)","Audit logging backend (database, log aggregation service, etc.)"],"input_types":["access request (client identity, requested resource, operation)","policy definitions (rules, roles, attributes)","data classification/sensitivity metadata"],"output_types":["access decision (allow/deny)","audit log entries (timestamp, client, resource, decision, reason)","policy violation alerts"],"categories":["safety-moderation","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-transcend-iomcp-server-discovery__cap_5","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.structured.data.extraction.and.schema.mapping","name":"structured data extraction and schema mapping","description":"Extracts structured data from unstructured or semi-structured sources (documents, logs, APIs) and maps it to standardized schemas using pattern matching, LLM-based extraction, or rule-based parsers. Converts raw data into typed, validated structures that conform to defined schemas, enabling downstream tools to work with consistent, predictable data formats. Exposes extraction and mapping as MCP tools that clients can invoke on arbitrary data.","intents":["I need to extract structured fields from unstructured documents and expose them as queryable data","I want to normalize data from multiple sources into a common schema for consistent access","I need to parse logs, CSVs, or API responses into typed structures that LLMs can reason about"],"best_for":["Data engineers building ETL pipelines with heterogeneous source formats","Teams integrating unstructured data sources into LLM-accessible catalogs","Organizations standardizing data formats across legacy and modern systems"],"limitations":["Extraction accuracy depends on source data quality and schema complexity — ambiguous or malformed data may fail extraction","LLM-based extraction adds latency (typically 1-5 seconds per document) and cost; rule-based extraction is faster but less flexible","Schema mapping requires manual definition; automatic schema inference may produce incorrect or overly broad schemas","Extracted data validation may reject valid data that doesn't conform to strict schema constraints"],"requires":["Source data in accessible format (files, API endpoints, databases)","Target schema definitions (JSON Schema, Avro, Protobuf, etc.)","Extraction rules or LLM API access for LLM-based extraction"],"input_types":["unstructured/semi-structured data (text, JSON, CSV, logs)","schema definitions","extraction rules or patterns"],"output_types":["structured data conforming to target schema","extraction confidence scores or validation results","error reports for failed extractions"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-transcend-iomcp-server-discovery__cap_6","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.data.quality.assessment.and.anomaly.detection","name":"data quality assessment and anomaly detection","description":"Analyzes data quality metrics (completeness, accuracy, consistency, timeliness) and detects anomalies using statistical methods, rule-based checks, or ML-based outlier detection. Computes quality scores for datasets and fields, identifies data quality issues (missing values, duplicates, outliers, schema violations), and exposes these assessments through MCP tools so clients can query data quality before using datasets.","intents":["I need to know if a dataset is reliable before using it in LLM analysis or decision-making","I want to detect data quality issues (missing values, duplicates, outliers) automatically and alert on them","I need to assess data quality across my organization and prioritize remediation efforts"],"best_for":["Data quality teams implementing quality monitoring and governance","LLM application builders needing to assess data reliability before use","Organizations with data quality SLAs requiring automated monitoring"],"limitations":["Quality assessment is heuristic-based; what constitutes 'good' quality is domain-specific and may require tuning","Anomaly detection may produce false positives/negatives depending on statistical assumptions and model choice","Computing quality metrics at scale (large datasets) can be expensive; may require sampling or incremental computation","Quality assessment is point-in-time; ongoing monitoring requires continuous scanning"],"requires":["Access to dataset contents for analysis","Quality rules/thresholds (domain-specific)","Statistical models or anomaly detection algorithms"],"input_types":["dataset samples or full datasets","quality rules and thresholds","historical data for baseline comparison"],"output_types":["quality scores (0-100 or similar scale)","quality issue reports (missing values, duplicates, outliers)","data quality metrics (completeness %, accuracy %, etc.)"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":27,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Node.js 16+ (typical for npm packages)","MCP specification compliance in target servers","Network access to MCP server registry or local filesystem access for discovery","Connection credentials or API keys for target data sources","Data source drivers/SDKs (database drivers, API clients, etc.)","MCP server running with appropriate network/filesystem access","Instrumentation/logging in data transformation code or query engines","Lineage storage backend (graph database, metadata store, or similar)","Access to query execution logs or transformation metadata","Classification rules/patterns (regex, ML models, or rule engine)"],"failure_modes":["Discovery scope limited to servers registered in the MCP registry or filesystem — cannot discover servers on arbitrary networks without explicit configuration","No built-in caching of discovered servers — each discovery call may incur latency from registry lookups","Requires MCP servers to be properly registered/installed; orphaned or misconfigured servers may not be discoverable","Introspection depth depends on source capabilities — some APIs/databases expose minimal schema information","Performance overhead for introspecting large schemas (thousands of tables/fields) on each discovery call","Requires appropriate permissions/credentials to introspect each data source; cannot discover sources the MCP server lacks access to","Lineage tracking requires instrumentation of data transformations — cannot infer lineage from passive observation alone","Complex transformations (stored procedures, custom code) may not be fully traceable without explicit lineage annotations","DAG construction adds computational overhead; large pipelines with thousands of nodes may have performance implications","Requires write access to lineage storage system; read-only data sources cannot contribute lineage information","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.24,"ecosystem":0.3,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:24.483Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:23:37.242Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=npm-transcend-iomcp-server-discovery","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=npm-transcend-iomcp-server-discovery"}},"signature":"7oNR+12UkUTy8Kc1YNwSzkA3jSDRdPVOKvb/DAYN8rrWMBp27WBdHqJXROaJwdcOrDili8npyzOdlb4nz6tUCA==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T00:22:35.792Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/npm-transcend-iomcp-server-discovery","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/npm-transcend-iomcp-server-discovery","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=npm-transcend-iomcp-server-discovery","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}