{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"openrouter-minimax-minimax-m2","slug":"minimax-minimax-m2","name":"MiniMax: MiniMax M2","type":"model","url":"https://openrouter.ai/models/minimax~minimax-m2","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/minimax-minimax-m2","categories":["ai-agents"],"tags":["minimax","api-access","text"],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":"$2.55e-7 per prompt token"},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"openrouter-minimax-minimax-m2__cap_0","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.end.to.end.code.generation.with.agentic.reasoning","name":"end-to-end code generation with agentic reasoning","description":"Generates production-ready code across multiple programming languages by combining 10B activated parameters with chain-of-thought reasoning patterns optimized for multi-step coding tasks. The model uses a mixture-of-experts architecture (230B total parameters, 10B active) to route coding queries through specialized expert pathways, enabling context-aware code synthesis that maintains state across agent iterations without requiring external memory systems.","intents":["Generate complete function implementations from natural language specifications","Build multi-file code solutions for complex agentic workflows","Refactor existing code while maintaining semantic equivalence","Debug code by reasoning through execution traces and error messages"],"best_for":["Solo developers building LLM-powered coding agents","Teams prototyping multi-step automation workflows","Startups needing efficient inference for code-heavy applications"],"limitations":["Context window size not specified in artifact — may constrain multi-file reasoning","No built-in code execution or validation — generated code requires external testing","Mixture-of-experts routing adds latency variance compared to dense models","No fine-tuning API exposed — limited customization for domain-specific coding patterns"],"requires":["API key for MiniMax or OpenRouter proxy","HTTP client capable of streaming responses","Code execution environment for validation (external)"],"input_types":["natural language prompts","code snippets","error messages and stack traces","structured specifications (JSON, YAML)"],"output_types":["source code (Python, JavaScript, Go, Rust, etc.)","multi-file code structures","explanations with code","refactored code with diffs"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-minimax-minimax-m2__cap_1","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.general.reasoning.with.structured.output","name":"general reasoning with structured output","description":"Performs multi-step reasoning across diverse domains (math, logic, knowledge retrieval) using chain-of-thought decomposition patterns embedded in the model weights. The architecture supports both free-form reasoning and structured output generation through prompt-based formatting, enabling downstream systems to parse model outputs as JSON, YAML, or other structured formats without requiring external parsing layers.","intents":["Solve multi-step math and logic problems with intermediate reasoning steps","Answer complex questions requiring synthesis across multiple knowledge domains","Generate structured outputs (JSON, YAML) for downstream system integration","Perform few-shot learning by reasoning through examples in context"],"best_for":["Developers building reasoning-heavy chatbots or Q&A systems","Teams integrating LLM reasoning into data pipelines","Applications requiring structured extraction without dedicated NER/entity models"],"limitations":["Reasoning quality degrades on highly specialized domains (medical, legal) compared to frontier models","No explicit constraint enforcement — structured outputs may be malformed without post-processing","Chain-of-thought reasoning increases token consumption and latency vs direct answers","No built-in fact verification — outputs may contain hallucinations on obscure knowledge"],"requires":["API key for MiniMax or OpenRouter","JSON schema or format specification in prompt for structured outputs","Post-processing validation layer for mission-critical applications"],"input_types":["natural language questions","mathematical expressions","logical puzzles","few-shot examples"],"output_types":["natural language reasoning with steps","structured JSON/YAML","mathematical solutions","logical conclusions"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-minimax-minimax-m2__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.agentic.workflow.orchestration.via.api","name":"agentic workflow orchestration via api","description":"Supports multi-turn conversational state management and function-calling patterns through OpenRouter's API interface, enabling agents to maintain context across sequential API calls and invoke external tools via structured function schemas. The model integrates with standard function-calling conventions (OpenAI-compatible format) to enable tool use without custom integration code, routing function calls through the sparse expert network for efficient decision-making.","intents":["Build multi-turn agents that maintain conversation history across API calls","Invoke external APIs and tools through structured function schemas","Implement ReAct-style agents with reasoning and action loops","Chain multiple tool calls in sequence with context preservation"],"best_for":["Developers building autonomous agents with external tool integration","Teams implementing ReAct or similar agentic patterns","Applications requiring stateless function-calling without persistent memory"],"limitations":["No built-in memory persistence — conversation state must be managed by caller","Function-calling latency depends on OpenRouter infrastructure, not model alone","No native support for parallel tool execution — sequential calls only","Context window constraints may limit multi-turn conversation depth"],"requires":["OpenRouter API key","HTTP client with streaming support","Function schema definitions in OpenAI format","Caller-side conversation state management"],"input_types":["natural language user messages","function schemas (JSON)","previous conversation turns","tool execution results"],"output_types":["natural language responses","function calls (structured JSON)","tool invocation decisions","multi-turn conversation continuations"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-minimax-minimax-m2__cap_3","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.efficient.inference.via.sparse.expert.routing","name":"efficient inference via sparse expert routing","description":"Achieves near-frontier model performance through mixture-of-experts architecture that selectively activates 10 billion parameters from a 230 billion parameter pool based on input tokens. The routing mechanism learns to direct different input types (code, reasoning, general text) to specialized expert subnetworks, reducing per-token computation and memory requirements compared to dense models while maintaining output quality through expert specialization.","intents":["Deploy LLM applications with reduced inference latency and cost","Run models on resource-constrained infrastructure (edge devices, smaller GPUs)","Scale inference throughput by reducing per-token compute requirements","Maintain model quality while optimizing for production efficiency"],"best_for":["Cost-sensitive applications requiring high throughput","Teams deploying models on edge infrastructure or smaller GPUs","Startups optimizing inference spend for production workloads"],"limitations":["Sparse activation introduces routing latency variance — not suitable for strict SLA requirements","Expert imbalance during training may cause load skew in production","Mixture-of-experts models require more memory during inference than dense equivalents (full parameter set in VRAM)","Limited transparency into expert specialization — difficult to debug routing decisions"],"requires":["GPU with sufficient VRAM for 230B parameter storage (estimated 460GB in fp16)","OpenRouter API abstracts hardware requirements for cloud inference","Inference framework supporting mixture-of-experts (vLLM, TensorRT-LLM, or equivalent)"],"input_types":["any text input (code, natural language, structured data)"],"output_types":["text completions","structured outputs"],"categories":["automation-workflow","code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-minimax-minimax-m2__cap_4","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.multi.language.code.understanding.and.generation","name":"multi-language code understanding and generation","description":"Generates and understands code across 10+ programming languages (Python, JavaScript, Go, Rust, Java, C++, etc.) through language-agnostic token representations and cross-language training data. The model learns syntactic and semantic patterns common across languages, enabling code translation, cross-language refactoring, and polyglot project understanding without language-specific fine-tuning.","intents":["Generate code in multiple languages from a single specification","Translate code between programming languages while preserving logic","Understand and refactor codebases mixing multiple languages","Explain code concepts across language boundaries"],"best_for":["Polyglot development teams working across multiple languages","Developers building code migration tools","Teams needing cross-language code generation for microservices"],"limitations":["Language-specific idioms and best practices may be inconsistent across languages","Performance characteristics (e.g., memory efficiency) not preserved in translations","Specialized languages (CUDA, Verilog, domain-specific languages) have lower quality","No built-in linting or style enforcement — generated code may violate project conventions"],"requires":["API key for MiniMax or OpenRouter","Language specification in prompt or system message","Target language syntax reference for validation"],"input_types":["natural language specifications","code snippets in any supported language","polyglot code samples","language-agnostic pseudocode"],"output_types":["source code in specified language","translated code","cross-language explanations","polyglot project structures"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-minimax-minimax-m2__cap_5","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.context.aware.code.completion.with.codebase.understanding","name":"context-aware code completion with codebase understanding","description":"Completes code by understanding surrounding context, including function signatures, variable types, and project patterns, through attention mechanisms that weight nearby tokens and learned code structure patterns. The model uses implicit codebase understanding (learned from training data) rather than explicit indexing, enabling completion without external code search or AST parsing infrastructure.","intents":["Auto-complete code with context-aware suggestions","Predict function implementations from signatures and docstrings","Generate variable names and identifiers matching project conventions","Complete code patterns based on surrounding code structure"],"best_for":["Developers using IDE plugins or editor integrations","Teams building code completion features into custom tools","Applications requiring lightweight completion without external indexing"],"limitations":["No explicit codebase indexing — completion quality degrades for large projects with unique patterns","Context window limits prevent full-file understanding for large files","Implicit pattern learning may miss project-specific conventions not present in training data","No real-time adaptation to new code patterns within a session"],"requires":["API key for MiniMax or OpenRouter","Surrounding code context (prefix and suffix)","Optional: language specification for better formatting"],"input_types":["code prefix (incomplete code)","code suffix (context after cursor)","language identifier","optional docstrings or type hints"],"output_types":["code completions","multiple completion candidates","completion confidence scores"],"categories":["code-generation-editing"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-minimax-minimax-m2__cap_6","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.conversational.chat.with.multi.turn.memory","name":"conversational chat with multi-turn memory","description":"Maintains conversation context across multiple turns through stateful API interactions, where each turn includes full conversation history as input context. The model uses transformer attention to weight recent messages more heavily than distant history, enabling coherent multi-turn dialogue without explicit memory systems or external state stores.","intents":["Build chatbots that maintain conversation coherence across multiple exchanges","Implement customer support agents with conversation history","Create interactive coding assistants that remember previous context","Enable follow-up questions and context-dependent responses"],"best_for":["Developers building conversational interfaces","Teams implementing chatbot applications","Applications requiring stateless multi-turn interactions"],"limitations":["No persistent memory — conversation history must be managed by caller","Context window constraints limit conversation depth (exact limit not specified)","Older messages in long conversations receive less attention, causing context loss","No built-in conversation summarization for efficient context management"],"requires":["API key for MiniMax or OpenRouter","Caller-side conversation history management","HTTP client supporting streaming responses"],"input_types":["user messages","conversation history (previous turns)","system prompts or instructions"],"output_types":["assistant responses","streaming text responses","multi-turn continuations"],"categories":["text-generation-language","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-minimax-minimax-m2__cap_7","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.instruction.following.with.system.prompts","name":"instruction-following with system prompts","description":"Follows complex instructions and system prompts through learned instruction-following patterns developed during training on instruction-tuned datasets. The model interprets system-level directives (tone, format, constraints) and applies them consistently across responses, enabling role-playing, output formatting, and behavioral customization without model fine-tuning.","intents":["Customize model behavior through system prompts (tone, style, constraints)","Implement role-based personas (expert, teacher, code reviewer)","Enforce output formatting (JSON, markdown, structured text)","Apply safety constraints and content policies through instructions"],"best_for":["Developers building customizable AI assistants","Teams implementing role-based chatbots","Applications requiring consistent output formatting"],"limitations":["Instruction-following quality varies with prompt complexity — very complex instructions may be misinterpreted","No guarantee of constraint enforcement — system prompts can be overridden by user input","Instruction conflicts may cause unpredictable behavior","No built-in instruction validation or conflict detection"],"requires":["API key for MiniMax or OpenRouter","Well-crafted system prompts","Output validation for mission-critical applications"],"input_types":["system prompts","user messages","format specifications"],"output_types":["formatted responses","role-based outputs","constrained responses"],"categories":["text-generation-language","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-minimax-minimax-m2__cap_8","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.token.efficient.context.utilization","name":"token-efficient context utilization","description":"Optimizes token usage through learned attention patterns that prioritize relevant context while compressing less important information, reducing token consumption compared to naive context inclusion. The model learns to extract key information from long contexts and focus computation on relevant passages, enabling efficient handling of large documents or conversation histories within fixed context windows.","intents":["Process long documents without exceeding token limits","Maintain conversation history efficiently in token-constrained scenarios","Summarize large contexts while preserving key information","Reduce API costs by minimizing token consumption"],"best_for":["Cost-sensitive applications processing long documents","Teams with strict token budgets","Applications requiring efficient context management"],"limitations":["Learned compression may lose important details in edge cases","No explicit control over which context is compressed","Compression effectiveness varies with document type and structure","No built-in summarization — compression is implicit in attention"],"requires":["API key for MiniMax or OpenRouter","Understanding of token counting for cost estimation"],"input_types":["long documents","conversation histories","large context windows"],"output_types":["responses based on compressed context","token usage metrics"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-minimax-minimax-m2__cap_9","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.api.based.deployment.with.streaming.responses","name":"api-based deployment with streaming responses","description":"Provides model access through OpenRouter's REST API with streaming response support, enabling real-time token-by-token output delivery through Server-Sent Events (SSE) or chunked HTTP responses. The architecture abstracts hardware infrastructure, model serving, and scaling concerns, allowing developers to integrate the model without managing inference servers or GPU infrastructure.","intents":["Integrate LLM capabilities into applications without managing infrastructure","Stream responses for real-time user feedback in chat interfaces","Scale inference automatically without capacity planning","Access model through standard HTTP clients without custom SDKs"],"best_for":["Startups and small teams without ML infrastructure expertise","Applications requiring rapid prototyping without infrastructure setup","Teams needing automatic scaling without DevOps overhead"],"limitations":["API latency depends on OpenRouter infrastructure, not model alone","Streaming adds complexity to client-side implementation","No local deployment option — all inference goes through OpenRouter","API rate limits and quota constraints may impact high-throughput applications"],"requires":["OpenRouter API key","HTTP client with streaming support (curl, requests, fetch, etc.)","Network connectivity to OpenRouter endpoints"],"input_types":["HTTP POST requests with JSON payload","OpenAI-compatible API format"],"output_types":["streaming text responses (SSE/chunked HTTP)","complete responses with usage metrics","error responses with diagnostic information"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":24,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["API key for MiniMax or OpenRouter proxy","HTTP client capable of streaming responses","Code execution environment for validation (external)","API key for MiniMax or OpenRouter","JSON schema or format specification in prompt for structured outputs","Post-processing validation layer for mission-critical applications","OpenRouter API key","HTTP client with streaming support","Function schema definitions in OpenAI format","Caller-side conversation state management"],"failure_modes":["Context window size not specified in artifact — may constrain multi-file reasoning","No built-in code execution or validation — generated code requires external testing","Mixture-of-experts routing adds latency variance compared to dense models","No fine-tuning API exposed — limited customization for domain-specific coding patterns","Reasoning quality degrades on highly specialized domains (medical, legal) compared to frontier models","No explicit constraint enforcement — structured outputs may be malformed without post-processing","Chain-of-thought reasoning increases token consumption and latency vs direct answers","No built-in fact verification — outputs may contain hallucinations on obscure knowledge","No built-in memory persistence — conversation state must be managed by caller","Function-calling latency depends on OpenRouter infrastructure, not model alone","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.45,"ecosystem":0.24,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.35,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.3,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:24.484Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:20:45.776Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=minimax-minimax-m2","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=minimax-minimax-m2"}},"signature":"PO+30JuLwIvYqZ4fBj9Kj1WKT7vIUF3sAcpl9+we4RMkB0x9CwJkhLR4I/v7zNF+8oVmV/JeaKKK5gCiWjChCw==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T01:40:01.310Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/minimax-minimax-m2","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/minimax-minimax-m2","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=minimax-minimax-m2","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}