{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"npm_npm-gotza02seq-thinking","slug":"npm-gotza02seq-thinking","name":"@gotza02/seq-thinking","type":"mcp","url":"https://www.npmjs.com/package/@gotza02/seq-thinking","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/npm-gotza02seq-thinking","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":["mcp","sequential-thinking","swarm-agents","ai","reasoning"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"npm_npm-gotza02seq-thinking__cap_0","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.sequential.thinking.chain.orchestration","name":"sequential-thinking-chain-orchestration","description":"Orchestrates multi-step reasoning chains where each step's output feeds into the next step's input, enabling structured decomposition of complex problems into sequential reasoning phases. Implements a pipeline pattern that maintains state across thinking steps and enforces execution order, allowing agents to build on previous conclusions rather than reasoning in isolation.","intents":["I need my AI agent to break down a complex problem into sequential reasoning steps","I want to ensure each reasoning step builds on the previous one's conclusions","I need to track and debug the reasoning path an agent takes through a problem"],"best_for":["AI engineers building multi-step reasoning agents","Teams implementing chain-of-thought patterns in production systems","Developers needing transparent, auditable reasoning traces"],"limitations":["Sequential execution means latency scales linearly with number of thinking steps","No built-in parallelization of independent reasoning branches","Requires careful prompt engineering to ensure each step produces usable output for the next"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","MCP server implementation (Claude Desktop or compatible client)","LLM with instruction-following capability (Claude, GPT-4, or equivalent)"],"input_types":["text prompts","structured problem definitions","context/background information"],"output_types":["reasoning traces (step-by-step text)","structured reasoning state","final conclusions"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-gotza02seq-thinking__cap_1","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.swarm.agent.coordination","name":"swarm-agent-coordination","description":"Coordinates multiple AI agents working in parallel or sequence toward a shared goal, managing agent lifecycle, message routing between agents, and consensus/aggregation of results. Implements a swarm pattern where agents can spawn sub-agents, communicate asynchronously, and coordinate on shared state or objectives without requiring a centralized orchestrator.","intents":["I need multiple specialized agents to collaborate on solving a single problem","I want agents to spawn child agents for subtasks and aggregate their results","I need to coordinate agent communication and prevent conflicts in a multi-agent system"],"best_for":["Teams building complex multi-agent systems (research, analysis, planning)","Developers implementing hierarchical agent architectures","Organizations needing scalable agent coordination without central bottlenecks"],"limitations":["Coordination overhead increases with number of agents; no built-in load balancing","Consensus mechanisms must be explicitly defined per use case","Debugging multi-agent interactions is complex; requires comprehensive logging"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","MCP server running with swarm coordination module","Multiple LLM instances or API keys for parallel agent execution","Shared state mechanism (in-memory, Redis, or database)"],"input_types":["agent specifications (role, capabilities, constraints)","shared problem statement","coordination rules/constraints"],"output_types":["aggregated results from multiple agents","coordination logs and decision traces","consensus outcomes"],"categories":["automation-workflow","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-gotza02seq-thinking__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.protocol.integration","name":"mcp-protocol-integration","description":"Exposes sequential thinking and swarm coordination capabilities through the Model Context Protocol (MCP), allowing any MCP-compatible client (Claude Desktop, custom applications, other agents) to invoke reasoning and coordination features as remote tools. Implements MCP server specification with proper resource handling, tool definitions, and protocol compliance.","intents":["I want to use advanced reasoning in Claude Desktop without code changes","I need to expose my reasoning engine to multiple different applications","I want to build a reasoning service that any MCP client can call"],"best_for":["Claude Desktop users wanting to extend reasoning capabilities","Teams building MCP-compatible tool ecosystems","Developers creating reasoning microservices for distributed systems"],"limitations":["MCP protocol adds serialization/deserialization overhead (~50-100ms per call)","Limited to tools/resources that fit MCP schema constraints","Requires MCP-compatible client; not directly usable in non-MCP environments"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","MCP client implementation (Claude Desktop 0.1.0+, or custom MCP client)","Network connectivity between client and MCP server"],"input_types":["MCP tool invocation parameters (JSON)","text prompts","structured tool arguments"],"output_types":["MCP tool results (JSON)","text responses","structured data"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-gotza02seq-thinking__cap_3","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.thinking.step.state.management","name":"thinking-step-state-management","description":"Maintains and tracks state across sequential thinking steps, preserving intermediate conclusions, context, and reasoning artifacts between steps. Implements a state machine pattern where each thinking step is a discrete state transition, with full history preservation for debugging and auditing. Allows agents to reference previous thinking steps and build cumulative reasoning.","intents":["I need to preserve intermediate reasoning results across multiple thinking steps","I want to debug a reasoning chain by examining state at each step","I need agents to reference conclusions from earlier thinking steps"],"best_for":["Teams building auditable AI systems with reasoning transparency","Developers debugging complex multi-step reasoning chains","Organizations needing compliance-grade reasoning traces"],"limitations":["State storage grows linearly with number of thinking steps; no automatic pruning","Large state objects can exceed context window limits in subsequent steps","No built-in state compression or summarization"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","Storage mechanism for state (in-memory for small chains, database for production)","Sufficient memory/storage for complete reasoning history"],"input_types":["thinking step outputs","context/background information","state references"],"output_types":["current state snapshot","state history","state diffs between steps"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-gotza02seq-thinking__cap_4","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.agent.spawning.and.lifecycle.management","name":"agent-spawning-and-lifecycle-management","description":"Enables agents to dynamically spawn child agents for subtasks and manages their complete lifecycle (creation, execution, monitoring, termination). Implements a hierarchical agent pattern where parent agents can delegate work to child agents with specific roles and constraints, and collect results asynchronously. Handles agent resource cleanup and prevents resource leaks.","intents":["I want an agent to spawn specialized sub-agents for different parts of a problem","I need to manage the lifecycle of dynamically created agents","I want to delegate work from one agent to multiple child agents in parallel"],"best_for":["Teams building hierarchical multi-agent systems","Developers implementing divide-and-conquer agent architectures","Organizations needing dynamic agent provisioning based on problem complexity"],"limitations":["Spawning agents has latency overhead; not suitable for fine-grained task decomposition","Resource limits may constrain maximum number of concurrent child agents","Debugging hierarchical agent trees requires specialized tooling"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","MCP server with agent spawning module","Resource limits configured (max concurrent agents, memory per agent)","LLM API keys or instances for each spawned agent"],"input_types":["agent specifications (role, capabilities, constraints)","subtask definitions","resource constraints"],"output_types":["agent instance identifiers","agent execution results","lifecycle events (created, running, completed, failed)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-gotza02seq-thinking__cap_5","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.reasoning.trace.export.and.visualization","name":"reasoning-trace-export-and-visualization","description":"Exports complete reasoning traces in structured formats (JSON, markdown, etc.) suitable for visualization, analysis, and debugging. Implements trace serialization that captures the full reasoning path including intermediate steps, decisions, and conclusions. Enables external tools to visualize reasoning as flowcharts, timelines, or decision trees.","intents":["I want to visualize how an agent reasoned through a problem","I need to export reasoning traces for analysis or compliance auditing","I want to debug a reasoning chain by examining the complete trace"],"best_for":["Teams building explainable AI systems","Developers debugging complex reasoning chains","Organizations needing reasoning audit trails for compliance"],"limitations":["Trace export can be large for deep reasoning chains; requires compression for large-scale export","Visualization tools must be built separately; no built-in visualization provided","Sensitive information in reasoning traces requires careful handling"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","MCP server with trace export module","Storage for exported traces (filesystem, database, or cloud storage)"],"input_types":["reasoning session identifiers","export format specifications","filtering criteria"],"output_types":["JSON trace files","markdown reasoning reports","structured trace data"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":26,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Node.js 16+","MCP server implementation (Claude Desktop or compatible client)","LLM with instruction-following capability (Claude, GPT-4, or equivalent)","MCP server running with swarm coordination module","Multiple LLM instances or API keys for parallel agent execution","Shared state mechanism (in-memory, Redis, or database)","MCP client implementation (Claude Desktop 0.1.0+, or custom MCP client)","Network connectivity between client and MCP server","Storage mechanism for state (in-memory for small chains, database for production)","Sufficient memory/storage for complete reasoning history"],"failure_modes":["Sequential execution means latency scales linearly with number of thinking steps","No built-in parallelization of independent reasoning branches","Requires careful prompt engineering to ensure each step produces usable output for the next","Coordination overhead increases with number of agents; no built-in load balancing","Consensus mechanisms must be explicitly defined per use case","Debugging multi-agent interactions is complex; requires comprehensive logging","MCP protocol adds serialization/deserialization overhead (~50-100ms per call)","Limited to tools/resources that fit MCP schema constraints","Requires MCP-compatible client; not directly usable in non-MCP environments","State storage grows linearly with number of thinking steps; no automatic pruning","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.22,"ecosystem":0.45,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.6,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:23.903Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:24:06.526Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=npm-gotza02seq-thinking","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=npm-gotza02seq-thinking"}},"signature":"PNZr2y61n3cIACNcORvfxmEQiwSVOd+TAeU7lZ+KgkwyWjuHtUh8QUtMGzPPgJuoleKa7IPsiSBzdUuT+bkNCw==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T18:18:56.366Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/npm-gotza02seq-thinking","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/npm-gotza02seq-thinking","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=npm-gotza02seq-thinking","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}