{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"npm_npm-mcp-tool-lint","slug":"npm-mcp-tool-lint","name":"mcp-tool-lint","type":"mcp","url":"https://www.npmjs.com/package/mcp-tool-lint","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/npm-mcp-tool-lint","categories":["mcp-servers","testing-quality"],"tags":["mcp","model-context-protocol","linting","tools","ai","claude"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"npm_npm-mcp-tool-lint__cap_0","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.mcp.tool.definition.schema.validation","name":"mcp tool definition schema validation","description":"Validates MCP tool definitions against the Model Context Protocol specification schema, checking for required fields, type correctness, and structural compliance. Uses JSON schema validation to ensure tool definitions conform to MCP standards before they are exposed to LLM clients, preventing runtime failures and protocol violations.","intents":["I want to catch schema violations in my MCP tool definitions before deploying them","I need to ensure my tool definitions comply with the MCP specification","I want to validate that all required fields are present in my tool JSON"],"best_for":["MCP server developers building tool integrations","teams deploying MCP tools to production","developers integrating with Claude or other LLM clients via MCP"],"limitations":["Only validates against MCP schema — does not test actual tool functionality or runtime behavior","Cannot detect semantic issues like incorrect parameter types that are syntactically valid","Limited to static analysis — cannot validate dynamic tool behavior or conditional logic"],"requires":["Node.js 14+","MCP tool definition in JSON format","Valid MCP specification version reference"],"input_types":["JSON","MCP tool definition objects"],"output_types":["validation report","error list with line numbers","structured validation results"],"categories":["safety-moderation","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-mcp-tool-lint__cap_1","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.tool.parameter.schema.linting","name":"tool parameter schema linting","description":"Analyzes tool input parameter schemas for completeness, type safety, and usability issues. Checks for missing descriptions, ambiguous type definitions, undocumented required fields, and parameter naming inconsistencies that could confuse LLM clients when invoking tools.","intents":["I want to ensure my tool parameters are well-documented for LLM clients","I need to catch missing or unclear parameter descriptions before deployment","I want to verify that required vs optional parameters are correctly specified"],"best_for":["MCP tool developers optimizing for LLM usability","teams ensuring consistent parameter documentation across tool suites","developers building tools that will be called by Claude or other LLM agents"],"limitations":["Does not validate parameter values at runtime — only schema structure","Cannot detect logical conflicts between parameters (e.g., mutually exclusive options)","Limited to static schema analysis — cannot test parameter combinations"],"requires":["MCP tool definition with input schema","JSON schema format for parameters"],"input_types":["JSON schema objects","MCP tool definitions"],"output_types":["parameter quality report","list of missing descriptions","type safety warnings"],"categories":["safety-moderation","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-mcp-tool-lint__cap_2","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.tool.naming.and.convention.checking","name":"tool naming and convention checking","description":"Lints tool names, descriptions, and identifiers against MCP and industry best practices for naming conventions. Detects non-standard naming patterns, overly long or unclear tool names, and inconsistent naming styles across tool suites that could reduce discoverability or clarity for LLM clients.","intents":["I want to ensure my tool names follow MCP conventions","I need to catch naming inconsistencies across my tool suite","I want to verify tool names are clear and discoverable by LLM clients"],"best_for":["teams building large MCP tool suites with consistency requirements","developers optimizing tool discoverability for LLM clients","organizations establishing MCP tool naming standards"],"limitations":["Convention checking is opinionated — may flag valid but unconventional names","Cannot validate semantic appropriateness of names (e.g., whether a name accurately describes the tool)","Limited to static pattern matching — cannot detect naming conflicts across distributed tool registries"],"requires":["MCP tool definitions with name and description fields","Configurable naming convention rules (or defaults)"],"input_types":["tool names","tool descriptions","MCP tool definitions"],"output_types":["naming convention violations","suggestions for compliant names","consistency report"],"categories":["safety-moderation","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-mcp-tool-lint__cap_3","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.tool.description.quality.assessment","name":"tool description quality assessment","description":"Evaluates tool descriptions for clarity, completeness, and LLM-friendliness using heuristics like length, specificity, and presence of usage examples or caveats. Detects vague descriptions, missing context about tool behavior, and descriptions that lack sufficient detail for an LLM to make informed invocation decisions.","intents":["I want to ensure my tool descriptions are clear enough for LLMs to understand","I need to catch vague or incomplete tool descriptions","I want to verify that tool descriptions include important caveats or limitations"],"best_for":["MCP tool developers optimizing for LLM comprehension","teams ensuring high-quality tool documentation","developers building tools that will be used by Claude or other LLM agents"],"limitations":["Quality assessment is heuristic-based and may not catch all clarity issues","Cannot validate semantic accuracy of descriptions (e.g., whether description matches actual behavior)","Limited to English-language analysis — may not work well for other languages"],"requires":["Tool description text","MCP tool definitions"],"input_types":["text descriptions","MCP tool definitions"],"output_types":["description quality score","clarity warnings","suggestions for improvement"],"categories":["safety-moderation","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-mcp-tool-lint__cap_4","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.tool.response.schema.validation","name":"tool response schema validation","description":"Validates tool output/response schemas for completeness and consistency, checking that response structures are well-defined, documented, and compatible with MCP expectations. Detects missing response descriptions, undefined response types, and inconsistent response structures across similar tools.","intents":["I want to ensure my tool response schemas are well-defined","I need to catch missing or unclear response documentation","I want to verify that response structures are consistent across my tool suite"],"best_for":["MCP tool developers building reliable tool integrations","teams ensuring consistent response handling across tools","developers building tools that will be consumed by LLM clients"],"limitations":["Only validates schema structure — does not test actual runtime responses","Cannot detect semantic mismatches between documented and actual responses","Limited to static schema analysis — cannot validate response data quality"],"requires":["MCP tool definition with response schema","JSON schema format for responses"],"input_types":["JSON schema objects","MCP tool definitions"],"output_types":["response schema validation report","missing documentation warnings","consistency violations"],"categories":["safety-moderation","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-mcp-tool-lint__cap_5","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.tool.dependency.and.integration.checking","name":"tool dependency and integration checking","description":"Analyzes tool definitions for external dependencies, required environment variables, API keys, and integration points, flagging missing or incomplete dependency declarations. Detects tools that reference external services without documenting authentication requirements or configuration needs.","intents":["I want to identify all external dependencies my tools require","I need to catch missing environment variable or API key documentation","I want to verify that integration requirements are clearly documented"],"best_for":["MCP server operators managing tool deployments","teams ensuring tools are properly configured before production","developers building tools with external service dependencies"],"limitations":["Can only detect declared dependencies — cannot discover undeclared runtime dependencies","Does not validate that dependencies are actually available or correctly configured","Limited to static analysis — cannot test actual dependency resolution at runtime"],"requires":["MCP tool definitions with dependency declarations","Tool metadata or documentation"],"input_types":["MCP tool definitions","dependency declarations","configuration metadata"],"output_types":["dependency report","missing configuration warnings","integration requirement checklist"],"categories":["safety-moderation","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-mcp-tool-lint__cap_6","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.tool.error.handling.and.edge.case.documentation","name":"tool error handling and edge case documentation","description":"Lints tool definitions for documentation of error conditions, edge cases, and failure modes. Detects tools that lack error documentation, missing information about rate limits or quotas, and undocumented failure scenarios that could surprise LLM clients.","intents":["I want to ensure my tools document their error conditions","I need to catch missing documentation about rate limits or quotas","I want to verify that edge cases are documented for LLM clients"],"best_for":["MCP tool developers building robust integrations","teams ensuring tools fail gracefully and predictably","developers building tools that will be used by LLM agents in production"],"limitations":["Can only check for documentation of error conditions — cannot validate actual error handling","Cannot detect undocumented error scenarios that aren't mentioned in tool metadata","Limited to static analysis — cannot test error paths at runtime"],"requires":["MCP tool definitions with error or edge case documentation","Tool metadata or description fields"],"input_types":["MCP tool definitions","error documentation","tool descriptions"],"output_types":["error documentation report","missing edge case warnings","robustness assessment"],"categories":["safety-moderation","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-mcp-tool-lint__cap_7","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.batch.tool.definition.linting.with.aggregated.reporting","name":"batch tool definition linting with aggregated reporting","description":"Processes multiple MCP tool definitions in a single pass, aggregating linting results across an entire tool suite and providing consolidated reports. Enables cross-tool consistency checking, duplicate detection, and suite-wide quality metrics with configurable rule sets and output formats.","intents":["I want to lint all my MCP tools at once and get a consolidated report","I need to check for consistency across my entire tool suite","I want to generate a quality report for my MCP tools for stakeholders"],"best_for":["teams managing large MCP tool suites","MCP server operators deploying multiple tools","organizations establishing tool quality standards"],"limitations":["Performance may degrade with very large tool suites (100+ tools)","Aggregated reporting may obscure individual tool issues in large suites","Cross-tool consistency checking is limited to static patterns — cannot detect semantic duplicates"],"requires":["Multiple MCP tool definitions in JSON format","Node.js 14+"],"input_types":["JSON tool definitions","tool definition files","tool definition directories"],"output_types":["aggregated linting report","JSON or text format results","quality metrics and statistics"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-mcp-tool-lint__cap_8","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.configurable.linting.rules.and.custom.rule.support","name":"configurable linting rules and custom rule support","description":"Provides a rule configuration system allowing teams to customize which linting checks are enabled, set severity levels, and define custom validation rules specific to their MCP tool standards. Supports rule inheritance, overrides, and environment-specific configurations for different deployment contexts.","intents":["I want to customize which linting rules apply to my tools","I need to define custom validation rules for my organization's standards","I want different linting rules for development vs production deployments"],"best_for":["organizations with custom MCP tool standards","teams managing multiple MCP deployments with different requirements","developers building custom tool validation workflows"],"limitations":["Custom rule implementation requires understanding the linter's rule API","Rule configuration complexity increases with number of custom rules","No built-in rule versioning — custom rules may break with linter updates"],"requires":["Configuration file (JSON, YAML, or JavaScript)","Rule definitions or references","Node.js 14+"],"input_types":["configuration files","rule definitions","MCP tool definitions"],"output_types":["linting results based on custom rules","rule validation report"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-mcp-tool-lint__cap_9","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.integration.with.ci.cd.pipelines.and.pre.commit.hooks","name":"integration with ci/cd pipelines and pre-commit hooks","description":"Provides CLI interface and exit codes compatible with CI/CD systems, enabling integration as a build step or pre-commit hook. Supports JSON output for machine parsing, failure thresholds, and automated tool validation in development workflows without manual intervention.","intents":["I want to automatically lint my MCP tools in CI/CD","I need to prevent invalid tool definitions from being committed","I want to fail builds if tool quality falls below a threshold"],"best_for":["teams with automated deployment pipelines","developers using git pre-commit hooks","organizations enforcing tool quality standards"],"limitations":["Requires CLI integration — not suitable for runtime validation in applications","Exit codes and output format may need customization for specific CI/CD systems","Pre-commit hooks add latency to commit operations"],"requires":["Node.js 14+","CLI access to mcp-tool-lint","CI/CD system or git pre-commit hook support"],"input_types":["file paths","tool definition files"],"output_types":["exit codes","JSON output","text reports"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":30,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"moderate","permissions":["Node.js 14+","MCP tool definition in JSON format","Valid MCP specification version reference","MCP tool definition with input schema","JSON schema format for parameters","MCP tool definitions with name and description fields","Configurable naming convention rules (or defaults)","Tool description text","MCP tool definitions","MCP tool definition with response schema"],"failure_modes":["Only validates against MCP schema — does not test actual tool functionality or runtime behavior","Cannot detect semantic issues like incorrect parameter types that are syntactically valid","Limited to static analysis — cannot validate dynamic tool behavior or conditional logic","Does not validate parameter values at runtime — only schema structure","Cannot detect logical conflicts between parameters (e.g., mutually exclusive options)","Limited to static schema analysis — cannot test parameter combinations","Convention checking is opinionated — may flag valid but unconventional names","Cannot validate semantic appropriateness of names (e.g., whether a name accurately describes the tool)","Limited to static pattern matching — cannot detect naming conflicts across distributed tool registries","Quality assessment is heuristic-based and may not catch all clarity issues","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.3,"ecosystem":0.5800000000000001,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.6,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:23.903Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:24:00.597Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=npm-mcp-tool-lint","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=npm-mcp-tool-lint"}},"signature":"WBVWaDY60kZHnBmGcihmeO4/dhkVYBhSZf96Tl97+dfE92Ah3BenSrfLzruXOVXOJgbE0cGTmp9yIY5gOAYWDg==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T18:57:54.735Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/npm-mcp-tool-lint","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/npm-mcp-tool-lint","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=npm-mcp-tool-lint","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}