{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"npm_npm-malicious-mcp-server","slug":"npm-malicious-mcp-server","name":"malicious-mcp-server","type":"mcp","url":"https://www.npmjs.com/package/malicious-mcp-server","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/npm-malicious-mcp-server","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":["mcp","model-context-protocol","testing","e2e"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"npm_npm-malicious-mcp-server__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.malicious.protocol.endpoint.simulation","name":"malicious-protocol-endpoint-simulation","description":"Simulates a deliberately broken MCP server that violates protocol specifications and expected behaviors, allowing E2E test suites to verify how MCP clients handle protocol violations, malformed responses, and unexpected server states. Implements intentional deviations from the Model Context Protocol specification to trigger error handling paths in client implementations.","intents":["Test how my MCP client handles servers that send malformed JSON responses","Verify my application gracefully degrades when an MCP server violates the protocol contract","Validate error recovery and reconnection logic against a deliberately broken endpoint","Ensure my MCP integration doesn't crash or hang when receiving unexpected message types"],"best_for":["MCP client library developers building robust error handling","Teams implementing MCP integrations who need comprehensive E2E test coverage","AI application developers validating resilience against third-party server failures","Security researchers testing MCP client vulnerability to malformed inputs"],"limitations":["Only simulates protocol violations — does not test actual network failures like timeouts or connection drops","Limited to MCP specification violations; does not simulate resource exhaustion or performance degradation attacks","Requires manual configuration of which specific protocol violations to trigger; no randomized fuzzing mode","No built-in metrics or logging of which violations were triggered or how clients responded"],"requires":["Node.js 16+ for MCP server runtime","MCP client library compatible with the protocol version being tested","Test framework (Jest, Mocha, or similar) to orchestrate test scenarios","Understanding of MCP protocol specification to configure meaningful violations"],"input_types":["MCP protocol messages (JSON-RPC formatted)","Configuration objects specifying which violations to inject","Client connection requests following MCP handshake"],"output_types":["Malformed MCP protocol responses","Invalid JSON or truncated messages","Out-of-spec message types and field values","Protocol state violations (e.g., responses without matching requests)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","testing-validation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-malicious-mcp-server__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.protocol.violation.injection.engine","name":"protocol-violation-injection-engine","description":"Provides a configurable system for injecting specific protocol violations into MCP server responses, allowing test authors to programmatically specify which aspects of the MCP specification should be violated (malformed JSON, missing required fields, invalid message types, out-of-order state transitions). Implements a violation registry pattern where each violation type can be enabled/disabled and parameterized independently.","intents":["Configure which specific MCP protocol violations my test should trigger","Test multiple violation scenarios in a single test run without redeploying the server","Verify my client handles edge cases like missing required fields or unexpected message ordering","Document which protocol violations my MCP client can tolerate vs which cause failures"],"best_for":["MCP client library maintainers building comprehensive test suites","QA engineers designing E2E test scenarios for MCP integrations","Protocol specification authors validating client compliance requirements"],"limitations":["Violations must be pre-defined in the server code; cannot dynamically generate arbitrary malformed messages","No built-in way to chain multiple violations in sequence or create complex failure scenarios","Configuration is static per server instance; cannot modify violations mid-test without restart","Limited visibility into which violations were actually triggered during a test run"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","Familiarity with MCP protocol specification","Configuration mechanism (environment variables, config files, or constructor parameters)","Test framework integration code to orchestrate violation injection"],"input_types":["Configuration objects specifying violation types and parameters","Boolean flags enabling/disabling specific violation categories","Parameterized violation definitions (e.g., which fields to omit, which types to corrupt)"],"output_types":["MCP protocol responses with injected violations","Violation metadata (which violations are active, when they were triggered)","Test results indicating client behavior under each violation scenario"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","testing-validation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-malicious-mcp-server__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.client.error.path.validation","name":"mcp-client-error-path-validation","description":"Enables E2E test suites to verify that MCP client implementations correctly handle and recover from protocol violations, malformed responses, and server state violations by observing client behavior when connected to a deliberately broken server. Tests can assert that clients enter appropriate error states, log violations, attempt reconnection, or gracefully degrade rather than crashing or hanging.","intents":["Verify my MCP client doesn't crash when receiving malformed JSON from the server","Test that my client properly logs and reports protocol violations for debugging","Validate that my client attempts to reconnect after detecting a broken server","Ensure my application continues functioning when an MCP server violates the protocol"],"best_for":["MCP client library developers implementing robust error handling","Application developers integrating MCP clients who need reliability guarantees","Teams with strict uptime requirements validating graceful degradation","Security-conscious teams testing client resilience against malicious servers"],"limitations":["Only validates client behavior; does not test actual network resilience (timeouts, connection drops)","Requires manual test assertions; no built-in test result analysis or reporting","Cannot simulate cascading failures or complex failure chains","Limited to testing single-client scenarios; no multi-client concurrency testing"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","MCP client library with error handling and logging capabilities","Test framework with assertion library (Jest, Mocha + Chai, etc.)","Ability to inspect client logs, error events, and state transitions"],"input_types":["MCP client instances configured to connect to the malicious server","Test scenarios specifying which violations to trigger","Assertion configurations defining expected client behavior"],"output_types":["Client error events and exceptions","Client log messages indicating protocol violations detected","Client state transitions (connected → error → reconnecting, etc.)","Test pass/fail results based on client behavior validation"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","testing-validation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-malicious-mcp-server__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.specification.compliance.testing.harness","name":"mcp-specification-compliance-testing-harness","description":"Provides a test harness that validates MCP client compliance with the protocol specification by systematically violating each aspect of the specification and observing whether clients correctly detect and handle violations. Implements a structured approach to specification-based testing where each violation corresponds to a specific requirement in the MCP specification.","intents":["Systematically test my MCP client against every requirement in the MCP specification","Generate a compliance report showing which specification requirements my client handles correctly","Identify gaps in my client's error handling for specific protocol violations","Ensure my MCP implementation meets the specification before deploying to production"],"best_for":["MCP client library developers building specification-compliant implementations","Teams implementing MCP integrations who need compliance verification","Protocol specification authors validating client implementations","Organizations with regulatory requirements for protocol compliance"],"limitations":["Only tests client-side compliance; does not validate server-side specification adherence","Violations must be manually mapped to specification requirements; no automated requirement extraction","Cannot test performance or resource consumption requirements","Limited to testing protocol-level compliance; does not validate semantic correctness of tool implementations"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","MCP protocol specification document or reference","Test framework with structured test organization (describe/it blocks, test suites)","Mapping between specification requirements and test cases"],"input_types":["MCP specification requirements (as test case definitions)","Client implementations to test","Violation configurations corresponding to each specification requirement"],"output_types":["Compliance test results (pass/fail per specification requirement)","Compliance report summarizing which requirements are met/violated","Detailed failure logs indicating which specification requirements clients don't handle","Recommendations for client improvements based on compliance gaps"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","testing-validation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":25,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Node.js 16+ for MCP server runtime","MCP client library compatible with the protocol version being tested","Test framework (Jest, Mocha, or similar) to orchestrate test scenarios","Understanding of MCP protocol specification to configure meaningful violations","Node.js 16+","Familiarity with MCP protocol specification","Configuration mechanism (environment variables, config files, or constructor parameters)","Test framework integration code to orchestrate violation injection","MCP client library with error handling and logging capabilities","Test framework with assertion library (Jest, Mocha + Chai, etc.)"],"failure_modes":["Only simulates protocol violations — does not test actual network failures like timeouts or connection drops","Limited to MCP specification violations; does not simulate resource exhaustion or performance degradation attacks","Requires manual configuration of which specific protocol violations to trigger; no randomized fuzzing mode","No built-in metrics or logging of which violations were triggered or how clients responded","Violations must be pre-defined in the server code; cannot dynamically generate arbitrary malformed messages","No built-in way to chain multiple violations in sequence or create complex failure scenarios","Configuration is static per server instance; cannot modify violations mid-test without restart","Limited visibility into which violations were actually triggered during a test run","Only validates client behavior; does not test actual network resilience (timeouts, connection drops)","Requires manual test assertions; no built-in test result analysis or reporting","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.18,"ecosystem":0.42,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.6,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:23.903Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:23:37.182Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=npm-malicious-mcp-server","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=npm-malicious-mcp-server"}},"signature":"6r8H90EVXNcV/X9pb4PN1+PERu/rfeVYEMwn6+6W9KkEeftSm3nYzufso6GhLAMmYuBYbokw7psfyj9D7eTuBA==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T20:03:53.793Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/npm-malicious-mcp-server","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/npm-malicious-mcp-server","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=npm-malicious-mcp-server","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}