{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"hf-space-nanotron--ultrascale-playbook","slug":"nanotron--ultrascale-playbook","name":"ultrascale-playbook","type":"webapp","url":"https://huggingface.co/spaces/nanotron/ultrascale-playbook","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/nanotron--ultrascale-playbook","categories":["automation"],"tags":["static","region:us"],"pricing":{"model":"free","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"hf-space-nanotron--ultrascale-playbook__cap_0","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.interactive.llm.scaling.demonstration","name":"interactive-llm-scaling-demonstration","description":"Provides a web-based interactive interface for demonstrating large language model scaling principles and training dynamics. The artifact uses a Gradio-based frontend deployed on HuggingFace Spaces to visualize how model performance, training efficiency, and inference characteristics change across different model scales. Users can adjust parameters and observe real-time or pre-computed scaling curves that illustrate relationships between model size, compute budget, and performance metrics.","intents":["understand how LLM performance scales with model parameters and training compute","visualize the relationship between training efficiency and model size for capacity planning","explore scaling laws and their implications for production deployment decisions","demonstrate scaling principles to non-technical stakeholders or team members"],"best_for":["ML researchers and engineers evaluating model scaling strategies","teams planning infrastructure investments for LLM training","educators teaching deep learning scaling concepts","practitioners making model size vs. inference cost tradeoff decisions"],"limitations":["Likely uses pre-computed scaling curves rather than live training, limiting real-time experimentation with custom datasets","Hosted on free HuggingFace Spaces tier, subject to rate limiting and potential downtime","No persistent state storage — parameter selections and analysis results are not saved between sessions","Visualization fidelity constrained by browser rendering capabilities and network latency for data transfer"],"requires":["Web browser with JavaScript enabled","Internet connectivity to access HuggingFace Spaces","No local installation required"],"input_types":["numerical parameters (model size, training compute, batch size)","categorical selections (model architecture, optimization strategy)"],"output_types":["interactive charts and graphs","numerical scaling metrics","visual comparisons across parameter ranges"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-space-nanotron--ultrascale-playbook__cap_1","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.parameter.sweep.configuration.interface","name":"parameter-sweep-configuration-interface","description":"Exposes a structured parameter configuration interface allowing users to adjust model scaling variables (e.g., model dimension, number of layers, training steps, batch size) and observe corresponding changes in predicted performance metrics. The interface likely uses Gradio sliders, dropdowns, and input fields to bind user selections to backend computation logic that evaluates scaling relationships, possibly leveraging pre-trained scaling law models or empirical data tables.","intents":["experiment with different model configurations to understand performance tradeoffs","estimate training time and compute requirements for a given model size","compare performance predictions across multiple configuration scenarios","identify optimal model size for a given compute budget constraint"],"best_for":["ML engineers designing model architectures within compute constraints","research teams exploring scaling law empirical relationships","practitioners estimating resource requirements before committing to training runs"],"limitations":["Predictions based on pre-computed scaling laws or empirical data, not live training validation","Limited to parameter ranges covered in underlying scaling law models","No ability to incorporate custom dataset characteristics or domain-specific scaling behaviors","Single-user session isolation — no collaborative parameter exploration or shared analysis"],"requires":["Web browser","Basic understanding of LLM architecture parameters (model dimension, layer count, etc.)"],"input_types":["numerical sliders and text inputs for model dimensions","dropdown selections for architecture choices"],"output_types":["numerical predictions (loss, perplexity, training time)","visual scaling curves","comparative metrics across configurations"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-space-nanotron--ultrascale-playbook__cap_2","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.scaling.law.prediction.engine","name":"scaling-law-prediction-engine","description":"Implements or wraps a computational backend that evaluates scaling law models (likely based on empirical relationships like Chinchilla scaling or similar research) to predict model performance metrics given input parameters. The engine takes model configuration inputs and returns predicted metrics such as loss, perplexity, or inference latency. This likely uses pre-trained regression models, lookup tables, or analytical formulas derived from published scaling law research.","intents":["predict final model performance before investing in training compute","estimate training duration and resource consumption for a given configuration","validate whether a proposed model size is reasonable for the available compute budget","generate scaling curves for documentation or presentation purposes"],"best_for":["teams making go/no-go decisions on model training projects","researchers validating scaling law hypotheses against new architectures","practitioners building cost estimation tools for LLM infrastructure"],"limitations":["Predictions are only as accurate as the underlying scaling law model, which may not generalize to novel architectures or datasets","Assumes standard training procedures and hyperparameter optimization — custom training regimes may violate assumptions","No uncertainty quantification or confidence intervals on predictions","Scaling laws typically derived from specific model families (e.g., Transformer-based) and may not apply to other architectures"],"requires":["Underlying scaling law model or empirical data (likely bundled with the app)","Numerical computation library (NumPy, PyTorch, or similar) on backend"],"input_types":["model configuration parameters (dimensions, layer counts, vocabulary size)","training configuration (batch size, learning rate schedule, training steps)"],"output_types":["numerical predictions (loss, perplexity, training time in hours/days)","scaling curves as arrays or visualization-ready formats"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-space-nanotron--ultrascale-playbook__cap_3","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.multi.scenario.comparative.analysis","name":"multi-scenario-comparative-analysis","description":"Enables side-by-side comparison of scaling predictions across multiple model configurations or parameter sets. Users can define or select multiple scenarios (e.g., 'small model with high learning rate' vs. 'large model with low learning rate') and view comparative metrics and visualizations. The interface likely supports scenario bookmarking or export, allowing users to save and revisit analysis results.","intents":["compare performance and cost tradeoffs between different model size options","evaluate the impact of specific hyperparameter changes on scaling behavior","present multiple design options to stakeholders with quantified tradeoffs","identify the Pareto frontier of model size vs. inference latency for deployment decisions"],"best_for":["teams evaluating multiple model candidates for a production system","researchers comparing scaling behavior across architectural variants","decision-makers needing quantified comparisons to justify model size choices"],"limitations":["Limited to scenarios that fit within the underlying scaling law model's assumptions","No statistical significance testing or confidence intervals on comparative differences","Comparison results are deterministic based on the scaling law model — no Monte Carlo or sensitivity analysis","No ability to export detailed analysis reports or integrate results into external tools"],"requires":["Web browser with support for multiple simultaneous visualizations","Basic understanding of model scaling tradeoffs"],"input_types":["multiple sets of model configuration parameters","scenario names or labels for organization"],"output_types":["side-by-side numerical comparisons","overlaid scaling curves","summary tables of key metrics"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"hf-space-nanotron--ultrascale-playbook__cap_4","uri":"capability://image.visual.web.based.interactive.visualization","name":"web-based-interactive-visualization","description":"Renders interactive charts and graphs using a web-based visualization library (likely Plotly, Matplotlib, or similar via Gradio's built-in plotting support) to display scaling curves, performance metrics, and comparative analyses. The visualizations are responsive to parameter changes, updating in real-time or near-real-time as users adjust inputs. The interface is stateless and runs entirely in the browser or via Gradio's server-side rendering.","intents":["visualize how model performance changes across a range of model sizes","explore the relationship between compute budget and achievable performance","identify inflection points or optimal configurations in scaling curves","create publication-ready figures for research papers or technical documentation"],"best_for":["visual learners who benefit from graphical representations of scaling relationships","researchers preparing figures for papers or presentations","teams conducting design reviews with non-technical stakeholders"],"limitations":["Visualization quality constrained by browser rendering capabilities and network latency","Limited customization of chart appearance (colors, fonts, axis labels) through the web interface","No export to high-resolution formats (PDF, SVG) suitable for publication without additional tools","Interactive features (zoom, pan, hover) may be slow on large datasets or low-bandwidth connections"],"requires":["Web browser with WebGL or Canvas support for smooth rendering","JavaScript enabled","Reasonable network latency (< 500ms) for responsive interaction"],"input_types":["numerical data (scaling curves, metrics)","configuration parameters that determine which data to visualize"],"output_types":["interactive HTML charts","PNG/JPG raster images (if export is supported)","raw data tables"],"categories":["image-visual","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":22,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"low","permissions":["Web browser with JavaScript enabled","Internet connectivity to access HuggingFace Spaces","No local installation required","Web browser","Basic understanding of LLM architecture parameters (model dimension, layer count, etc.)","Underlying scaling law model or empirical data (likely bundled with the app)","Numerical computation library (NumPy, PyTorch, or similar) on backend","Web browser with support for multiple simultaneous visualizations","Basic understanding of model scaling tradeoffs","Web browser with WebGL or Canvas support for smooth rendering"],"failure_modes":["Likely uses pre-computed scaling curves rather than live training, limiting real-time experimentation with custom datasets","Hosted on free HuggingFace Spaces tier, subject to rate limiting and potential downtime","No persistent state storage — parameter selections and analysis results are not saved between sessions","Visualization fidelity constrained by browser rendering capabilities and network latency for data transfer","Predictions based on pre-computed scaling laws or empirical data, not live training validation","Limited to parameter ranges covered in underlying scaling law models","No ability to incorporate custom dataset characteristics or domain-specific scaling behaviors","Single-user session isolation — no collaborative parameter exploration or shared analysis","Predictions are only as accurate as the underlying scaling law model, which may not generalize to novel architectures or datasets","Assumes standard training procedures and hyperparameter optimization — custom training regimes may violate assumptions","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.36,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:23.325Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:22:48.012Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=nanotron--ultrascale-playbook","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=nanotron--ultrascale-playbook"}},"signature":"wIdfGOmo937+SSTAH2KhJ0hCGrqn8k2EVWukM1BVF6hIlC0SroYuavXzrydh9CAyv6/4/LxBRlxWqiuKLFPADA==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T02:45:22.433Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/nanotron--ultrascale-playbook","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/nanotron--ultrascale-playbook","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=nanotron--ultrascale-playbook","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}