{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"npm_npm-modelcontextprotocolserver-basic-react","slug":"npm-modelcontextprotocolserver-basic-react","name":"@modelcontextprotocol/server-basic-react","type":"mcp","url":"https://www.npmjs.com/package/@modelcontextprotocol/server-basic-react","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/npm-modelcontextprotocolserver-basic-react","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"npm_npm-modelcontextprotocolserver-basic-react__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.server.initialization.with.react.component.rendering","name":"mcp server initialization with react component rendering","description":"Bootstraps a Model Context Protocol server that uses React as the templating and component composition layer for generating dynamic tool definitions and resource schemas. The server implements the MCP protocol specification, handling client connections and exposing tools/resources as React-rendered JSON structures rather than static configurations, enabling component-based abstraction of server capabilities.","intents":["Set up an MCP server that uses React patterns for composing and managing tool definitions","Create a server where tool schemas and responses are generated via React component rendering","Build an MCP server with reusable, composable tool definitions using component-based architecture"],"best_for":["Node.js developers building MCP servers with component-driven architectures","Teams wanting to leverage React patterns for server-side tool composition","Developers prototyping MCP integrations with familiar React component models"],"limitations":["React rendering adds overhead compared to static JSON tool definitions — each tool invocation may require component tree evaluation","Limited to Node.js runtime; no browser or edge runtime support","Minimal documentation for production deployments; primarily an example/reference implementation"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","npm or yarn package manager","React 18+ (as peer dependency)","@modelcontextprotocol/sdk package"],"input_types":["MCP protocol messages (JSON-RPC 2.0)","Tool invocation requests with parameters"],"output_types":["MCP protocol responses (JSON-RPC 2.0)","Tool definitions (JSON schemas)","Resource manifests (JSON)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-modelcontextprotocolserver-basic-react__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.tool.definition.composition.via.react.components","name":"tool definition composition via react components","description":"Implements a pattern where individual MCP tools are defined as React components that render to tool schema objects (name, description, input schema). Each tool component encapsulates its schema definition, input validation rules, and metadata, allowing tools to be composed, extended, and reused through React's component composition patterns (props, children, higher-order components) rather than flat configuration objects.","intents":["Define MCP tools using React component syntax with reusable, composable patterns","Create parameterized tool templates that can be instantiated with different configurations via props","Build tool libraries where common functionality (validation, error handling, logging) is shared across tools via component composition"],"best_for":["React developers building tool-heavy MCP servers who want familiar component patterns","Teams with existing React component libraries wanting to extend them to MCP tool definitions","Projects requiring highly composable, DRY tool definitions across multiple MCP servers"],"limitations":["React component rendering for schema generation adds latency compared to static schema objects — measurable for servers with 50+ tools","Requires understanding of both React component patterns AND MCP tool schema specification","No built-in type safety for tool input schemas; TypeScript types must be manually aligned with rendered schemas"],"requires":["React 18+","TypeScript 4.5+ (recommended for type safety)","Understanding of MCP tool schema format (JSON Schema draft 2020-12)"],"input_types":["React component props (configuration objects)","JSX component definitions"],"output_types":["Tool definition objects (name, description, inputSchema)","JSON Schema objects for input validation"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-modelcontextprotocolserver-basic-react__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.resource.manifest.generation.with.react.rendering","name":"resource manifest generation with react rendering","description":"Generates MCP resource manifests (lists of available resources with URIs, types, and descriptions) by rendering React components to JSON structures. Resources are defined as components that describe what data/capabilities the server exposes, with the manifest dynamically built from the component tree, enabling resources to be conditionally included, parameterized, or composed based on configuration or runtime state.","intents":["Define MCP resources (files, APIs, databases) as React components with dynamic manifest generation","Conditionally expose resources based on server configuration or environment variables","Build resource libraries where common resource types are reusable components"],"best_for":["Developers building MCP servers that expose variable or dynamic resource sets","Teams wanting to manage resource definitions alongside tool definitions in a unified component model","Projects where resource availability depends on runtime configuration or feature flags"],"limitations":["Component rendering overhead for large resource manifests (100+ resources) — manifest generation may add 50-200ms per server startup","No built-in caching of rendered manifests; each client connection may re-render the full manifest","Limited examples of complex resource types (databases, APIs with authentication) in the reference implementation"],"requires":["React 18+","@modelcontextprotocol/sdk","Understanding of MCP resource URI format and MIME types"],"input_types":["React component tree definitions","Configuration objects (environment, feature flags)"],"output_types":["Resource manifest (JSON array of resource objects)","Resource URIs (strings)","MIME type declarations"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-modelcontextprotocolserver-basic-react__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.protocol.message.handling.and.routing","name":"mcp protocol message handling and routing","description":"Implements the MCP protocol message loop (JSON-RPC 2.0) that receives client requests, routes them to appropriate tool/resource handlers, and returns responses. The server parses incoming MCP messages, validates them against the protocol specification, dispatches to React-rendered tool/resource handlers, and serializes responses back to JSON-RPC format, with error handling for malformed requests and handler failures.","intents":["Handle incoming MCP protocol messages from clients and route them to the correct tool or resource handler","Implement proper JSON-RPC 2.0 error handling and response formatting","Manage the server lifecycle (startup, shutdown, client connection/disconnection)"],"best_for":["Developers building MCP servers that need to handle multiple concurrent client connections","Teams integrating MCP servers into larger systems requiring robust protocol compliance","Projects needing proper error handling and logging for protocol-level debugging"],"limitations":["Single-threaded Node.js event loop — high concurrency (1000+ simultaneous tool invocations) may cause latency spikes","No built-in request queuing or rate limiting; clients can overwhelm the server with rapid requests","Error messages follow MCP spec but may not include detailed stack traces in production mode"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","@modelcontextprotocol/sdk (provides protocol implementation)","Understanding of JSON-RPC 2.0 specification"],"input_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 request messages (tools/initialize, resources/read, etc.)","Binary or text transport (stdio, HTTP, WebSocket depending on transport layer)"],"output_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 response messages","Error responses with error codes and messages","Tool execution results or resource content"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-modelcontextprotocolserver-basic-react__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.tool.invocation.execution.with.parameter.binding","name":"tool invocation execution with parameter binding","description":"Executes tool invocations by binding client-provided parameters to tool handler functions, with parameter validation against the tool's input schema. When a client calls a tool, the server matches the request to the corresponding React-rendered tool component, validates input parameters against the schema, invokes the handler function with bound parameters, and returns the result or error, with support for async handlers and error propagation.","intents":["Execute tool functions with client-provided parameters and proper validation","Handle async tool handlers (e.g., API calls, database queries) with promise resolution","Provide detailed error messages when parameter validation fails or tool execution fails"],"best_for":["Developers building MCP servers with complex tool logic (API calls, database operations)","Teams needing reliable parameter validation and error handling for tool invocations","Projects where tools have async dependencies (external APIs, databases)"],"limitations":["No built-in timeout handling for long-running tools — hung handlers can block the event loop","Parameter validation is schema-based but doesn't support custom validation logic beyond JSON Schema","No built-in retry logic or circuit breaker for failing tool invocations"],"requires":["Tool handlers defined as JavaScript/TypeScript functions","Input schema defined in JSON Schema format","Understanding of async/await or Promise-based error handling"],"input_types":["Tool invocation requests with parameter objects","Parameter values (strings, numbers, objects, arrays)"],"output_types":["Tool execution results (any JSON-serializable type)","Error objects with error codes and messages","Async promises that resolve to results or errors"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-modelcontextprotocolserver-basic-react__cap_5","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.resource.content.retrieval.and.streaming","name":"resource content retrieval and streaming","description":"Retrieves and serves resource content (files, API responses, database records) when clients request resources by URI. The server matches the requested resource URI to a React-rendered resource component, invokes the resource handler to fetch or generate content, and returns the content with appropriate MIME type and encoding. Supports both synchronous content return and streaming for large resources, with proper error handling for missing or inaccessible resources.","intents":["Serve file content, API responses, or database records to MCP clients via resource URIs","Stream large resources (files, logs) without loading entire content into memory","Handle resource access errors (404, 403, 500) with proper error responses"],"best_for":["Developers exposing files, APIs, or databases through MCP servers","Teams needing to serve large resources (logs, datasets) efficiently without memory overhead","Projects where resource content is dynamically generated or fetched from external sources"],"limitations":["No built-in caching of resource content — repeated requests for the same resource re-fetch from source","Streaming support depends on transport layer (stdio doesn't support streaming; HTTP/WebSocket do)","No built-in access control or authentication per resource — all exposed resources are accessible to all clients"],"requires":["Resource handlers that return content as strings or streams","MIME type declarations for each resource","Understanding of MCP resource URI format"],"input_types":["Resource URI (string)","Optional query parameters or headers"],"output_types":["Resource content (text, binary, JSON)","MIME type (text/plain, application/json, etc.)","Error responses (404, 403, 500)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-modelcontextprotocolserver-basic-react__cap_6","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.server.configuration.and.environment.based.capability.exposure","name":"server configuration and environment-based capability exposure","description":"Configures server behavior (port, host, logging level, feature flags) through environment variables and configuration objects, with conditional exposure of tools and resources based on configuration. The server reads configuration at startup, passes it to React components via context or props, enabling tools/resources to be conditionally rendered based on environment (development vs. production), feature flags, or API keys, allowing a single server codebase to support multiple deployment scenarios.","intents":["Configure server behavior (port, host, logging) via environment variables","Conditionally expose tools/resources based on feature flags or environment","Support multiple deployment scenarios (development, staging, production) from a single codebase"],"best_for":["Teams deploying MCP servers across multiple environments with different capabilities","Developers wanting to enable/disable tools based on feature flags or API key availability","Projects where server configuration is managed through environment variables (Docker, Kubernetes)"],"limitations":["Configuration is read at server startup; changes require server restart","No built-in validation of configuration values — invalid configs may cause runtime errors","Limited examples of complex configuration scenarios (multi-tenant, dynamic feature flags)"],"requires":["Environment variables or configuration file","Understanding of Node.js process.env","React context or props for passing configuration to components"],"input_types":["Environment variables (strings)","Configuration objects (JSON)"],"output_types":["Server configuration state","Conditional tool/resource lists based on configuration"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":25,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Node.js 16+","npm or yarn package manager","React 18+ (as peer dependency)","@modelcontextprotocol/sdk package","React 18+","TypeScript 4.5+ (recommended for type safety)","Understanding of MCP tool schema format (JSON Schema draft 2020-12)","@modelcontextprotocol/sdk","Understanding of MCP resource URI format and MIME types","@modelcontextprotocol/sdk (provides protocol implementation)"],"failure_modes":["React rendering adds overhead compared to static JSON tool definitions — each tool invocation may require component tree evaluation","Limited to Node.js runtime; no browser or edge runtime support","Minimal documentation for production deployments; primarily an example/reference implementation","React component rendering for schema generation adds latency compared to static schema objects — measurable for servers with 50+ tools","Requires understanding of both React component patterns AND MCP tool schema specification","No built-in type safety for tool input schemas; TypeScript types must be manually aligned with rendered schemas","Component rendering overhead for large resource manifests (100+ resources) — manifest generation may add 50-200ms per server startup","No built-in caching of rendered manifests; each client connection may re-render the full manifest","Limited examples of complex resource types (databases, APIs with authentication) in the reference implementation","Single-threaded Node.js event loop — high concurrency (1000+ simultaneous tool invocations) may cause latency spikes","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.24,"ecosystem":0.3,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.6,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:23.904Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:23:44.323Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=npm-modelcontextprotocolserver-basic-react","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=npm-modelcontextprotocolserver-basic-react"}},"signature":"xOw2WJgXuXEsxhaCA8mfLwzCcc4US/I+qeD0NH6H84m3ioX75+aeUxn4vP7TCQ5UTkIgBNzITyuVBltwH7U8Ag==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T22:17:48.312Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/npm-modelcontextprotocolserver-basic-react","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/npm-modelcontextprotocolserver-basic-react","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=npm-modelcontextprotocolserver-basic-react","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}