{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"npm_npm-grackle-aimcp","slug":"npm-grackle-aimcp","name":"@grackle-ai/mcp","type":"mcp","url":"https://www.npmjs.com/package/@grackle-ai/mcp","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/npm-grackle-aimcp","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":["grackle","mcp","model-context-protocol","ai-agents"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"npm_npm-grackle-aimcp__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.protocol.server.with.connectrpc.translation.layer","name":"mcp protocol server with connectrpc translation layer","description":"Implements a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that translates incoming MCP tool call requests into ConnectRPC procedure calls, enabling AI agents and LLM clients to invoke backend services through a standardized protocol bridge. Uses a request-response translation pattern that maps MCP's JSON-RPC 2.0 message format to ConnectRPC's protobuf-based RPC semantics, handling serialization/deserialization and error propagation across protocol boundaries.","intents":["Connect an AI agent or LLM client to backend services via MCP without rewriting service interfaces","Expose existing ConnectRPC services to Claude, ChatGPT, or other MCP-compatible AI clients","Build a protocol adapter that translates between MCP tool schemas and ConnectRPC method signatures"],"best_for":["Teams building AI agent infrastructure with existing ConnectRPC backends","Developers integrating Anthropic Claude or other MCP-aware LLMs with gRPC/ConnectRPC services","Organizations standardizing on MCP for AI tool access while maintaining ConnectRPC for internal RPC"],"limitations":["Limited to ConnectRPC as the backend RPC protocol — no built-in support for REST, GraphQL, or other RPC frameworks","Requires ConnectRPC service definitions to be pre-defined; dynamic service discovery not mentioned","No built-in authentication/authorization layer — delegates to underlying ConnectRPC service security","Low package download count (54) suggests limited production adoption and community validation"],"requires":["Node.js 16+ (typical for npm packages)","ConnectRPC server running and accessible from MCP server","MCP client library or compatible AI agent framework (Claude, etc.)","@grackle-ai/mcp npm package installed"],"input_types":["MCP tool call requests (JSON-RPC 2.0 format)","Tool schema definitions (JSON)","ConnectRPC service method signatures"],"output_types":["MCP tool call responses (JSON-RPC 2.0 format)","ConnectRPC procedure results (serialized protobuf or JSON)","Error responses with MCP-compliant error codes"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","protocol-bridge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-grackle-aimcp__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.tool.schema.inference.and.mcp.capability.advertisement","name":"tool schema inference and mcp capability advertisement","description":"Automatically discovers ConnectRPC service methods and generates MCP-compatible tool schemas that describe available procedures, their input parameters, return types, and documentation. Implements schema generation that maps ConnectRPC protobuf message definitions to MCP's JSON Schema format, enabling AI clients to understand and invoke backend services without manual schema authoring.","intents":["Automatically expose ConnectRPC service methods as MCP tools without writing schema definitions","Generate JSON Schema descriptions of RPC method parameters for AI agent understanding","Advertise available backend capabilities to MCP clients in a standardized format"],"best_for":["Teams with large ConnectRPC service catalogs who want to expose them to AI agents automatically","Developers building AI agent platforms that need dynamic tool discovery","Organizations reducing schema maintenance overhead by deriving MCP schemas from protobuf definitions"],"limitations":["Schema inference depth unknown — may not handle complex nested protobuf types or custom message options","No mention of schema caching or incremental updates — full re-inference on each server start likely","Documentation extraction from protobuf comments may be limited or not supported","Circular dependencies or recursive message types may cause inference failures"],"requires":["ConnectRPC service definitions (protobuf .proto files or compiled service descriptors)","Access to ConnectRPC service reflection API or compiled service metadata","MCP client capable of parsing JSON Schema tool definitions"],"input_types":["ConnectRPC service descriptors","Protobuf message definitions","Service method signatures"],"output_types":["JSON Schema tool definitions","MCP capability advertisements","Tool parameter documentation"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-grackle-aimcp__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.request.routing.and.method.dispatch.from.mcp.to.connectrpc","name":"request routing and method dispatch from mcp to connectrpc","description":"Routes incoming MCP tool call requests to the appropriate ConnectRPC service method based on tool name and parameters, handling request marshaling (JSON to protobuf), method invocation, and response unmarshaling (protobuf back to JSON). Implements a dispatch table or registry pattern that maps MCP tool identifiers to ConnectRPC service/method pairs, with parameter binding and type coercion.","intents":["Route MCP tool calls from an AI agent to the correct backend ConnectRPC service method","Marshal JSON request parameters into protobuf message format for ConnectRPC invocation","Unmarshal ConnectRPC responses back into JSON for MCP client consumption"],"best_for":["AI agent platforms that need reliable request routing between protocol boundaries","Teams building multi-service backends where different MCP tools map to different ConnectRPC services","Developers requiring transparent protocol translation without manual request/response handling"],"limitations":["Parameter type coercion rules not documented — may fail on complex types or edge cases","No mention of request validation before routing — invalid parameters may reach backend services","Timeout handling and retry logic not specified — may hang on slow or unresponsive ConnectRPC services","No built-in request/response logging or observability hooks for debugging routing issues"],"requires":["MCP client sending properly formatted tool call requests","ConnectRPC service accessible and running","Tool registry or mapping configuration defining MCP tool → ConnectRPC method relationships"],"input_types":["MCP tool call requests (JSON-RPC 2.0)","Tool parameters (JSON objects)"],"output_types":["ConnectRPC procedure responses (protobuf or JSON)","MCP tool call results (JSON-RPC 2.0 format)","Error responses with status codes"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-grackle-aimcp__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.error.handling.and.status.code.translation.across.protocol.boundaries","name":"error handling and status code translation across protocol boundaries","description":"Translates ConnectRPC error responses (gRPC status codes like INVALID_ARGUMENT, INTERNAL, UNAVAILABLE) into MCP-compliant error formats, preserving error context and messages while adapting to each protocol's error semantics. Maps backend service errors to appropriate MCP error codes and wraps them in JSON-RPC 2.0 error response format for client consumption.","intents":["Translate backend service errors into MCP-compatible error responses that AI clients understand","Preserve error context and debugging information across protocol translation","Handle ConnectRPC service failures gracefully without breaking the MCP client connection"],"best_for":["Teams building resilient AI agent systems that need clear error propagation","Developers debugging issues across protocol boundaries (MCP client → ConnectRPC backend)","Organizations requiring detailed error logging and monitoring for AI agent interactions"],"limitations":["Error code mapping strategy not documented — may lose semantic information during translation","No mention of error retry logic or circuit breaker patterns for cascading failures","Sensitive error details from backend may leak to MCP clients if not properly sanitized","Timeout errors and network failures may not be distinguished from application errors"],"requires":["ConnectRPC service returning standard gRPC status codes","MCP client capable of parsing JSON-RPC 2.0 error responses"],"input_types":["ConnectRPC error responses (gRPC status codes and messages)","Service exceptions and error details"],"output_types":["MCP error responses (JSON-RPC 2.0 error format)","Error codes and messages suitable for AI client handling"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-grackle-aimcp__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.server.lifecycle.management.and.mcp.protocol.initialization","name":"server lifecycle management and mcp protocol initialization","description":"Manages the MCP server lifecycle including initialization, capability advertisement, and graceful shutdown. Implements the MCP protocol handshake with clients, advertises supported tools and resources, and handles server state transitions. Uses standard MCP initialization messages to establish the protocol version, client/server capabilities, and available tools.","intents":["Initialize an MCP server that AI clients can discover and connect to","Advertise available tools and capabilities to MCP clients during handshake","Manage server startup, shutdown, and resource cleanup"],"best_for":["Developers building MCP servers that need standard protocol compliance","Teams deploying AI agent infrastructure with multiple MCP clients","Organizations requiring reliable server initialization and capability negotiation"],"limitations":["No mention of hot-reload or dynamic tool registration — tools likely fixed at startup","Graceful shutdown behavior not documented — may drop in-flight requests","No built-in health checks or liveness probes for monitoring server status","Protocol version negotiation strategy not specified — may not handle client version mismatches"],"requires":["Node.js runtime with MCP protocol support","MCP client library or compatible AI agent framework","ConnectRPC backend service for tool implementation"],"input_types":["MCP initialization requests","Client capability declarations"],"output_types":["MCP initialization responses","Server capability advertisements","Tool and resource listings"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-grackle-aimcp__cap_5","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.streaming.and.long.running.tool.execution.support","name":"streaming and long-running tool execution support","description":"Enables MCP tools to execute long-running operations and stream results back to clients through the MCP protocol. Implements streaming response handling that allows ConnectRPC services to return results incrementally rather than waiting for complete execution, mapping server-side streaming or async operations to MCP's streaming capabilities.","intents":["Execute long-running backend operations without blocking the MCP client","Stream partial results from ConnectRPC services back to AI agents in real-time","Support async operations like batch processing or background jobs through MCP tools"],"best_for":["Teams building AI agents that need to handle long-running backend tasks","Developers exposing streaming ConnectRPC services (server-side streaming) through MCP","Organizations requiring real-time feedback from backend operations to AI clients"],"limitations":["Streaming implementation details not documented — unclear if it supports server-side streaming, client-side streaming, or bidirectional","No mention of backpressure handling or flow control — may buffer unbounded amounts of data","Timeout behavior for long-running streams not specified — may disconnect on extended operations","Stream error recovery and reconnection logic not documented"],"requires":["ConnectRPC service with streaming support (server-side or bidirectional streaming)","MCP client capable of handling streaming responses","Proper timeout and resource management configuration"],"input_types":["MCP tool call requests for streaming operations","ConnectRPC streaming service method invocations"],"output_types":["Streamed MCP tool responses (incremental results)","ConnectRPC streaming responses (protobuf messages)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":26,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Node.js 16+ (typical for npm packages)","ConnectRPC server running and accessible from MCP server","MCP client library or compatible AI agent framework (Claude, etc.)","@grackle-ai/mcp npm package installed","ConnectRPC service definitions (protobuf .proto files or compiled service descriptors)","Access to ConnectRPC service reflection API or compiled service metadata","MCP client capable of parsing JSON Schema tool definitions","MCP client sending properly formatted tool call requests","ConnectRPC service accessible and running","Tool registry or mapping configuration defining MCP tool → ConnectRPC method relationships"],"failure_modes":["Limited to ConnectRPC as the backend RPC protocol — no built-in support for REST, GraphQL, or other RPC frameworks","Requires ConnectRPC service definitions to be pre-defined; dynamic service discovery not mentioned","No built-in authentication/authorization layer — delegates to underlying ConnectRPC service security","Low package download count (54) suggests limited production adoption and community validation","Schema inference depth unknown — may not handle complex nested protobuf types or custom message options","No mention of schema caching or incremental updates — full re-inference on each server start likely","Documentation extraction from protobuf comments may be limited or not supported","Circular dependencies or recursive message types may cause inference failures","Parameter type coercion rules not documented — may fail on complex types or edge cases","No mention of request validation before routing — invalid parameters may reach backend services","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.22,"ecosystem":0.42,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.6,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:23.903Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:23:56.961Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=npm-grackle-aimcp","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=npm-grackle-aimcp"}},"signature":"NJr2D0jdSsiGmaLH1F3GtVJLfhgJdZr8H8Qu17tTVoHuR13MpSiSQtmCAo+/O4UfaHfZGsUCZJXpUYkEMLNMAg==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T20:53:54.333Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/npm-grackle-aimcp","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/npm-grackle-aimcp","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=npm-grackle-aimcp","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}