{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"npm_npm-callmux","slug":"npm-callmux","name":"callmux","type":"mcp","url":"https://www.npmjs.com/package/callmux","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/npm-callmux","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":["mcp","model-context-protocol","multiplexer","parallel","batch","proxy","ai","agents","tool-calls"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"npm_npm-callmux__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.parallel.mcp.tool.call.execution","name":"parallel mcp tool call execution","description":"Executes multiple MCP tool calls concurrently rather than sequentially, using a multiplexing architecture that batches requests to the underlying MCP server and manages concurrent response handling. Implements request queuing with configurable concurrency limits to prevent server overload while maximizing throughput for independent tool invocations.","intents":["I need to call 10 different MCP tools at once without waiting for each to complete serially","I want to speed up agent workflows that make multiple independent tool calls","I need to handle concurrent tool requests from multiple LLM agents without blocking"],"best_for":["AI agent frameworks executing multi-step workflows with independent tool calls","teams building MCP-based systems where latency from sequential execution is a bottleneck","developers optimizing throughput in tool-calling pipelines"],"limitations":["Concurrency limits must be tuned per MCP server — too high causes server resource exhaustion","Tool call ordering dependencies must be managed by caller; multiplexer assumes independence","No automatic retry logic for failed concurrent calls — requires external error handling"],"requires":["MCP server implementation compatible with concurrent request handling","Node.js 16+ for Promise-based concurrency primitives","Understanding of tool call dependencies to avoid race conditions"],"input_types":["MCP tool call objects with name, arguments, and metadata"],"output_types":["structured tool call results with execution metadata","error objects for failed calls with timing information"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-callmux__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.request.batching.with.protocol.aware.aggregation","name":"request batching with protocol-aware aggregation","description":"Groups multiple MCP tool calls into optimized batches before transmission to the server, reducing network round-trips and server processing overhead. Uses protocol-aware batching logic that respects MCP message framing while aggregating independent requests, with configurable batch size and timeout windows to balance latency vs throughput.","intents":["I want to reduce network overhead when making many small MCP tool calls","I need to batch tool calls intelligently without violating MCP protocol constraints","I want to tune batching behavior based on network conditions and server capacity"],"best_for":["systems making high-frequency tool calls over high-latency networks","MCP deployments where server processing cost per request is significant","developers optimizing for throughput in batch-oriented workflows"],"limitations":["Batching introduces latency variance — individual calls may wait up to batch timeout window","Batch size tuning is workload-dependent and requires profiling for optimal performance","Tool calls with strict ordering requirements cannot be batched together"],"requires":["MCP server supporting batch request semantics or multiple concurrent messages","Configuration of batch size and timeout parameters","Caller awareness that batched calls may not execute in submission order"],"input_types":["MCP tool call objects","batch configuration parameters (size, timeout)"],"output_types":["batched response objects with per-call result mapping","execution timing metadata per batch"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-callmux__cap_2","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.response.caching.with.tool.call.deduplication","name":"response caching with tool call deduplication","description":"Caches MCP tool call results and returns cached responses for duplicate requests within a configurable TTL window, using request fingerprinting to identify identical tool invocations. Implements cache invalidation strategies and supports both in-memory and pluggable external cache backends for distributed scenarios.","intents":["I want to avoid re-executing the same MCP tool call multiple times in a workflow","I need to cache tool results across multiple agent invocations to reduce latency","I want to deduplicate concurrent requests for the same tool call"],"best_for":["agent systems with repeated tool calls across multiple reasoning steps","multi-agent deployments where different agents query the same tools","read-heavy tool call patterns where results are stable over time"],"limitations":["Caching assumes tool results are deterministic — non-deterministic tools produce stale results","Cache invalidation must be manually triggered or TTL-based; no automatic invalidation on tool state changes","In-memory cache is not shared across process boundaries — distributed caching requires external backend","Cache key collision risk if tool call fingerprinting is insufficient for complex argument types"],"requires":["Configuration of cache TTL and size limits","Understanding of tool call determinism to avoid caching non-idempotent operations","Optional: external cache backend (Redis, Memcached) for distributed caching"],"input_types":["MCP tool call objects with name and arguments","cache configuration (TTL, max size, backend type)"],"output_types":["cached tool results with cache hit/miss metadata","cache statistics and performance metrics"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-callmux__cap_3","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.tool.call.pipelining.with.dependency.resolution","name":"tool call pipelining with dependency resolution","description":"Chains multiple MCP tool calls into pipelines where outputs of one call feed into inputs of subsequent calls, with automatic dependency graph resolution and topological ordering. Implements a DAG-based execution model that identifies independent branches for parallel execution while respecting data dependencies between sequential stages.","intents":["I want to express complex multi-step tool workflows as a declarative pipeline","I need to automatically parallelize independent tool calls while respecting data dependencies","I want to avoid manually managing data flow between sequential tool invocations"],"best_for":["agent frameworks building complex multi-step reasoning chains","ETL-style workflows that transform data through multiple tool calls","developers building reusable tool call templates with variable inputs"],"limitations":["Pipeline definition requires explicit dependency declaration — implicit dependencies are not detected","Circular dependencies cause deadlock; no automatic cycle detection or breaking","Error in one pipeline stage fails the entire pipeline unless explicit error handling is configured","Pipeline execution is synchronous — no streaming of results as stages complete"],"requires":["Pipeline definition format (JSON, DSL, or programmatic API)","Explicit declaration of tool call dependencies and data mapping","Error handling strategy for failed pipeline stages"],"input_types":["pipeline definition with tool calls and dependency edges","initial input values for pipeline entry points"],"output_types":["final pipeline output from terminal stages","execution trace with per-stage timing and results"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-callmux__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.server.proxying.with.protocol.translation","name":"mcp server proxying with protocol translation","description":"Acts as a transparent proxy between MCP clients and servers, intercepting and transforming tool calls at the protocol level. Enables middleware-style processing such as request logging, authentication injection, response transformation, and server-side filtering without modifying client or server code.","intents":["I want to add logging and monitoring to MCP tool calls without changing client code","I need to enforce authentication or authorization policies on tool calls","I want to transform tool call arguments or responses at the protocol level"],"best_for":["teams deploying MCP servers in production with observability requirements","multi-tenant systems needing per-user authorization on tool calls","developers building MCP middleware for cross-cutting concerns"],"limitations":["Proxy adds latency to every tool call — typically 5-50ms depending on middleware complexity","Streaming responses may be buffered by proxy, breaking real-time semantics","Protocol translation errors can silently corrupt tool call semantics if not carefully implemented","Proxy state is not shared across instances — distributed proxies require external coordination"],"requires":["MCP server endpoint URL and credentials","Middleware configuration for request/response transformation","Network access to both MCP clients and servers"],"input_types":["MCP protocol messages (tool calls, responses)","middleware configuration (filters, transformers, validators)"],"output_types":["transformed MCP protocol messages","audit logs and metrics"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-callmux__cap_5","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.adaptive.concurrency.control.with.backpressure","name":"adaptive concurrency control with backpressure","description":"Dynamically adjusts the number of concurrent tool calls based on server response times and error rates, implementing backpressure mechanisms that slow down request submission when the server is overloaded. Uses exponential backoff and circuit breaker patterns to prevent cascading failures and maintain system stability under varying load.","intents":["I want to automatically scale down tool call concurrency when the server is struggling","I need to prevent overwhelming an MCP server with too many concurrent requests","I want to gracefully degrade performance rather than fail when the server is overloaded"],"best_for":["production MCP deployments with variable server capacity","systems making tool calls to unreliable or rate-limited servers","developers building resilient agent systems that handle server degradation"],"limitations":["Backpressure introduces latency variance — request completion times become unpredictable","Circuit breaker may reject valid requests if server recovers slowly after transient failure","Tuning backoff parameters is workload-dependent and requires empirical profiling","No coordination between multiple clients — each client independently adjusts concurrency"],"requires":["Configuration of backoff strategy (exponential, linear) and parameters","Circuit breaker thresholds (error rate, timeout duration)","Monitoring of server health metrics to inform backpressure decisions"],"input_types":["tool call requests","server response metrics (latency, error rate)"],"output_types":["tool call results with adaptive concurrency metadata","backpressure events and circuit breaker state transitions"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-callmux__cap_6","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.tool.call.tracing.and.performance.profiling","name":"tool call tracing and performance profiling","description":"Captures detailed execution traces for each tool call including timing, arguments, results, and error information, with support for distributed tracing across multiple MCP servers. Provides built-in profiling to identify performance bottlenecks and integrates with observability platforms like Datadog, New Relic, or OpenTelemetry.","intents":["I want to understand which tool calls are slow and why","I need to trace tool call execution across multiple MCP servers for debugging","I want to export tool call metrics to my observability platform"],"best_for":["teams debugging complex multi-step tool workflows","production systems requiring observability into tool call performance","developers optimizing agent latency and throughput"],"limitations":["Tracing adds overhead — typically 1-5% CPU and memory cost per traced call","Distributed tracing requires trace context propagation across service boundaries","Sensitive data in tool arguments may be logged — requires careful filtering configuration","Trace storage and retention can become expensive at high call volumes"],"requires":["Tracing backend or observability platform (optional but recommended)","Configuration of trace sampling rate and retention policy","OpenTelemetry SDK or vendor-specific instrumentation"],"input_types":["tool call requests and responses","execution timing and error information"],"output_types":["structured trace data with spans and attributes","performance metrics and profiling reports"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-callmux__cap_7","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.request.filtering.and.routing.based.on.tool.metadata","name":"request filtering and routing based on tool metadata","description":"Routes tool calls to different MCP servers or execution paths based on tool name, argument patterns, or custom metadata predicates. Implements a rule-based routing engine that allows conditional execution, load balancing across multiple servers, and selective tool availability based on client context.","intents":["I want to route tool calls to different servers based on tool type or arguments","I need to load balance tool calls across multiple MCP server instances","I want to selectively enable/disable tools based on user permissions or context"],"best_for":["multi-server MCP deployments with specialized tool sets","systems enforcing fine-grained access control on tool availability","teams load balancing tool calls across geographically distributed servers"],"limitations":["Routing rules must be explicitly defined — no automatic routing based on tool semantics","Complex routing logic can become difficult to maintain and debug","Routing decisions add latency — typically 1-10ms per decision","No automatic failover if routed server is unavailable"],"requires":["Routing rule definition format (JSON, DSL, or programmatic API)","Tool metadata or classification scheme for routing decisions","Multiple MCP server endpoints for load balancing scenarios"],"input_types":["tool call requests with name and arguments","routing rules and metadata predicates"],"output_types":["routed tool call to selected server","routing decision metadata"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm_npm-callmux__cap_8","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.error.handling.and.retry.logic.with.exponential.backoff","name":"error handling and retry logic with exponential backoff","description":"Implements configurable retry strategies for failed tool calls with exponential backoff, jitter, and maximum retry limits. Distinguishes between retryable errors (transient failures, rate limits) and non-retryable errors (invalid arguments, authentication failures), with support for custom retry predicates and fallback handlers.","intents":["I want failed tool calls to automatically retry with exponential backoff","I need to distinguish between transient and permanent failures","I want to define custom retry logic for specific tool calls or error types"],"best_for":["systems calling unreliable or rate-limited MCP servers","agent frameworks requiring resilience to transient failures","developers building production-grade tool calling systems"],"limitations":["Retries increase total latency for failed calls — worst case is exponential backoff timeout","Retry logic assumes idempotent tool calls — non-idempotent tools may have side effects on retry","Distinguishing retryable from non-retryable errors requires domain knowledge","Jitter adds randomness to retry timing — makes behavior less predictable for testing"],"requires":["Configuration of retry strategy (max attempts, backoff multiplier, jitter)","Definition of retryable error types or custom retry predicates","Understanding of tool call idempotency"],"input_types":["tool call requests","error objects from failed calls","retry configuration"],"output_types":["successful tool call result after retries","final error if all retries exhausted"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":34,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"moderate","permissions":["MCP server implementation compatible with concurrent request handling","Node.js 16+ for Promise-based concurrency primitives","Understanding of tool call dependencies to avoid race conditions","MCP server supporting batch request semantics or multiple concurrent messages","Configuration of batch size and timeout parameters","Caller awareness that batched calls may not execute in submission order","Configuration of cache TTL and size limits","Understanding of tool call determinism to avoid caching non-idempotent operations","Optional: external cache backend (Redis, Memcached) for distributed caching","Pipeline definition format (JSON, DSL, or programmatic API)"],"failure_modes":["Concurrency limits must be tuned per MCP server — too high causes server resource exhaustion","Tool call ordering dependencies must be managed by caller; multiplexer assumes independence","No automatic retry logic for failed concurrent calls — requires external error handling","Batching introduces latency variance — individual calls may wait up to batch timeout window","Batch size tuning is workload-dependent and requires profiling for optimal performance","Tool calls with strict ordering requirements cannot be batched together","Caching assumes tool results are deterministic — non-deterministic tools produce stale results","Cache invalidation must be manually triggered or TTL-based; no automatic invalidation on tool state changes","In-memory cache is not shared across process boundaries — distributed caching requires external backend","Cache key collision risk if tool call fingerprinting is insufficient for complex argument types","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.43,"ecosystem":0.5000000000000001,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:23.903Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:23:57.731Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=npm-callmux","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=npm-callmux"}},"signature":"Ghq+Z8SQglvAJOzINVtiyC7T/kUwH4zyQ7tlZ9r+v4FqZvGJna299JDa9Ixf+LfRqlNB2W0o9rG1Jrn//rldDA==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T20:17:54.702Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/npm-callmux","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/npm-callmux","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=npm-callmux","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}