{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"npm-neoagent","slug":"neoagent","name":"neoagent","type":"agent","url":"https://github.com/NeoLabs-Systems/NeoAgent#readme","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/neoagent","categories":["ai-agents"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"npm-neoagent__cap_0","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.proactive.task.execution.with.autonomous.decision.making","name":"proactive task execution with autonomous decision-making","description":"Executes tasks without explicit user prompts by monitoring system state and user context, making autonomous decisions about when and how to act. The agent uses an internal reasoning loop to evaluate conditions, prioritize tasks, and execute actions with minimal human intervention, implementing a reactive-planning architecture that combines state observation with goal-directed execution.","intents":["I want my AI agent to automatically handle routine tasks without me asking each time","I need an agent that can proactively identify opportunities to help based on what I'm doing","I want to set goals once and have the agent work toward them independently"],"best_for":["developers building autonomous workflow systems","teams wanting to reduce manual task overhead","builders prototyping self-directed AI agents"],"limitations":["proactive execution without explicit guardrails can lead to unintended side effects if task scope is poorly defined","autonomous decision-making requires careful tuning of trigger conditions to avoid action spam","no built-in rollback mechanism for failed autonomous actions"],"requires":["Node.js 14+ (based on npm package registry)","clear task definitions and success criteria","system access permissions for intended autonomous actions"],"input_types":["task definitions","goal specifications","system state data"],"output_types":["execution logs","task completion status","decision traces"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-neoagent__cap_1","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.multi.step.reasoning.with.internal.thought.chains","name":"multi-step reasoning with internal thought chains","description":"Decomposes complex problems into sequential reasoning steps using an internal chain-of-thought mechanism that tracks intermediate conclusions and decision points. The agent maintains a reasoning state across multiple steps, allowing it to backtrack, refine hypotheses, and build toward conclusions through explicit logical progression rather than single-pass inference.","intents":["I need the agent to show its reasoning process and explain how it reached a decision","I want complex problems broken down into manageable reasoning steps","I need the agent to reconsider and refine its approach if initial reasoning seems flawed"],"best_for":["developers debugging agent behavior and decision quality","teams requiring explainable AI decisions for compliance","builders creating agents for complex analytical tasks"],"limitations":["multi-step reasoning increases latency proportionally to chain depth (typically 200-500ms per step)","longer reasoning chains consume more tokens, increasing API costs for cloud-based LLM backends","no automatic pruning of redundant reasoning steps"],"requires":["LLM backend with sufficient context window (8k+ tokens recommended)","structured prompt templates supporting step-by-step reasoning","logging infrastructure to capture intermediate reasoning states"],"input_types":["problem statements","context data","constraints"],"output_types":["reasoning traces","step-by-step conclusions","final decisions with justification"],"categories":["planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-neoagent__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.dynamic.tool.binding.and.function.execution","name":"dynamic tool binding and function execution","description":"Registers and executes arbitrary functions as tools available to the agent through a dynamic binding system that maps tool schemas to executable code. The agent can discover available tools, select appropriate ones based on task requirements, and execute them with parameter binding, supporting both synchronous and asynchronous function execution with error handling and result marshaling.","intents":["I want to extend the agent with custom functions specific to my domain","I need the agent to call external APIs and services as part of its reasoning","I want to expose my codebase functions to the agent without manual integration"],"best_for":["developers building domain-specific agents with custom tooling","teams integrating agents with existing service ecosystems","builders creating extensible agent frameworks"],"limitations":["tool discovery and selection adds overhead to each decision cycle","no built-in timeout handling for long-running tool executions","parameter binding errors can cause agent execution to halt without graceful degradation"],"requires":["Node.js 14+","function signatures compatible with JSON schema for parameter definition","error handling in tool implementations to prevent agent crashes"],"input_types":["function definitions","parameter schemas","tool metadata"],"output_types":["function results","execution status","error messages"],"categories":["tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-neoagent__cap_3","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.context.aware.memory.management.with.state.persistence","name":"context-aware memory management with state persistence","description":"Maintains agent state and conversation history across execution cycles using a pluggable memory backend that supports both short-term working memory and long-term persistent storage. The agent can retrieve relevant historical context based on semantic similarity or explicit queries, enabling coherent multi-turn interactions and learning from past experiences without requiring full context replay.","intents":["I want the agent to remember previous conversations and decisions across sessions","I need the agent to learn from past interactions and improve its future responses","I want to query the agent's memory to understand what it has learned"],"best_for":["developers building long-running agents with persistent state","teams needing audit trails of agent decisions and reasoning","builders creating agents that improve over time through experience"],"limitations":["memory retrieval adds latency to each decision cycle (typically 50-200ms for semantic search)","no built-in mechanism for memory decay or forgetting, leading to unbounded storage growth","memory corruption or inconsistency can propagate through subsequent agent decisions"],"requires":["persistent storage backend (file system, database, or vector store)","memory schema definition for structured state storage","optional: vector embedding model for semantic memory retrieval"],"input_types":["conversation history","execution traces","user feedback"],"output_types":["retrieved context","memory summaries","state snapshots"],"categories":["memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-neoagent__cap_4","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.adaptive.goal.decomposition.and.task.planning","name":"adaptive goal decomposition and task planning","description":"Automatically breaks down high-level goals into executable subtasks using a hierarchical planning algorithm that considers dependencies, resource constraints, and success criteria. The agent generates task graphs with explicit ordering constraints, estimates effort for each subtask, and adjusts the plan dynamically as tasks complete or fail, supporting both linear and parallel task execution patterns.","intents":["I want to specify a high-level goal and have the agent figure out the steps to achieve it","I need the agent to handle complex multi-step projects with dependencies between tasks","I want the agent to replan when unexpected obstacles arise during execution"],"best_for":["developers building project management or workflow automation agents","teams with complex, multi-step processes that need autonomous execution","builders creating agents for research, analysis, or creative tasks"],"limitations":["planning overhead increases exponentially with goal complexity, limiting practical task graph size to ~50 subtasks","no built-in cost estimation for subtasks, making resource planning difficult","replanning on failure can lead to infinite loops if failure conditions aren't properly handled"],"requires":["goal specification with clear success criteria","task dependency definitions or automatic dependency inference","LLM backend capable of structured output (JSON task graphs)"],"input_types":["goal descriptions","constraints and resources","task templates"],"output_types":["task graphs","execution plans","progress tracking"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-neoagent__cap_5","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.multi.agent.coordination.and.delegation","name":"multi-agent coordination and delegation","description":"Enables multiple agent instances to coordinate on shared goals through a delegation protocol that routes subtasks to specialized agents based on capability matching. The system maintains a shared context across agents, coordinates their execution to avoid conflicts, and aggregates results from parallel agent work, supporting both hierarchical (manager-worker) and peer-to-peer coordination patterns.","intents":["I want to distribute complex work across multiple specialized agents","I need agents to coordinate on shared goals without duplicating effort","I want to scale agent capacity by adding more agent instances"],"best_for":["teams building large-scale autonomous systems with multiple agents","developers creating specialized agent teams for different domains","builders needing horizontal scaling of agent capacity"],"limitations":["inter-agent communication adds latency and complexity to coordination","no built-in consensus mechanism for conflicting agent decisions","shared context synchronization can become a bottleneck in high-concurrency scenarios"],"requires":["message queue or pub/sub system for agent communication","shared state store for coordination context","capability registry for agent-to-task matching"],"input_types":["shared goals","agent capability definitions","task routing rules"],"output_types":["coordination logs","aggregated results","conflict resolution decisions"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-neoagent__cap_6","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.natural.language.interface.with.semantic.understanding","name":"natural language interface with semantic understanding","description":"Accepts free-form natural language input and converts it into structured agent directives through semantic parsing that extracts intent, entities, and constraints. The system uses intent classification to route requests to appropriate handlers, entity extraction to identify task parameters, and constraint parsing to understand limitations and preferences, supporting multi-turn dialogue with context carryover.","intents":["I want to interact with the agent using natural language instead of structured APIs","I need the agent to understand ambiguous or incomplete requests and ask clarifying questions","I want the agent to remember context from previous messages in the conversation"],"best_for":["non-technical users interacting with agents through chat interfaces","developers building conversational agent applications","teams deploying agents that need to handle diverse user input"],"limitations":["semantic parsing errors propagate through the agent pipeline, causing incorrect task execution","ambiguous natural language input requires clarification loops that increase interaction latency","no built-in handling for sarcasm, idioms, or cultural context in language understanding"],"requires":["NLP model or LLM backend for intent classification and entity extraction","dialogue state tracking for multi-turn conversations","intent and entity schema definitions"],"input_types":["natural language text","conversation history"],"output_types":["structured directives","clarification questions","natural language responses"],"categories":["text-generation-language","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-neoagent__cap_7","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.execution.monitoring.and.failure.recovery","name":"execution monitoring and failure recovery","description":"Continuously monitors agent execution for failures, timeouts, and anomalies using health checks and execution traces, implementing automatic recovery strategies including retry with exponential backoff, fallback to alternative approaches, and graceful degradation. The system logs detailed execution traces for debugging and maintains execution metrics for performance analysis.","intents":["I want the agent to automatically recover from transient failures without manual intervention","I need visibility into what the agent is doing and why it failed","I want to set reliability thresholds and have the agent adapt its behavior accordingly"],"best_for":["teams deploying agents in production with reliability requirements","developers debugging agent behavior and failure modes","builders creating resilient autonomous systems"],"limitations":["retry logic can mask underlying issues, making root cause analysis difficult","exponential backoff increases total execution time for flaky operations","no built-in mechanism for distinguishing transient vs permanent failures"],"requires":["logging infrastructure for execution traces","health check definitions for monitored operations","retry policy configuration (max attempts, backoff strategy)"],"input_types":["execution traces","health check results","failure logs"],"output_types":["recovery actions","execution metrics","failure reports"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-neoagent__cap_8","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.constraint.aware.decision.making.with.policy.enforcement","name":"constraint-aware decision making with policy enforcement","description":"Enforces user-defined constraints and policies during agent decision-making by evaluating proposed actions against constraint rules before execution. The system supports multiple constraint types including resource limits, safety guardrails, business rules, and user preferences, with explicit conflict resolution when constraints compete, preventing the agent from taking prohibited actions.","intents":["I want to set boundaries on what the agent can do (budget limits, access restrictions, etc.)","I need the agent to respect business rules and compliance requirements","I want to prevent the agent from taking certain actions even if they seem optimal"],"best_for":["teams deploying agents in regulated environments with compliance requirements","developers building agents with explicit safety constraints","builders creating agents for high-stakes domains (finance, healthcare, etc.)"],"limitations":["constraint checking adds latency to each decision (typically 50-100ms per constraint)","overly restrictive constraints can prevent the agent from achieving goals","no automatic constraint relaxation when constraints become infeasible"],"requires":["constraint definition language or schema","policy evaluation engine","conflict resolution strategy for competing constraints"],"input_types":["constraint definitions","policy rules","proposed actions"],"output_types":["constraint violations","approved actions","policy enforcement logs"],"categories":["safety-moderation","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"npm-neoagent__cap_9","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.performance.optimization.and.resource.management","name":"performance optimization and resource management","description":"Optimizes agent execution for latency and resource consumption through techniques including prompt caching, batch processing of similar tasks, and selective context pruning. The system monitors resource usage (tokens, compute, memory) and adjusts execution strategies dynamically to stay within budgets, supporting both cost optimization and latency minimization modes.","intents":["I want to reduce the cost of running the agent by optimizing token usage","I need the agent to respond quickly even with large context windows","I want to understand and control the resource consumption of agent operations"],"best_for":["teams running agents at scale with significant API costs","developers building latency-sensitive agent applications","builders optimizing agent efficiency for resource-constrained environments"],"limitations":["prompt caching can lead to stale context if cache invalidation isn't properly managed","batch processing introduces latency overhead for individual requests","context pruning can lose important information needed for accurate decisions"],"requires":["resource monitoring infrastructure","cost/latency budget definitions","caching layer (in-memory or distributed cache)"],"input_types":["execution traces","resource budgets","optimization preferences"],"output_types":["optimized execution plans","resource usage reports","cost estimates"],"categories":["automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":31,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Node.js 14+ (based on npm package registry)","clear task definitions and success criteria","system access permissions for intended autonomous actions","LLM backend with sufficient context window (8k+ tokens recommended)","structured prompt templates supporting step-by-step reasoning","logging infrastructure to capture intermediate reasoning states","Node.js 14+","function signatures compatible with JSON schema for parameter definition","error handling in tool implementations to prevent agent crashes","persistent storage backend (file system, database, or vector store)"],"failure_modes":["proactive execution without explicit guardrails can lead to unintended side effects if task scope is poorly defined","autonomous decision-making requires careful tuning of trigger conditions to avoid action spam","no built-in rollback mechanism for failed autonomous actions","multi-step reasoning increases latency proportionally to chain depth (typically 200-500ms per step)","longer reasoning chains consume more tokens, increasing API costs for cloud-based LLM backends","no automatic pruning of redundant reasoning steps","tool discovery and selection adds overhead to each decision cycle","no built-in timeout handling for long-running tool executions","parameter binding errors can cause agent execution to halt without graceful degradation","memory retrieval adds latency to each decision cycle (typically 50-200ms for semantic search)","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.19499751778296537,"quality":0.3,"ecosystem":0.39999999999999997,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.6,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.28,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:23.902Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:04:47.473Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":4456,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=neoagent","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=neoagent"}},"signature":"M0rq7G97tGGO8Ulg4WET+oe4NFyCnxb7viKWs3E8UnIdCPQOnHoVEu+pw8sORo9grjDd6j/Bwcn5re4IGJKvDw==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T16:25:32.137Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/neoagent","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/neoagent","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=neoagent","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}