{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"awesome-mcp-run","slug":"mcp-run","name":"mcp.run","type":"mcp","url":"https://mcp.run","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/mcp-run","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"unknown","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"awesome-mcp-run__cap_0","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.server.registry.aggregation.and.unified.gateway","name":"mcp server registry aggregation and unified gateway","description":"Provides a centralized registry and HTTP gateway that aggregates multiple MCP servers (both public and private) into a single standardized endpoint. Acts as a protocol-compliant proxy that normalizes access to heterogeneous MCP server implementations, allowing clients to interact with multiple servers through one URL without managing individual server connections or authentication credentials.","intents":["I want to expose multiple MCP servers to my LLM application without managing individual server endpoints","I need a single entry point to access tools from different MCP server implementations","I want to centralize governance and access control across multiple MCP servers"],"best_for":["Teams deploying multiple MCP servers across infrastructure","Enterprise organizations requiring centralized tool management","LLM application builders needing simplified server orchestration"],"limitations":["Requires MCP servers to be registered and approved through admin workflow before exposure","Single gateway creates potential bottleneck for high-throughput tool access","No documented support for server-to-server communication or chaining","Unknown latency overhead from gateway proxying vs direct server access"],"requires":["MCP-compatible servers (protocol version unknown)","Network connectivity to mcp.run platform or self-hosted instance","Admin credentials to register and approve servers in registry"],"input_types":["MCP server configuration","Tool schemas from registered servers"],"output_types":["Unified MCP protocol responses","Aggregated tool definitions"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","api-gateway"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-mcp-run__cap_1","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.oidc.and.oauth.based.identity.federation.with.automatic.dcr","name":"oidc and oauth-based identity federation with automatic dcr","description":"Integrates with external identity providers via OIDC (OpenID Connect) protocol and supports OAuth 2.0 flows with automatic Dynamic Client Registration (DCR). Enables centralized user authentication and authorization without requiring manual OAuth app registration, allowing organizations to delegate identity management to existing IdP infrastructure (Okta, Azure AD, etc.).","intents":["I want to authenticate users against my organization's existing identity provider","I need to avoid manual OAuth app registration and configuration","I want to enforce centralized access control based on user identity and roles"],"best_for":["Enterprise organizations with existing OIDC-compatible IdP deployments","Teams requiring SSO (Single Sign-On) integration","Organizations with strict identity governance requirements"],"limitations":["Requires OIDC-compatible identity provider (specific supported providers unknown)","DCR support depends on IdP implementation and configuration","No documented support for SAML or other legacy identity protocols","Token refresh and session management behavior not specified"],"requires":["OIDC-compatible identity provider (Okta, Azure AD, etc.)","IdP configuration with DCR support enabled","Network connectivity between mcp.run and IdP endpoints"],"input_types":["OIDC discovery endpoint URL","IdP configuration parameters"],"output_types":["JWT tokens","User identity claims","Authorization context"],"categories":["safety-moderation","authentication"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-mcp-run__cap_10","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.server.testing.and.validation.before.registry.approval","name":"server testing and validation before registry approval","description":"Implements validation workflow that tests MCP server functionality and compatibility before approving submission to the registry. Performs automated checks on server schemas, tool definitions, and execution behavior to ensure quality and prevent broken or malicious servers from being exposed to users.","intents":["I want to ensure servers are tested before they're available to users","I need to validate server schemas and tool definitions","I want to prevent broken or incompatible servers from being registered"],"best_for":["Organizations maintaining shared server registries","Teams requiring quality gates before tool exposure","Enterprises with strict tool governance policies"],"limitations":["Validation test suite and criteria not documented","Automated vs manual testing requirements unknown","Test coverage and failure reporting not specified","Performance and load testing requirements not documented","Security scanning and vulnerability detection not specified","Validation result feedback to server submitters not documented"],"requires":["MCP server submission","Server implementation meeting MCP protocol requirements"],"input_types":["MCP server code/configuration","Tool schema definitions"],"output_types":["Validation report","Approval/rejection decision","Test results"],"categories":["safety-moderation","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-mcp-run__cap_11","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.profile.based.configuration.templates.for.server.setup","name":"profile-based configuration templates for server setup","description":"Provides reusable configuration profiles that standardize MCP server setup and deployment parameters. Enables administrators to define configuration templates that enforce organizational standards, reducing manual configuration overhead and ensuring consistent server deployment across the platform.","intents":["I want to standardize server configuration across my organization","I need to reduce manual configuration when deploying new servers","I want to enforce organizational standards for server setup"],"best_for":["Organizations deploying multiple similar servers","Teams requiring configuration standardization","Enterprises with strict infrastructure standards"],"limitations":["Profile composition and inheritance model not documented","Parameter override and customization capabilities unknown","Profile versioning and rollback support not specified","Template validation and conflict resolution not documented","Profile sharing and reuse across teams not specified"],"requires":["Admin permissions to create profiles","Server configuration parameters"],"input_types":["Configuration parameters","Server definitions"],"output_types":["Profile definition","Applied configuration"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-mcp-run__cap_2","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.role.based.access.control.rbac.for.server.and.tool.governance","name":"role-based access control (rbac) for server and tool governance","description":"Implements role-based permission model that controls which users can submit MCP servers to the registry, approve server submissions, and access specific tools. Enforces governance gates through admin-controlled approval workflows, preventing unauthorized tool exposure and enabling fine-grained access policies based on user roles and organizational structure.","intents":["I want to control which team members can register new MCP servers","I need to approve server submissions before they're exposed to LLM applications","I want to restrict access to sensitive tools based on user roles"],"best_for":["Enterprise organizations with compliance and governance requirements","Teams managing tools with varying sensitivity levels","Organizations requiring audit trails for tool access decisions"],"limitations":["RBAC model specifics not documented (permission matrix unknown)","Tool-level filtering mentioned but implementation details absent","No documented support for attribute-based access control (ABAC) or dynamic policies","Approval workflow is binary (approve/reject) with no documented conditional approval"],"requires":["Identity provider integration (OIDC/OAuth)","Role definitions configured in identity provider or mcp.run","Admin user with permission to configure RBAC policies"],"input_types":["User identity and role claims","Server submission metadata"],"output_types":["Authorization decision (allow/deny)","Filtered tool list based on permissions"],"categories":["safety-moderation","access-control"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-mcp-run__cap_3","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.webhook.triggered.task.automation.with.http.integration","name":"webhook-triggered task automation with http integration","description":"Enables HTTP webhook triggers that invoke automated tasks and tool executions within the mcp.run platform. Accepts incoming HTTP requests with task payloads, executes associated MCP tools, and returns results, providing event-driven automation without requiring direct API calls. Supports integration with external systems via standard HTTP webhooks for triggering complex workflows.","intents":["I want to trigger MCP tool execution from external systems via HTTP webhooks","I need to automate tasks based on events from third-party applications","I want to integrate mcp.run into existing webhook-based workflows"],"best_for":["Teams integrating mcp.run with external SaaS platforms","Event-driven automation scenarios (CI/CD, monitoring alerts, form submissions)","Organizations building workflow automation without custom code"],"limitations":["Webhook payload schema not documented","HTTP method support (POST, PUT, etc.) not specified","Retry logic, timeout behavior, and failure handling not documented","No documented support for webhook signing or verification","Synchronous vs asynchronous execution model unknown"],"requires":["HTTP endpoint accessible from external systems","Webhook URL provided by mcp.run","Task configuration with associated MCP tools"],"input_types":["HTTP request with JSON payload"],"output_types":["HTTP response with task execution result","Tool execution output"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-mcp-run__cap_4","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.persistent.prompt.and.tool.template.storage.with.execution","name":"persistent prompt and tool template storage with execution","description":"Provides persistent storage for saved prompts and tool combinations, allowing users to define reusable task templates that combine multiple MCP tools with predefined parameters. Enables execution of these templates on-demand, supporting workflow repeatability and reducing manual configuration overhead for common task patterns.","intents":["I want to save and reuse complex tool combinations without reconfiguring them each time","I need to create templates for common tasks that my team executes repeatedly","I want to standardize tool usage patterns across my organization"],"best_for":["Teams executing repetitive multi-tool workflows","Organizations standardizing tool usage patterns","Non-technical users who need to execute complex tool chains"],"limitations":["Template composition model not documented (sequential, parallel, conditional execution unknown)","Parameter binding and variable substitution mechanism not specified","No documented support for template versioning or rollback","Template sharing and collaboration features not documented","Storage limits and retention policies unknown"],"requires":["MCP tools registered in the platform","Permission to create and save templates"],"input_types":["Tool definitions","Parameter configurations","Prompt text"],"output_types":["Saved template metadata","Template execution results"],"categories":["automation-workflow","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-mcp-run__cap_5","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.real.time.usage.auditing.and.activity.logging","name":"real-time usage auditing and activity logging","description":"Captures and logs all tool executions, server access, and administrative actions in real-time, providing audit trails for compliance and operational visibility. Enables tracking of who accessed which tools, when, and with what parameters, supporting forensic analysis and compliance reporting requirements.","intents":["I need to audit which users accessed which tools and when","I want to track all administrative changes to server registry and permissions","I need to generate compliance reports showing tool usage patterns"],"best_for":["Enterprise organizations with compliance requirements (SOC 2, HIPAA, etc.)","Teams requiring forensic analysis of tool usage","Organizations with regulatory audit obligations"],"limitations":["Audit log retention policy not documented","Query and filtering capabilities for audit logs not specified","Export formats and compliance report templates unknown","Real-time log streaming vs batch export behavior not documented","Sensitive data handling in audit logs (parameter masking, PII redaction) not specified"],"requires":["Audit logging enabled in platform configuration","Storage capacity for audit logs"],"input_types":["Tool execution events","Administrative actions","Access attempts"],"output_types":["Audit log entries","Compliance reports","Activity dashboards"],"categories":["safety-moderation","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-mcp-run__cap_6","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.ai.kill.switch.and.one.click.agent.deactivation","name":"ai kill-switch and one-click agent deactivation","description":"Provides emergency control mechanism to instantly disable all MCP tool access and deactivate running agents through a single administrative action. Enables rapid response to security incidents or policy violations by cutting off tool execution without requiring individual server shutdown or configuration changes.","intents":["I need to immediately stop all tool execution in response to a security incident","I want to deactivate an agent that's behaving unexpectedly","I need emergency controls to prevent unauthorized tool usage"],"best_for":["Organizations with strict security incident response requirements","Teams running autonomous agents requiring emergency controls","Enterprises with regulatory requirements for rapid system shutdown"],"limitations":["Kill-switch scope not documented (affects all tools, specific servers, or per-agent)","Activation/deactivation latency not specified","No documented support for granular kill-switch policies (e.g., disable specific tool categories)","Recovery procedure and re-enablement workflow not documented","Impact on in-flight tool executions not specified (graceful shutdown vs immediate termination)"],"requires":["Admin-level permissions to activate kill-switch","Agent or tool execution running on platform"],"input_types":["Kill-switch activation signal"],"output_types":["Deactivation confirmation","Agent/tool execution termination"],"categories":["safety-moderation","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-mcp-run__cap_7","uri":"capability://safety.moderation.data.loss.prevention.dlp.with.tool.output.filtering","name":"data loss prevention (dlp) with tool output filtering","description":"Implements data loss prevention mechanisms that scan and filter tool outputs to prevent sensitive data exposure. Applies configurable DLP rules to tool execution results before returning to clients, blocking or redacting outputs containing patterns matching sensitive data categories (PII, credentials, etc.).","intents":["I want to prevent tools from exposing personally identifiable information","I need to block credential leakage from tool outputs","I want to enforce data classification policies on tool results"],"best_for":["Organizations handling regulated data (HIPAA, GDPR, PCI-DSS)","Teams requiring data classification and protection","Enterprises with strict data governance policies"],"limitations":["DLP rule configuration options not documented","Supported sensitive data categories unknown (PII patterns, credential formats, etc.)","Redaction vs blocking behavior not specified","False positive/negative rates for pattern matching unknown","Performance impact of DLP scanning not documented","Custom DLP rule creation capability not specified"],"requires":["DLP rules configured in platform","Tool outputs to scan and filter"],"input_types":["Tool execution output","DLP rule definitions"],"output_types":["Filtered/redacted tool output","DLP violation events"],"categories":["safety-moderation","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-mcp-run__cap_8","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.self.hosted.and.cloud.deployment.with.containerized.distribution","name":"self-hosted and cloud deployment with containerized distribution","description":"Supports both cloud-hosted (managed service) and self-hosted deployment models via containerized distribution (Docker implied). Enables organizations to deploy mcp.run within their own infrastructure for data residency, compliance, or operational control requirements, with unified feature parity between cloud and self-hosted variants.","intents":["I need to deploy mcp.run within my own infrastructure for data residency","I want to run mcp.run on-premises without external dependencies","I need to comply with data sovereignty requirements"],"best_for":["Enterprise organizations with data residency requirements","Teams requiring on-premises deployment for compliance","Organizations with strict network isolation policies"],"limitations":["Container runtime requirements not documented (Docker version, Kubernetes support unknown)","Self-hosted deployment guide not available","Infrastructure requirements (CPU, memory, storage) not specified","High-availability and clustering support for self-hosted unknown","Update and patch management procedures not documented","Support model for self-hosted deployments unclear"],"requires":["Container runtime (Docker or Kubernetes)","Network connectivity for IdP integration","Storage for audit logs and template persistence","Compute resources (specifications unknown)"],"input_types":["Container image","Configuration parameters"],"output_types":["Running mcp.run instance","Service endpoints"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"awesome-mcp-run__cap_9","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.email.delivery.integration.for.task.results","name":"email delivery integration for task results","description":"Enables automated email delivery of task execution results and notifications through integrated email transport. Supports sending tool outputs, task completion status, and alerts via email without requiring external email service configuration, providing simple notification mechanism for non-interactive workflows.","intents":["I want to receive task results via email","I need to send notifications to users when tools complete execution","I want to integrate mcp.run results into email-based workflows"],"best_for":["Teams using email as primary notification channel","Workflows requiring asynchronous result delivery","Organizations with email-centric communication patterns"],"limitations":["Email template customization options not documented","SMTP configuration requirements not specified","Email delivery guarantees and retry logic unknown","Attachment support and size limits not documented","HTML vs plain text email format options unknown","Recipient list management and distribution group support not specified"],"requires":["Email configuration (SMTP settings or email service integration)","Recipient email addresses","Task configured to send email results"],"input_types":["Task execution results","Email recipient list","Email template parameters"],"output_types":["Email message","Delivery status"],"categories":["automation-workflow","text-generation-language"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":28,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["MCP-compatible servers (protocol version unknown)","Network connectivity to mcp.run platform or self-hosted instance","Admin credentials to register and approve servers in registry","OIDC-compatible identity provider (Okta, Azure AD, etc.)","IdP configuration with DCR support enabled","Network connectivity between mcp.run and IdP endpoints","MCP server submission","Server implementation meeting MCP protocol requirements","Admin permissions to create profiles","Server configuration parameters"],"failure_modes":["Requires MCP servers to be registered and approved through admin workflow before exposure","Single gateway creates potential bottleneck for high-throughput tool access","No documented support for server-to-server communication or chaining","Unknown latency overhead from gateway proxying vs direct server access","Requires OIDC-compatible identity provider (specific supported providers unknown)","DCR support depends on IdP implementation and configuration","No documented support for SAML or other legacy identity protocols","Token refresh and session management behavior not specified","Validation test suite and criteria not documented","Automated vs manual testing requirements unknown","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.05,"quality":0.34,"ecosystem":0.25,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.75,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-06-17T09:51:03.578Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:00:18.053Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=mcp-run","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=mcp-run"}},"signature":"HTqrdbt0vvMrA449u15mByd/i2fceyWrsQhAph7YN2VrPARGKvE5fZuY16RnDzrpC38nSPpCVL5E35wX7WF3AA==","signedAt":"2026-06-21T14:26:56.805Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/mcp-run","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/mcp-run","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=mcp-run","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}