{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_metabob","slug":"metabob","name":"Metabob","type":"product","url":"https://metabob.com","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/metabob","categories":["code-review-security"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"freemium","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_metabob__cap_0","uri":"capability://coding.semantic.bug.detection","name":"semantic-bug-detection","description":"Uses graph neural networks to identify logic errors and bugs by understanding code semantics and control flow, rather than relying on pattern matching. Catches subtle bugs that traditional linters miss by analyzing relationships between code elements.","intents":["Find logic errors that static analysis tools miss","Understand why a bug exists in the code context","Catch edge cases and control flow issues before production"],"best_for":["Development teams prioritizing code quality","Projects with complex business logic","Developers working with Python, JavaScript, or Java"],"limitations":["Performance degrades on very large codebases","Requires integration setup and API credits","Free tier has restrictive credit limits"],"requires":["Source code in supported languages (Python, JavaScript, Java)","GitHub repository or API access","API credits (limited on free tier)"],"input_types":["source code","code repository"],"output_types":["bug reports with explanations","severity classifications"],"categories":["coding","quality-assurance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_metabob__cap_1","uri":"capability://security.security.vulnerability.scanning","name":"security-vulnerability-scanning","description":"Identifies security vulnerabilities in code by analyzing semantic patterns and data flow. Goes beyond signature-based detection to find context-aware security issues including injection flaws, authentication bypasses, and insecure dependencies.","intents":["Find security vulnerabilities before deployment","Understand the security risk context of flagged issues","Meet security compliance requirements in code review"],"best_for":["Security-conscious development teams","Enterprise organizations with compliance requirements","Teams handling sensitive data or authentication"],"limitations":["Free tier has limited scanning capacity","May require paid tier for comprehensive vulnerability detection","Performance impact on large codebases"],"requires":["Source code in supported languages","GitHub integration or API access","Sufficient API credits"],"input_types":["source code","code repository","dependency files"],"output_types":["vulnerability reports","risk severity levels","remediation guidance"],"categories":["security","coding"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_metabob__cap_2","uri":"capability://coding.code.quality.assessment","name":"code-quality-assessment","description":"Evaluates code quality issues including maintainability, readability, and best practice violations. Provides contextual explanations for why code patterns are problematic rather than just flagging them.","intents":["Improve code maintainability and readability","Learn best practices through AI-powered feedback","Enforce consistent code quality standards across teams"],"best_for":["Development teams establishing code standards","Mentoring junior developers","Projects requiring high maintainability"],"limitations":["Free tier restrictions limit comprehensive analysis","Explanations may vary in depth on free tier","Requires developer engagement to act on feedback"],"requires":["Source code in supported languages","GitHub integration","API credits"],"input_types":["source code","code repository"],"output_types":["quality issue reports","explanations and context","improvement suggestions"],"categories":["coding","quality-assurance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_metabob__cap_3","uri":"capability://coding.github.integrated.code.review","name":"github-integrated-code-review","description":"Integrates directly into GitHub workflows to provide automated code review feedback on pull requests. Analyzes changes in context and provides inline comments with explanations.","intents":["Automate code review process on pull requests","Get instant feedback on code changes before merge","Reduce manual review burden on senior developers"],"best_for":["GitHub-based development teams","Teams with high pull request volume","Organizations wanting to scale code review"],"limitations":["Only integrates with GitHub (not GitLab, Bitbucket, etc.)","Free tier has limited PR analysis capacity","Requires GitHub permissions and setup"],"requires":["GitHub repository access","GitHub App installation","API credits for each PR analysis"],"input_types":["pull request diffs","changed code files"],"output_types":["inline PR comments","review summaries","issue flags with context"],"categories":["coding","collaboration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_metabob__cap_4","uri":"capability://coding.contextual.issue.explanation","name":"contextual-issue-explanation","description":"Provides detailed, human-readable explanations for flagged code issues rather than just highlighting problems. Explains the 'why' behind each issue to reduce false positives and developer frustration.","intents":["Understand why a code issue matters","Learn from AI feedback to improve coding skills","Distinguish between critical and minor issues"],"best_for":["Individual developers learning best practices","Teams wanting to reduce false positive frustration","Organizations investing in developer education"],"limitations":["Explanation depth may be limited on free tier","Requires reading and understanding explanations","Not all issues may have equally detailed explanations"],"requires":["Flagged code issues from analysis","API credits for explanation generation"],"input_types":["code snippets","issue context"],"output_types":["text explanations","remediation suggestions","educational context"],"categories":["coding","education"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_metabob__cap_5","uri":"capability://coding.multi.language.code.analysis","name":"multi-language-code-analysis","description":"Analyzes source code across multiple programming languages including Python, JavaScript, and Java using language-specific semantic understanding. Applies consistent quality and security standards across polyglot codebases.","intents":["Analyze code quality across multiple languages in one tool","Maintain consistent standards in polyglot projects","Reduce tool fragmentation for multi-language teams"],"best_for":["Polyglot development teams","Microservices architectures with multiple languages","Organizations wanting unified code review"],"limitations":["Only supports Python, JavaScript, and Java","Analysis quality may vary by language","Performance impact increases with language diversity"],"requires":["Source code in supported languages","GitHub integration","API credits"],"input_types":["Python code","JavaScript code","Java code"],"output_types":["language-specific issue reports","unified quality metrics"],"categories":["coding","quality-assurance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_metabob__cap_6","uri":"capability://coding.custom.model.training","name":"custom-model-training","description":"Allows teams on paid tiers to train custom AI models on their codebase and coding standards. Enables the system to learn organization-specific patterns and enforce custom rules beyond default detection.","intents":["Enforce organization-specific coding standards","Improve detection accuracy for domain-specific issues","Adapt AI analysis to team's unique architecture patterns"],"best_for":["Enterprise teams with custom coding standards","Organizations with domain-specific code patterns","Teams on paid tier with sufficient resources"],"limitations":["Only available on paid tiers","Requires significant codebase history for training","Training process may take time to complete","Requires ongoing maintenance and updates"],"requires":["Paid Metabob subscription","Historical codebase data","Custom rule definitions","Team collaboration for model refinement"],"input_types":["historical code repositories","custom rule specifications","coding standard documentation"],"output_types":["custom trained model","organization-specific detection rules"],"categories":["coding","customization"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_metabob__cap_7","uri":"capability://coding.false.positive.reduction","name":"false-positive-reduction","description":"Uses semantic understanding to minimize false positives by analyzing code context and intent. Distinguishes between intentional patterns and actual issues through graph neural network analysis.","intents":["Reduce noise in code review feedback","Trust AI recommendations without manual filtering","Improve developer experience with relevant findings only"],"best_for":["Teams frustrated with traditional linter false positives","High-velocity development teams","Organizations wanting to maximize developer productivity"],"limitations":["Cannot eliminate all false positives","May miss some edge cases in pursuit of precision","Requires sufficient context to make accurate judgments"],"requires":["Complete code context for analysis","Sufficient API credits for deep analysis"],"input_types":["source code with full context","code repository structure"],"output_types":["filtered issue reports","confidence scores for findings"],"categories":["coding","quality-assurance"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":43,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Source code in supported languages (Python, JavaScript, Java)","GitHub repository or API access","API credits (limited on free tier)","Source code in supported languages","GitHub integration or API access","Sufficient API credits","GitHub integration","API credits","GitHub repository access","GitHub App installation"],"failure_modes":["Performance degrades on very large codebases","Requires integration setup and API credits","Free tier has restrictive credit limits","Free tier has limited scanning capacity","May require paid tier for comprehensive vulnerability detection","Performance impact on large codebases","Free tier restrictions limit comprehensive analysis","Explanations may vary in depth on free tier","Requires developer engagement to act on feedback","Only integrates with GitHub (not GitLab, Bitbucket, etc.)","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.39999999999999997,"quality":0.77,"ecosystem":0.15000000000000002,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:31.857Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.546Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=metabob","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=metabob"}},"signature":"ujvSTXj+ulM5GIG7uA5yuyuXLoHeax5o6Fb5/seKDwybfebLqwDDIWymbbe/4HyoPHo+7F2OidBxea+2TbcABg==","signedAt":"2026-06-23T08:20:27.662Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/metabob","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/metabob","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=metabob","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}