{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"npm_npm-heznpcanvil","slug":"npm-heznpcanvil","name":"@heznpc/anvil","type":"mcp","url":"https://www.npmjs.com/package/@heznpc/anvil","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/npm-heznpcanvil","categories":["mcp-servers","automation"],"tags":["claude-code","mcp","workflow","git","automation","ci-cd"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"npm_npm-heznpcanvil__cap_0","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.atomic.git.to.merge.workflow.orchestration","name":"atomic git-to-merge workflow orchestration","description":"Executes a complete CI/CD pipeline (commit → push → PR creation → CI wait → merge) as a single MCP tool invocation, eliminating manual step sequencing. Implements workflow atomicity by composing sequential git operations, GitHub API calls for PR management, and CI polling into one idempotent recipe that Claude Code can trigger with a single instruction, reducing context switching and human intervention points.","intents":["I want Claude to automatically commit my changes, push them, create a PR, wait for CI to pass, and merge everything in one command","I need to reduce the number of manual steps between code generation and production deployment","I want to eliminate the context loss that happens when switching between git CLI, GitHub UI, and CI dashboards"],"best_for":["solo developers using Claude Code for full-stack feature development","teams automating routine code review and merge workflows","AI-assisted development workflows where Claude generates and deploys code end-to-end"],"limitations":["Requires pre-configured GitHub repository with branch protection rules compatible with automated merging","No built-in rollback mechanism if CI fails mid-pipeline — requires manual intervention to revert","Assumes linear git history; may conflict with complex rebase or merge strategies","CI wait polling adds latency (typically 30s-5min depending on CI provider response time)","No support for multi-repository workflows or cross-org PR creation"],"requires":["GitHub repository with write access and API token (classic or fine-grained PAT)","Git CLI installed and configured on the system running the MCP server","CI/CD system with publicly queryable status API (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, etc.)","Claude Code integration with MCP server running locally or remotely accessible"],"input_types":["commit message (string)","branch name (string)","PR title and description (string)","CI status polling timeout (integer, milliseconds)"],"output_types":["structured workflow result (JSON with commit SHA, PR URL, merge status)","CI status logs (text)","error messages with rollback instructions (text)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-heznpcanvil__cap_1","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.ci.status.polling.with.timeout.aware.waiting","name":"ci status polling with timeout-aware waiting","description":"Implements non-blocking polling of CI/CD pipeline status (GitHub Actions, etc.) with configurable timeout and backoff strategy, allowing Claude Code to wait for test/build completion without blocking the MCP server. Uses exponential backoff or fixed-interval polling to query CI provider APIs and returns early if timeout is exceeded, enabling graceful degradation when CI is slow or unavailable.","intents":["I want Claude to wait for CI to pass before merging, but not hang indefinitely if CI is slow","I need to know the CI status (passed/failed/running) before deciding whether to merge","I want to set a maximum wait time and get notified if CI doesn't complete in time"],"best_for":["teams with variable CI execution times (5min to 30min builds)","developers who want AI-assisted workflows but need safety gates before merge","projects with flaky CI that occasionally times out"],"limitations":["Polling interval and timeout are static per invocation — no dynamic adjustment based on CI history","Does not distinguish between CI failure and CI timeout — both return error state","No webhook support — relies on pull-based status queries which add latency","GitHub Actions API rate limits apply (60 requests/hour for unauthenticated, 5000/hour for authenticated)"],"requires":["GitHub API token with 'actions:read' permission","CI/CD system with queryable status endpoint (GitHub Actions native, or custom webhook adapter)","Network connectivity to CI provider API"],"input_types":["pull request URL or ID (string)","timeout duration in milliseconds (integer)","polling interval in milliseconds (integer, optional)"],"output_types":["CI status object: {status: 'success'|'failure'|'pending'|'timeout', logs: string, duration: number}","error with timeout reason (string)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-heznpcanvil__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.github.pr.creation.with.branch.and.commit.context","name":"github pr creation with branch and commit context","description":"Creates a GitHub pull request from a feature branch to a target branch (typically main/master) with title, description, and optional metadata (labels, assignees, reviewers) derived from commit history or Claude Code context. Uses GitHub REST API v3 to create the PR and optionally configures branch protection rules, enabling Claude Code to propose changes for human review without manual GitHub UI interaction.","intents":["I want Claude to create a PR from the current branch with a descriptive title and body","I need to automatically add labels and assign reviewers based on code changes","I want the PR description to include a summary of what changed and why"],"best_for":["teams using Claude Code for feature development with mandatory code review","projects where PR creation is a bottleneck in the development workflow","developers who want to maintain audit trails of AI-generated changes"],"limitations":["Does not support draft PRs or PR templates — uses basic title/description only","Cannot automatically determine appropriate reviewers without custom logic","No support for cross-repository PRs or forked workflows","PR description length limited to GitHub API constraints (~65k characters)"],"requires":["GitHub API token with 'repo' or 'pull-requests:write' scope","Feature branch already pushed to remote repository","Target branch (main/master) exists and is accessible"],"input_types":["source branch name (string)","target branch name (string, default 'main')","PR title (string)","PR description (string, markdown supported)","labels array (string[])","assignees array (string[])"],"output_types":["PR object: {url: string, number: integer, status: 'open'|'draft'}","error with GitHub API response (string)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-heznpcanvil__cap_3","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.git.commit.and.push.with.message.templating","name":"git commit and push with message templating","description":"Executes git commit with an optional message template that Claude Code can populate with change summary, ticket references, or co-author information, then pushes the commit to a remote branch. Implements commit atomicity by staging changes, creating the commit, and pushing in sequence, with error handling for merge conflicts or authentication failures. Supports conventional commit format (feat:, fix:, etc.) for automated changelog generation.","intents":["I want Claude to commit my changes with a descriptive message that references the ticket or feature","I need to ensure commits follow our team's commit message conventions","I want to push changes to a feature branch without manual git CLI commands"],"best_for":["teams with strict commit message conventions (conventional commits, semantic versioning)","projects using automated changelog generation from commit history","developers who want to reduce manual git CLI usage in AI-assisted workflows"],"limitations":["Does not support interactive rebase or commit squashing — commits are appended linearly","No built-in conflict resolution — fails if local branch diverges from remote","Requires git credentials to be pre-configured (SSH keys or git credential helper)","Cannot commit partial changes (no staging of individual hunks)"],"requires":["Git CLI installed and configured with user.name and user.email","SSH key or git credential helper configured for authentication","Working directory with uncommitted changes","Remote branch exists or auto-create flag is enabled"],"input_types":["commit message (string)","branch name (string)","files to commit (string[], default all staged changes)","commit template with placeholders (string, optional)"],"output_types":["commit result: {sha: string, branch: string, message: string}","push result: {remote: string, branch: string, status: 'success'|'error'}","error with git output (string)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-heznpcanvil__cap_4","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.automated.pr.merge.with.branch.protection.compliance","name":"automated pr merge with branch protection compliance","description":"Merges a pull request to the target branch after verifying CI status and branch protection rule compliance (required reviews, status checks, etc.). Implements merge strategy selection (squash, rebase, or merge commit) and handles merge conflicts by returning detailed error information. Uses GitHub REST API to check PR merge eligibility before attempting merge, ensuring compliance with repository policies.","intents":["I want Claude to merge the PR only if all CI checks pass and required reviews are complete","I need to ensure merges respect our branch protection rules without manual GitHub UI approval","I want to choose between squash, rebase, or merge commit strategies based on the PR"],"best_for":["teams with automated merge workflows and strict branch protection policies","projects where Claude Code is trusted to make merge decisions after CI validation","developers who want to eliminate manual merge steps in AI-assisted development"],"limitations":["Cannot override branch protection rules — will fail if required reviews are missing","No support for conditional merging based on code quality metrics or custom checks","Merge strategy is fixed per invocation — cannot dynamically choose based on PR content","Does not handle merge conflicts — returns error and requires manual resolution"],"requires":["GitHub API token with 'repo' or 'pull-requests:write' scope","PR must be mergeable (no conflicts, all required checks passing)","Sufficient permissions to merge to the target branch"],"input_types":["pull request URL or ID (string)","merge strategy: 'squash'|'rebase'|'merge' (string, default 'squash')","delete branch after merge (boolean, optional)"],"output_types":["merge result: {status: 'merged'|'error', sha: string, message: string}","merge eligibility check: {mergeable: boolean, required_reviews_missing: string[], failed_checks: string[]}","error with GitHub API response (string)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-heznpcanvil__cap_5","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.server.integration.for.claude.code.context","name":"mcp server integration for claude code context","description":"Exposes the atomic workflow recipes as MCP (Model Context Protocol) tools that Claude Code can discover and invoke with full context about the current repository, branch, and changes. Implements MCP tool schema definition with input validation, error handling, and structured output that Claude Code can parse and act upon. Enables Claude Code to reason about multi-step workflows and make decisions based on tool results without manual context switching.","intents":["I want Claude Code to understand what workflow operations are available and when to use them","I need Claude to invoke the workflow tools with the correct parameters based on the current state","I want structured feedback from each workflow step so Claude can decide what to do next"],"best_for":["Claude Code users who want to automate git and GitHub workflows","teams building custom MCP servers for AI-assisted development","developers who want to extend Claude Code with domain-specific workflow tools"],"limitations":["MCP server must be running and accessible to Claude Code (local or remote)","Tool discovery is static — new tools require server restart","No built-in authentication for MCP server — relies on environment variables or config files","Error handling depends on Claude Code's interpretation of tool output — ambiguous errors may cause incorrect decisions"],"requires":["Claude Code with MCP support enabled","MCP server running (local or remote accessible)","MCP server configuration with tool definitions and GitHub API credentials"],"input_types":["MCP tool invocation with parameters (JSON)","Claude Code context: current branch, repository, uncommitted changes"],"output_types":["MCP tool result: structured JSON with operation status and data","error messages with remediation steps (string)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-heznpcanvil__cap_6","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.tool.invocation.with.error.handling","name":"mcp-tool-invocation-with-error-handling","description":"Provides a standardized MCP tool interface that Claude Code can invoke as a single atomic operation, with built-in error handling, timeout management, and state recovery. The implementation wraps the entire workflow (commit → push → PR → CI wait → merge) in a single tool call boundary, catching errors at each step and reporting them back to Claude with actionable context.","intents":["I want a single tool call that handles the entire workflow without me managing intermediate steps","I need clear error messages if any step fails (e.g., CI timeout, merge conflict)","I want Claude to understand what went wrong and potentially retry or escalate"],"best_for":["Claude Code users who want hands-off workflow automation","teams building LLM-driven development pipelines","developers who want to reduce manual intervention in code change workflows"],"limitations":["Error recovery is limited to predefined strategies (retry, rollback, escalate)","No support for partial rollback (e.g., if merge succeeds but branch deletion fails)","Timeout handling is fixed; no per-invocation timeout customization visible","Error messages may not be detailed enough for complex failure scenarios","No built-in logging or audit trail for compliance/debugging"],"requires":["Claude Code with MCP server support","MCP server running and accessible to Claude Code","All prerequisites for individual workflow steps (git, API tokens, etc.)"],"input_types":["workflow configuration (object with commit message, PR title, merge strategy, etc.)","code changes (file diffs or full content)"],"output_types":["workflow execution result (object with status, PR URL, merge status, errors)","detailed execution log (text)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-heznpcanvil__cap_7","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.declarative.workflow.recipe.definition","name":"declarative-workflow-recipe-definition","description":"Allows developers to define workflow recipes as declarative configurations (likely YAML or JSON) that specify the sequence of steps (commit, push, PR, CI wait, merge) with parameters and error handling strategies. The implementation parses these recipes and executes them atomically, allowing customization without code changes.","intents":["I want to define a standard workflow recipe that Claude can invoke repeatedly without reconfiguring each time","I need to customize the workflow (e.g., different merge strategies for different branches) without changing code","I want to version control my workflow definitions alongside my code"],"best_for":["teams with standardized workflow patterns (e.g., 'auto-merge after CI for main branch')","projects where workflow customization is frequent","developers who want to avoid hardcoding workflow logic"],"limitations":["Recipe format and schema are not documented in the provided description","No support for conditional logic (if/else) within recipes","No support for dynamic parameter substitution based on code analysis","Recipes are static; no runtime customization visible","No validation or schema enforcement for recipe definitions"],"requires":["Recipe definition file (format unknown, likely YAML or JSON)","MCP server configured to load recipes from specified location"],"input_types":["recipe name (string)","recipe parameters (object, optional)"],"output_types":["workflow execution result (object with status, PR URL, merge status)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":35,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["GitHub repository with write access and API token (classic or fine-grained PAT)","Git CLI installed and configured on the system running the MCP server","CI/CD system with publicly queryable status API (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, etc.)","Claude Code integration with MCP server running locally or remotely accessible","GitHub API token with 'actions:read' permission","CI/CD system with queryable status endpoint (GitHub Actions native, or custom webhook adapter)","Network connectivity to CI provider API","GitHub API token with 'repo' or 'pull-requests:write' scope","Feature branch already pushed to remote repository","Target branch (main/master) exists and is accessible"],"failure_modes":["Requires pre-configured GitHub repository with branch protection rules compatible with automated merging","No built-in rollback mechanism if CI fails mid-pipeline — requires manual intervention to revert","Assumes linear git history; may conflict with complex rebase or merge strategies","CI wait polling adds latency (typically 30s-5min depending on CI provider response time)","No support for multi-repository workflows or cross-org PR creation","Polling interval and timeout are static per invocation — no dynamic adjustment based on CI history","Does not distinguish between CI failure and CI timeout — both return error state","No webhook support — relies on pull-based status queries which add latency","GitHub Actions API rate limits apply (60 requests/hour for unauthenticated, 5000/hour for authenticated)","Does not support draft PRs or PR templates — uses basic title/description only","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.41,"ecosystem":0.5800000000000001,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:23.903Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:24:03.844Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=npm-heznpcanvil","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=npm-heznpcanvil"}},"signature":"XN6a8tlQw0NokhFkAOGTZ2lpF+2X6xmHIcTmLk6iD92ITd9j8zrg7ZYAi9OrTEnkWidsPaIHdaLVqRTT+uArAg==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T18:31:22.000Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/npm-heznpcanvil","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/npm-heznpcanvil","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=npm-heznpcanvil","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}