{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"npm_npm-mcp-demo-example","slug":"npm-mcp-demo-example","name":"mcp-demo-example","type":"mcp","url":"https://www.npmjs.com/package/mcp-demo-example","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/npm-mcp-demo-example","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"npm_npm-mcp-demo-example__cap_0","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.react.agent.orchestration.with.filesystem.tool.binding","name":"react agent orchestration with filesystem tool binding","description":"Implements a ReAct (Reasoning + Acting) agent loop that decomposes user intents into reasoning steps and tool invocations, using the Model Context Protocol (MCP) to bind a filesystem server as a tool. The agent maintains an internal thought-action-observation cycle, routing filesystem operations through the MCP server-filesystem implementation rather than direct OS calls, enabling sandboxed, auditable file system access with structured tool schemas.","intents":["I want to build an agent that can reason about file operations before executing them","I need to demonstrate how MCP tools integrate with LLM reasoning loops","I want to create a sandboxed file system interface that logs all operations"],"best_for":["developers building agentic systems with tool-use patterns","teams evaluating MCP as a tool integration standard","builders prototyping LLM agents with filesystem access"],"limitations":["ReAct loop adds latency per reasoning step — no streaming of intermediate thoughts","Filesystem operations are serialized through MCP protocol — no parallel file operations","No built-in persistence of agent reasoning traces — requires external logging","Single-threaded agent loop — concurrent tool calls not supported"],"requires":["Node.js 18+","@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem package","@flomatai/mcp-client package","LLM API access (OpenAI, Anthropic, or compatible)"],"input_types":["natural language user intent","file paths (strings)","file content (text)"],"output_types":["agent reasoning trace (text)","tool invocation results (structured)","file system state changes (logged)"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-mcp-demo-example__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.server.filesystem.tool.schema.exposure","name":"mcp server-filesystem tool schema exposure","description":"Exposes filesystem operations (read, write, list, delete) as structured MCP tool schemas that can be discovered and invoked by MCP clients. The server-filesystem implementation defines tool signatures with JSON Schema validation, allowing the agent to understand tool capabilities, required parameters, and return types before invocation, enabling the LLM to reason about which tools to call and with what arguments.","intents":["I want to expose filesystem capabilities as discoverable tools to an LLM agent","I need to define structured schemas for file operations so the agent understands parameters","I want to validate tool inputs before execution to prevent invalid file operations"],"best_for":["developers building MCP-compatible tool servers","teams standardizing on MCP for tool integration","builders creating agent-accessible file system interfaces"],"limitations":["Schema validation is JSON Schema only — no custom validation logic per tool","Tool discovery is static at server startup — no dynamic tool registration","No built-in rate limiting or quota enforcement per tool","File operation schemas don't express filesystem constraints (e.g., max file size)"],"requires":["@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem package","MCP protocol v1.0+","JSON Schema understanding in the client"],"input_types":["tool schema definitions (JSON Schema)","file paths (strings)","operation parameters (structured)"],"output_types":["tool schema metadata (JSON)","operation results (structured)","error responses (structured)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-mcp-demo-example__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.client.server.protocol.communication","name":"mcp client-server protocol communication","description":"Implements bidirectional JSON-RPC 2.0 communication between the MCP client (@flomatai/mcp-client) and the filesystem server (@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem) over stdio or HTTP transport. The client sends tool invocation requests with parameters, the server processes them and returns results, with built-in error handling and message framing for reliable tool execution in agent loops.","intents":["I need reliable communication between my agent and filesystem tools","I want to handle tool invocation errors gracefully in the agent loop","I need to understand how MCP protocol messages are structured for debugging"],"best_for":["developers integrating MCP clients and servers","teams debugging agent-tool communication issues","builders implementing custom MCP transports"],"limitations":["JSON-RPC 2.0 adds serialization overhead — ~5-10ms per round-trip","Stdio transport is single-process only — no network distribution","No built-in request batching — each tool call is a separate RPC message","Error propagation relies on JSON-RPC error format — custom error types may be lost"],"requires":["@flomatai/mcp-client package","@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem package","Node.js 18+ with stdio or HTTP support"],"input_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 requests (structured)","tool invocation parameters (JSON)","protocol messages (text)"],"output_types":["JSON-RPC 2.0 responses (structured)","tool results (JSON)","error messages (structured)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-mcp-demo-example__cap_3","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.filesystem.operation.sandboxing.via.mcp.server","name":"filesystem operation sandboxing via mcp server","description":"Routes all filesystem operations through the MCP server-filesystem implementation, which can enforce access controls, logging, and restrictions at the server level rather than relying on OS-level permissions. The agent never directly accesses the filesystem; instead, it requests operations through the MCP protocol, allowing the server to audit, validate, and potentially restrict operations based on policies defined in the server configuration.","intents":["I want to audit all file operations performed by an agent","I need to restrict agent access to specific directories or file types","I want to prevent the agent from deleting or modifying sensitive files"],"best_for":["teams building multi-tenant agent systems","developers requiring audit trails for file operations","builders implementing agent sandboxing"],"limitations":["Sandboxing is only as strong as the server implementation — no kernel-level isolation","No built-in policy language — restrictions must be coded in the server","Audit logging is not included — requires custom implementation","Performance overhead of MCP protocol adds latency to file operations"],"requires":["@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem package with custom policy implementation","MCP client that respects server-enforced restrictions","Logging infrastructure for audit trails"],"input_types":["file paths (strings)","operation types (read, write, delete, list)","file content (text or binary)"],"output_types":["operation results (success/failure)","audit logs (structured)","access denial messages (structured)"],"categories":["safety-moderation","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-mcp-demo-example__cap_4","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.agent.reasoning.trace.generation.and.introspection","name":"agent reasoning trace generation and introspection","description":"Captures the agent's thought process during the ReAct loop, including reasoning steps, tool selection decisions, and observation processing. The agent generates intermediate reasoning text before each tool invocation, allowing developers to inspect why the agent chose specific actions and debug unexpected behavior. This trace is typically logged or returned alongside the final result, enabling post-hoc analysis of agent decision-making.","intents":["I want to understand why the agent chose to invoke a specific tool","I need to debug agent failures by examining its reasoning steps","I want to log agent reasoning for compliance or audit purposes"],"best_for":["developers debugging agentic systems","teams building explainable AI systems","builders implementing agent monitoring and observability"],"limitations":["Reasoning traces add latency — each reasoning step requires an LLM call","Traces are not persisted by default — requires custom logging implementation","Reasoning quality depends on LLM capability — weaker models produce less useful traces","No built-in trace visualization — requires external tools for inspection"],"requires":["LLM API access with reasoning capability","Agent loop implementation that captures intermediate outputs","Logging or storage infrastructure for traces"],"input_types":["user intent (natural language)","tool results (structured)","previous reasoning steps (text)"],"output_types":["reasoning text (natural language)","tool selection decisions (text)","reasoning traces (structured logs)"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-mcp-demo-example__cap_5","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.tool.invocation.with.parameter.validation","name":"tool invocation with parameter validation","description":"Validates tool invocation parameters against the JSON Schema definitions exposed by the MCP server before sending requests. The client checks that required parameters are present, types match the schema, and values fall within specified constraints (e.g., string length, numeric ranges). Invalid invocations are rejected locally before reaching the server, reducing round-trips and providing immediate feedback to the agent about malformed requests.","intents":["I want to prevent the agent from invoking tools with invalid parameters","I need to validate file paths before the agent attempts to access them","I want to catch parameter errors early without server round-trips"],"best_for":["developers building robust agent systems","teams requiring strict parameter validation","builders implementing client-side validation for tools"],"limitations":["Validation is JSON Schema only — no custom validation logic","Schema validation adds latency to each tool invocation","Complex schemas may be difficult for agents to understand","Validation errors may not provide actionable feedback to the agent"],"requires":["@flomatai/mcp-client package with schema validation","JSON Schema definitions for all tools","JSON Schema validator library (e.g., ajv)"],"input_types":["tool invocation requests (structured)","JSON Schema definitions (structured)","parameter values (mixed types)"],"output_types":["validation results (pass/fail)","validation error messages (structured)","validated parameters (structured)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":24,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Node.js 18+","@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem package","@flomatai/mcp-client package","LLM API access (OpenAI, Anthropic, or compatible)","MCP protocol v1.0+","JSON Schema understanding in the client","Node.js 18+ with stdio or HTTP support","@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem package with custom policy implementation","MCP client that respects server-enforced restrictions","Logging infrastructure for audit trails"],"failure_modes":["ReAct loop adds latency per reasoning step — no streaming of intermediate thoughts","Filesystem operations are serialized through MCP protocol — no parallel file operations","No built-in persistence of agent reasoning traces — requires external logging","Single-threaded agent loop — concurrent tool calls not supported","Schema validation is JSON Schema only — no custom validation logic per tool","Tool discovery is static at server startup — no dynamic tool registration","No built-in rate limiting or quota enforcement per tool","File operation schemas don't express filesystem constraints (e.g., max file size)","JSON-RPC 2.0 adds serialization overhead — ~5-10ms per round-trip","Stdio transport is single-process only — no network distribution","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.22,"ecosystem":0.3,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.6,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:23.903Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-22T08:09:53.364Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=npm-mcp-demo-example","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=npm-mcp-demo-example"}},"signature":"fhGX0MSscNkO+qJKy66ceHNaNM52+f+pBspsUdrkCXxweCeaQZ+pvv1Q53v1U7Ik2JjMgbf4Bqhmkag+M1J1AA==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T15:03:11.138Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/npm-mcp-demo-example","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/npm-mcp-demo-example","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=npm-mcp-demo-example","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}