{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"npm_npm-mcp-mock-sim","slug":"npm-mcp-mock-sim","name":"mcp-mock-sim","type":"mcp","url":"https://www.npmjs.com/package/mcp-mock-sim","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/npm-mcp-mock-sim","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"npm_npm-mcp-mock-sim__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.tool.call.scenario.recording.with.request.response.capture","name":"mcp tool-call scenario recording with request/response capture","description":"Records live MCP tool invocations by intercepting and serializing the complete request-response cycle (tool name, arguments, results, errors) into a structured scenario file. Uses a middleware-style interception pattern that sits between the MCP client and server, capturing the exact state and side effects of each tool call without modifying the underlying tool implementations.","intents":["I want to capture real tool-call sequences from my MCP server to use as test fixtures","I need to record a complex multi-step workflow so I can replay it deterministically later","I want to create golden-master recordings of expected tool behavior for regression testing"],"best_for":["MCP server developers building tool-calling agents","teams implementing integration tests for MCP-based systems","developers debugging complex tool-call chains in production-like environments"],"limitations":["Recording captures only the MCP protocol layer — side effects outside the tool boundary (database writes, file system changes) are not automatically captured","Large binary responses or streaming tool outputs may require custom serialization handlers","No built-in deduplication of identical tool calls — recordings can become verbose with repeated invocations"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","Active MCP server instance","Write permissions to filesystem for scenario file output"],"input_types":["MCP protocol messages (tool calls with arguments)","Live tool execution context"],"output_types":["JSON scenario files with recorded tool calls and responses","Structured scenario metadata (timestamps, execution order)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","testing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-mcp-mock-sim__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.deterministic.mcp.scenario.replay.with.request.matching","name":"deterministic mcp scenario replay with request matching","description":"Replays recorded MCP tool-call scenarios by matching incoming tool requests against stored recordings and returning pre-recorded responses in sequence. Uses a state machine pattern that tracks replay position and validates that incoming requests match the recorded scenario structure (tool name, argument schema) before returning the corresponding response, enabling deterministic testing without live tool execution.","intents":["I want to run my MCP client tests without hitting real external tools or services","I need to replay a specific sequence of tool calls to reproduce a bug or edge case","I want to test my agent's behavior when tools return specific error states or unusual responses"],"best_for":["MCP client developers testing agent logic in isolation","CI/CD pipelines that need fast, deterministic tool-call testing without external dependencies","developers reproducing and fixing bugs in tool-call handling logic"],"limitations":["Replay is strictly sequential — out-of-order tool calls or branching logic that deviates from the recording will cause replay to fail or return incorrect responses","No built-in support for parameterized scenarios — each unique set of arguments requires a separate recording","Replay state is not persisted across sessions — restarting the replay requires re-initializing from the scenario file"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","Valid scenario file from prior recording","MCP client configured to point to the replay mock server"],"input_types":["JSON scenario files (recorded tool calls and responses)","MCP protocol requests from client"],"output_types":["MCP protocol responses matching recorded data","Replay state/progress logs"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","testing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-mcp-mock-sim__cap_2","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.cli.driven.scenario.management.and.execution","name":"cli-driven scenario management and execution","description":"Provides command-line interface for recording, replaying, and managing MCP scenarios without requiring programmatic integration. Implements a CLI command parser that handles subcommands (record, replay, list, validate) and pipes scenario files through the recording/replay engines, with support for configuration files and environment variable overrides for server endpoints and scenario paths.","intents":["I want to record and replay scenarios from the command line without writing code","I need to integrate scenario recording/replay into my shell scripts or CI/CD pipeline","I want to quickly validate that a scenario file is well-formed before using it in tests"],"best_for":["DevOps engineers and CI/CD pipeline builders","developers who prefer CLI tools over programmatic APIs","teams using shell-based testing frameworks or scripts"],"limitations":["CLI interface may not expose all programmatic configuration options available in the underlying library","Error messages are printed to stdout/stderr — integration with structured logging systems requires wrapper scripts","No built-in support for parallel scenario execution — multiple scenarios must be run sequentially or in separate processes"],"requires":["Node.js 16+ with npm or yarn","mcp-mock-sim installed globally or via npx","MCP server running and accessible at configured endpoint"],"input_types":["CLI arguments and flags","Configuration files (JSON or YAML)","Environment variables"],"output_types":["Scenario files (JSON)","CLI exit codes and console output","Validation reports"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-mcp-mock-sim__cap_3","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.scenario.validation.and.schema.conformance.checking","name":"scenario validation and schema conformance checking","description":"Validates recorded scenario files against MCP protocol schema and tool definitions to ensure consistency and correctness. Implements a validation engine that checks that tool names match registered tools, arguments conform to declared schemas, and responses have the correct structure, reporting detailed validation errors that help developers identify malformed or stale scenarios.","intents":["I want to verify that my recorded scenarios are still valid after updating tool definitions","I need to catch schema mismatches between recorded scenarios and current tool implementations","I want to ensure that scenario files are well-formed before committing them to version control"],"best_for":["teams maintaining large scenario libraries","developers integrating scenario validation into pre-commit hooks or CI/CD","teams evolving tool schemas and needing to track scenario compatibility"],"limitations":["Validation only checks structural conformance — it cannot verify that recorded responses are semantically correct or up-to-date","No built-in migration tools for updating scenarios when tool schemas change","Validation errors are reported as text — no structured output format for programmatic consumption"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","Valid scenario file","Access to tool schema definitions (from running MCP server or schema registry)"],"input_types":["JSON scenario files","MCP tool schema definitions"],"output_types":["Validation report (text or JSON)","Exit codes indicating pass/fail"],"categories":["safety-moderation","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-mcp-mock-sim__cap_4","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.multi.scenario.test.suite.execution.with.result.aggregation","name":"multi-scenario test suite execution with result aggregation","description":"Executes multiple recorded scenarios in sequence or parallel, aggregating results and reporting pass/fail status for each scenario. Implements a test runner that loads scenario files, replays them against a mock MCP server, and compares actual responses against recorded expectations, with support for filtering scenarios by name or tag and generating test reports.","intents":["I want to run a suite of MCP scenarios as automated tests in my CI/CD pipeline","I need to see which scenarios pass and which fail, with detailed failure information","I want to selectively run only scenarios matching certain criteria (e.g., by tool name or tag)"],"best_for":["teams building comprehensive test suites for MCP-based systems","CI/CD pipelines that need to validate MCP scenarios as part of the build process","developers debugging failures in specific scenarios"],"limitations":["Test runner assumes scenarios are independent — no built-in support for shared state or setup/teardown across scenarios","Result aggregation is basic — no support for custom assertions or conditional test logic","Parallel execution may cause conflicts if scenarios share resources or modify global state"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","Multiple scenario files in a directory or list","Mock MCP server running or spawned by the test runner"],"input_types":["Scenario files (JSON)","Test configuration (filters, parallelism settings)"],"output_types":["Test report (text, JSON, or TAP format)","Exit codes indicating overall pass/fail","Per-scenario pass/fail status"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":24,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Node.js 16+","Active MCP server instance","Write permissions to filesystem for scenario file output","Valid scenario file from prior recording","MCP client configured to point to the replay mock server","Node.js 16+ with npm or yarn","mcp-mock-sim installed globally or via npx","MCP server running and accessible at configured endpoint","Valid scenario file","Access to tool schema definitions (from running MCP server or schema registry)"],"failure_modes":["Recording captures only the MCP protocol layer — side effects outside the tool boundary (database writes, file system changes) are not automatically captured","Large binary responses or streaming tool outputs may require custom serialization handlers","No built-in deduplication of identical tool calls — recordings can become verbose with repeated invocations","Replay is strictly sequential — out-of-order tool calls or branching logic that deviates from the recording will cause replay to fail or return incorrect responses","No built-in support for parameterized scenarios — each unique set of arguments requires a separate recording","Replay state is not persisted across sessions — restarting the replay requires re-initializing from the scenario file","CLI interface may not expose all programmatic configuration options available in the underlying library","Error messages are printed to stdout/stderr — integration with structured logging systems requires wrapper scripts","No built-in support for parallel scenario execution — multiple scenarios must be run sequentially or in separate processes","Validation only checks structural conformance — it cannot verify that recorded responses are semantically correct or up-to-date","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.3,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.6,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:23.903Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-22T08:11:33.249Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=npm-mcp-mock-sim","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=npm-mcp-mock-sim"}},"signature":"84lgU/9a83LR6B2kT3c/C5aAJrtDUOnTNnH0ep5utExRrAw4cCHDByHTPeJW4jkJgcAuncIzBblFnV8SyEFRBQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T18:40:53.149Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/npm-mcp-mock-sim","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/npm-mcp-mock-sim","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=npm-mcp-mock-sim","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}