{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_my-legacy-ai","slug":"my-legacy-ai","name":"My-Legacy.ai","type":"product","url":"https://my-legacy.ai","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/my-legacy-ai","categories":["text-writing"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_my-legacy-ai__cap_0","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.personalized.estate.plan.generation.with.family.structure.mapping","name":"personalized-estate-plan-generation-with-family-structure-mapping","description":"Generates customized estate planning documents and recommendations by ingesting user-provided family structure, asset inventory, and personal preferences, then mapping these inputs through a knowledge graph of estate planning scenarios to produce tailored guidance. The system appears to use conversational AI to iteratively gather family and financial details, then synthesizes this context into structured estate plan recommendations rather than applying generic templates.","intents":["I need to understand what documents I should create based on my family size and asset types","I want personalized advice on how to structure my estate given my specific dependents and financial situation","I need help organizing my assets and identifying gaps in my current estate planning"],"best_for":["individuals with straightforward family structures seeking initial estate planning guidance","people wanting to organize financial information before attorney consultation","users in states with relatively standard probate procedures looking for baseline recommendations"],"limitations":["Cannot handle complex multi-jurisdictional estates or blended family scenarios with competing interests","State-specific probate law variations not fully mapped — may produce generic advice that doesn't account for local tax implications or filing requirements","No ability to validate recommendations against actual state statutes or recent legal precedent changes","Lacks integration with actual legal document generation tools — produces guidance only, not executable legal documents"],"requires":["User willingness to share detailed family structure and asset information","Internet connection for cloud-based AI inference","Basic understanding of personal financial situation (asset types, approximate values, dependent names)"],"input_types":["conversational text input describing family structure","structured data about asset types and approximate values","personal preferences and goals for estate distribution"],"output_types":["natural language estate planning recommendations","structured checklist of recommended documents","personalized action plan with prioritized next steps"],"categories":["text-generation-language","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_my-legacy-ai__cap_1","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.privacy.preserving.sensitive.data.handling.with.encryption","name":"privacy-preserving-sensitive-data-handling-with-encryption","description":"Implements a privacy-first data architecture that encrypts or locally processes sensitive financial and family information, preventing transmission of personally identifiable information to external legal databases or third-party analytics services. The system likely uses client-side encryption, differential privacy techniques, or local inference to ensure that detailed asset and family data never leaves the user's control in plaintext form.","intents":["I want to share detailed financial information without worrying it will be sold or breached","I need assurance that my family structure and asset details remain confidential","I'm concerned about data privacy implications of traditional estate planning services"],"best_for":["users with high-net-worth estates concerned about data breaches or privacy violations","individuals in sensitive professions (government, healthcare, finance) requiring confidentiality","privacy-conscious users skeptical of traditional legal service data practices"],"limitations":["Privacy guarantees only as strong as the underlying encryption implementation — no third-party security audit details provided","Local processing may limit AI model sophistication or real-time updates to legal knowledge","Cannot leverage aggregated anonymized data from other users to improve recommendations (privacy-utility tradeoff)","No clear mechanism for secure data deletion or account termination"],"requires":["HTTPS/TLS connection to service","User trust in stated privacy practices (no independent verification mechanism visible)","Modern browser with encryption support"],"input_types":["personally identifiable information (names, relationships)","financial data (asset types, values, account details)","health/medical information (if relevant to guardianship planning)"],"output_types":["encrypted local storage of user profile","privacy-compliant recommendations without data leakage"],"categories":["safety-moderation","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_my-legacy-ai__cap_2","uri":"capability://memory.knowledge.state.specific.probate.and.tax.guidance.lookup","name":"state-specific-probate-and-tax-guidance-lookup","description":"Provides jurisdiction-aware estate planning recommendations by querying a knowledge base of state-specific probate laws, inheritance tax rules, and filing requirements. The system likely maintains a structured database mapping states to key legal variations (community property vs. common law, estate tax thresholds, probate exemptions) and uses this to contextualize recommendations, though the depth and currency of this database is unclear.","intents":["I need to understand how my state's probate laws affect my estate plan","I want to know if my state has inheritance or estate taxes that impact my planning","I need guidance on whether I should use a trust or will based on my state's requirements"],"best_for":["users in states with straightforward probate procedures and standard tax regimes","individuals seeking high-level understanding of state-specific implications before attorney consultation","people in low-tax states where federal planning is the primary concern"],"limitations":["Knowledge base currency unclear — probate laws change frequently and AI training data may be outdated","No mechanism to verify recommendations against current state statutes or recent court decisions","Cannot handle multi-state estates or property held in different jurisdictions","Complex tax scenarios (generation-skipping transfers, QTIP trusts, dynasty trusts) likely beyond scope","No integration with state-specific filing systems or document requirements"],"requires":["User to specify their state of residence","Assumption that user's primary assets are in that state","Current state probate code and tax law (system responsibility)"],"input_types":["state of residence","asset types and approximate values","family structure and dependent information"],"output_types":["state-specific probate process overview","tax implications summary","document checklist tailored to state requirements"],"categories":["memory-knowledge","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_my-legacy-ai__cap_3","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.interactive.asset.inventory.and.beneficiary.mapping","name":"interactive-asset-inventory-and-beneficiary-mapping","description":"Provides a conversational interface for users to catalog their assets, identify beneficiaries, and map asset distribution preferences through guided questioning. The system likely uses a structured data model to organize asset types (real estate, investments, retirement accounts, digital assets) and beneficiary relationships, then visualizes or summarizes this information to help users identify gaps or conflicts in their estate plan.","intents":["I need to create a comprehensive list of all my assets and who should inherit them","I want to identify which assets have existing beneficiary designations and which don't","I need to organize my digital assets and ensure someone can access them after I'm gone"],"best_for":["individuals with moderate asset complexity (primary residence, investment accounts, retirement savings)","users wanting to organize financial information before meeting with an attorney","people concerned about digital asset access and succession planning"],"limitations":["Cannot integrate with actual financial institutions to auto-import asset data — requires manual entry","No real-time valuation or market data integration for investment accounts","Limited ability to handle complex assets (business interests, intellectual property, international holdings)","No mechanism to flag beneficiary designation conflicts or tax-inefficient distributions","Digital asset access mechanisms (password management, account recovery) not integrated"],"requires":["User knowledge of their asset types and approximate values","Willingness to enter detailed financial information","Understanding of beneficiary relationships and preferences"],"input_types":["conversational text describing assets","structured input for asset type, value, and location","beneficiary names and relationships"],"output_types":["organized asset inventory with categorization","beneficiary mapping visualization","checklist of assets requiring beneficiary designation updates"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_my-legacy-ai__cap_4","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.document.recommendation.and.prioritization.engine","name":"document-recommendation-and-prioritization-engine","description":"Analyzes user profile (family structure, asset types, goals) and recommends a prioritized list of estate planning documents with explanations of why each is needed. The system likely uses a decision tree or rule-based engine to determine which documents are essential (will, healthcare directive) versus optional (trust, UTMA accounts) based on user circumstances, then ranks them by implementation priority and complexity.","intents":["I don't know what estate planning documents I actually need — what should I prioritize?","I want to understand why each document is recommended for my specific situation","I need a roadmap for implementing my estate plan in phases based on complexity and urgency"],"best_for":["first-time estate planners unsure what documents to create","users with limited budgets wanting to prioritize essential documents","individuals seeking to understand document purposes before attorney consultation"],"limitations":["Recommendations are advisory only and cannot replace attorney guidance on document necessity","Cannot account for complex family dynamics or unusual circumstances that might change document priorities","No integration with actual document drafting tools — provides recommendations only","Prioritization logic not transparent — users cannot understand why certain documents are ranked higher","No mechanism to track implementation progress or flag when documents become outdated"],"requires":["Complete user profile with family structure and asset information","User understanding of their goals and concerns","Willingness to follow recommendations (advisory only)"],"input_types":["user profile data (family, assets, goals)","state of residence","special circumstances (minor children, special needs dependents, business ownership)"],"output_types":["ranked list of recommended documents","explanation of purpose for each document","implementation roadmap with estimated complexity and timeline"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_my-legacy-ai__cap_5","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.goal.based.estate.planning.scenario.modeling","name":"goal-based-estate-planning-scenario-modeling","description":"Allows users to define estate planning goals (minimize taxes, ensure minor children are cared for, equitable distribution among beneficiaries) and models how different planning strategies would achieve those goals. The system likely uses scenario simulation to show outcomes of different approaches (trust vs. will, lifetime gifts vs. testamentary transfers) and helps users understand tradeoffs between competing objectives.","intents":["I want to minimize estate taxes — what strategies would work best for my situation?","How can I ensure my minor children are cared for if something happens to me?","I want to treat my children fairly but they have different financial needs — what's the best approach?"],"best_for":["users with multiple competing estate planning goals","individuals wanting to understand tradeoffs between different planning strategies","people with moderate complexity (multiple children, significant assets, tax concerns)"],"limitations":["Scenario modeling is simplified and cannot account for market volatility, inflation, or changing family circumstances","Tax projections are estimates only and not binding — actual tax liability depends on future law changes and execution","Cannot model complex strategies like dynasty trusts, charitable remainder trusts, or grantor retained annuity trusts","No integration with actual tax software or professional tax planning tools","Modeling assumptions not transparent — users cannot understand how scenarios are calculated"],"requires":["Clear articulation of user goals and priorities","Asset and income information for modeling","Understanding that projections are estimates only"],"input_types":["user goals (tax minimization, asset protection, family harmony, etc.)","asset types and values","family structure and beneficiary information","risk tolerance and preferences"],"output_types":["scenario comparison showing outcomes of different strategies","projected tax implications for each scenario","recommendation of best-fit strategy based on goals","explanation of tradeoffs and assumptions"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_my-legacy-ai__cap_6","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.healthcare.and.incapacity.planning.guidance","name":"healthcare-and-incapacity-planning-guidance","description":"Provides guidance on healthcare directives, powers of attorney, and incapacity planning documents by asking about healthcare preferences, end-of-life wishes, and trusted decision-makers. The system likely uses a questionnaire format to gather preferences and then generates recommendations for healthcare planning documents and decision-maker selection, though it cannot provide medical advice or replace healthcare provider consultation.","intents":["I need to document my healthcare wishes and end-of-life preferences","I want to designate someone to make medical decisions if I become incapacitated","I need to create a healthcare directive that reflects my values and beliefs"],"best_for":["individuals wanting to document healthcare preferences and incapacity planning","people concerned about end-of-life decision-making and medical autonomy","users in states with standard healthcare directive requirements"],"limitations":["Cannot provide medical advice or guidance on specific health conditions","Healthcare directive requirements vary significantly by state — recommendations may not comply with local law","No integration with healthcare providers or medical records systems","Cannot validate that designated decision-makers are willing or able to serve","Sensitive medical information collected but not integrated with actual healthcare providers"],"requires":["User willingness to discuss healthcare preferences and end-of-life wishes","Identification of trusted decision-makers","State of residence for jurisdiction-specific guidance"],"input_types":["healthcare preferences and end-of-life wishes","medical conditions or concerns (for context only)","designated healthcare decision-makers","religious or cultural values affecting healthcare decisions"],"output_types":["healthcare directive recommendations","power of attorney for healthcare guidance","HIPAA authorization recommendations","conversation starters for healthcare provider discussions"],"categories":["text-generation-language","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_my-legacy-ai__cap_7","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.guardian.and.custodian.planning.for.minor.children","name":"guardian-and-custodian-planning-for-minor-children","description":"Guides users through the process of selecting guardians for minor children and custodians for assets, with prompts to consider factors like values alignment, geographic proximity, financial responsibility, and willingness to serve. The system likely uses a structured questionnaire to help users think through guardian selection criteria and document their preferences, though it cannot validate that selected guardians will actually accept the role.","intents":["I need to decide who should raise my children if something happens to me","I want to ensure my children's assets are managed responsibly if I die before they're adults","I need to have conversations with potential guardians about my expectations"],"best_for":["parents with minor children wanting to document guardian preferences","individuals concerned about asset management for young beneficiaries","users wanting to think through guardian selection criteria systematically"],"limitations":["Cannot validate that selected guardians are willing or able to serve — requires separate conversations","No mechanism to track whether guardians have agreed to serve or updated their own estate plans","Cannot account for complex family dynamics or potential conflicts between guardians and other family members","Guardianship laws vary by state — recommendations may not reflect local requirements for guardian designation","No integration with actual guardianship documents or court filing processes"],"requires":["Identification of potential guardians","Consideration of values alignment and practical factors","Willingness to have conversations with potential guardians"],"input_types":["names and ages of minor children","potential guardian candidates","values and parenting philosophy","geographic and practical considerations"],"output_types":["guardian selection criteria and evaluation","conversation starters for potential guardians","custodian selection guidance for asset management","documentation of preferences for will or trust"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_my-legacy-ai__cap_8","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.legal.compliance.and.disclaimer.management","name":"legal-compliance-and-disclaimer-management","description":"Manages disclaimers and compliance messaging to clarify that AI recommendations are not legal advice and cannot replace attorney consultation. The system likely includes prominent disclaimers, limitations statements, and guidance directing users to seek professional legal review before implementing recommendations, though the effectiveness of these disclaimers in protecting against liability is unclear.","intents":["I need to understand the limitations of AI-generated estate planning guidance","I want to know when I should consult with an attorney instead of relying on AI recommendations","I need to understand what legal liability I accept by using this tool"],"best_for":["users seeking initial guidance before attorney consultation","individuals wanting to understand AI limitations in legal planning","people concerned about legal liability and professional review requirements"],"limitations":["Disclaimers may not provide adequate legal protection if users treat AI recommendations as final legal advice","No mechanism to verify that users have consulted with attorneys before implementing recommendations","Liability exposure unclear — unclear whether disclaimers adequately protect against claims of unauthorized practice of law","No integration with attorney referral or document review services","Compliance requirements vary by jurisdiction — disclaimers may not address all regulatory concerns"],"requires":["User acknowledgment of disclaimers and limitations","Understanding that recommendations are advisory only","Commitment to seek professional legal review before implementation"],"input_types":["user acknowledgment of terms and disclaimers"],"output_types":["disclaimer and limitation statements","guidance on when to consult with attorneys","explanation of AI capabilities and limitations"],"categories":["safety-moderation","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":39,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["User willingness to share detailed family structure and asset information","Internet connection for cloud-based AI inference","Basic understanding of personal financial situation (asset types, approximate values, dependent names)","HTTPS/TLS connection to service","User trust in stated privacy practices (no independent verification mechanism visible)","Modern browser with encryption support","User to specify their state of residence","Assumption that user's primary assets are in that state","Current state probate code and tax law (system responsibility)","User knowledge of their asset types and approximate values"],"failure_modes":["Cannot handle complex multi-jurisdictional estates or blended family scenarios with competing interests","State-specific probate law variations not fully mapped — may produce generic advice that doesn't account for local tax implications or filing requirements","No ability to validate recommendations against actual state statutes or recent legal precedent changes","Lacks integration with actual legal document generation tools — produces guidance only, not executable legal documents","Privacy guarantees only as strong as the underlying encryption implementation — no third-party security audit details provided","Local processing may limit AI model sophistication or real-time updates to legal knowledge","Cannot leverage aggregated anonymized data from other users to improve recommendations (privacy-utility tradeoff)","No clear mechanism for secure data deletion or account termination","Knowledge base currency unclear — probate laws change frequently and AI training data may be outdated","No mechanism to verify recommendations against current state statutes or recent court decisions","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.31666666666666665,"quality":0.67,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:31.858Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.560Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=my-legacy-ai","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=my-legacy-ai"}},"signature":"ZhWwG3TdDdv8U9JMB3hAW5gCOnvkTiLBfHwyX8cPyJVLo78aRyxtWP87BJcYE1bujXIbQwvhSYH5+334czfcCg==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T20:14:57.214Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/my-legacy-ai","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/my-legacy-ai","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=my-legacy-ai","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}