{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"openrouter-microsoft-wizardlm-2-8x22b","slug":"microsoft-wizardlm-2-8x22b","name":"WizardLM-2 8x22B","type":"model","url":"https://openrouter.ai/models/microsoft~wizardlm-2-8x22b","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/microsoft-wizardlm-2-8x22b","categories":["chatbots-assistants"],"tags":["microsoft","api-access","text"],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":"$6.20e-7 per prompt token"},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"openrouter-microsoft-wizardlm-2-8x22b__cap_0","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.multi.turn.conversational.reasoning.with.instruction.following","name":"multi-turn conversational reasoning with instruction-following","description":"Processes multi-turn conversations using a transformer-based architecture trained on instruction-following datasets, maintaining context across dialogue turns through attention mechanisms over the full conversation history. Implements chain-of-thought reasoning patterns to decompose complex queries into intermediate reasoning steps before generating final responses, enabling coherent multi-step problem solving within a single conversation thread.","intents":["I need an AI that can maintain context across multiple back-and-forth exchanges without losing track of earlier points","I want to ask follow-up questions and have the model reference previous context in its responses","I need the model to break down complex problems step-by-step rather than jumping to conclusions"],"best_for":["developers building conversational AI agents that require sustained reasoning","teams implementing customer support chatbots with multi-turn problem solving","researchers evaluating instruction-following capabilities in open models"],"limitations":["context window is finite (exact size not specified in artifact); very long conversations may lose early context","reasoning quality degrades on domain-specific problems outside training distribution","no persistent memory across separate conversation sessions — each new session starts fresh"],"requires":["API access via OpenRouter or compatible endpoint","HTTP client capable of streaming or polling responses","valid authentication token for the hosting service"],"input_types":["text (natural language queries)","code snippets (for debugging or explanation tasks)","structured prompts with system instructions"],"output_types":["text (conversational responses)","code (generated or explained)","reasoning traces (intermediate steps)"],"categories":["text-generation-language","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-microsoft-wizardlm-2-8x22b__cap_1","uri":"capability://code.generation.editing.code.generation.and.technical.explanation","name":"code generation and technical explanation","description":"Generates syntactically correct code across multiple programming languages by leveraging training on large code corpora and instruction-tuning for code-specific tasks. Produces not just code but accompanying explanations of logic, architectural patterns, and implementation choices. Uses attention mechanisms to understand code context and generate contextually appropriate completions that follow language idioms and best practices.","intents":["I need to generate boilerplate code or starter templates for a new project","I want the model to explain how existing code works and suggest improvements","I need code examples in multiple languages for the same algorithm or pattern"],"best_for":["solo developers prototyping features quickly","teams using AI-assisted code generation in their development workflow","educators creating code examples and explanations for students"],"limitations":["generated code may contain logical errors or security vulnerabilities that require human review","performance on domain-specific or proprietary frameworks depends on training data coverage","does not have access to real-time documentation or latest library versions"],"requires":["API access via OpenRouter","understanding of target programming language syntax","ability to validate and test generated code before deployment"],"input_types":["natural language descriptions of desired functionality","partial code snippets to complete or refactor","code in any language with request for translation to another language"],"output_types":["complete code functions or modules","code explanations and documentation","refactored or optimized versions of input code"],"categories":["code-generation-editing","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-microsoft-wizardlm-2-8x22b__cap_2","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.complex.question.answering.with.source.reasoning","name":"complex question answering with source reasoning","description":"Answers factual and analytical questions by synthesizing information from its training data and applying multi-step reasoning to arrive at well-justified answers. Implements reasoning-before-response patterns where the model explicitly works through the logic of a question before stating conclusions. Supports both factual recall and analytical reasoning tasks, with the ability to acknowledge uncertainty and explain the basis for answers.","intents":["I need accurate answers to technical questions with explanations of the reasoning","I want the model to acknowledge when it's uncertain rather than hallucinating","I need to understand not just the answer but why that answer is correct"],"best_for":["knowledge workers building research tools or documentation systems","teams implementing question-answering systems for internal knowledge bases","developers creating educational or tutoring applications"],"limitations":["knowledge cutoff date means information about recent events or developments is unavailable","factual accuracy is not guaranteed — model can hallucinate plausible-sounding but incorrect information","no ability to access external sources or real-time data during inference","reasoning quality varies significantly based on question complexity and domain specificity"],"requires":["API access via OpenRouter","ability to validate answers against authoritative sources when accuracy is critical","understanding that model outputs should be treated as suggestions, not ground truth"],"input_types":["natural language questions (factual, analytical, or open-ended)","questions with context or background information provided","follow-up questions that reference previous answers"],"output_types":["text explanations with reasoning steps","structured answers with supporting evidence","uncertainty acknowledgments and confidence indicators"],"categories":["text-generation-language","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-microsoft-wizardlm-2-8x22b__cap_3","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.creative.and.technical.writing.generation","name":"creative and technical writing generation","description":"Generates diverse written content from creative fiction to technical documentation by leveraging instruction-tuning on varied writing styles and domains. Adapts tone, formality, and structure based on implicit or explicit instructions about the target audience and purpose. Uses attention over writing conventions and stylistic patterns to maintain consistency within generated documents and match specified writing styles.","intents":["I need to generate technical documentation or API reference content","I want to create marketing copy or creative writing with a specific tone","I need to rewrite existing content in a different style or for a different audience"],"best_for":["content creators and technical writers accelerating documentation workflows","marketing teams generating copy variations and messaging","developers creating in-game dialogue, narrative content, or user-facing text"],"limitations":["generated content may require significant editing to match brand voice or specific requirements","creative writing can be formulaic or lack originality compared to human authors","domain-specific terminology or jargon may be used incorrectly without proper context"],"requires":["API access via OpenRouter","clear instructions about tone, audience, and purpose for best results","editorial review process to ensure quality and appropriateness"],"input_types":["writing prompts or outlines","existing content to rewrite or expand","style guidelines or examples to match"],"output_types":["prose content (creative or technical)","structured documents (documentation, guides)","marketing or promotional text"],"categories":["text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-microsoft-wizardlm-2-8x22b__cap_4","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.logical.reasoning.and.constraint.satisfaction","name":"logical reasoning and constraint satisfaction","description":"Solves logical puzzles, mathematical problems, and constraint satisfaction tasks by applying structured reasoning patterns and symbolic manipulation. Implements step-by-step logical deduction where the model explicitly works through logical implications and constraints before arriving at conclusions. Handles problems requiring tracking multiple constraints and reasoning about their interactions.","intents":["I need to solve logic puzzles or mathematical problems with step-by-step explanations","I want the model to verify logical consistency of arguments or propositions","I need help with constraint satisfaction problems like scheduling or resource allocation"],"best_for":["educators creating logic and mathematics tutoring systems","developers building puzzle or game applications with AI assistance","teams implementing automated reasoning components in larger systems"],"limitations":["performance degrades on problems requiring very deep reasoning chains (>10-15 steps)","mathematical reasoning is limited to problems solvable through symbolic manipulation; numerical computation is not a strength","constraint satisfaction performance depends on problem complexity and the clarity of constraint specification"],"requires":["API access via OpenRouter","clear problem specification with all constraints explicitly stated","ability to validate solutions against ground truth"],"input_types":["natural language problem descriptions","logical propositions or constraints","mathematical problem statements"],"output_types":["step-by-step reasoning traces","logical conclusions or solutions","constraint satisfaction assignments"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-microsoft-wizardlm-2-8x22b__cap_5","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.api.integration.and.function.calling.orchestration","name":"api integration and function calling orchestration","description":"Supports structured function calling and API integration by understanding function schemas and generating appropriately formatted function calls. Parses function definitions, understands parameter requirements and types, and generates valid function call syntax that can be executed by external systems. Enables chaining multiple function calls to accomplish complex tasks that require interaction with external tools or APIs.","intents":["I need the model to call specific functions or APIs based on user requests","I want to build an agent that can use tools to accomplish tasks beyond pure language generation","I need the model to understand function signatures and generate valid calls with correct parameters"],"best_for":["developers building AI agents with tool-use capabilities","teams implementing autonomous workflow systems that integrate with existing APIs","builders creating applications where the model needs to take actions beyond text generation"],"limitations":["function calling accuracy depends on clarity of function definitions and parameter documentation","no built-in error handling or retry logic — requires external orchestration layer","model cannot learn from function execution results within a single inference pass; requires multi-turn conversation for iterative refinement"],"requires":["API access via OpenRouter","ability to define and expose function schemas to the model","orchestration layer to execute generated function calls and return results","mechanism to parse and validate generated function calls"],"input_types":["natural language requests","function schema definitions (JSON or similar format)","context about available tools and their capabilities"],"output_types":["structured function calls with parameters","function call sequences for multi-step tasks","natural language explanations of intended function calls"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-microsoft-wizardlm-2-8x22b__cap_6","uri":"capability://text.generation.language.multilingual.text.understanding.and.generation","name":"multilingual text understanding and generation","description":"Processes and generates text in multiple languages with understanding of language-specific grammar, idioms, and cultural context. Implements cross-lingual transfer learning where knowledge from high-resource languages improves performance on lower-resource languages. Supports code-switching and maintains language consistency within generated text while respecting language-specific conventions.","intents":["I need to translate content between languages while preserving meaning and tone","I want the model to understand and respond to queries in non-English languages","I need to generate content in multiple languages from a single prompt or instruction"],"best_for":["teams building global applications serving multiple language communities","content creators and translators accelerating multilingual content workflows","developers implementing chatbots or support systems for international audiences"],"limitations":["translation quality varies significantly by language pair; low-resource languages may have lower accuracy","cultural context and idioms may not translate perfectly, requiring human review","language identification can fail on code-switched text or ambiguous inputs","performance on non-Latin scripts depends on training data representation"],"requires":["API access via OpenRouter","clear language specification for input and desired output languages","human review of translations for quality-critical applications"],"input_types":["text in any supported language","translation requests with source and target language specification","multilingual prompts or code-switched input"],"output_types":["translated text in target language","responses in requested language","multilingual content generation"],"categories":["text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"openrouter-microsoft-wizardlm-2-8x22b__cap_7","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.safety.aware.response.generation.with.refusal.capability","name":"safety-aware response generation with refusal capability","description":"Generates responses while respecting safety guidelines and refusing to engage with harmful requests. Implements safety filtering through training on instruction-following datasets that include examples of appropriate refusals and boundary-setting. Distinguishes between legitimate requests for sensitive information (e.g., educational content about security) and genuinely harmful requests, enabling nuanced safety without over-censoring.","intents":["I need an AI that will refuse harmful requests but still answer legitimate sensitive questions","I want the model to explain why it's declining a request rather than just refusing silently","I need safety guardrails that don't prevent legitimate use cases like security research or education"],"best_for":["teams deploying AI systems in production environments with safety requirements","developers building applications for sensitive domains (healthcare, finance, education)","organizations needing to demonstrate responsible AI practices to stakeholders"],"limitations":["safety mechanisms can be circumvented through prompt injection or adversarial techniques","refusal decisions may be inconsistent across similar requests due to model stochasticity","safety training may result in over-refusal on legitimate requests, requiring tuning","no real-time monitoring or logging of safety-relevant interactions"],"requires":["API access via OpenRouter","understanding that safety is probabilistic, not deterministic","additional safety layers or monitoring if deploying in high-risk contexts"],"input_types":["any user input, including potentially harmful requests"],"output_types":["safe responses to legitimate requests","refusals with explanations for harmful requests","educational content on sensitive topics when appropriate"],"categories":["safety-moderation","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":24,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"low","permissions":["API access via OpenRouter or compatible endpoint","HTTP client capable of streaming or polling responses","valid authentication token for the hosting service","API access via OpenRouter","understanding of target programming language syntax","ability to validate and test generated code before deployment","ability to validate answers against authoritative sources when accuracy is critical","understanding that model outputs should be treated as suggestions, not ground truth","clear instructions about tone, audience, and purpose for best results","editorial review process to ensure quality and appropriateness"],"failure_modes":["context window is finite (exact size not specified in artifact); very long conversations may lose early context","reasoning quality degrades on domain-specific problems outside training distribution","no persistent memory across separate conversation sessions — each new session starts fresh","generated code may contain logical errors or security vulnerabilities that require human review","performance on domain-specific or proprietary frameworks depends on training data coverage","does not have access to real-time documentation or latest library versions","knowledge cutoff date means information about recent events or developments is unavailable","factual accuracy is not guaranteed — model can hallucinate plausible-sounding but incorrect information","no ability to access external sources or real-time data during inference","reasoning quality varies significantly based on question complexity and domain specificity","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.41,"ecosystem":0.24,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.35,"quality":0.2,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.3,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:24.484Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T15:20:45.777Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=microsoft-wizardlm-2-8x22b","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=microsoft-wizardlm-2-8x22b"}},"signature":"8Cr+dSK7hZ9H20xNX/yWD9ybMagPtuDfckU8cuvmOqSeu3GMRdJOrx4pgSbnH4rRmbFrGZrOfW5Jx/2VpoWcCg==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T18:48:26.767Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/microsoft-wizardlm-2-8x22b","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/microsoft-wizardlm-2-8x22b","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=microsoft-wizardlm-2-8x22b","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}