{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"npm_npm-forwardimpactlibmcp","slug":"npm-forwardimpactlibmcp","name":"@forwardimpact/libmcp","type":"mcp","url":"https://www.npmjs.com/package/@forwardimpact/libmcp","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/npm-forwardimpactlibmcp","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":["mcp","grpc","tool","agent"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"npm_npm-forwardimpactlibmcp__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.grpc.to.mcp.service.bridge.with.protobuf.introspection","name":"grpc-to-mcp service bridge with protobuf introspection","description":"Automatically discovers and registers gRPC services defined in protobuf files as MCP-compatible tools by introspecting service definitions, method signatures, and message schemas. Uses protobuf reflection to extract service metadata and dynamically generates MCP tool schemas that map gRPC methods to callable tool interfaces, enabling agents to invoke backend gRPC services without manual tool definition.","intents":["I want my AI agent to call existing gRPC microservices without rewriting them as REST APIs","I need to expose protobuf-defined services to Claude or other MCP clients automatically","I want to avoid manually defining tool schemas for every gRPC method my agent needs to call"],"best_for":["teams with existing gRPC microservice architectures looking to add AI agent capabilities","developers building multi-agent systems that need to coordinate across gRPC services","organizations migrating legacy gRPC services to be agent-accessible without refactoring"],"limitations":["Requires protobuf definitions to be available at runtime for reflection — cannot work with compiled-only gRPC services without .proto files","No built-in support for gRPC streaming methods — unary RPC only","Protobuf message complexity (nested types, oneof fields, map types) may require custom serialization handling in agent context","gRPC service discovery must be pre-configured — no automatic service mesh integration (Consul, Kubernetes DNS)"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","gRPC service with .proto definitions accessible at runtime","@grpc/grpc-js package","MCP server implementation (Claude SDK or compatible)"],"input_types":["protobuf service definitions (.proto files)","gRPC service endpoint (host:port)","method parameters as JSON matching protobuf message structure"],"output_types":["MCP tool schema (JSON)","gRPC method response as JSON","tool invocation results serialized from protobuf messages"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","grpc-bridge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-forwardimpactlibmcp__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.config.driven.tool.registration.with.schema.mapping","name":"config-driven tool registration with schema mapping","description":"Provides a declarative configuration system (likely YAML/JSON) that maps gRPC service methods to MCP tool definitions, handling parameter transformation, type coercion, and response formatting. Configuration drives the entire registration pipeline, allowing operators to customize tool names, descriptions, parameter constraints, and output transformations without code changes.","intents":["I want to customize how gRPC methods appear to agents (tool names, descriptions, parameter constraints)","I need to transform gRPC responses before returning them to the agent (filtering, flattening, renaming fields)","I want to manage which gRPC methods are exposed as tools without redeploying code"],"best_for":["platform teams managing multiple gRPC services exposed to agents","operators who need to adjust tool behavior without developer involvement","organizations with strict API governance requiring centralized tool definition control"],"limitations":["Configuration complexity grows with number of services and methods — no built-in validation or schema for the config format itself","No hot-reload capability mentioned — configuration changes likely require server restart","Limited to static mappings — cannot implement dynamic routing or conditional tool availability based on runtime state","No versioning mechanism for configurations — breaking changes to tool schemas could affect deployed agents"],"requires":["Configuration file (YAML/JSON format — exact schema unknown)","gRPC service definitions matching config declarations","MCP server instance to load and apply configuration"],"input_types":["configuration file (YAML or JSON)","gRPC service endpoint references","parameter transformation rules (format unknown)"],"output_types":["registered MCP tools","tool schema definitions","transformed gRPC responses"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-forwardimpactlibmcp__cap_2","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.protobuf.message.to.json.serialization.with.type.preservation","name":"protobuf message-to-json serialization with type preservation","description":"Handles bidirectional conversion between protobuf messages and JSON representations, preserving type information and handling protobuf-specific constructs (enums, nested messages, repeated fields, oneof variants). Ensures gRPC method parameters from agent JSON payloads are correctly deserialized into protobuf messages, and gRPC responses are serialized back to JSON with proper type handling.","intents":["I need to pass complex protobuf message structures from my agent to gRPC services","I want gRPC responses with enums and nested types to be readable in agent context","I need to ensure type safety when converting between JSON (agent) and protobuf (service) representations"],"best_for":["developers working with complex protobuf schemas (nested messages, enums, repeated fields)","teams requiring strict type fidelity between agent requests and gRPC service contracts","systems where protobuf schema evolution must not break agent tool invocations"],"limitations":["Protobuf `Any` type support unknown — may not handle polymorphic message types","Custom protobuf options and extensions may not be preserved during serialization","Large nested message structures could cause performance degradation in JSON conversion","No explicit handling of protobuf `bytes` fields — encoding/decoding strategy unclear"],"requires":["@grpc/grpc-js package","protobuf message definitions (.proto files)","protobuf runtime library (likely @grpc/proto-loader or similar)"],"input_types":["JSON objects matching protobuf message structure","protobuf message instances","enum values (as strings or integers)"],"output_types":["JSON representation of protobuf messages","protobuf message instances","typed JSON with enum names preserved"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-forwardimpactlibmcp__cap_3","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.tool.schema.generation.from.grpc.method.signatures","name":"mcp tool schema generation from grpc method signatures","description":"Automatically generates MCP-compliant tool schemas (including name, description, input parameters, output format) from gRPC service method definitions. Extracts parameter types from protobuf message definitions, generates JSON Schema for tool inputs, and creates tool descriptions that agents can understand. Handles method overloading and generates unique tool names for disambiguation.","intents":["I want Claude or other MCP clients to understand what parameters my gRPC methods accept","I need tool schemas that accurately reflect my gRPC service contract without manual definition","I want agents to have clear descriptions of what each gRPC method does"],"best_for":["teams exposing gRPC services to multiple AI agents with different capabilities","developers who want schema-driven tool discovery and validation","organizations needing to maintain tool schemas in sync with service changes"],"limitations":["Schema generation quality depends on protobuf documentation — if .proto files lack comments, generated tool descriptions will be generic","Complex protobuf constraints (field validation rules, min/max values) may not be reflected in generated JSON Schema","No support for generating tool schemas for gRPC streaming methods — only unary RPC","Tool naming collisions across multiple services require manual disambiguation configuration"],"requires":["gRPC service definitions with method signatures","protobuf message definitions for all input/output types","MCP server framework to register generated schemas"],"input_types":["gRPC service definition (.proto file)","method metadata (name, input message, output message)"],"output_types":["MCP tool schema (JSON)","JSON Schema for tool input parameters","tool description and metadata"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-forwardimpactlibmcp__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.grpc.service.endpoint.configuration.and.connection.pooling","name":"grpc service endpoint configuration and connection pooling","description":"Manages gRPC client connections to backend services with configurable endpoints, TLS/mTLS support, and connection pooling to reduce overhead. Handles service discovery configuration (static endpoints or dynamic discovery), connection lifecycle management, and graceful shutdown. Supports multiple service endpoints for load balancing or failover scenarios.","intents":["I want to configure which gRPC services my agent can reach without hardcoding endpoints","I need secure mTLS connections to my gRPC services","I want connection pooling to avoid creating new gRPC connections for every tool invocation"],"best_for":["production deployments requiring secure gRPC communication","teams with multiple gRPC service instances needing load balancing","organizations with strict network security requirements (mTLS, certificate pinning)"],"limitations":["No built-in service mesh integration (Istio, Linkerd) — requires manual endpoint configuration","Connection pooling strategy and pool size limits unknown — may not be tunable for high-throughput scenarios","No circuit breaker or retry logic mentioned — failed gRPC calls may not be resilient","TLS certificate rotation strategy unclear — may require server restart for certificate updates"],"requires":["gRPC service endpoint (host:port)","TLS certificates if mTLS is required (client cert, key, CA cert)","@grpc/grpc-js package","network connectivity to gRPC services"],"input_types":["endpoint configuration (host, port, protocol)","TLS/mTLS certificate paths","connection pool configuration (if exposed)"],"output_types":["gRPC client connection","connection pool status","health check results"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-forwardimpactlibmcp__cap_5","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.tool.invocation.with.grpc.method.execution","name":"mcp tool invocation with grpc method execution","description":"Implements the MCP tool execution interface by mapping incoming tool calls to gRPC method invocations. Receives tool invocation requests from MCP clients (with tool name and parameters), resolves the corresponding gRPC method, marshals parameters into protobuf messages, executes the RPC call, and returns results back to the MCP client in the expected format. Handles error propagation and timeout management.","intents":["I want my agent to invoke gRPC methods through the standard MCP tool calling interface","I need errors from gRPC services to be properly reported back to the agent","I want to set timeouts on gRPC method calls to prevent agent hangs"],"best_for":["MCP server implementations that need to bridge to gRPC backends","agents (Claude, custom LLM agents) invoking gRPC services through MCP","teams building multi-service orchestration layers with agents"],"limitations":["No built-in retry logic for transient gRPC failures — agents may see errors that could be recovered","Timeout handling strategy unclear — may not support per-method timeout customization","No streaming response support — large gRPC responses may be truncated or cause memory issues","Error messages from gRPC services may not be user-friendly when returned to agents"],"requires":["MCP server framework","gRPC service definitions and connections configured","tool schemas registered via MCP"],"input_types":["MCP tool invocation request (tool name, parameters)","tool parameters as JSON"],"output_types":["MCP tool result (success or error)","gRPC method response as JSON","error messages and status codes"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-forwardimpactlibmcp__cap_6","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.error.handling.and.status.code.mapping.from.grpc.to.mcp","name":"error handling and status code mapping from grpc to mcp","description":"Translates gRPC error codes and status messages into MCP-compatible error responses that agents can understand and handle. Maps gRPC status codes (UNAVAILABLE, INVALID_ARGUMENT, PERMISSION_DENIED, etc.) to appropriate MCP error formats, preserves error details and context, and ensures error messages are meaningful to agents without exposing internal service details.","intents":["I want my agent to understand why a gRPC method call failed","I need to distinguish between transient errors (retry) and permanent errors (fail fast) from gRPC services","I want error messages from gRPC services to be safe to show to end users through the agent"],"best_for":["production agent systems requiring robust error handling and recovery","teams building agent workflows that need to handle service failures gracefully","organizations with compliance requirements around error logging and user-facing messages"],"limitations":["Error message sanitization strategy unknown — may expose internal service details to agents","No built-in error recovery suggestions — agents may not know how to retry or work around failures","gRPC error details (custom error codes, metadata) may be lost in translation to MCP format","No structured error logging — debugging tool invocation failures may be difficult"],"requires":["gRPC service returning standard status codes","MCP error response format support","error handling configuration (optional)"],"input_types":["gRPC error response (status code, message, details)"],"output_types":["MCP error response","human-readable error message","error metadata (retryable, error code)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":28,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"moderate","permissions":["Node.js 16+","gRPC service with .proto definitions accessible at runtime","@grpc/grpc-js package","MCP server implementation (Claude SDK or compatible)","Configuration file (YAML/JSON format — exact schema unknown)","gRPC service definitions matching config declarations","MCP server instance to load and apply configuration","protobuf message definitions (.proto files)","protobuf runtime library (likely @grpc/proto-loader or similar)","gRPC service definitions with method signatures"],"failure_modes":["Requires protobuf definitions to be available at runtime for reflection — cannot work with compiled-only gRPC services without .proto files","No built-in support for gRPC streaming methods — unary RPC only","Protobuf message complexity (nested types, oneof fields, map types) may require custom serialization handling in agent context","gRPC service discovery must be pre-configured — no automatic service mesh integration (Consul, Kubernetes DNS)","Configuration complexity grows with number of services and methods — no built-in validation or schema for the config format itself","No hot-reload capability mentioned — configuration changes likely require server restart","Limited to static mappings — cannot implement dynamic routing or conditional tool availability based on runtime state","No versioning mechanism for configurations — breaking changes to tool schemas could affect deployed agents","Protobuf `Any` type support unknown — may not handle polymorphic message types","Custom protobuf options and extensions may not be preserved during serialization","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.24,"ecosystem":0.42,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:23.903Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:23:58.898Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=npm-forwardimpactlibmcp","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=npm-forwardimpactlibmcp"}},"signature":"0XRxxrXyd10pX1b86VfTqdky6uebZNtW5TRojuQjXinpkNJgxbL8OrJ6eXbx4UKqVXkvuO8QHaCdZWpHCifmCQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-22T10:39:02.256Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/npm-forwardimpactlibmcp","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/npm-forwardimpactlibmcp","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=npm-forwardimpactlibmcp","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}