{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"awesome-mcp-servers-rating-and-user-reviews","slug":"mcp-servers-rating-and-user-reviews","name":"MCP Servers Rating and User Reviews","type":"mcp","url":"http://www.deepnlp.org/store/ai-agent/mcp-server","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/mcp-servers-rating-and-user-reviews","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"unknown","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"awesome-mcp-servers-rating-and-user-reviews__cap_0","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.mcp.server.discovery.and.marketplace.search","name":"mcp server discovery and marketplace search","description":"Provides a searchable directory of 11,000+ MCP servers across 40+ categories (Search, Database, Finance, Healthcare, etc.) with full-text search and faceted filtering by category, rating, and provider. The search engine indexes server metadata including tool descriptions, pricing, ratings, and availability status, enabling developers to find compatible MCP servers for their agent workflows without manual registry scanning.","intents":["Find an MCP server that provides web search capabilities for my agent","Discover all available MCP servers in the Finance category with 4+ star ratings","Search for MCP servers that support real-time data extraction","Browse official vs community-maintained MCP servers by provider"],"best_for":["AI agent developers building multi-tool workflows","Teams evaluating third-party MCP integrations","Non-technical founders exploring available agent capabilities"],"limitations":["Search limited to servers already indexed in the marketplace — no real-time discovery of external MCP servers","Tool schema details and input/output specifications not consistently documented across all listings","No advanced filtering by protocol version, transport type, or authentication method"],"requires":["Web browser with internet access","No authentication required for browsing (registration optional for advanced features)"],"input_types":["text search queries","category filters","rating/review filters"],"output_types":["structured server listings with metadata","tool descriptions and pricing","user reviews and ratings"],"categories":["search-retrieval","marketplace"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-mcp-servers-rating-and-user-reviews__cap_1","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.mcp.server.rating.and.review.aggregation","name":"mcp server rating and review aggregation","description":"Collects and displays user ratings (1-5 star scale) and written reviews for MCP servers, enabling community-driven quality assessment. The platform aggregates review data per server listing, calculates average ratings, and surfaces review text to help developers evaluate server reliability, feature completeness, and real-world performance before integration. Reviews are tied to user accounts and timestamped for transparency.","intents":["Check if the tavily-search MCP server is reliable based on user reviews","Read authentic feedback from developers who have integrated a specific MCP server","Compare two MCP servers by their community ratings and review sentiment","Write a review sharing my experience with an MCP server I deployed"],"best_for":["Developers making integration decisions based on peer feedback","Teams evaluating production-readiness of third-party MCP servers","Community members contributing quality signals to the ecosystem"],"limitations":["Review authenticity depends on user account verification — no documented anti-fraud mechanisms","No sentiment analysis or automated review quality scoring visible to users","Review volume per server varies widely (example: Google Maps has 2 reviews, tavily-mcp has 3) — low sample sizes may not be statistically meaningful","No filtering or sorting of reviews by date, helpfulness, or reviewer expertise"],"requires":["User account registration to submit reviews","No authentication required to read reviews"],"input_types":["star rating (1-5)","review text (free-form)","server identifier"],"output_types":["aggregated star rating","review text with author and timestamp","review count per server"],"categories":["safety-moderation","community-feedback"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-mcp-servers-rating-and-user-reviews__cap_10","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.official.vs.community.mcp.server.distinction.and.filtering","name":"official vs community mcp server distinction and filtering","description":"Distinguishes between official MCP servers (maintained by original creators or verified partners) and community-maintained servers, with visual indicators and filtering options in the marketplace. Official servers (e.g., Google Maps MCP Server marked as 'Official, LIVE') are highlighted and may receive priority support or SLA guarantees. Community servers are clearly labeled, enabling developers to make informed decisions about maintenance risk and support availability.","intents":["Filter the marketplace to show only official MCP servers for production deployments","Understand the maintenance status and support level of a community-maintained MCP server","Prioritize official servers when multiple options exist for the same functionality","Assess the risk of integrating a community-maintained server with limited support"],"best_for":["Teams deploying production agents requiring guaranteed support and maintenance","Organizations with compliance requirements for official/verified integrations","Developers evaluating maintenance risk before integrating third-party servers"],"limitations":["Criteria for 'official' designation not documented — unclear what makes a server official vs community","No documented SLA or support guarantees for official servers","No documented maintenance status or update frequency for community servers","No documented deprecation or end-of-life process for servers","No way to filter by official status in search results (only visible in individual listings)"],"requires":["Web browser with internet access","No authentication required for viewing status"],"input_types":["server listing view"],"output_types":["official/community status indicator","support contact information","maintenance status"],"categories":["safety-moderation","search-retrieval"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-mcp-servers-rating-and-user-reviews__cap_2","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.hosted.mcp.server.deployment.and.subdomain.provisioning","name":"hosted mcp server deployment and subdomain provisioning","description":"Provides managed hosting for MCP servers with automatic subdomain allocation (e.g., user-agent.deepnlp.org) and tier-based deployment quotas. Developers can deploy up to 1-8 MCP server instances depending on subscription tier (Free: 1, Pro Monthly: 5, Pro Annually: 8), with the platform handling infrastructure, routing, and availability. Deployment configuration and API key management are accessible via a workspace dashboard.","intents":["Deploy my custom MCP server without managing infrastructure or domain configuration","Scale from 1 to 5 agent deployments as my project grows by upgrading to Pro","Get a production-ready HTTPS endpoint for my MCP server instantly","Manage API keys and billing for multiple deployed MCP servers from one dashboard"],"best_for":["Solo developers and small teams avoiding infrastructure management","Non-technical founders prototyping AI agents without DevOps expertise","Teams needing rapid deployment without CI/CD pipeline setup"],"limitations":["Deployment quotas are tier-locked — Free tier limited to 1 deployment, requiring upgrade for scaling","No documented SLA or uptime guarantees for hosted deployments","Self-hosted MCP server deployment not supported — platform-hosted only","Transport protocol (stdio vs SSE vs HTTP) and MCP version not specified in documentation","No documented auto-scaling, load balancing, or failover mechanisms"],"requires":["User account with Free or Pro subscription","API key provisioned in workspace (automatic on account creation)","MCP server implementation compatible with platform's deployment runtime (runtime details unknown)"],"input_types":["MCP server code/binary","configuration parameters","API keys and credentials"],"output_types":["HTTPS subdomain endpoint","deployment status and logs","API key for authentication"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-mcp-servers-rating-and-user-reviews__cap_3","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.tier.based.rate.limiting.and.quota.management","name":"tier-based rate limiting and quota management","description":"Implements subscription-tier-based rate limiting and quota enforcement for deployed MCP servers and API calls. Free tier users receive standard rate limits (unspecified), while Pro Monthly and Pro Annual tiers unlock 'production-grade rate limits & quota' (specific values not documented). The platform enforces these limits at the gateway level, preventing abuse and ensuring fair resource allocation across users. Quota usage is tracked and displayed in the workspace dashboard.","intents":["Ensure my MCP server can handle production traffic by upgrading to Pro tier","Understand how many API calls my deployed agent can make per month","Monitor quota usage and avoid unexpected rate-limiting during peak traffic","Scale rate limits as my agent's usage grows"],"best_for":["Teams deploying production agents requiring guaranteed throughput","Developers prototyping with Free tier and upgrading when moving to production","Organizations needing predictable API call budgets"],"limitations":["Specific rate limit values for Free and Pro tiers not documented — developers cannot calculate exact throughput","No documented burst allowance or token bucket algorithm details","Rate limits appear to be per-deployment, not per-user — unclear if quotas are shared across multiple deployments","No documented grace period or soft limits before hard cutoff","Upgrade path from Free to Pro requires manual tier change — no auto-scaling based on usage"],"requires":["Active subscription (Free or Pro)","Deployed MCP server or API integration","Workspace access to view quota metrics"],"input_types":["subscription tier selection","API call requests"],"output_types":["rate limit enforcement (HTTP 429 or equivalent)","quota usage metrics in dashboard","remaining quota display"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-mcp-servers-rating-and-user-reviews__cap_4","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.onekey.mcp.router.and.multi.provider.tool.orchestration","name":"onekey mcp router and multi-provider tool orchestration","description":"Routes MCP server requests through a centralized 'OneKey MCP Router' that abstracts away provider-specific protocol details and enables seamless switching between multiple MCP server implementations. The router handles protocol translation, authentication bridging, and request/response mapping across different MCP servers, allowing agents to call tools from different providers (e.g., tavily-search, Google Maps, custom servers) through a unified interface. The platform also provides 'OneKey Agent Router' and 'OneKey LLM Router' for agent and LLM orchestration.","intents":["Call tools from multiple MCP servers in a single agent workflow without provider-specific code","Switch between two MCP servers providing similar functionality without rewriting agent logic","Route agent requests to the best available MCP server based on latency or cost","Integrate custom MCP servers alongside official ones through a unified routing layer"],"best_for":["AI agent developers building multi-tool workflows across heterogeneous MCP servers","Teams wanting to avoid vendor lock-in by abstracting MCP provider details","Organizations needing intelligent routing based on cost, latency, or availability"],"limitations":["Router architecture and protocol translation logic not documented — unclear how provider differences are abstracted","No documented latency overhead from routing layer (likely 50-200ms per request based on typical proxy patterns)","Authentication bridging mechanism not specified — unclear how credentials are managed across providers","No documented fallback or retry logic if primary MCP server is unavailable","Routing rules and cost/latency optimization algorithms not exposed to users"],"requires":["Deployed MCP servers registered with the platform","Agent implementation compatible with unified tool interface","API keys for each MCP server provider"],"input_types":["tool call requests with provider-agnostic schema","routing hints (cost, latency, availability)"],"output_types":["tool responses mapped to unified schema","routing metrics (latency, cost, provider used)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-mcp-servers-rating-and-user-reviews__cap_5","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.onekey.gateway.api.aggregation.across.100.ai.agent.mcp.apis","name":"onekey gateway api aggregation across 100+ ai/agent/mcp apis","description":"Provides a unified gateway ('OneKey Gateway') that aggregates access to 100+ AI, Agent, and MCP APIs across multiple categories (Search, Database, Finance, Healthcare, Payment, etc.). Rather than agents managing separate API keys and authentication for each service, the gateway provides a single authentication point and request routing mechanism. The platform claims to support 30+ categories of APIs, enabling agents to access diverse functionality (web search, maps, payments, databases) through standardized request/response patterns.","intents":["Access web search, maps, and payment APIs through a single authentication gateway","Avoid managing 10+ separate API keys by using the platform's unified gateway","Route API calls to the best available provider based on cost or latency","Integrate new APIs without rewriting agent code by adding them to the gateway"],"best_for":["AI agent developers building multi-API workflows","Teams wanting centralized API key management and billing","Organizations needing cost optimization across multiple API providers"],"limitations":["Specific list of 100+ supported APIs not documented — unclear which services are available","API schema normalization approach not specified — unclear how different APIs are mapped to unified interface","No documented latency overhead from gateway routing (likely 100-300ms per request)","Authentication mechanism for gateway not detailed — unclear how credentials are stored and transmitted","No documented rate limiting or quota management per API provider","Pricing for gateway access not specified — unclear if it's included in subscription or charged separately"],"requires":["User account with workspace access","API keys for desired providers (or platform-managed credentials)","Agent implementation compatible with gateway request/response format"],"input_types":["API request with provider and method","authentication credentials"],"output_types":["normalized API response","routing metrics (provider used, latency, cost)"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-mcp-servers-rating-and-user-reviews__cap_6","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.agent.monetization.and.revenue.sharing","name":"agent monetization and revenue sharing","description":"Enables deployed agents to generate revenue through a built-in monetization system ('Agent A2Z Payment') that tracks usage, calculates fees based on MCP server pricing, and distributes revenue to agent creators. When an agent calls an MCP server tool (e.g., tavily-search at 0.0 USD/1k calls or Google Maps at 10.0 USD/1k calls), the platform charges the user and credits the agent creator's account. Revenue is aggregated in the workspace dashboard and can be withdrawn via integrated payment processing.","intents":["Monetize my custom agent by charging users for MCP server tool calls","Track revenue generated by my deployed agent across multiple MCP servers","Set custom pricing for my agent's tools while the platform handles billing","Withdraw earnings from my agent deployments to a bank account"],"best_for":["Individual developers and small teams building commercial AI agents","Non-technical creators wanting to monetize agents without payment infrastructure","Agencies building agents for clients and needing transparent cost tracking"],"limitations":["Revenue model based on underlying MCP server pricing — agent creators cannot set custom rates","Payment processing fees not documented — unclear what percentage is retained by platform vs paid to creator","Withdrawal thresholds and minimum payout amounts not specified","No documented fraud detection or chargeback handling","Tax reporting and 1099 generation not mentioned — unclear how creators handle tax obligations","Revenue is tied to MCP server usage — no flat-rate or subscription monetization options documented"],"requires":["Deployed agent with MCP server integrations","Verified payment account (bank account or payment processor)","User account with Pro subscription (Free tier monetization unclear)"],"input_types":["MCP server tool calls from agent users","pricing configuration for agent"],"output_types":["revenue metrics in dashboard","payment transactions and history","withdrawal requests to bank account"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-mcp-servers-rating-and-user-reviews__cap_7","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.workspace.based.api.key.and.credential.management","name":"workspace-based api key and credential management","description":"Provides a centralized workspace dashboard for managing API keys, credentials, and authentication tokens across deployed MCP servers and integrated APIs. Users can generate, rotate, and revoke keys without redeploying agents. The workspace also displays deployment status, quota usage, and billing information. Keys are scoped to specific deployments or APIs, enabling fine-grained access control and reducing the blast radius of compromised credentials.","intents":["Generate an API key for my deployed agent without redeploying code","Rotate API keys monthly for security compliance","Revoke a compromised key and immediately stop unauthorized access","View which deployments are using which API keys for audit purposes"],"best_for":["Teams managing multiple deployed agents with different credential requirements","Organizations with security compliance requirements (key rotation, audit trails)","Developers wanting to avoid hardcoding credentials in agent code"],"limitations":["Key scoping mechanism not documented — unclear if keys can be restricted to specific tools or deployments","No documented audit trail showing who created/revoked keys and when","Key rotation process not specified — unclear if it's manual or automated","No documented encryption for keys at rest or in transit","No documented expiration policies or automatic key rotation","Credential storage mechanism not specified — unclear if keys are encrypted in database"],"requires":["User account with workspace access","Deployed MCP server or API integration"],"input_types":["key generation request","key rotation/revocation request"],"output_types":["API key (displayed once, not retrievable later)","key metadata (creation date, last used, scopes)","audit log of key operations"],"categories":["safety-moderation","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-mcp-servers-rating-and-user-reviews__cap_8","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.mcp.server.pricing.transparency.and.cost.tracking","name":"mcp server pricing transparency and cost tracking","description":"Displays per-call pricing for each MCP server in the marketplace (e.g., tavily-search at 0.0 USD/1k calls, Google Maps at 10.0 USD/1k calls) and tracks cumulative costs in the workspace dashboard. Pricing is expressed in both credits (500 credits/1k calls) and USD, enabling developers to estimate costs before deployment and monitor spending in real-time. The platform aggregates costs across all deployed agents and MCP server calls, providing visibility into total API spending.","intents":["Compare the cost of two MCP servers providing similar functionality before integration","Estimate monthly costs for my agent based on expected tool call volume","Monitor my actual spending against budget and receive alerts if costs exceed threshold","Understand which MCP servers are driving the highest costs in my agent deployments"],"best_for":["Teams with fixed API budgets needing cost visibility","Developers optimizing agent costs by choosing cheaper MCP servers","Organizations requiring cost tracking for chargeback or billing purposes"],"limitations":["Credit-to-USD conversion rate not documented — unclear how 500 credits maps to actual cost","Pricing is per-call, not per-token — unclear how pricing scales with response size or complexity","No documented volume discounts or tiered pricing for high-volume users","Cost tracking is real-time but no documented cost forecasting or budget alerts","Pricing may vary by region or user tier — no documented pricing variations","Some MCP servers show 0.0 USD/1k calls (tavily-search) — unclear if this is truly free or subsidized"],"requires":["Deployed agent with MCP server integrations","Workspace access to view cost metrics"],"input_types":["MCP server selection","tool call volume estimates"],"output_types":["per-call pricing in USD and credits","cumulative cost metrics in dashboard","cost breakdown by MCP server"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-mcp-servers-rating-and-user-reviews__cap_9","uri":"capability://search.retrieval.multi.category.mcp.server.organization.and.browsing","name":"multi-category mcp server organization and browsing","description":"Organizes 11,000+ MCP servers into 40+ semantic categories (Search, Database, Finance, Healthcare, Payment, Browser Use, Communication, Developer, Entertainment, File System, Memory, Art, Science, Research, Calendar, Sales, Marketing, Operations, Workflow, Education, Legal, Business, Image Generator, Chatbot, Travel, Trip Planning, etc.), enabling developers to browse by use case rather than searching by name. Each category displays relevant servers with ratings, pricing, and availability status. This hierarchical organization reduces discovery friction for developers building agents with specific capabilities.","intents":["Browse all available MCP servers in the Finance category to find payment processing tools","Discover new MCP servers in the Healthcare category that I didn't know existed","Compare all Search-category servers to find the best fit for my agent's web search needs","Filter servers by category and rating to find the most reliable options"],"best_for":["Developers exploring available capabilities by use case rather than keyword search","Non-technical founders browsing agent capabilities to understand what's possible","Teams evaluating multiple servers in a category to choose the best fit"],"limitations":["Category taxonomy is fixed by the platform — users cannot create custom categories","Some servers may fit multiple categories but are only listed in one — unclear how categorization conflicts are resolved","No documented category-level filtering (e.g., show only 4+ star servers in Finance category)","Category descriptions and use cases not documented — unclear what 'Browser Use' or 'Memory' categories include","No documented sorting within categories (by rating, price, popularity, etc.)"],"requires":["Web browser with internet access","No authentication required for browsing"],"input_types":["category selection","optional filters (rating, price)"],"output_types":["list of servers in category","server metadata (rating, pricing, availability)"],"categories":["search-retrieval","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":32,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Web browser with internet access","No authentication required for browsing (registration optional for advanced features)","User account registration to submit reviews","No authentication required to read reviews","No authentication required for viewing status","User account with Free or Pro subscription","API key provisioned in workspace (automatic on account creation)","MCP server implementation compatible with platform's deployment runtime (runtime details unknown)","Active subscription (Free or Pro)","Deployed MCP server or API integration"],"failure_modes":["Search limited to servers already indexed in the marketplace — no real-time discovery of external MCP servers","Tool schema details and input/output specifications not consistently documented across all listings","No advanced filtering by protocol version, transport type, or authentication method","Review authenticity depends on user account verification — no documented anti-fraud mechanisms","No sentiment analysis or automated review quality scoring visible to users","Review volume per server varies widely (example: Google Maps has 2 reviews, tavily-mcp has 3) — low sample sizes may not be statistically meaningful","No filtering or sorting of reviews by date, helpfulness, or reviewer expertise","Criteria for 'official' designation not documented — unclear what makes a server official vs community","No documented SLA or support guarantees for official servers","No documented maintenance status or update frequency for community servers","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.47,"ecosystem":0.25,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:03.578Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:00:18.053Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=mcp-servers-rating-and-user-reviews","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=mcp-servers-rating-and-user-reviews"}},"signature":"0n+R7Na1+THG6eDyPFI8oWbs6gWIxvrJzb7RbkFZN8oGFPWfgR0IyHKhgf9W6TQBql5d0wnKDaEuRdc/ZvFpAA==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T02:00:53.234Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/mcp-servers-rating-and-user-reviews","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/mcp-servers-rating-and-user-reviews","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=mcp-servers-rating-and-user-reviews","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}