{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"npm_npm-mcp-auth","slug":"npm-mcp-auth","name":"mcp-auth","type":"mcp","url":"https://www.npmjs.com/package/mcp-auth","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/npm-mcp-auth","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":["modelcontextprotocol","mcp","oauth","openid","connect","oidc"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"npm_npm-mcp-auth__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.oauth.2.0.openid.connect.server.integration.for.mcp","name":"oauth 2.0 / openid connect server integration for mcp","description":"Implements OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect (OIDC) authentication flows as a plug-and-play MCP server capability, handling authorization code exchange, token validation, and identity provider integration. Uses standard OAuth/OIDC protocols to delegate authentication to external identity providers (Google, GitHub, Auth0, etc.) rather than managing credentials directly, reducing security surface area and enabling single sign-on across MCP clients.","intents":["I want my MCP server to authenticate users via their existing OAuth provider without building auth from scratch","I need to integrate my MCP server with an enterprise OIDC identity provider for SSO","I want to delegate authentication responsibility to a third-party provider rather than storing passwords"],"best_for":["MCP server developers building multi-tenant or user-facing applications","Teams integrating MCP into enterprise environments with existing identity infrastructure","Developers wanting to avoid implementing custom authentication logic"],"limitations":["Requires pre-configured OAuth/OIDC provider with registered application credentials","No built-in support for custom authentication schemes beyond OAuth 2.0/OIDC standard","Token refresh and expiration handling depends on provider implementation details","Adds network latency for each authentication flow (provider round-trip)"],"requires":["Node.js 16+ (typical MCP server runtime)","OAuth 2.0 or OpenID Connect provider with client credentials (client_id, client_secret)","Configured redirect URI matching provider settings","MCP server framework (e.g., @modelcontextprotocol/sdk)"],"input_types":["authorization code (from OAuth provider redirect)","provider configuration object (issuer URL, client credentials)","access tokens (for validation)"],"output_types":["authenticated user identity object","access token","ID token (OIDC)","user claims/attributes"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-mcp-auth__cap_1","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.mcp.protocol.aware.token.validation.and.session.management","name":"mcp protocol-aware token validation and session management","description":"Validates authentication tokens within the MCP request/response lifecycle, managing session state and enforcing token expiration policies at the MCP server level. Intercepts MCP tool calls and resource requests to verify valid authentication before execution, implementing middleware-style authentication guards that integrate with MCP's resource and tool calling architecture rather than HTTP-level middleware.","intents":["I want to ensure only authenticated clients can call specific MCP tools or access resources","I need to validate tokens on every MCP request and reject expired or invalid sessions","I want to attach user context (claims, permissions) to each MCP tool invocation"],"best_for":["MCP server developers building secure multi-client systems","Teams needing per-request authentication enforcement at the MCP protocol level","Applications where HTTP middleware authentication is insufficient"],"limitations":["Token validation adds latency to every MCP request (cryptographic verification)","No built-in distributed session store — requires external state management for token revocation","Limited to token-based authentication (JWT, opaque tokens) — no session cookie support in MCP context","Requires explicit integration with each MCP tool/resource handler"],"requires":["Token validation library (e.g., jsonwebtoken for JWT)","MCP server implementation with access to request context","Token issuer public key or shared secret for validation"],"input_types":["MCP request with authorization header or token parameter","token (JWT or opaque)","validation rules/policies"],"output_types":["validated user identity","token claims/payload","authorization decision (allow/deny)"],"categories":["safety-moderation","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-mcp-auth__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.multi.provider.identity.federation.for.mcp.clients","name":"multi-provider identity federation for mcp clients","description":"Abstracts multiple OAuth/OIDC providers behind a unified authentication interface, allowing MCP clients to authenticate via any configured provider (Google, GitHub, Auth0, custom OIDC) without client-side provider selection logic. Routes authentication requests to the appropriate provider based on configuration or client hints, normalizing user identity attributes across providers into a consistent schema.","intents":["I want my MCP server to accept authentication from multiple identity providers without duplicating auth code","I need to normalize user identity from different providers (Google, GitHub, corporate OIDC) into a single user model","I want to support provider-agnostic MCP clients that don't know which identity provider to use"],"best_for":["MCP servers serving diverse user bases with different identity providers","Enterprise deployments supporting both public OAuth (GitHub) and internal OIDC","SaaS MCP platforms offering flexible authentication options"],"limitations":["Requires managing multiple provider configurations and credentials","User identity normalization across providers may lose provider-specific attributes","No built-in account linking — users with same email from different providers treated as separate identities","Adds configuration complexity for each new provider"],"requires":["Configuration for each supported OAuth/OIDC provider","Provider-specific client credentials (client_id, client_secret) for each provider","User identity mapping/normalization logic"],"input_types":["provider identifier (e.g., 'google', 'github')","authorization code from selected provider","provider-specific user claims"],"output_types":["normalized user identity object","mapped user attributes (email, name, avatar, etc.)","provider source identifier"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-mcp-auth__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.credential.exchange.and.token.refresh.orchestration","name":"credential exchange and token refresh orchestration","description":"Manages OAuth token lifecycle including refresh token handling, automatic token renewal, and credential rotation for long-lived MCP server sessions. Implements refresh token grant flows to obtain new access tokens before expiration, storing and rotating credentials securely, and handling provider-specific token refresh policies (expiration windows, refresh token rotation, etc.).","intents":["I want my MCP server to automatically refresh expired tokens without requiring user re-authentication","I need to handle long-lived MCP client sessions that span multiple token expiration cycles","I want to implement secure credential rotation and refresh token management"],"best_for":["MCP servers supporting persistent client connections","Applications requiring uninterrupted service across token expiration boundaries","Teams implementing security best practices for credential rotation"],"limitations":["Requires secure storage for refresh tokens (adds complexity vs stateless access tokens only)","Refresh token rotation policies vary by provider — no universal standard","If refresh token expires or is revoked, user must re-authenticate","Adds state management overhead (tracking token expiration, refresh windows)"],"requires":["Secure credential storage (encrypted database, secrets manager, or similar)","Refresh token from OAuth provider","Token expiration tracking mechanism","Provider-specific refresh token grant implementation"],"input_types":["refresh token","token expiration timestamp","provider configuration"],"output_types":["new access token","new refresh token (if provider rotates)","updated token expiration"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-mcp-auth__cap_4","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.mcp.resource.and.tool.access.control.based.on.authentication.context","name":"mcp resource and tool access control based on authentication context","description":"Enforces fine-grained access control on MCP resources and tool calls based on authenticated user identity and claims, implementing authorization policies that map user attributes (roles, scopes, groups) to specific MCP capabilities. Integrates with MCP's resource and tool calling architecture to gate access before execution, supporting both role-based access control (RBAC) and attribute-based access control (ABAC) patterns.","intents":["I want to restrict certain MCP tools to authenticated users only","I need to enforce role-based access control where only admin users can call sensitive tools","I want to implement scope-based authorization where users can only access resources matching their permissions"],"best_for":["MCP servers with multi-tenant or role-based access requirements","Teams implementing least-privilege access patterns","Applications with sensitive tools requiring authorization beyond authentication"],"limitations":["Requires explicit authorization policy definition for each tool/resource","No built-in role/permission management — requires external identity provider or custom store","Authorization checks add latency to every protected tool call","Complex ABAC policies may require custom evaluation logic"],"requires":["Authenticated user context with claims/attributes","Authorization policy definitions (role mappings, scope requirements)","Access control evaluation engine"],"input_types":["user identity and claims","requested MCP tool or resource","authorization policy"],"output_types":["authorization decision (allow/deny)","filtered resource list (if applicable)","access denial reason (for logging)"],"categories":["safety-moderation","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-mcp-auth__cap_5","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.secure.credential.storage.and.secrets.management.integration","name":"secure credential storage and secrets management integration","description":"Provides secure storage for sensitive authentication data (client secrets, refresh tokens, API keys) with encryption at rest and integration with external secrets management systems (AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault, etc.). Abstracts credential retrieval and rotation, preventing secrets from being logged or exposed in configuration files, and supporting key rotation policies.","intents":["I want to store OAuth client secrets and refresh tokens securely without hardcoding them","I need to integrate my MCP server with a secrets management system like Vault or AWS Secrets Manager","I want to implement automatic credential rotation without manual intervention"],"best_for":["Production MCP deployments handling sensitive credentials","Teams with security compliance requirements (SOC 2, HIPAA, etc.)","Organizations using centralized secrets management infrastructure"],"limitations":["Requires external secrets store or encryption infrastructure","Adds latency for credential retrieval (network call to secrets manager)","Credential rotation policies must be coordinated with provider","No built-in audit logging — requires external logging integration"],"requires":["Encryption library (e.g., crypto module in Node.js)","Optional: external secrets manager (AWS Secrets Manager, Vault, etc.)","Key management infrastructure for encryption keys"],"input_types":["credential data (client secret, refresh token, API key)","credential identifier/name","encryption key"],"output_types":["encrypted credential","decrypted credential (for use)","credential metadata (expiration, rotation status)"],"categories":["safety-moderation","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":26,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Node.js 16+ (typical MCP server runtime)","OAuth 2.0 or OpenID Connect provider with client credentials (client_id, client_secret)","Configured redirect URI matching provider settings","MCP server framework (e.g., @modelcontextprotocol/sdk)","Token validation library (e.g., jsonwebtoken for JWT)","MCP server implementation with access to request context","Token issuer public key or shared secret for validation","Configuration for each supported OAuth/OIDC provider","Provider-specific client credentials (client_id, client_secret) for each provider","User identity mapping/normalization logic"],"failure_modes":["Requires pre-configured OAuth/OIDC provider with registered application credentials","No built-in support for custom authentication schemes beyond OAuth 2.0/OIDC standard","Token refresh and expiration handling depends on provider implementation details","Adds network latency for each authentication flow (provider round-trip)","Token validation adds latency to every MCP request (cryptographic verification)","No built-in distributed session store — requires external state management for token revocation","Limited to token-based authentication (JWT, opaque tokens) — no session cookie support in MCP context","Requires explicit integration with each MCP tool/resource handler","Requires managing multiple provider configurations and credentials","User identity normalization across providers may lose provider-specific attributes","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.22,"ecosystem":0.48000000000000004,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.52,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:23.903Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:23:51.713Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=npm-mcp-auth","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=npm-mcp-auth"}},"signature":"hw/O2aPvXuEMj32PgTAZKbOPfnmwB5pxrIvP/q0FVh27z7VDe2ZGQsLNJN+hSs7FvU1h73M7xfake0KvW13pBA==","signedAt":"2026-06-19T21:51:11.136Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/npm-mcp-auth","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/npm-mcp-auth","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=npm-mcp-auth","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}