{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"npm-nestjs-ai-rag","slug":"nestjs-ai-rag","name":"@nestjs-ai/rag","type":"framework","url":"https://nestjs-port.github.io/nestjs-ai","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/nestjs-ai-rag","categories":["rag-knowledge"],"tags":["ai","nestjs","rag"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"npm-nestjs-ai-rag__cap_0","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.nestjs.integrated.vector.store.abstraction.layer","name":"nestjs-integrated vector store abstraction layer","description":"Provides a pluggable vector store interface that integrates seamlessly with NestJS dependency injection, allowing developers to swap between multiple vector database backends (Pinecone, Weaviate, Milvus, etc.) without changing application code. Uses NestJS providers and modules to manage vector store lifecycle, configuration, and connection pooling within the framework's IoC container.","intents":["I want to add vector storage to my NestJS app without learning multiple database SDKs","I need to switch vector databases in production without refactoring my RAG pipeline","I want vector store connections managed by NestJS dependency injection like other services"],"best_for":["NestJS backend developers building RAG systems","teams standardizing on NestJS for AI-powered microservices","developers wanting vendor-agnostic vector storage abstractions"],"limitations":["Abstraction layer may not expose all vendor-specific optimizations (e.g., Pinecone's metadata filtering syntax)","Performance characteristics vary significantly between backends — no built-in benchmarking or auto-selection","Limited to vector stores with Node.js SDKs; proprietary or gRPC-only stores require custom adapters"],"requires":["NestJS 9.0+","Node.js 16+","API credentials for at least one supported vector store (Pinecone, Weaviate, Milvus, etc.)","@nestjs/common and @nestjs/core installed"],"input_types":["vector embeddings (float arrays)","metadata objects (JSON)","query vectors (float arrays)"],"output_types":["search results with scores","stored vector metadata","connection status and health checks"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-nestjs-ai-rag__cap_1","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.embedding.pipeline.with.multi.provider.support","name":"embedding pipeline with multi-provider support","description":"Orchestrates text-to-embedding conversion through a pluggable provider interface supporting OpenAI, Anthropic, Cohere, HuggingFace, and local models. Handles batching, retry logic, rate limiting, and caching of embeddings within NestJS services, with configurable chunk size and normalization strategies to optimize for different vector store backends.","intents":["I want to generate embeddings for documents using my preferred embedding model without vendor lock-in","I need to batch embed thousands of documents efficiently with automatic retry and rate limiting","I want to cache embeddings to avoid re-computing them on every RAG query"],"best_for":["teams using multiple embedding providers for cost optimization or redundancy","developers building document ingestion pipelines at scale","applications requiring offline or self-hosted embedding models"],"limitations":["Embedding quality and dimensionality vary by provider — no automatic normalization across models","Batch processing adds latency; optimal batch size depends on provider rate limits and model size","Caching requires external state store (Redis, database) — no built-in in-memory cache with TTL","Local model support requires GPU or significant CPU resources; inference latency not optimized for real-time queries"],"requires":["NestJS 9.0+","API keys for embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere, etc.) or local model setup","Optional: Redis or database for embedding cache","Node.js 16+"],"input_types":["plain text","document chunks (strings)","batch arrays of text"],"output_types":["embedding vectors (float arrays)","embedding metadata (model name, dimensions, timestamp)","batch processing status and error logs"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-nestjs-ai-rag__cap_2","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.document.chunking.and.metadata.extraction","name":"document chunking and metadata extraction","description":"Splits documents into semantically-aware chunks using configurable strategies (fixed-size, semantic boundaries, recursive splitting) and automatically extracts metadata (source, timestamp, section headers) to attach to vectors. Supports multiple document formats (PDF, Markdown, plain text) with format-specific parsing logic and preserves document structure for context-aware retrieval.","intents":["I want to split large documents into chunks optimized for my embedding model and vector store","I need to preserve document structure and metadata so RAG results include source attribution","I want to handle different document formats (PDFs, Markdown, web pages) with a single pipeline"],"best_for":["teams ingesting diverse document types into RAG systems","applications requiring source attribution and document context in retrieval results","developers building knowledge bases from unstructured text"],"limitations":["PDF parsing quality depends on document structure — scanned PDFs or complex layouts may require OCR (not built-in)","Semantic chunking strategies require embedding calls, adding latency to ingestion pipeline","Metadata extraction is rule-based; complex documents may require custom parsing logic","No built-in handling for multi-language documents or right-to-left text"],"requires":["NestJS 9.0+","Document parsing libraries (pdf-parse for PDFs, markdown-it for Markdown, etc.)","Embedding provider for semantic chunking strategies","Node.js 16+"],"input_types":["PDF files","Markdown documents","plain text","HTML content"],"output_types":["document chunks (strings)","chunk metadata objects (source, page number, section, timestamp)","chunk-to-vector mappings"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-nestjs-ai-rag__cap_3","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.semantic.search.with.hybrid.retrieval.strategies","name":"semantic search with hybrid retrieval strategies","description":"Executes vector similarity search against indexed documents and optionally combines results with keyword/BM25 search to improve recall. Implements ranking strategies (reciprocal rank fusion, score normalization) to merge vector and keyword results, with configurable similarity thresholds and result filtering based on metadata predicates.","intents":["I want to retrieve the most relevant documents for a query using semantic similarity","I need hybrid search combining vector and keyword matching to catch both semantic and exact-match results","I want to filter search results by metadata (date range, document type, source) before returning to the LLM"],"best_for":["RAG systems requiring high recall across diverse document collections","applications where both semantic and keyword relevance matter (e.g., legal, technical documentation)","teams needing fine-grained control over retrieval ranking and filtering"],"limitations":["Hybrid search requires maintaining both vector and keyword indexes — increased storage and indexing overhead","Ranking strategy (RRF, score normalization) is heuristic-based; optimal weights vary by use case and require tuning","Metadata filtering is applied post-retrieval; complex predicates may require custom query logic","No built-in query expansion or relevance feedback — static retrieval strategy per query"],"requires":["NestJS 9.0+","Vector store with similarity search API","Optional: keyword search backend (Elasticsearch, database full-text search)","Node.js 16+"],"input_types":["query text (string)","similarity threshold (float 0-1)","metadata filter predicates (JSON)"],"output_types":["ranked search results with scores","result metadata (source, relevance score, chunk position)","retrieval statistics (query time, result count)"],"categories":["search-retrieval","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-nestjs-ai-rag__cap_4","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.rag.context.assembly.and.prompt.injection.prevention","name":"rag context assembly and prompt injection prevention","description":"Automatically constructs LLM prompts by combining retrieved documents with user queries, implementing prompt templates with variable substitution and built-in safeguards against prompt injection attacks. Handles context window management (token counting, truncation) to fit retrieved documents within model limits, with configurable strategies for prioritizing relevant chunks when context exceeds capacity.","intents":["I want to automatically format retrieved documents into prompts for my LLM without manual string concatenation","I need to prevent prompt injection attacks where malicious content in retrieved documents could manipulate the LLM","I want to fit as much relevant context as possible into the LLM's context window without exceeding token limits"],"best_for":["teams building production RAG systems with security requirements","applications using large language models with fixed context windows","developers wanting to avoid manual prompt engineering and context management"],"limitations":["Prompt injection prevention is rule-based (sanitization, escaping) — sophisticated attacks may bypass filters","Token counting requires model-specific tokenizers; estimates may be inaccurate for some models","Context truncation strategies (e.g., sliding window) may lose important information from longer documents","Prompt templates are static; dynamic prompt generation requires custom logic"],"requires":["NestJS 9.0+","LLM provider SDK (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) for token counting","Prompt template engine (Handlebars, Nunjucks, or custom)","Node.js 16+"],"input_types":["user query (string)","retrieved documents (array of chunks with metadata)","prompt template (string with variables)","model context window size (integer)"],"output_types":["formatted prompt (string)","context metadata (token count, truncation info)","security audit log (injection attempts detected)"],"categories":["text-generation-language","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-nestjs-ai-rag__cap_5","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.rag.pipeline.orchestration.and.state.management","name":"rag pipeline orchestration and state management","description":"Coordinates multi-step RAG workflows (document ingestion → embedding → storage → retrieval → prompt assembly → LLM call) as composable NestJS services with explicit state management and error handling. Implements pipeline patterns (sequential, parallel, conditional) with observability hooks for logging, metrics, and debugging at each stage.","intents":["I want to build complex RAG workflows without manually orchestrating each step","I need visibility into what's happening at each stage of my RAG pipeline for debugging and optimization","I want to handle errors gracefully (e.g., retry failed embeddings, fallback to keyword search) without stopping the entire pipeline"],"best_for":["teams building production RAG systems with complex workflows","developers needing observability and debugging capabilities for RAG pipelines","applications requiring fault tolerance and graceful degradation"],"limitations":["Pipeline orchestration adds abstraction overhead — debugging complex workflows requires understanding service composition","State management requires external store (database, Redis) for distributed pipelines — no built-in in-process state","Error handling strategies are configurable but not automatic; developers must define retry policies and fallbacks","Observability hooks require integration with logging/metrics infrastructure (Winston, Prometheus, etc.)"],"requires":["NestJS 9.0+","Optional: external state store (Redis, database) for distributed pipelines","Optional: logging and metrics infrastructure (Winston, Prometheus, Datadog, etc.)","Node.js 16+"],"input_types":["pipeline configuration (JSON/YAML)","input documents or queries","error handling policies"],"output_types":["pipeline execution results","execution logs and metrics","error reports with stack traces"],"categories":["automation-workflow","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-nestjs-ai-rag__cap_6","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.streaming.response.generation.with.token.level.control","name":"streaming response generation with token-level control","description":"Streams LLM responses token-by-token back to clients while maintaining RAG context, allowing real-time feedback and cancellation. Implements backpressure handling to prevent buffer overflow, token counting for cost tracking, and optional streaming of intermediate retrieval results (e.g., which documents were retrieved) before the LLM response begins.","intents":["I want to show users LLM responses in real-time as tokens arrive, rather than waiting for the full response","I need to track token usage for cost accounting and rate limiting","I want to cancel long-running LLM requests if the user disconnects or requests a different query"],"best_for":["web applications with real-time user interfaces","teams needing token-level cost tracking and billing","applications with strict latency requirements where streaming improves perceived performance"],"limitations":["Streaming requires HTTP/2 or WebSocket support — not compatible with older HTTP/1.1-only clients","Token counting during streaming may be inaccurate for some models (e.g., models with dynamic tokenization)","Backpressure handling adds complexity; misconfigured buffers can cause memory leaks or dropped tokens","Streaming intermediate results (e.g., retrieved documents) requires custom serialization logic"],"requires":["NestJS 9.0+","LLM provider with streaming API (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)","HTTP/2 or WebSocket support in client and server","Node.js 16+"],"input_types":["query text","RAG context (retrieved documents)","streaming configuration (buffer size, timeout)"],"output_types":["token stream (Server-Sent Events or WebSocket)","token metadata (token count, cost estimate)","intermediate results (optional)"],"categories":["text-generation-language","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-nestjs-ai-rag__cap_7","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.evaluation.and.metrics.collection.for.rag.quality","name":"evaluation and metrics collection for rag quality","description":"Collects metrics on RAG system performance including retrieval quality (precision, recall, NDCG), LLM response quality (relevance, factuality), and end-to-end latency. Implements evaluation strategies (ground truth comparison, LLM-as-judge, human feedback) and stores results for analysis and continuous improvement, with integration points for A/B testing different retrieval or generation strategies.","intents":["I want to measure how well my RAG system is retrieving relevant documents","I need to track whether my LLM is generating accurate, relevant responses based on retrieved context","I want to compare different retrieval or generation strategies (e.g., hybrid vs. vector-only search) to optimize performance"],"best_for":["teams building production RAG systems with quality requirements","developers iterating on retrieval and generation strategies","organizations needing to demonstrate RAG system performance to stakeholders"],"limitations":["Ground truth evaluation requires labeled datasets — expensive and time-consuming to create","LLM-as-judge evaluation is subjective and may not correlate with human judgment","Metrics collection adds latency to every query; sampling strategies required for high-traffic systems","No built-in statistical significance testing — A/B test results require external analysis"],"requires":["NestJS 9.0+","External metrics store (database, time-series database like InfluxDB)","Optional: labeled evaluation datasets","Optional: LLM provider for LLM-as-judge evaluation","Node.js 16+"],"input_types":["queries and retrieved documents","LLM responses","ground truth labels (optional)","human feedback (optional)"],"output_types":["retrieval metrics (precision, recall, NDCG)","generation metrics (relevance, factuality scores)","latency and cost metrics","A/B test results"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-nestjs-ai-rag__cap_8","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.multi.tenant.rag.isolation.and.access.control","name":"multi-tenant rag isolation and access control","description":"Isolates RAG data and operations between tenants using namespace-based partitioning in vector stores and metadata-based filtering in retrieval queries. Implements tenant-aware authentication and authorization checks at the service layer, ensuring queries only retrieve documents belonging to the authenticated tenant, with audit logging for compliance.","intents":["I want to build a multi-tenant SaaS RAG application where each customer's documents are isolated","I need to ensure users can only retrieve documents they have permission to access","I want to audit which documents were retrieved by which users for compliance and security"],"best_for":["SaaS platforms offering RAG capabilities to multiple customers","enterprises with strict data isolation and compliance requirements","teams building RAG systems with role-based access control"],"limitations":["Namespace-based isolation in vector stores may not support complex permission models (e.g., document-level sharing)","Metadata-based filtering adds query complexity and latency; large numbers of tenants may impact performance","Audit logging requires external store and can generate large volumes of data","No built-in support for cross-tenant analytics or aggregated metrics"],"requires":["NestJS 9.0+","Vector store with namespace or metadata filtering support","Authentication provider (JWT, OAuth, etc.)","Audit logging infrastructure (database, log aggregation service)","Node.js 16+"],"input_types":["authenticated user context (tenant ID, user ID, permissions)","queries and documents","access control policies"],"output_types":["tenant-isolated search results","audit logs (user, action, timestamp, document IDs)","access control decisions (allow/deny)"],"categories":["safety-moderation","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":28,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["NestJS 9.0+","Node.js 16+","API credentials for at least one supported vector store (Pinecone, Weaviate, Milvus, etc.)","@nestjs/common and @nestjs/core installed","API keys for embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere, etc.) or local model setup","Optional: Redis or database for embedding cache","Document parsing libraries (pdf-parse for PDFs, markdown-it for Markdown, etc.)","Embedding provider for semantic chunking strategies","Vector store with similarity search API","Optional: keyword search backend (Elasticsearch, database full-text search)"],"failure_modes":["Abstraction layer may not expose all vendor-specific optimizations (e.g., Pinecone's metadata filtering syntax)","Performance characteristics vary significantly between backends — no built-in benchmarking or auto-selection","Limited to vector stores with Node.js SDKs; proprietary or gRPC-only stores require custom adapters","Embedding quality and dimensionality vary by provider — no automatic normalization across models","Batch processing adds latency; optimal batch size depends on provider rate limits and model size","Caching requires external state store (Redis, database) — no built-in in-memory cache with TTL","Local model support requires GPU or significant CPU resources; inference latency not optimized for real-time queries","PDF parsing quality depends on document structure — scanned PDFs or complex layouts may require OCR (not built-in)","Semantic chunking strategies require embedding calls, adding latency to ingestion pipeline","Metadata extraction is rule-based; complex documents may require custom parsing logic","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.07909884750888159,"quality":0.28,"ecosystem":0.48999999999999994,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.6,"weights":{"adoption":0.3,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:23.902Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:04:47.474Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":309,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=nestjs-ai-rag","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=nestjs-ai-rag"}},"signature":"7WRHAxuE28FBydp19Xe0l/gidwZls+bw5NQuNQ+fgw47tmNdbY+6gGZsBJ1JMSndgybI1vsc9hwuzHqS3HXhDw==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T08:26:02.173Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/nestjs-ai-rag","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/nestjs-ai-rag","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=nestjs-ai-rag","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}