{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"npm_npm-capgate","slug":"npm-capgate","name":"capgate","type":"mcp","url":"https://www.npmjs.com/package/capgate","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/npm-capgate","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":["mcp","model-context-protocol","policy","sandbox","capability","bwrap","bubblewrap","typescript"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"npm_npm-capgate__cap_0","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.mcp.tool.manifest.parsing.and.schema.extraction","name":"mcp tool manifest parsing and schema extraction","description":"Parses MCP (Model Context Protocol) tool manifests in JSON/YAML format to extract tool definitions, input schemas, and capability metadata. Uses schema introspection to build an intermediate representation of tool capabilities that can be compiled into sandbox policies. Handles nested JSON schemas with support for complex type definitions and validation constraints.","intents":["I need to read MCP tool definitions and understand what capabilities each tool exposes","I want to extract input/output schemas from tool manifests to understand security boundaries","I need to programmatically analyze tool capabilities before generating sandbox policies"],"best_for":["MCP server developers building sandboxed tool environments","Security engineers designing capability-based access control policies","Teams implementing model-context-protocol integrations with runtime policy enforcement"],"limitations":["Requires well-formed MCP manifests — malformed schemas will fail parsing","No automatic schema validation against MCP specification versions","Limited support for dynamic/runtime schema generation — expects static manifest definitions"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","Valid MCP tool manifest in JSON or YAML format","TypeScript 4.5+ (if using as library)"],"input_types":["JSON","YAML","MCP tool manifest objects"],"output_types":["Parsed tool schema objects","Capability metadata structures","Input/output type definitions"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-capgate__cap_1","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.capability.to.sandbox.policy.compilation","name":"capability-to-sandbox-policy compilation","description":"Compiles extracted MCP tool capabilities into concrete sandbox enforcement policies by mapping tool operations to system-level restrictions. Generates bwrap (bubblewrap) configuration, egress rules, and filesystem access policies based on tool input/output schemas and declared resource requirements. Uses capability analysis to determine minimum required permissions and generates deny-by-default policies with explicit allow lists.","intents":["I want to automatically generate sandbox policies from tool definitions without manual security configuration","I need to restrict what system resources a tool can access based on its declared capabilities","I want to create least-privilege execution environments where tools only get permissions they actually need"],"best_for":["Platform teams implementing multi-tenant MCP server environments","Security-conscious developers deploying untrusted or third-party tools","Organizations requiring automated compliance with capability-based security models"],"limitations":["Policy generation is static — cannot adapt to runtime behavior changes or emergent tool capabilities","Bwrap policies are Linux-specific — no native support for Windows or macOS sandboxing","Egress rules assume network-layer enforcement — requires compatible network stack (iptables, nftables, or equivalent)","Cannot infer implicit capabilities from tool code — relies entirely on manifest declarations"],"requires":["Linux kernel with user namespace support (for bwrap)","Bubblewrap (bwrap) binary installed and accessible","Parsed MCP tool manifests from prior parsing step","Network policy enforcement infrastructure (iptables, nftables, or cloud-native equivalent)"],"input_types":["Parsed tool capability objects","Tool schema definitions","Resource requirement declarations"],"output_types":["Bwrap configuration files","Egress firewall rules","Filesystem mount policies","Capability restriction lists"],"categories":["safety-moderation","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-capgate__cap_2","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.bwrap.configuration.generation","name":"bwrap configuration generation","description":"Generates bubblewrap (bwrap) sandbox configurations from capability policies, creating isolated execution environments with restricted filesystem access, network isolation, and process constraints. Translates abstract capability restrictions into concrete bwrap command-line arguments and configuration files, handling mount point mapping, read-only filesystem layers, and capability dropping. Supports both inline argument generation and persistent configuration file output.","intents":["I need to create isolated execution environments for MCP tools using bwrap","I want to restrict filesystem access for a tool to only the directories it needs","I need to generate bwrap configurations programmatically from tool policies"],"best_for":["Container orchestration teams integrating MCP tools into Kubernetes or Docker environments","Developers building sandboxed tool execution layers for LLM agents","DevOps engineers automating sandbox policy deployment across tool fleets"],"limitations":["Bwrap is Linux-only — no equivalent generation for Windows or macOS sandboxing mechanisms","Generated configs are static — cannot adapt to dynamic filesystem changes at runtime","Requires elevated privileges (user namespaces) — may not work in all container/VM environments","No automatic validation that generated configs actually restrict intended capabilities"],"requires":["Linux kernel 3.19+ with user namespace support enabled","Bubblewrap (bwrap) 0.5.0+ installed on target system","Capability policy objects from compilation step","Root or user namespace creation privileges"],"input_types":["Capability policy objects","Filesystem access requirements","Network isolation specifications"],"output_types":["Bwrap command-line arguments","Bwrap configuration files","Shell scripts for sandbox invocation"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-capgate__cap_3","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.egress.rule.generation.and.network.policy.enforcement","name":"egress rule generation and network policy enforcement","description":"Generates network egress rules (firewall rules, iptables configurations, or cloud-native network policies) that restrict outbound network access based on tool capabilities. Analyzes tool schemas to identify which external services or APIs each tool needs to contact, then generates minimal allow-list rules that permit only necessary egress traffic. Supports multiple policy backends including iptables, nftables, and Kubernetes NetworkPolicy formats.","intents":["I want to prevent tools from making unauthorized network requests to external services","I need to generate firewall rules that allow only the APIs a tool actually needs","I want to audit and control what external services my tools can communicate with"],"best_for":["Security teams implementing network segmentation for multi-tenant tool environments","Platform engineers deploying MCP tools in Kubernetes clusters with network policies","Organizations with strict data exfiltration prevention requirements"],"limitations":["Rule generation requires explicit API/service declarations in tool manifests — cannot infer from code analysis","Iptables rules are host-specific and don't scale across distributed systems without additional orchestration","No built-in support for DNS-based filtering or domain wildcard rules — requires exact IP/port specifications","Cannot enforce egress rules at application layer — only network layer (IP/port)"],"requires":["Network policy enforcement infrastructure (iptables, nftables, or Kubernetes)","Tool manifests with explicit API/service endpoint declarations","Network access to policy enforcement points (firewall, network controller, etc.)"],"input_types":["Tool capability objects","API endpoint declarations","Service dependency specifications"],"output_types":["Iptables rule sets","Nftables configurations","Kubernetes NetworkPolicy manifests","Firewall rule definitions"],"categories":["safety-moderation","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-capgate__cap_4","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.multi.backend.policy.output.and.format.translation","name":"multi-backend policy output and format translation","description":"Translates compiled capability policies into multiple sandbox policy formats and backends, enabling deployment across heterogeneous infrastructure. Supports output to bwrap configurations, iptables/nftables rules, Kubernetes NetworkPolicy manifests, and custom policy formats. Uses a backend-agnostic intermediate representation that can be serialized to any target format, allowing single policy definitions to target multiple enforcement mechanisms.","intents":["I need to deploy the same tool policies across different infrastructure (bare metal, Kubernetes, cloud)","I want to generate policies for multiple sandbox backends from a single tool definition","I need to migrate tool policies from one enforcement mechanism to another"],"best_for":["Multi-cloud or hybrid infrastructure teams managing tool deployments across platforms","Organizations with heterogeneous sandbox enforcement (some Kubernetes, some bare metal)","Platform teams building tool-as-a-service offerings with flexible deployment options"],"limitations":["Not all policy concepts map cleanly across backends — some restrictions may be lossy in translation","Backend-specific features cannot be expressed in the intermediate representation","Requires explicit backend selection — no automatic detection of available enforcement mechanisms","Policy validation is backend-specific — generated rules may fail at deployment time"],"requires":["Compiled capability policies from prior compilation step","Target backend specification (bwrap, iptables, nftables, kubernetes, etc.)","Backend-specific dependencies (bwrap binary, iptables, kubectl, etc.)"],"input_types":["Compiled capability policy objects","Backend target specification"],"output_types":["Bwrap configurations","Iptables/nftables rule files","Kubernetes NetworkPolicy YAML","Custom policy format files","Shell scripts for policy deployment"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-capgate__cap_5","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.tool.capability.validation.and.policy.verification","name":"tool capability validation and policy verification","description":"Validates that generated sandbox policies actually enforce the intended capability restrictions by analyzing policy rules against tool capability declarations. Performs static verification that policies don't grant unintended permissions, checks for gaps in coverage (capabilities without corresponding restrictions), and validates policy syntax for target backends. Uses policy analysis to detect overly permissive rules and suggest tighter restrictions.","intents":["I want to verify that my generated sandbox policies actually restrict what I intended","I need to detect if a tool policy accidentally grants too many permissions","I want to audit sandbox policies to ensure they match tool capability declarations"],"best_for":["Security teams auditing sandbox policies before deployment","Compliance-focused organizations requiring policy verification","Teams implementing automated policy testing in CI/CD pipelines"],"limitations":["Verification is static — cannot detect runtime policy bypass or privilege escalation","Cannot verify that policies actually prevent intended attacks — only checks syntax and coverage","Backend-specific validation requires knowledge of each enforcement mechanism's semantics","No integration with dynamic testing or fuzzing — relies on static analysis only"],"requires":["Compiled capability policies","Tool manifest definitions","Backend-specific policy validators (for syntax checking)"],"input_types":["Compiled policies","Tool capability declarations","Policy rule sets"],"output_types":["Verification reports","Policy coverage analysis","Gap detection results","Suggested policy improvements"],"categories":["safety-moderation","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-capgate__cap_6","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.tool.manifest.schema.normalization.and.canonicalization","name":"tool manifest schema normalization and canonicalization","description":"Normalizes and canonicalizes MCP tool manifests to a standard internal representation, handling variations in schema format, version differences, and optional field defaults. Resolves schema references, expands nested definitions, and validates against MCP specification. Produces a canonical form suitable for policy compilation, enabling consistent policy generation regardless of manifest source or format variations.","intents":["I need to handle tool manifests from different sources with varying formats","I want to normalize schema variations before policy compilation","I need to validate tool manifests against MCP specification requirements"],"best_for":["Tool aggregation platforms collecting manifests from multiple sources","Organizations with legacy tool definitions that need migration to standard formats","Teams implementing tool marketplace or registry systems"],"limitations":["Normalization may lose format-specific metadata or comments","Cannot infer missing required fields — manifests must be complete","Version compatibility is limited to supported MCP specification versions","Custom extensions or non-standard fields are stripped during canonicalization"],"requires":["MCP tool manifests in JSON or YAML format","MCP specification version information","Schema reference resolution (local or remote)"],"input_types":["JSON manifests","YAML manifests","Manifest objects"],"output_types":["Canonical manifest objects","Normalized schema definitions","Validation reports"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-capgate__cap_7","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.declarative.policy.composition.and.inheritance","name":"declarative policy composition and inheritance","description":"Enables declarative composition of sandbox policies through inheritance and mixins, allowing policy templates to be defined once and reused across multiple tools. Supports policy composition rules that combine base policies with tool-specific overrides, enabling consistent policy patterns across tool families. Uses composition semantics to merge policies while detecting conflicts and maintaining least-privilege principles.","intents":["I want to define reusable policy templates for common tool categories","I need to apply consistent base policies across multiple tools with tool-specific customizations","I want to maintain policy consistency across a fleet of similar tools"],"best_for":["Platform teams managing large tool fleets with common policy patterns","Organizations implementing policy-as-code for tool sandboxing","Teams building tool governance frameworks"],"limitations":["Policy composition can become complex — difficult to reason about final effective policies","Conflict resolution between inherited policies is deterministic but may not match intent","No automatic detection of policy conflicts until composition time","Composition semantics are framework-specific — not portable to other policy systems"],"requires":["Policy template definitions","Composition rule specifications","Tool manifest definitions"],"input_types":["Policy templates","Composition rules","Tool-specific policy overrides"],"output_types":["Composed policy objects","Effective policy definitions","Policy composition reports"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-capgate__cap_8","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.typescript.javascript.sdk.for.programmatic.policy.compilation","name":"typescript/javascript sdk for programmatic policy compilation","description":"Provides a TypeScript/JavaScript SDK enabling programmatic policy compilation within Node.js applications and build pipelines. Exports typed APIs for manifest parsing, capability analysis, policy compilation, and backend code generation. Integrates with TypeScript type system for compile-time safety and enables IDE autocomplete for policy configuration. Supports both ESM and CommonJS module formats.","intents":["I want to integrate policy compilation into my Node.js build pipeline","I need to programmatically generate sandbox policies from tool definitions","I want type-safe policy configuration in my TypeScript application"],"best_for":["Node.js/TypeScript developers building tool orchestration platforms","Teams implementing policy-as-code in JavaScript/TypeScript ecosystems","Developers integrating capgate into CI/CD pipelines"],"limitations":["TypeScript-only SDK — no native Python, Go, or other language bindings","Requires Node.js runtime — cannot be used in browser environments","Type definitions are TypeScript-specific — limited utility for JavaScript-only projects","SDK API surface may change between versions — no stability guarantees for pre-1.0 releases"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","TypeScript 4.5+ (for type checking)","npm or yarn package manager"],"input_types":["Tool manifest objects","Policy configuration objects","Backend specification objects"],"output_types":["Compiled policy objects","Backend-specific configuration files","Policy validation results"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-capgate__cap_9","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.cli.tool.for.batch.policy.compilation.and.deployment","name":"cli tool for batch policy compilation and deployment","description":"Provides a command-line interface for batch compilation of tool manifests into sandbox policies and deployment to target environments. Supports reading manifest directories, compiling multiple tools in parallel, and outputting policies to files or directly deploying to infrastructure. Includes options for policy validation, format selection, and deployment configuration. Integrates with shell scripts and CI/CD pipelines.","intents":["I want to compile policies for multiple tools in a batch operation","I need to deploy generated policies directly to my infrastructure from the command line","I want to integrate policy compilation into my CI/CD pipeline"],"best_for":["DevOps engineers automating policy deployment in CI/CD pipelines","Teams managing tool fleets with batch policy compilation needs","Developers using capgate in shell scripts and automation workflows"],"limitations":["CLI interface is less flexible than programmatic API for complex policy logic","Batch operations are sequential by default — parallel compilation requires explicit configuration","Error handling is CLI-specific — limited debugging information for policy compilation failures","Deployment operations require infrastructure credentials — security implications for CI/CD usage"],"requires":["Node.js 16+","capgate CLI installed (via npm or direct binary)","Tool manifests in accessible filesystem locations","Infrastructure credentials for deployment operations"],"input_types":["Manifest file paths","Manifest directories","Policy configuration files"],"output_types":["Policy files (bwrap configs, iptables rules, etc.)","Deployment logs","Exit codes and status reports"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":31,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Node.js 16+","Valid MCP tool manifest in JSON or YAML format","TypeScript 4.5+ (if using as library)","Linux kernel with user namespace support (for bwrap)","Bubblewrap (bwrap) binary installed and accessible","Parsed MCP tool manifests from prior parsing step","Network policy enforcement infrastructure (iptables, nftables, or cloud-native equivalent)","Linux kernel 3.19+ with user namespace support enabled","Bubblewrap (bwrap) 0.5.0+ installed on target system","Capability policy objects from compilation step"],"failure_modes":["Requires well-formed MCP manifests — malformed schemas will fail parsing","No automatic schema validation against MCP specification versions","Limited support for dynamic/runtime schema generation — expects static manifest definitions","Policy generation is static — cannot adapt to runtime behavior changes or emergent tool capabilities","Bwrap policies are Linux-specific — no native support for Windows or macOS sandboxing","Egress rules assume network-layer enforcement — requires compatible network stack (iptables, nftables, or equivalent)","Cannot infer implicit capabilities from tool code — relies entirely on manifest declarations","Bwrap is Linux-only — no equivalent generation for Windows or macOS sandboxing mechanisms","Generated configs are static — cannot adapt to dynamic filesystem changes at runtime","Requires elevated privileges (user namespaces) — may not work in all container/VM environments","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.3,"ecosystem":0.5000000000000001,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:23.903Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:24:09.657Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=npm-capgate","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=npm-capgate"}},"signature":"OVFYioH8XJmRc7GSfs3l4JmI+YWE3PRnnP6a6at6bV8XaqikF3iOoU6JfryjAmo2UdIF/vfcRVggEcp/uMfoBQ==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T15:58:08.323Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/npm-capgate","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/npm-capgate","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=npm-capgate","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}