{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_monitaur","slug":"monitaur","name":"Monitaur","type":"product","url":"https://www.monitaur.ai","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/monitaur","categories":["automation"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_monitaur__cap_0","uri":"capability://ai.governance.continuous.ai.model.monitoring","name":"continuous-ai-model-monitoring","description":"Automatically monitors deployed AI models for performance degradation, data drift, and behavioral anomalies in real-time. Generates alerts when models deviate from expected baselines without requiring manual checks.","intents":["I need to know when my AI models are performing worse than expected","I want to catch model drift before it impacts production","I need continuous visibility into model health across all deployments"],"best_for":["ML ops teams","enterprise AI deployment teams","compliance-focused organizations"],"limitations":["Requires integration with model serving infrastructure","Effectiveness depends on quality of baseline metrics","May generate false positives if thresholds not properly tuned"],"requires":["Deployed AI models with accessible metrics","Historical baseline data","Integration with model serving platform"],"input_types":["model predictions","inference logs","performance metrics"],"output_types":["alerts","monitoring dashboards","drift reports"],"categories":["AI governance","monitoring","risk management"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_monitaur__cap_1","uri":"capability://compliance.automated.compliance.audit.trail","name":"automated-compliance-audit-trail","description":"Creates and maintains comprehensive audit logs of all AI system decisions, inputs, and outputs for regulatory compliance. Automatically captures evidence needed for SOC 2, HIPAA, and other compliance frameworks without manual documentation.","intents":["I need to prove to auditors what decisions my AI systems made and why","I want to maintain a complete record of AI system activity for compliance","I need to demonstrate that our AI governance meets regulatory requirements"],"best_for":["regulated industries (finance, healthcare, legal)","enterprises undergoing compliance audits","teams managing multiple AI applications"],"limitations":["Requires integration at inference time","Storage costs scale with volume of AI decisions","May impact latency if not properly optimized"],"requires":["Access to AI system inputs/outputs","Compliance framework definitions","Storage infrastructure"],"input_types":["model inputs","model outputs","user interactions","system events"],"output_types":["audit logs","compliance reports","evidence artifacts"],"categories":["compliance","governance","risk management"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_monitaur__cap_10","uri":"capability://monitoring.model.performance.regression.detection","name":"model-performance-regression-detection","description":"Detects when AI model performance degrades over time or after updates, comparing current performance against historical baselines. Alerts teams to performance regressions before they impact users or business outcomes.","intents":["I need to know immediately if a model update made performance worse","I want to catch performance degradation before it affects users","I need to validate that model improvements actually work in production"],"best_for":["ML ops teams","model development teams","production AI systems"],"limitations":["Requires stable baseline metrics","May be noisy in early deployment phases","Requires sufficient data volume for statistical significance"],"requires":["Historical performance data","current model metrics","baseline definitions"],"input_types":["model predictions","performance metrics","ground truth labels"],"output_types":["regression alerts","performance comparisons","rollback recommendations"],"categories":["monitoring","quality assurance","operations"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_monitaur__cap_11","uri":"capability://governance.configurable.governance.framework.builder","name":"configurable-governance-framework-builder","description":"Provides tools to define and customize governance frameworks tailored to specific organizational needs and regulatory requirements. Enables teams to build governance policies without requiring engineering resources.","intents":["I need to create governance policies specific to our industry and regulations","I want non-technical team members to define and update governance rules","I need to adapt governance as our compliance requirements change"],"best_for":["compliance teams","governance officers","organizations with custom requirements"],"limitations":["Requires understanding of governance concepts","Complex policies may still need technical support","Framework flexibility is bounded by platform capabilities"],"requires":["Governance requirements documentation","regulatory framework knowledge","user access to configuration tools"],"input_types":["policy requirements","regulatory documents","organizational rules"],"output_types":["policy definitions","governance frameworks","enforcement rules"],"categories":["governance","configuration","compliance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_monitaur__cap_2","uri":"capability://governance.policy.enforcement.across.ai.workflows","name":"policy-enforcement-across-ai-workflows","description":"Enforces configurable governance policies across AI workflows, blocking or flagging decisions that violate organizational rules. Enables teams to define custom policies for bias detection, output validation, and risk thresholds without code changes.","intents":["I want to prevent my AI systems from making decisions that violate our policies","I need to enforce consistent governance rules across all AI applications","I want to block high-risk outputs before they reach users"],"best_for":["governance teams","risk management departments","enterprises with complex compliance needs"],"limitations":["Policy effectiveness depends on rule definition quality","May require iterative tuning to avoid over-blocking","Complex policies can impact inference latency"],"requires":["Clear policy definitions","Access to model outputs","Integration with inference pipeline"],"input_types":["policy rules","model outputs","contextual data"],"output_types":["policy violations","blocked decisions","enforcement logs"],"categories":["governance","risk management","compliance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_monitaur__cap_3","uri":"capability://ai.governance.hallucination.detection.and.flagging","name":"hallucination-detection-and-flagging","description":"Identifies and flags instances where AI models generate false, misleading, or unsupported information. Automatically detects hallucinations in LLM outputs and other generative AI systems to prevent misinformation.","intents":["I need to catch when my AI generates false information before users see it","I want to measure the hallucination rate of my LLMs in production","I need to flag potentially unreliable AI outputs for human review"],"best_for":["teams using LLMs or generative AI","customer-facing AI applications","organizations prioritizing output reliability"],"limitations":["Detection accuracy varies by domain and complexity","May require domain-specific training data","False positive rates can be high without tuning"],"requires":["Generative AI model outputs","Reference data or knowledge bases","Human review capacity for flagged outputs"],"input_types":["model outputs","source documents","context data"],"output_types":["hallucination flags","confidence scores","review queues"],"categories":["AI governance","quality assurance","risk management"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_monitaur__cap_4","uri":"capability://security.prompt.injection.attack.detection","name":"prompt-injection-attack-detection","description":"Detects and blocks prompt injection attempts that try to manipulate AI system behavior through malicious inputs. Identifies suspicious patterns in user inputs designed to override system instructions or extract sensitive information.","intents":["I need to protect my AI systems from prompt injection attacks","I want to detect when users try to manipulate my AI's behavior","I need to prevent attackers from extracting sensitive data through prompt manipulation"],"best_for":["teams deploying LLMs or chat-based AI","customer-facing AI applications","security-conscious organizations"],"limitations":["Detection can be evaded by sophisticated attacks","May require continuous updates as attack patterns evolve","Can block legitimate edge-case inputs"],"requires":["User input access","Attack pattern definitions","Integration with input validation"],"input_types":["user prompts","system instructions","historical attack patterns"],"output_types":["injection alerts","blocked inputs","threat reports"],"categories":["security","governance","risk management"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_monitaur__cap_5","uri":"capability://governance.bias.and.fairness.monitoring","name":"bias-and-fairness-monitoring","description":"Continuously monitors AI model outputs for demographic bias, fairness violations, and discriminatory patterns across protected attributes. Generates reports on fairness metrics and identifies when models treat different groups inequitably.","intents":["I need to ensure my AI systems don't discriminate against protected groups","I want to measure fairness metrics across my AI deployments","I need to demonstrate that our AI meets fairness requirements to regulators"],"best_for":["regulated industries (lending, hiring, insurance)","organizations with fairness commitments","teams managing high-stakes AI decisions"],"limitations":["Requires definition of protected attributes and fairness metrics","Fairness is context-dependent and subjective","May require significant historical data for statistical significance"],"requires":["Model predictions with demographic data","Fairness metric definitions","Historical outcome data"],"input_types":["model predictions","demographic attributes","actual outcomes"],"output_types":["fairness reports","bias alerts","metric dashboards"],"categories":["governance","risk management","compliance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_monitaur__cap_6","uri":"capability://compliance.automated.compliance.reporting","name":"automated-compliance-reporting","description":"Generates compliance reports and evidence artifacts automatically based on collected audit data and monitoring results. Creates documentation needed for regulatory audits, certifications, and stakeholder reviews without manual compilation.","intents":["I need to prepare compliance documentation for auditors quickly","I want to generate SOC 2 or HIPAA compliance reports automatically","I need to demonstrate governance maturity to stakeholders and regulators"],"best_for":["compliance officers","audit teams","enterprises undergoing certifications"],"limitations":["Report quality depends on underlying data quality","May require customization for specific regulatory frameworks","Cannot replace human compliance review"],"requires":["Audit trail data","Compliance framework definitions","Policy documentation"],"input_types":["audit logs","monitoring data","policy records"],"output_types":["compliance reports","audit evidence","certification documentation"],"categories":["compliance","governance","reporting"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_monitaur__cap_7","uri":"capability://governance.multi.model.governance.orchestration","name":"multi-model-governance-orchestration","description":"Manages governance policies and monitoring across multiple AI models and applications from a centralized platform. Enables consistent policy enforcement and compliance tracking across diverse AI systems without managing each separately.","intents":["I need to manage governance for 10+ AI applications from one place","I want to enforce consistent policies across different models and teams","I need a single view of compliance status across all our AI systems"],"best_for":["large enterprises with multiple AI deployments","organizations with distributed AI teams","enterprises scaling AI operations"],"limitations":["Requires integration with each AI system","Complexity increases with number of models","May require custom integrations for legacy systems"],"requires":["Multiple AI model deployments","Centralized governance policies","Integration capabilities"],"input_types":["model metadata","policy definitions","monitoring data from multiple sources"],"output_types":["unified dashboards","cross-model reports","centralized alerts"],"categories":["governance","operations","management"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_monitaur__cap_8","uri":"capability://risk.management.risk.assessment.automation","name":"risk-assessment-automation","description":"Automatically assesses and scores risks associated with AI system deployments based on model characteristics, data sensitivity, and use case criticality. Generates risk profiles and recommendations without manual risk analysis.","intents":["I need to quickly assess the risk level of a new AI deployment","I want to prioritize which AI systems need the most governance attention","I need to document risk assessments for compliance and stakeholder reviews"],"best_for":["risk management teams","AI governance committees","enterprises deploying new AI systems"],"limitations":["Risk assessment depends on accurate input data","May miss domain-specific risks","Requires human judgment for final risk decisions"],"requires":["Model metadata","data sensitivity classifications","use case descriptions"],"input_types":["model specifications","data characteristics","deployment context"],"output_types":["risk scores","risk profiles","mitigation recommendations"],"categories":["risk management","governance","assessment"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_monitaur__cap_9","uri":"capability://governance.data.lineage.and.provenance.tracking","name":"data-lineage-and-provenance-tracking","description":"Tracks the complete lineage of data flowing through AI systems, documenting where data originates, how it's transformed, and where it's used. Provides visibility into data provenance for compliance and debugging purposes.","intents":["I need to trace where the data in my AI system came from for compliance","I want to understand how data flows through my AI pipeline","I need to identify which AI systems use specific sensitive data"],"best_for":["data governance teams","compliance officers","organizations handling sensitive data"],"limitations":["Requires integration with data pipelines","Tracking overhead can impact performance","Complex data transformations may be difficult to trace"],"requires":["Access to data pipelines","metadata collection infrastructure","integration points"],"input_types":["data sources","transformation logs","model inputs"],"output_types":["lineage diagrams","provenance reports","data flow documentation"],"categories":["governance","data management","compliance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":44,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"low","permissions":["Deployed AI models with accessible metrics","Historical baseline data","Integration with model serving platform","Access to AI system inputs/outputs","Compliance framework definitions","Storage infrastructure","Historical performance data","current model metrics","baseline definitions","Governance requirements documentation"],"failure_modes":["Requires integration with model serving infrastructure","Effectiveness depends on quality of baseline metrics","May generate false positives if thresholds not properly tuned","Requires integration at inference time","Storage costs scale with volume of AI decisions","May impact latency if not properly optimized","Requires stable baseline metrics","May be noisy in early deployment phases","Requires sufficient data volume for statistical significance","Requires understanding of governance concepts","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.39999999999999997,"quality":0.82,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:31.858Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.545Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=monitaur","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=monitaur"}},"signature":"Egq7/ZjoM6lwNMaDEACfWD1+gM+gD/ESJvefm0Toybi2y2ehI0Ons+70qKo9mLljqwFEo3Khmtw8LQ3c1AUSBg==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T06:55:34.481Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/monitaur","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/monitaur","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=monitaur","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}