{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"github_mcp-ota-tech-ai-web-agent-protocol","slug":"mcp-ota-tech-ai-web-agent-protocol","name":"web-agent-protocol","type":"mcp","url":"https://github.com/OTA-Tech-AI/web-agent-protocol","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/mcp-ota-tech-ai-web-agent-protocol","categories":["mcp-servers"],"tags":["ai-agents","ai-tools","browser-automation","browser-use","llm","mcp","mcp-server","modelcontextprotocol","playwright","python","record-replay","wap","web-agent-protocol","web-agents"],"pricing":{"model":"open_source","free":true,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"github_mcp-ota-tech-ai-web-agent-protocol__cap_0","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.browser.interaction.recording.with.dom.state.capture","name":"browser-interaction-recording-with-dom-state-capture","description":"Records user interactions (clicks, typing, navigation) in a live browser session by instrumenting Playwright's event listeners and capturing DOM snapshots at each interaction point. Stores interaction sequences with full DOM state, element selectors, and coordinate data to enable deterministic replay and agent learning from human demonstrations.","intents":["I want to record a user's browser workflow and replay it programmatically for testing or automation","I need to capture human demonstrations of web tasks so an LLM agent can learn the interaction patterns","I want to build a dataset of real user interactions with DOM context for training web agents"],"best_for":["AI agent developers building web automation systems","Teams creating training datasets for browser-based LLM agents","QA engineers automating complex multi-step web workflows"],"limitations":["Recording adds overhead to browser session — captures full DOM at each step which can be memory-intensive for long sessions","Cannot record interactions in iframes or cross-origin contexts due to browser security restrictions","Selector stability depends on DOM structure — dynamic or frequently-changing UIs may produce unreliable replay selectors"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Playwright browser automation library","Chromium, Firefox, or WebKit browser binary"],"input_types":["browser session handle","interaction event stream"],"output_types":["JSON interaction log with DOM snapshots","structured interaction sequence"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github_mcp-ota-tech-ai-web-agent-protocol__cap_1","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.deterministic.interaction.replay.with.selector.resolution","name":"deterministic-interaction-replay-with-selector-resolution","description":"Replays recorded interaction sequences by resolving stored selectors (CSS, XPath, or coordinate-based) against the current DOM and executing the corresponding Playwright actions (click, type, navigate). Handles selector drift by falling back to alternative selector strategies and validates element visibility/interactability before execution.","intents":["I want to replay a recorded user workflow exactly as it was performed","I need to execute a sequence of web interactions programmatically without writing step-by-step code","I want to verify that a recorded workflow still works after UI changes"],"best_for":["Automation engineers building regression test suites from recorded workflows","LLM agent systems that need to execute learned interaction patterns","Teams validating web application stability across UI iterations"],"limitations":["Replay fails if selectors become invalid due to DOM restructuring — requires manual selector updates or fuzzy matching","Timing-sensitive interactions (rapid clicks, drag operations) may not replay identically due to network/rendering delays","Cannot replay interactions that depend on external state (file uploads, camera access) without mocking"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Playwright library","Recorded interaction log in WAP format"],"input_types":["interaction log JSON","browser session handle","target URL"],"output_types":["execution result (success/failure)","final page state","error log with selector resolution failures"],"categories":["automation-workflow","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github_mcp-ota-tech-ai-web-agent-protocol__cap_10","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.interaction.validation.and.assertion.framework","name":"interaction-validation-and-assertion-framework","description":"Provides built-in assertions for validating interaction outcomes: element visibility, text content matching, URL changes, network request completion. Supports both immediate assertions (after each interaction) and deferred assertions (after workflow completion), enabling agents to verify that interactions succeeded and pages reached expected states.","intents":["I want to verify that interactions succeeded before proceeding to the next step","I need to detect when a workflow failed and understand why","I want to assert that the page reached an expected state after a sequence of interactions"],"best_for":["QA automation engineers building reliable test suites","LLM agent systems that need to validate action outcomes","Teams building self-healing automation with error detection"],"limitations":["Assertions are synchronous — cannot detect asynchronous state changes that occur after assertion completes","Timing is critical — assertions may fail if executed before page fully loads, requiring explicit waits","Network-based assertions are fragile — depend on network conditions and may timeout unpredictably"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Playwright library","Valid page context with elements to assert"],"input_types":["assertion type (visibility, text, URL, etc.)","assertion target (element selector, URL pattern, etc.)","expected value"],"output_types":["assertion result (pass/fail)","assertion error message","actual vs expected values"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github_mcp-ota-tech-ai-web-agent-protocol__cap_2","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.mcp.server.integration.for.agent.tool.exposure","name":"mcp-server-integration-for-agent-tool-exposure","description":"Exposes recording and replay capabilities as MCP (Model Context Protocol) tools that LLM agents can invoke through a standardized interface. Implements MCP server protocol with tool definitions for start-recording, stop-recording, and replay-interaction, allowing Claude, other LLMs, and agent frameworks to orchestrate browser automation without direct library imports.","intents":["I want my LLM agent to be able to record and replay browser interactions as part of its action toolkit","I need to expose web automation capabilities to Claude or other MCP-compatible models","I want to build an agent that can learn from recorded demonstrations and then execute similar tasks"],"best_for":["LLM agent developers using Claude, GPT-4, or other MCP-compatible models","Teams building multi-tool agent systems where web automation is one capability among many","Researchers prototyping agents that learn from human demonstrations"],"limitations":["MCP protocol adds serialization overhead — tool invocations must be JSON-serializable, limiting complex object passing","Agent decision-making latency increases because LLM must reason about when to record vs replay vs navigate","Requires MCP-compatible LLM client — not all models or frameworks support MCP yet"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","MCP server implementation (provided by WAP)","MCP-compatible LLM client (Claude API, local LLM with MCP support)","Playwright browser binary"],"input_types":["MCP tool call JSON","tool parameters (URL, interaction log, etc.)"],"output_types":["MCP tool result JSON","structured response with status and data"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github_mcp-ota-tech-ai-web-agent-protocol__cap_3","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.dom.aware.element.selection.with.multi.strategy.matching","name":"dom-aware-element-selection-with-multi-strategy-matching","description":"Selects elements for interaction using a cascading strategy: first attempts CSS selectors, falls back to XPath expressions, then uses coordinate-based selection as last resort. Validates element interactability (visibility, clickability) before returning and caches selector strategies that work for future reference, enabling robust element targeting across dynamic UIs.","intents":["I want to reliably find and interact with elements even when the DOM changes slightly","I need to handle dynamic web applications where selectors become stale","I want to avoid brittle coordinate-based automation that breaks on layout changes"],"best_for":["Automation engineers working with complex, dynamic web applications","Teams building web agents that need to handle UI variations","QA automation for applications with frequent UI updates"],"limitations":["Selector caching adds memory overhead — long-running sessions may accumulate stale selector mappings","XPath evaluation can be slow on large DOMs — performance degrades with page complexity","Coordinate-based fallback is unreliable for responsive designs or different screen sizes"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Playwright library","Valid DOM context from browser session"],"input_types":["element description (text, role, attributes)","CSS selector string","XPath expression","coordinate tuple (x, y)"],"output_types":["element handle (Playwright ElementHandle)","selector strategy used","interactability status"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github_mcp-ota-tech-ai-web-agent-protocol__cap_4","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.interaction.sequence.composition.for.multi.step.workflows","name":"interaction-sequence-composition-for-multi-step-workflows","description":"Chains multiple recorded or programmatic interactions into a single executable workflow by composing interaction objects with dependency tracking and state validation between steps. Supports conditional branching based on page state (e.g., 'if element exists, click it; otherwise navigate') and error recovery strategies (retry with backoff, alternative action path).","intents":["I want to build complex multi-step workflows from recorded interactions","I need to handle conditional logic in web automation (if-then-else based on page state)","I want to create reusable interaction sequences that can be composed into larger workflows"],"best_for":["Automation engineers building complex business process automation","LLM agent developers creating multi-step task execution plans","Teams building workflow orchestration systems on top of web automation"],"limitations":["Conditional branching requires explicit state checks — no automatic state inference, so workflows must be manually designed with branch points","Error recovery strategies add complexity — retry logic can mask underlying issues if not carefully configured","Workflow composition is linear/sequential — no parallel interaction execution"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Playwright library","Interaction log or programmatic interaction definitions"],"input_types":["list of interaction objects","conditional state predicates","error recovery strategy definitions"],"output_types":["workflow execution result","step-by-step execution log","final page state"],"categories":["automation-workflow","planning-reasoning"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github_mcp-ota-tech-ai-web-agent-protocol__cap_5","uri":"capability://data.processing.analysis.page.state.snapshot.and.diff.analysis","name":"page-state-snapshot-and-diff-analysis","description":"Captures full DOM snapshots at interaction points and computes diffs between consecutive states to identify what changed (new elements, removed elements, attribute changes, text content changes). Provides structured representation of page state changes that agents can reason about, enabling learning from state transitions rather than just action sequences.","intents":["I want to understand what changed on the page after each interaction","I need to teach an agent to recognize successful vs failed interactions by analyzing page state changes","I want to extract structured data about page mutations for debugging or analysis"],"best_for":["LLM agent developers training models on interaction-outcome pairs","Teams building intelligent automation that adapts based on page state feedback","Researchers analyzing web application behavior and user interaction patterns"],"limitations":["Full DOM snapshots are memory-intensive — storing snapshots for long sessions can consume gigabytes of RAM","Diff computation is O(n) in DOM size — performance degrades on complex pages with thousands of elements","Snapshot timing is discrete — misses intermediate state changes that occur between captured snapshots"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Playwright library","Sufficient memory for DOM snapshots (varies by page complexity)"],"input_types":["browser page handle","snapshot interval (time or interaction count)"],"output_types":["DOM snapshot JSON","state diff object","list of changed elements with before/after values"],"categories":["data-processing-analysis","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github_mcp-ota-tech-ai-web-agent-protocol__cap_6","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.playwright.browser.session.management.with.context.isolation","name":"playwright-browser-session-management-with-context-isolation","description":"Manages Playwright browser instances, pages, and contexts with automatic lifecycle handling (launch, create page, close on error). Supports context isolation for parallel recording sessions and provides utilities for managing browser state (cookies, local storage, authentication) across interactions, enabling reproducible automation with consistent browser environment.","intents":["I want to manage browser lifecycle automatically without manual setup/teardown","I need to run multiple recording sessions in parallel without interference","I want to preserve browser state (cookies, auth) across interaction sequences"],"best_for":["Automation engineers building production web automation systems","Teams running parallel test suites with isolated browser contexts","LLM agent systems that need reliable browser session management"],"limitations":["Context isolation adds memory overhead — each context requires separate browser resources","Browser launch time adds latency to first interaction — typically 2-5 seconds per browser instance","State preservation is context-specific — cookies/storage don't transfer between contexts by design"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Playwright library","Chromium, Firefox, or WebKit browser binary installed"],"input_types":["browser type (chromium, firefox, webkit)","launch options (headless, proxy, etc.)","context configuration (viewport, locale, etc.)"],"output_types":["browser instance handle","page handle","context handle"],"categories":["automation-workflow","tool-use-integration"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github_mcp-ota-tech-ai-web-agent-protocol__cap_7","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.agent.learning.from.recorded.demonstrations","name":"agent-learning-from-recorded-demonstrations","description":"Converts recorded interaction sequences into training examples for LLM agents by pairing interaction contexts (page state, user goal) with executed actions. Generates structured prompts that teach agents to recognize similar situations and execute appropriate interactions, supporting few-shot learning where agents learn from 1-5 demonstrations before generalizing to new tasks.","intents":["I want to teach an LLM agent to perform web tasks by showing it examples of human interactions","I need to generate training data for fine-tuning web automation models","I want to enable agents to learn task patterns from recorded workflows"],"best_for":["ML engineers building specialized web automation models","LLM agent developers using few-shot learning to teach new capabilities","Teams creating domain-specific agents for vertical-specific web tasks"],"limitations":["Few-shot learning effectiveness depends on demonstration quality — poor recordings produce poor agent behavior","Generalization is limited — agents may overfit to specific UI layouts and fail on similar sites with different designs","Requires manual annotation of task goals and success criteria — not fully automated"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Recorded interaction logs with DOM state","LLM API access (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) or local model"],"input_types":["recorded interaction sequence","task description/goal","success criteria"],"output_types":["few-shot prompt template","training example JSON","agent instruction set"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","memory-knowledge"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github_mcp-ota-tech-ai-web-agent-protocol__cap_8","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.web.task.execution.with.natural.language.goals","name":"web-task-execution-with-natural-language-goals","description":"Accepts natural language task descriptions (e.g., 'log in with email and password, then navigate to settings') and translates them into executable interaction sequences using LLM reasoning. The system decomposes goals into sub-tasks, selects appropriate recorded interactions or generates new ones, and executes them with error handling and goal validation.","intents":["I want to specify web automation tasks in natural language without writing code","I need an agent to understand high-level goals and figure out the interaction steps","I want to automate web tasks that weren't explicitly recorded"],"best_for":["Non-technical users automating web tasks","LLM agent systems that need to handle open-ended web automation requests","Teams building no-code automation platforms"],"limitations":["Natural language interpretation is ambiguous — agent may misunderstand task intent or generate incorrect interaction sequences","Goal validation is difficult — system must infer success criteria from task description, which is error-prone","Requires LLM API calls for each task — adds latency and cost compared to pre-recorded workflows"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","LLM API access (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)","Recorded interaction library or agent capable of generating interactions","Playwright browser instance"],"input_types":["natural language task description","target URL","optional context (user credentials, preferences)"],"output_types":["execution result (success/failure)","generated interaction sequence","final page state or extracted data"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"github_mcp-ota-tech-ai-web-agent-protocol__cap_9","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.cross.browser.interaction.portability","name":"cross-browser-interaction-portability","description":"Records interactions in a browser-agnostic format (semantic selectors, coordinate-independent actions) that can be replayed across different browsers (Chromium, Firefox, WebKit) without modification. Abstracts browser-specific APIs and handles rendering differences, enabling recorded workflows to work consistently regardless of browser engine.","intents":["I want to record a workflow once and replay it on multiple browsers","I need to ensure my automation works consistently across Chrome, Firefox, and Safari","I want to test web applications for cross-browser compatibility using recorded interactions"],"best_for":["QA teams testing cross-browser compatibility","Automation engineers building browser-agnostic workflows","Teams supporting multiple browser environments"],"limitations":["Browser-specific behavior still exists — some interactions may behave differently across browsers (e.g., drag-and-drop, file uploads)","Rendering differences can affect selector validity — elements may be positioned or sized differently, breaking coordinate-based fallbacks","Performance varies by browser — recorded timing assumptions may not hold across different engines"],"requires":["Python 3.8+","Playwright library with multiple browser binaries installed","Interaction log in browser-agnostic format"],"input_types":["recorded interaction sequence","target browser type (chromium, firefox, webkit)"],"output_types":["execution result per browser","cross-browser compatibility report","browser-specific failures"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":38,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Python 3.8+","Playwright browser automation library","Chromium, Firefox, or WebKit browser binary","Playwright library","Recorded interaction log in WAP format","Valid page context with elements to assert","MCP server implementation (provided by WAP)","MCP-compatible LLM client (Claude API, local LLM with MCP support)","Playwright browser binary","Valid DOM context from browser session"],"failure_modes":["Recording adds overhead to browser session — captures full DOM at each step which can be memory-intensive for long sessions","Cannot record interactions in iframes or cross-origin contexts due to browser security restrictions","Selector stability depends on DOM structure — dynamic or frequently-changing UIs may produce unreliable replay selectors","Replay fails if selectors become invalid due to DOM restructuring — requires manual selector updates or fuzzy matching","Timing-sensitive interactions (rapid clicks, drag operations) may not replay identically due to network/rendering delays","Cannot replay interactions that depend on external state (file uploads, camera access) without mocking","Assertions are synchronous — cannot detect asynchronous state changes that occur after assertion completes","Timing is critical — assertions may fail if executed before page fully loads, requiring explicit waits","Network-based assertions are fragile — depend on network conditions and may timeout unpredictably","MCP protocol adds serialization overhead — tool invocations must be JSON-serializable, limiting complex object passing","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.3702303462210859,"quality":0.32,"ecosystem":0.6000000000000001,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.52,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.15,"match_graph":0.23,"freshness":0.12}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:22.065Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-05-03T14:23:38.364Z","last_commit":"2025-06-19T04:03:18Z"},"community":{"stars":497,"forks":90,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=mcp-ota-tech-ai-web-agent-protocol","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=mcp-ota-tech-ai-web-agent-protocol"}},"signature":"0unqlyRSJiLzRHNrieHqwzC/oYKcwbzjrPgXH5Kih/VeTolx+XSA7lVWcIh/lhgPsZTYO0Zez0+3yW+7L1p5Dw==","signedAt":"2026-06-20T10:42:59.250Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/mcp-ota-tech-ai-web-agent-protocol","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/mcp-ota-tech-ai-web-agent-protocol","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=mcp-ota-tech-ai-web-agent-protocol","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}